80% coming in on the '9ers, and the line is hanging tough. We'll have to watch this one longer and wait for an edge. Lookin' for +3.5 to take the Rams at home against a sloppy '9er team with issues.
you missed +3.5. i got it at the very beginning, but it moved to +3 very quickly.
Quote Originally Posted by Forty6and2:
80% coming in on the '9ers, and the line is hanging tough. We'll have to watch this one longer and wait for an edge. Lookin' for +3.5 to take the Rams at home against a sloppy '9er team with issues.
you missed +3.5. i got it at the very beginning, but it moved to +3 very quickly.
i bet sf vs gb, but bet against them @ sea and vs ind (and was rewarded with +400 ml!). gut instinct told me stl before i saw the lines. stl plays sf tough, esp last year. sf lost at home to indy and now they have even more injuries and missing players. already took stl +3.5, going to hit the ml as well, and looking at the under, but not sure on that one. i'll at least be teasing the under and the rams.
i bet sf vs gb, but bet against them @ sea and vs ind (and was rewarded with +400 ml!). gut instinct told me stl before i saw the lines. stl plays sf tough, esp last year. sf lost at home to indy and now they have even more injuries and missing players. already took stl +3.5, going to hit the ml as well, and looking at the under, but not sure on that one. i'll at least be teasing the under and the rams.
I think some people forgot they two victory of Saint Louis they won with players wasn't present cause of injuries. Right now Saint Louis for to night everybody is back against SF many are probable isn't case for San Francisco many injuries and back not untill Sunday.
I took STL + 3 for to night big reaction local team .
I think some people forgot they two victory of Saint Louis they won with players wasn't present cause of injuries. Right now Saint Louis for to night everybody is back against SF many are probable isn't case for San Francisco many injuries and back not untill Sunday.
I took STL + 3 for to night big reaction local team .
Cap has started the season as a pocket passer. The reason for the 1-2 start. Of course the seahawks is a better team, but the colts they should have beat. It seems Cap has a problem on throwing short passes and putting balls on the money in a man to man coverage. Colts play a cover 2 defense in which that allows the QB to throw in tight coverage. Cap isnt that type of QB and doesn't have the type of recieving corps with Cabtree and Davis out. If the running game can get going with Cap leading the way then the niners should be 2-2 after tonight. Bradford will be on his toes against the niners minus smith, pressure will still be applied and the rams dont have the receiving corps as the colts did. If you can't beat the niners physically in the secondary then the rams will fall short. Expect Cap to run more tonight and the niners defense to hold the rams on a last possesion drive to win them tonight.
Niners- 20
Rams- 16
Cap has started the season as a pocket passer. The reason for the 1-2 start. Of course the seahawks is a better team, but the colts they should have beat. It seems Cap has a problem on throwing short passes and putting balls on the money in a man to man coverage. Colts play a cover 2 defense in which that allows the QB to throw in tight coverage. Cap isnt that type of QB and doesn't have the type of recieving corps with Cabtree and Davis out. If the running game can get going with Cap leading the way then the niners should be 2-2 after tonight. Bradford will be on his toes against the niners minus smith, pressure will still be applied and the rams dont have the receiving corps as the colts did. If you can't beat the niners physically in the secondary then the rams will fall short. Expect Cap to run more tonight and the niners defense to hold the rams on a last possesion drive to win them tonight.
Cap has started the season as a pocket passer. The reason for the 1-2 start. Of course the seahawks is a better team, but the colts they should have beat. It seems Cap has a problem on throwing short passes and putting balls on the money in a man to man coverage. Colts play a cover 2 defense in which that allows the QB to throw in tight coverage. Cap isnt that type of QB and doesn't have the type of recieving corps with Cabtree and Davis out. If the running game can get going with Cap leading the way then the niners should be 2-2 after tonight. Bradford will be on his toes against the niners minus smith, pressure will still be applied and the rams dont have the receiving corps as the colts did. If you can't beat the niners physically in the secondary then the rams will fall short. Expect Cap to run more tonight and the niners defense to hold the rams on a last possesion drive to win them tonight.
