All Forums | Pro Football

Green Bay at Seattle (10/12/2008)

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 2726
Posts: 36
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 8687
Posted: #1

Away:  Green Bay [2-3 ATS]
Home:  Seattle [1-3 ATS]

Game Time: 4:15 PM
Stadium: Qwest Field

Recent Meetings:
N/A

Team Leaders:

Green Bay:
Passing: Aaron Rodgers (1274)
Rushing: Ryan Grant (269)
Receiving: Greg Jennings (569)

Seattle:
Passing: Matt Hasselbeck (656)
Rushing: Julius Jones (373)
Receiving: John Carlson (168)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1028
Posted: #2
 NO don't tell me that you're gonna do it again...
 
Yes my little wee lad. I sure am. I am holding the Seahawks personally responsible for my cash. The Packers have just enough injuries to make this game a close one. The edge goes to the home team with the better quarterback, the rain and the crowd.
 
How do you know it's gonna rain on Sunday?
 
Dude, it always rains in Seattle, didn't you... Hey, look out!
 
 
You alright man?
 
 Help, help! My microphone is fried! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 394
Posted: #3
GB +3
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 3328
Posted: #4
Say it ain't so Watch- but after that ass whipping and this low line this is just the spot to take the seagulls!
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 25141
Posted: #5
Green Bay - 24                   Seattle - 20
Packers +2.5                   under 46
The idea of a lame duck coach seems to be turning out pretty bad for thr Gulls. Rodgers has to get this team back on track and start winning games. Pressure also on McCARTHY because of that Favre decision. Packers catching the Hawks coming off a sound beating.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1028
Posted: #6
Mr . Mannix, I can't be that predictable. Besides, you and I know that by gametime, the Packers will be favored anyway. I will always take the homedog that plays on a different surface than the away team. Seattle is too good of a team to go to 1-4. They have a great quarterback, and the receivers needed more than a week or two to get up to speed. I think they get it clicking in this game. i also like the over on this one too. Seattle is desperate and I expect an all out effort in front of the 12th man
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 3328
Posted: #7
You speakin the truth there Watch. Keep up the good work!
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 3917
Posted: #8
I have it 24 to 21 Birds
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 7906
Posted: #9
go pack go!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 394
Posted: #10
there is no way GB loses 4 in a row or all hell will break loose down in Lambeu
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 6280
Posted: #11

The Pack  ML
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 148
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by Watch:

Mr . Mannix, I can't be that predictable. Besides, you and I know that by gametime, the Packers will be favored anyway. I will always take the homedog that plays on a different surface than the away team. Seattle is too good of a team to go to 1-4. They have a great quarterback, and the receivers needed more than a week or two to get up to speed. I think they get it clicking in this game. i also like the over on this one too. Seattle is desperate and I expect an all out effort in front of the 12th man

 

Word 'em up Watch - I think the Packers injuries, especially on defense is the biggest factor - that and that they have ZERO depth.  Their guys who have had to step in for the hurt have not gotten the job done and I don't expect them to.  In fact, I think its going to be a long season in Cheeseland because of their lack of depth. 

 

Seattle will run left, run left, run left, then...when they are in need of some good yardage, they'll run left behind Walter Jones and Wahle - No Clifton, KGB is a mess, and once again, the depth on the left side of their line is a joke - they will give up 30+ points.  They might score 25+ but the Pack is going to lose in a shootout.  The over is an easy play IMO.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1204
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by Unit_G:


The Pack  ML

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 487
Posted: #14
No way Seattle drop to 1-4.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 4236
Posted: #15
Looks like it'll be Charlie Fry going for Seattle.
That kills my Birds lean
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 189
Posted: #16
HASSELBACK is out. Ride the Pack here, wouldn't be surprised to see a 5 or 6 point change in the line.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1028
Posted: #17
With Hasselback out, i am going to take the Seahawks anyway. Hell he cost me money last week anyway. Frye it is. I am staying with my pick of Seattle. I hope he never comes back. Let's go Seahawks! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 3328
Posted: #18
Was wondering what the line movement was for- Hasselbeck a no go.
Frye will want to make the most of the oppurtunity although he hasn't played in a while. But I think the coaching staff will probably just have him manage the game while trying to run the ball against the weakened GB defense. The under and SEA are my probable plays. GL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1096
Posted: #19
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 730
Posted: #20
Line move up again ?
 
Seahawks -1
 
why?? some1?..
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 394
Posted: #21
GB wont lose 4 in a row its almost impossible. Bigby and Harris are they back ?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 735
Posted: #22
Seahawks -1
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 8634
Posted: #23
I can't and won't play Sea.
Why Sea -1, answer, to suck you in
 
GB for me
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 383
Posted: #24
Under Under Under
Both QB's hurt, field goals and field position for both teams
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1777
Posted: #25
Green Bay
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.