Centrebet daylight robbery
If they did anything different it would be a breach of their rules.
Agree 100%. it's the same with TAB in Oz...when you back a fav at ML and it's a draw, you will get portion of your money back....
If they did anything different it would be a breach of their rules.
Agree 100%. it's the same with TAB in Oz...when you back a fav at ML and it's a draw, you will get portion of your money back....
a draw is not a loss, nor is it a win so why the fark should a book be stealing money? they shouldn't, luckily there are books out there who don't.
a draw is not a loss, nor is it a win so why the fark should a book be stealing money? they shouldn't, luckily there are books out there who don't.
can't believe you aussies think this sort of thing is acceptable
can't believe you aussies think this sort of thing is acceptable
Why use some horrible hypothetical situation?
Like anything in gambling, there's always two sides of the coin. Someone who had the Force in your multi might've been spewing if the payout was under your rules.
P.S. this isn't just limited to Australia, it's the same with the New Zealand TAB.
Why use some horrible hypothetical situation?
Like anything in gambling, there's always two sides of the coin. Someone who had the Force in your multi might've been spewing if the payout was under your rules.
P.S. this isn't just limited to Australia, it's the same with the New Zealand TAB.
Like anything in gambling, there's always two sides of the coin. Someone who had the Force in your multi might've been spewing if the payout was under your rules.
P.S. this isn't just limited to Australia, it's the same with the New Zealand TAB.
yeah and what they would've got like 1.40 line? would have been better off with the plus line, thats just an insult really.
yeah the NZ TAB is absolute scum of the earth with their $2 fees for topping up with visa
Like anything in gambling, there's always two sides of the coin. Someone who had the Force in your multi might've been spewing if the payout was under your rules.
P.S. this isn't just limited to Australia, it's the same with the New Zealand TAB.
yeah and what they would've got like 1.40 line? would have been better off with the plus line, thats just an insult really.
yeah the NZ TAB is absolute scum of the earth with their $2 fees for topping up with visa
Luxbet do it as well. Get this: betting first 5 innings in MLB the odds are (virtually) the same as for 9 innings but they operate a Dead Heat Rule even in this sport so a tie after 5 innings and you lose half your stake!
Well, so basically you are giving up the juice on the favorite or a -0.5. Dead Heat Rule in a 5 Inning prop is only worthwhile when you are betting the favorite. Unless the dog is given added value on the line, there isn't really any reason to play a dog on the Dead Heat option.
Luxbet do it as well. Get this: betting first 5 innings in MLB the odds are (virtually) the same as for 9 innings but they operate a Dead Heat Rule even in this sport so a tie after 5 innings and you lose half your stake!
Well, so basically you are giving up the juice on the favorite or a -0.5. Dead Heat Rule in a 5 Inning prop is only worthwhile when you are betting the favorite. Unless the dog is given added value on the line, there isn't really any reason to play a dog on the Dead Heat option.
I thought only betfair did the dead heat rule.
I thought only betfair did the dead heat rule.
again....
the point.
your head.
no one is disputing the fact that these scum books have the right to employ this rule.
again....
the point.
your head.
no one is disputing the fact that these scum books have the right to employ this rule.
yeah and what they would've got like 1.40 line? would have been better off with the plus line, thats just an insult really.
Still better than 1.00 though, it's a rule that could either be good or bad for you. Unfortunately for you, you were on the wrong end of that.
It's merely a rule variation, not an example of crookedness.
yeah and what they would've got like 1.40 line? would have been better off with the plus line, thats just an insult really.
Still better than 1.00 though, it's a rule that could either be good or bad for you. Unfortunately for you, you were on the wrong end of that.
It's merely a rule variation, not an example of crookedness.
how often do you have a draw between a team paying money where it would actually be advantageous over a + handicap?
the books are smart, they know this and thats why they have it in place. personally i think its pathetic and know if i ever want to do a favs parlay again 365 is the place lol.
how often do you have a draw between a team paying money where it would actually be advantageous over a + handicap?
the books are smart, they know this and thats why they have it in place. personally i think its pathetic and know if i ever want to do a favs parlay again 365 is the place lol.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
445,985
-
🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets
301,733
-
PART DEUX
349
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
253,413
-
Patriots vs Seahawks in-game live season kickoff
1,426
-
PART TROIS
271
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
95,227
-
9/9 🫣🫣🔥🔥🔥
4,667
-
Couple thoughts
4,058
-
***Macwesties * Wed. Sept. 09, 2026 * NFL * Week #1 * Football Plays***
3,819
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
