Line is up to -4.5 for Denver. Lot of action must be going their way.
Cincinnati at Denver (12/28/2015)
I'm not sure about this game but I am wondering how many alias accounts THE MYTH has created?
What's the over/under on that? LOL
I'm not sure about this game but I am wondering how many alias accounts THE MYTH has created?
What's the over/under on that? LOL
HeadOverHeart,
As I earlier
stated, this game is toss-up; thus, I have NO opinion on either side and I wish
you the best of luck on your side investment.
However, for you to say Denver has a superior receiving corp (wideouts and
tight ends) is completely inaccurate.
Outside of Pittsburgh, there is NO team in the NFL including but
NOT limited to Arizona, has more playmakers in its receiving corp
than Cincinnati my friend… ![]()
I'll take Thomas, Sanders, Daniels, Davis, and Anderson out of the backfield any day over Green, Sanu, Jones, and Bernard. Not only are they more consistent, but they have one more option tonight.
And if you think the Bengals have a better receiving corps than the Cardinals, either you are a Bengals fan or you've been drinking tonight. The Cardinals receiving options are #1 in the NFL, bar-none. They have seven WR/TE playmakers that can take the ball for a huge gain at any given moment and that is not including all three of their running backs who are excellent pass catchers out of the backfield.
HeadOverHeart,
As I earlier
stated, this game is toss-up; thus, I have NO opinion on either side and I wish
you the best of luck on your side investment.
However, for you to say Denver has a superior receiving corp (wideouts and
tight ends) is completely inaccurate.
Outside of Pittsburgh, there is NO team in the NFL including but
NOT limited to Arizona, has more playmakers in its receiving corp
than Cincinnati my friend… ![]()
I'll take Thomas, Sanders, Daniels, Davis, and Anderson out of the backfield any day over Green, Sanu, Jones, and Bernard. Not only are they more consistent, but they have one more option tonight.
And if you think the Bengals have a better receiving corps than the Cardinals, either you are a Bengals fan or you've been drinking tonight. The Cardinals receiving options are #1 in the NFL, bar-none. They have seven WR/TE playmakers that can take the ball for a huge gain at any given moment and that is not including all three of their running backs who are excellent pass catchers out of the backfield.
Denver has the best Defense in the league.
A.J. McCarron will be running for his life!
The Brockwiler will exploit a banged up Bungal secondary with an air raid
Navy ??
CMU .... +6
Denver.... -4
to complete the day ??
Denver has the best Defense in the league.
A.J. McCarron will be running for his life!
The Brockwiler will exploit a banged up Bungal secondary with an air raid
Navy ??
CMU .... +6
Denver.... -4
to complete the day ??
Denver and Under guys. Denver's defense plays better at home and they are facing a 2nd string qb. Bengals defense don't allow a lot of points as well.
Denver and Under guys. Denver's defense plays better at home and they are facing a 2nd string qb. Bengals defense don't allow a lot of points as well.
HeadOverHeart,
LOL! As my father, God rest his soul, would say, “Now you are now mudding the waters.” Your initial post explicitly stated Denver has a better receiving unit than Cincinnati which they do NOT… Now your retort is including running backs… Notwithstanding, even if you include running backs along with the receiving core, your original statement would still be inaccurate my friend…
In addition, you
are getting completely swept up in the moment with the Arizona Cardinals…
With as many snaps Aaron Rogers made his defensive unit play on yesterday, I would have had
a field day against that mediocre Packer secondary. You better believe if Carson Palmer was pitching
to that Bengals receiving core all season long, he would have amassed 800+ more
passing yards EASY! Again, good luck tonight... ![]()
Thanks holtnt. Good luck to you tonight.
No, I'm not muddling the waters. I said "receiving corps." Meaning, anyone who receiving the ball as a pass. I did not say Denver has better WRs than Cincy, I said "receiving corps." This includes TEs and RBs, anyone involved in the passing game. If this was the 1980's, then we could safely assume only WR/TEs, but this is 2015 and any team's receiving prowess must include the running backs.
And I cannot convince you otherwise that Arizona has been top dog in the receiving game all season if you don't want to believe it. Put 100 NFL watchers in a room and over half would agree Arizona has the best receiving corps options in the NFL. I've watched all but a few of their games this year and they have it all, long play, short play, over the middle, extremely fast receivers, bulky tight ends, and a triple-headed running back combo which all catch passes and turn them into huge gains....the latest being David Johnson who is having a great season.