Niners- 20
Rams- 16
Niners - 20 Rams - 16 ? Handicap is +3 STL or -3 for SF =S
[Quote: Originally Posted by betipickem]
Cap has started the season as a pocket passer. The reason for the 1-2 start. Of course the seahawks is a better team, but the colts they should have beat. It seems Cap has a problem on throwing short passes and putting balls on the money in a man to man coverage. Colts play a cover 2 defense in which that allows the QB to throw in tight coverage. Cap isnt that type of QB and doesn't have the type of recieving corps with Cabtree and Davis out. If the running game can get going with Cap leading the way then the niners should be 2-2 after tonight. Bradford will be on his toes against the niners minus smith, pressure will still be applied and the rams dont have the receiving corps as the colts did. If you can't beat the niners physically in the secondary then the rams will fall short. Expect Cap to run more tonight and the niners defense to hold the rams on a last possesion drive to win them tonight.
Niners- 20
Rams- 16
Niners - 20 Rams - 16 ? Handicap is +3 STL or -3 for SF =S
49ers win the game but don't cover.......19 to 17 looks like the final score here
Either way I am teasing the Rams. Only safe bet here it seems like. Even this honestly is not safe though....I mean the Rams screwed over the teaser cards last week. Lucky I only had them on one ticket.
Maybe ;)
Quote Originally Posted by LIanafranks5:
49ers win the game but don't cover.......19 to 17 looks like the final score here
Either way I am teasing the Rams. Only safe bet here it seems like. Even this honestly is not safe though....I mean the Rams screwed over the teaser cards last week. Lucky I only had them on one ticket.
The 9'ers were a
machine last year and had all facets of the game clicking but it just
hasn't happened this year. And I keep reading that they're elite and
it's only a matter of time. But one thing I've learned about wagering is
that it's better to roll with a trend rather than try and buck it by
guessing ,and hoping when it ends. And for SF I'm not so sure it'll
happen before they start getting a handful of key players back in the
lineup AND healthy playing close to 100% not hobbling around the field
outta desperation.
On offense Gore is banged up and although I
just read he was updated from questionable to probable he's obviously
still not 100%. And that will take some of the sting out of SF's ability
to run the option (so will 8 in the box for STL). Another issue is that
the big target and release valve of Vernon Davis is also a game-time
decision and even if he plays he's not likely to be the impact player he
could be at full speed. Add that to the fact that there is no
Crabtree,Manningham or even Moss and thats basically all the starting skill players on offense from last years run.
So
far this year defenses have had success against the 9'ers by holding
Krappydick in the box and not allowing him to run wild. And being a true
pocket passer is tough enough,and even more so for a qb that likes to
use his legs to extend or make plays. But when you add the fact that all
the guys he had just started to create a report with are all on the
shelf. And that he's going to have to move this team down the field from
the pocket throwing to 3rd,4th and 5th stringer receivers and it's
looking less and less likely he'll be able to get it done.
Now on
the other side if the ball things aren't great for SF either. They're
missing a great pass rusher in Smith and cover corner in Asomugha. And
this could be tough to overcome for SF since the RAMS have been very
pass heavy this year. Yes short passes but perhaps if given a lil more
time since the pass rush is a lil late. And also all the db's having to
rotate up a player on to a more skilled player to cover and we might see
some more shots down field by the RAMS.
I'm not gonna sit
here and say that STL are world beaters but they did play SF very tough
last year. And in recent history with only 1 game in the last 6 meetings
being decided by more than 1 possession,and 2 of those 6 needing extra
time. And thats not overly surprising to me since this is a divisional
rivalry. And I'd bet that while STL has been rebuilding they've taken
into consideration making a team that plays tough against SF,and for that matter all the teams in their division as most teams in most sports will do.
