All Forums | Pro Football

Indianapolis at Baltimore (11/22/2009)

...

Participants:

Posts: 111

jgenti

Rookie

Joined: Feb, 2008

Posts: 674

Posted: Nov. 19, 2009 - 6:42 PM ET #51

Quote Originally Posted by BreakaBookie:

I'm taking the COLTS....

Ravens off short rest... can't get into the endzone on offense against the browns?

the defense isn't going to score points in this one...

cover 2 defense will take away the check down to ray rice when 4 indy defenders swarm them...

otherwise who are they playing offense against?

I think Baltimore tries to run the ball often to keep the Colts off the field, but then ends up trying to play catch-up...

Colts in the UNDER...

GL TO ALL!

by the way the COLTS beat down the RAVENS last year with Samari Rolle and Chris McCallister at corner...

remember manning was good on sunday night but not great. His true colors came out at the end when it mattered. The last 2 weeks against the 49ers and i think the texans they kind of played down to the competition. the ravens can score against this defense. maybe a high scoring affair who knows. gl bb

Captain

Joined: Dec, 2008

Posts: 5051

Posted: Nov. 19, 2009 - 8:03 PM ET #52

Stop trying to over analyze this game. Colts win and cover- it's just that simple!

RMAC04

Prospect

Joined: Aug, 2008

Posts: 39

Posted: Nov. 19, 2009 - 8:13 PM ET #53

WOW...I HAVE NEVER BEEN MORE CONFIDENT THEN THIS IF I WAS A PRO HC EXPERT I WOULD SAY "GAME OF THE YEAR INDY - 1" ...I will eat my shorts in indy loses this game i have never been more sure of anything in my life i am hitting this one hard they had NE LAST WEEK underdog +3 and now your tellin me baltimore +1 hillarious...flacco eats shit this game

buttafooco42

Covers Rehab

Joined: Oct, 2009

Posts: 133

Posted: Nov. 19, 2009 - 10:43 PM ET #54

COLTS BY 7 , BOYS AND GIRLS.

usmail

Rookie

Joined: Nov, 2009

Posts: 626

Posted: Nov. 19, 2009 - 10:54 PM ET #55

INDY WITH NUMEROUS DEF. INJURIES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

coltpower

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2009

Posts: 99

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 6:06 AM ET #56

Vue 21849, you have hit it right on. These are two different teams playing here. One that can come from behind ( Colts )and one that can't ( Ravens ). Too much over analyzing on this one gang. Colts win handily. Give the point, this spread should be pounded and pounded hard ! I can't help but wonder why there are some of you that believe that the Ravens have done anything this year to make you believe they can win this game

and for those of you who are just wanting to cover the spread, then maybe at +11.......but not at +1.

ForecastinFloyd

Veteran

Joined: Mar, 2009

Posts: 1014

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 6:44 AM ET #57

Indianapolis +1

Too much is being looked into a game Indianapolis will dominate and ultimately win, leaving Baltimore backers and homers asking
"Why didn't I just stay away?"

From a neutral standpoint, it's Indy or nothing here, IMO.

Indianapolis 31
Baltimore 17

Philly215

Captain

Joined: Mar, 2007

Posts: 5491

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 9:12 AM ET #58

Dont know why everyone thinks the Colts will easily dominate this game. Did they easily dominate the game against the piss por jags earlier in the year? Did the easily dominate the game against the niners who were actully winning that game for three quarters? No, they struglled and definetly looded beatalbe, and both of those games were at home. What makes everyone think that they are gonna roll over the Ravens on the road? You saw what Baltimore did to the Broncos at home. Ravnes need this win much more than the colts do, and with the colts coming off a very difficult sunday night game, I can see them not having much left in the tank, while Baltimore will be all out in a game they muust have at home.

Ravens +1

ForecastinFloyd

Veteran

Joined: Mar, 2009

Posts: 1014

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 10:00 AM ET #59

Quote Originally Posted by Philly215:

Ravens +1

The Ravens have not scored a offensive TD in the first half of any game since they played New England in week 4. Sorry, that's not going to keep you in the game against the Indianapolis Colts.

Sandman21403

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2005

Posts: 43

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 10:31 AM ET #60

boy what do you know about winning?!? we are not here to talk about out winnings cause if we did i would be telling you how i had only one loss last week. and baltimore playing like shit last week would have nothing to do with this game but the ravens played like shit against teams all year long. they lost to cinci the first time and the second time. they lost to denver ,lost to the vikings. they got shut out 3 quarters by the browns after they beat them 37-3 and the second win was 16-0 all points scored in the third. they lost to new england when brady was still at 60 percent. they let kc score 24 points on them. enough said man. the colts will light them up we are just trying to help you. as you can see the more they play, the more their energy runs out.

[/Quote]

Baltimore lost to Denver? Really? Go look up the result of that game again. I think Denver was 6-0 at the time and had already won @ Cincinnati and @ San Diego, plus beat New England & Dallas. They lost to the Vikings after their kicker missed the FG that would have won the game. They won @ San Diego. Who are you Brady's doctor? How did you determine he was @ 60% when he played the Ravens? The point I was trying to make is that deciding your pick on this game based on how the Ravens played the week before is not a good move.