HeadOverHeart,
LOL! As my father, God rest his soul, would say, “Now you are now mudding the waters.” Your initial post explicitly stated Denver has a better receiving unit than Cincinnati which they do NOT… Now your retort is including running backs… Notwithstanding, even if you include running backs along with the receiving core, your original statement would still be inaccurate my friend…
In addition, you
are getting completely swept up in the moment with the Arizona Cardinals…
With as many snaps Aaron Rogers made his defensive unit play on yesterday, I would have had
a field day against that mediocre Packer secondary. You better believe if Carson Palmer was pitching
to that Bengals receiving core all season long, he would have amassed 800+ more
passing yards EASY! Again, good luck tonight... ![]()
Thanks holtnt. Good luck to you tonight.
No, I'm not muddling the waters. I said "receiving corps." Meaning, anyone who receiving the ball as a pass. I did not say Denver has better WRs than Cincy, I said "receiving corps." This includes TEs and RBs, anyone involved in the passing game. If this was the 1980's, then we could safely assume only WR/TEs, but this is 2015 and any team's receiving prowess must include the running backs.
And I cannot convince you otherwise that Arizona has been top dog in the receiving game all season if you don't want to believe it. Put 100 NFL watchers in a room and over half would agree Arizona has the best receiving corps options in the NFL. I've watched all but a few of their games this year and they have it all, long play, short play, over the middle, extremely fast receivers, bulky tight ends, and a triple-headed running back combo which all catch passes and turn them into huge gains....the latest being David Johnson who is having a great season.
I was hoping for the hook on the 4, but will have to settle for Cincy - 4. I can see Denver winning by a field go. Broncos get field goals, not touchdowns and Cincy is good for 17 points tonight. Cincy is the play.
I was hoping for the hook on the 4, but will have to settle for Cincy - 4. I can see Denver winning by a field go. Broncos get field goals, not touchdowns and Cincy is good for 17 points tonight. Cincy is the play.
A lot of us bros are on Denver and the under. I think they are great picks. Hopefully we all didn't blow it. This is a game a lot of us can go, high5ing, to the window together. Let's all get this loot.
A lot of us bros are on Denver and the under. I think they are great picks. Hopefully we all didn't blow it. This is a game a lot of us can go, high5ing, to the window together. Let's all get this loot.
GAMBLERHOLIC 63 -- LOL ! I'm not that creative !!! My bother in law gave me my nickname 47 years ago -- THE MYTH
Myth, I'm gonna bust on ya a little.
You look like somebody I was drinking shots with at some dive bar back in the day, if that is, indeed, your real mug and drinkers noz.
Holt, for all of your sophistication" and professing to be a scholar,
how in the world did you miss SD ST ? With a plus 35 t/o diff.
I hope your right on this over.
Makes me wonder which side your bread is buttered on.
GAMBLERHOLIC 63 -- LOL ! I'm not that creative !!! My bother in law gave me my nickname 47 years ago -- THE MYTH
Myth, I'm gonna bust on ya a little.
You look like somebody I was drinking shots with at some dive bar back in the day, if that is, indeed, your real mug and drinkers noz.
Holt, for all of your sophistication" and professing to be a scholar,
how in the world did you miss SD ST ? With a plus 35 t/o diff.
I hope your right on this over.
Makes me wonder which side your bread is buttered on.
I'm not sure about this game but I am wondering how many alias accounts THE MYTH has created?
What's the over/under on that? LOL
I'm not sure about this game but I am wondering how many alias accounts THE MYTH has created?
What's the over/under on that? LOL
Myth, I'm gonna bust on ya a little.
You look like somebody I was drinking shots with at some dive bar back in the day, if that is, indeed, your real mug and drinkers noz.
Holt, for all of your sophistication" and professing to be a scholar,
how in the world did you miss SD ST ? With a plus 35 t/o diff.
I hope your right on this over.
Makes me wonder which side your bread is buttered on.
Myth, I'm gonna bust on ya a little.
You look like somebody I was drinking shots with at some dive bar back in the day, if that is, indeed, your real mug and drinkers noz.
Holt, for all of your sophistication" and professing to be a scholar,
how in the world did you miss SD ST ? With a plus 35 t/o diff.
I hope your right on this over.
Makes me wonder which side your bread is buttered on.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 463,151
- BEAT Your book 126,199
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 289,604
- PART DEUX 156
- NFL LOCKED IN! 112,232
- KC/DENVER live in game COMMENTS 886
- I’m on the Brewers to defeat the Rays in the World Series 6,556
- $$$ MAX MAX MAX $$$ Play 7,776
- Week 10 Money 843
- Sunday 11/01/2026 620
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