I
haven't locked in my plays yet and I won't be putting a ton on STL but I
do like them to cover AND win......Some potential plays I like are STL
+3.5,STL ML and even STL -2.5....all for smaller wagers. As well as STL
+10 to the UNDER 49 in a teaser for a full unit
Back in a bit with some plays.
I'm going with STL....heres why;
The 9'ers were a
machine last year and had all facets of the game clicking but it just
hasn't happened this year. And I keep reading that they're elite and
it's only a matter of time. But one thing I've learned about wagering is
that it's better to roll with a trend rather than try and buck it by
guessing ,and hoping when it ends. And for SF I'm not so sure it'll
happen before they start getting a handful of key players back in the
lineup AND healthy playing close to 100% not hobbling around the field
outta desperation.
On offense Gore is banged up and although I
just read he was updated from questionable to probable he's obviously
still not 100%. And that will take some of the sting out of SF's ability
to run the option (so will 8 in the box for STL). Another issue is that
the big target and release valve of Vernon Davis is also a game-time
decision and even if he plays he's not likely to be the impact player he
could be at full speed. Add that to the fact that there is no
Crabtree,Manningham or even Moss and thats basically all the starting skill players on offense from last years run.
So
far this year defenses have had success against the 9'ers by holding
Krappydick in the box and not allowing him to run wild. And being a true
pocket passer is tough enough,and even more so for a qb that likes to
use his legs to extend or make plays. But when you add the fact that all
the guys he had just started to create a report with are all on the
shelf. And that he's going to have to move this team down the field from
the pocket throwing to 3rd,4th and 5th stringer receivers and it's
looking less and less likely he'll be able to get it done.
Now on
the other side if the ball things aren't great for SF either. They're
missing a great pass rusher in Smith and cover corner in Asomugha. And
this could be tough to overcome for SF since the RAMS have been very
pass heavy this year. Yes short passes but perhaps if given a lil more
time since the pass rush is a lil late. And also all the db's having to
rotate up a player on to a more skilled player to cover and we might see
some more shots down field by the RAMS.
I'm not gonna sit
here and say that STL are world beaters but they did play SF very tough
last year. And in recent history with only 1 game in the last 6 meetings
being decided by more than 1 possession,and 2 of those 6 needing extra
time. And thats not overly surprising to me since this is a divisional
rivalry. And I'd bet that while STL has been rebuilding they've taken
into consideration making a team that plays tough against SF,and for that matter all the teams in their division as most teams in most sports will do.
I
haven't locked in my plays yet and I won't be putting a ton on STL but I
do like them to cover AND win......Some potential plays I like are STL
+3.5,STL ML and even STL -2.5....all for smaller wagers. As well as STL
+10 to the UNDER 49 in a teaser for a full unit
The 9'ers were a
machine last year and had all facets of the game clicking but it just
hasn't happened this year. And I keep reading that they're elite and
it's only a matter of time. But one thing I've learned about wagering is
that it's better to roll with a trend rather than try and buck it by
guessing ,and hoping when it ends. And for SF I'm not so sure it'll
happen before they start getting a handful of key players back in the
lineup AND healthy playing close to 100% not hobbling around the field
outta desperation.
On offense Gore is banged up and although I
just read he was updated from questionable to probable he's obviously
still not 100%. And that will take some of the sting out of SF's ability
to run the option (so will 8 in the box for STL). Another issue is that
the big target and release valve of Vernon Davis is also a game-time
decision and even if he plays he's not likely to be the impact player he
could be at full speed. Add that to the fact that there is no
Crabtree,Manningham or even Moss and thats basically all the starting skill players on offense from last years run.
So
far this year defenses have had success against the 9'ers by holding
Krappydick in the box and not allowing him to run wild. And being a true
pocket passer is tough enough,and even more so for a qb that likes to
use his legs to extend or make plays. But when you add the fact that all
the guys he had just started to create a report with are all on the
shelf. And that he's going to have to move this team down the field from
the pocket throwing to 3rd,4th and 5th stringer receivers and it's
looking less and less likely he'll be able to get it done.