Sandman21403

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2005

Posts: 43

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 10:34 AM ET #61

Quote Originally Posted by coltsalltheway:

It amazes me how so many people always based their current week picks based on what happened the week before. Baltimore playing poorly and winning 16-0 at Cleveland will have nothing to do with how they play against Indy at home this week! If you think it does, then keep thinking like that and keep wondering why you lose so many of your bets. Baltimore will hand Indy thier 1st lost of the season this week.

boy what do you know about winning?!? we are not here to talk about out winnings cause if we did i would be telling you how i had only one loss last week. and baltimore playing like shit last week would have nothing to do with this game but the ravens played like shit against teams all year long. they lost to cinci the first time and the second time. they lost to denver ,lost to the vikings. they got shut out 3 quarters by the browns after they beat them 37-3 and the second win was 16-0 all points scored in the third. they lost to new england when brady was still at 60 percent. they let kc score 24 points on them. enough said man. the colts will light them up we are just trying to help you. as you can see the more they play, the more their energy runs out.

Baltimore lost to Denver? Really? Go look up the result of that game again. I think Denver was 6-0 at the time and had already won @ Cincinnati and @ San Diego, plus beat New England & Dallas. The Ravens lost to the Vikings after their kicker missed the FG that would have won the game. They won @ San Diego. Who are you Brady's doctor? How did you determine he was @ 60% when he played the Ravens? The point I was trying to make is that deciding your pick on this game based on how the Ravens played the week before is not a good move.

ForecastinFloyd

Veteran

Joined: Mar, 2009

Posts: 1014

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 10:37 AM ET #62

Quote Originally Posted by Sandman21403:

Baltimore lost to Denver? Really? Go look up the result of that game again. I think Denver was 6-0 at the time and had already won @ Cincinnati and @ San Diego, plus beat New England & Dallas. The Ravens lost to the Vikings after their kicker missed the FG that would have won the game. They won @ San Diego. Who are you Brady's doctor? How did you determine he was @ 60% when he played the Ravens? The point I was trying to make is that deciding your pick on this game based on how the Ravens played the week before is not a good move.

So that's why Indianapolis will lose to Baltimore this week.

mokedogg

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2009

Posts: 81

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 1:54 PM ET #63

if my name was coltsalltheway i dont think i'd be takin b-more this week either.........................................

Nitro

Rookie

Joined: Feb, 2009

Posts: 896

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 4:05 PM ET #64

Bait ,line and hook all have been tossed out by Vegas.

coltsalltheway

Covers Rehab

Joined: Oct, 2009

Posts: 398

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 4:31 PM ET #65

Baltimore lost to Denver? Really? Go look up the result of that game again. I think Denver was 6-0 at the time and had already won @ Cincinnati and @ San Diego, plus beat New England & Dallas. The Ravens lost to the Vikings after their kicker missed the FG that would have won the game. They won @ San Diego. Who are you Brady's doctor? How did you determine he was @ 60% when he played the Ravens? The point I was trying to make is that deciding your pick on this game based on how the Ravens played the week before is not a good move.

ur an idiot and you will lose your money. watch and learn. indi is 9-0 for a reason and thats because they are the best. baltimore lost 17-7 at home to cinci, 33-31 to minni, 17-14 to cinci again, 21-27 to new england. come on dude they are shit and you will see it when you lose. just like people where on carolina yesterday and i picked miami

coltpower

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2009

Posts: 99

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 5:54 PM ET #66

I guess some people want to see the proof before they want to believe the the Ravens can play with the Colts. Unfortunately it'll be to late for collecting any cash. Unless that is , you take the Colts to cover.........easily ! So for those of us picking the Colts to cover, congrats. Your about to make some money. For those who are staying with the Ravens, well maybe it's time you got on the Colt bandwagon and reap a little ching too. I won't say "I told ya so ", I'll just move on to next week...................a little richer !

Captain

Joined: Dec, 2008

Posts: 5051

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 6:25 PM ET #67

A major wager Colts +1!!

Captain

Joined: Dec, 2008

Posts: 5051

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 6:30 PM ET #68

Quote Originally Posted by mokedogg:

if my name was coltsalltheway i dont think i'd be takin b-more this week either.........................................

Imean like who else will Cover??????

Radiators

Veteran

Joined: Dec, 2007

Posts: 2937

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 8:08 PM ET #69

colts are better Proz is right but the spread is goofy

bigdaddyhpd

Captain

Joined: Oct, 2003

Posts: 8330

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 8:16 PM ET #70

I was actually thinking that the Ravens takes this SU but....isn't Suggs out for this game due to that chop block by Quinn? I think the Ravens looked ahead before the Browns game..

If Suggs was playing in this one I would be on the Ravens.

coltsalltheway

Covers Rehab

Joined: Oct, 2009

Posts: 398

Posted: Nov. 20, 2009 - 11:37 PM ET #71

nice one vue

easypics

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 2635

Posted: Nov. 21, 2009 - 2:07 AM ET #72

While Flacco may need 4 quarters tossing a TD,

Peyton only needs 4 plays.

NOBODY does it better.

If Ray Lewis knocks Peyton out,Ravens will win.

CoopDogg

Prospect

Joined: Oct, 2009

Posts: 56

Posted: Nov. 21, 2009 - 12:50 PM ET #73

The books know everyone is loading up on Indy, and are making it easy to do so with this line. I'll be winning along with the oddsmakers by taking Baltimore here.