Posted:
#101
Penrith have defended better that most might think and the Tigers have struggled to score.
CBet have it set at 45.5 which is lower than I would have guessed but that may just be the point.
0
Battler's NRL Round 7
Posted:
#104
Quote Originally Posted by Aussie Battler:
We've had this discussion before.
The way you write it, is the Dogs 26 is the larger of the two variables, insinuating that you believe that the dogs to score less than 26 is 
Now I knew what you meant, but I can also see where JT got all 
I answered an email last night from my dad, a retired ENGLISH teacher, and I just had to ask him about all this. His exact copy and pasted reply:
> means “greater than”
< means “less than”
HA! 
That's two demerit points for you and a cookie for me, Jack! 
Now the Knights better win me some SU $$$ tonight, or I'll put my boot on and make OzBat cry
0
Daddy
Posted:
#108
Quote Originally Posted by norseman67:
Dogs 26>
Dogs 26>
Not so fast sunshine.
> is indeed greater than, well done.
So what you have written, is the Dogs scoring 26 is greater than your bet.
Let me dumb it down for you.
The thing on the left of the > sign is the larger variable.
Dogs 26 is more points than your bet.
0
Posted:
#111
Quote Originally Posted by Aussie Battler:
Not so fast sunshine.
> is indeed greater than, well done.
So what you have written, is the Dogs scoring 26 is greater than your bet.
Let me dumb it down for you.
The thing on the left of the > sign is the larger variable.
Dogs 26 is more points than your bet.
I don't even understand this.
But I'm sure the English teacher is 100% correct on this one.
Class dismissed! 
0
Posted:
#117
Sounds like a toss. I didn't appreciate his comments on a previous post stating for me to "go elsewhere and blow my whistle".
I didn't have to expose anything about the betting scandal, and you guys got info that no-one else has the pleasure of knowing.
Just a little respect and humility goes a long way...
0
Hot Forum Topics