Now on
the other side if the ball things aren't great for SF either. They're
missing a great pass rusher in Smith and cover corner in Asomugha. And
this could be tough to overcome for SF since the RAMS have been very
pass heavy this year. Yes short passes but perhaps if given a lil more
time since the pass rush is a lil late. And also all the db's having to
rotate up a player on to a more skilled player to cover and we might see
some more shots down field by the RAMS.
I'm not gonna sit
here and say that STL are world beaters but they did play SF very tough
last year. And in recent history with only 1 game in the last 6 meetings
being decided by more than 1 possession,and 2 of those 6 needing extra
time. And thats not overly surprising to me since this is a divisional
rivalry. And I'd bet that while STL has been rebuilding they've taken
into consideration making a team that plays tough against SF,and for that matter all the teams in their division as most teams in most sports will do.
I
haven't locked in my plays yet and I won't be putting a ton on STL but I
do like them to cover AND win......Some potential plays I like are STL
+3.5,STL ML and even STL -2.5....all for smaller wagers. As well as STL
+10 to the UNDER 49 in a teaser for a full unit
Back in a bit with some plays.
I love your opinion I hope we are in good way :) .
Quote Originally Posted by DDH420:
I'm going with STL....heres why;
The 9'ers were a
machine last year and had all facets of the game clicking but it just
hasn't happened this year. And I keep reading that they're elite and
it's only a matter of time. But one thing I've learned about wagering is
that it's better to roll with a trend rather than try and buck it by
guessing ,and hoping when it ends. And for SF I'm not so sure it'll
happen before they start getting a handful of key players back in the
lineup AND healthy playing close to 100% not hobbling around the field
outta desperation.
On offense Gore is banged up and although I
just read he was updated from questionable to probable he's obviously
still not 100%. And that will take some of the sting out of SF's ability
to run the option (so will 8 in the box for STL). Another issue is that
the big target and release valve of Vernon Davis is also a game-time
decision and even if he plays he's not likely to be the impact player he
could be at full speed. Add that to the fact that there is no
Crabtree,Manningham or even Moss and thats basically all the starting skill players on offense from last years run.
So
far this year defenses have had success against the 9'ers by holding
Krappydick in the box and not allowing him to run wild. And being a true
pocket passer is tough enough,and even more so for a qb that likes to
use his legs to extend or make plays. But when you add the fact that all
the guys he had just started to create a report with are all on the
shelf. And that he's going to have to move this team down the field from
the pocket throwing to 3rd,4th and 5th stringer receivers and it's
looking less and less likely he'll be able to get it done.
Now on
the other side if the ball things aren't great for SF either. They're
missing a great pass rusher in Smith and cover corner in Asomugha. And
this could be tough to overcome for SF since the RAMS have been very
pass heavy this year. Yes short passes but perhaps if given a lil more
time since the pass rush is a lil late. And also all the db's having to
rotate up a player on to a more skilled player to cover and we might see
some more shots down field by the RAMS.
I'm not gonna sit
here and say that STL are world beaters but they did play SF very tough
last year. And in recent history with only 1 game in the last 6 meetings
being decided by more than 1 possession,and 2 of those 6 needing extra
time. And thats not overly surprising to me since this is a divisional
rivalry. And I'd bet that while STL has been rebuilding they've taken
into consideration making a team that plays tough against SF,and for that matter all the teams in their division as most teams in most sports will do.
I
haven't locked in my plays yet and I won't be putting a ton on STL but I
do like them to cover AND win......Some potential plays I like are STL
+3.5,STL ML and even STL -2.5....all for smaller wagers. As well as STL
+10 to the UNDER 49 in a teaser for a full unit
Back in a bit with some plays.
I love your opinion I hope we are in good way :) .
and eat the juice ... wow.
Do we need the Wikipedia police on here?!?! Subtraction didn't work for you ...
?
Hot Forum Topics
