Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says
(THERE IS NO WARMING ACTUALLY, BUT PLAY ALONG)
2007 ARTICLE
Solar Cycles
Abdussamatov believes that changes in the sun's heat output can account for almost all the climate changes we see on both planets.
Mars and Earth, for instance, have experienced periodic ice ages throughout their histories.
"Man-made greenhouse warming has made a small contribution to the warming seen on Earth in recent years, but it cannot compete with the increase in solar irradiance," Abdussamatov said.
By studying fluctuations in the warmth of the sun, Abdussamatov believes he can see a pattern that fits with the ups and downs in climate we see on Earth and Mars.
Abdussamatov's work, however, has not been well received by other climate scientists
Solar Cycles
Abdussamatov believes that changes in the sun's heat output can account for almost all the climate changes we see on both planets.
Mars and Earth, for instance, have experienced periodic ice ages throughout their histories.
"Man-made greenhouse warming has made a small contribution to the warming seen on Earth in recent years, but it cannot compete with the increase in solar irradiance," Abdussamatov said.
By studying fluctuations in the warmth of the sun, Abdussamatov believes he can see a pattern that fits with the ups and downs in climate we see on Earth and Mars.
Abdussamatov's work, however, has not been well received by other climate scientists
WW Wall and cd - Gobal warming is not the evil boogie man the left wants you to think it is.
first off CO2 is not destroying the Ozone layer, CFC's are alleged to be doing that and there is some disagreement on whether they are or not, but the current "concensus" is that it is. CO2 has never been related to Ozone depletion that I have ever read, if so, please provide links to articles as I am sure it would be fascinating reading.
CO2 does absorb and subsequently emit certain wavelengths of infrared radiation. The simplistic theory is that with enough CO2 molecules in the atmosphere, more "heat" will be absorbed and not allowed to be released into space thus heating the planet. If this were a closed laboratory experiment with all other variables remaining constant then the result would be as described above.
HOWEVER, the planets atmosphere is not a closed system and for each action there are complex reactions that either enhance or counteract the original action.
The primary GHG is water vapor. Depending on what you read, 80-95% of the greenhouse effect that makes the earth habitable is from the water vapor in the atmosphere. As the water vapor density increases, so does the amount of clouds. Clouds reflect the suns radiation reducing the amount of infrared that can be absorbed and re-released by CO2 or any other gases. With less source heat, less residual heat is available and the temps cool. basically we have a built in thermostat.
I believe the planet is bigger and more resilient than we give her credit for and nothing man can do will significantly reduce the amount of CO2 or the temp of the planet.
incidentally, during the last recession, CO2 output from the US decreased as we were using less. What if any measurable reduction was there in CO2? I haven't researched, but I suspect it wasn't measurable if there even was one.
Cheers ![]()
WW Wall and cd - Gobal warming is not the evil boogie man the left wants you to think it is.
first off CO2 is not destroying the Ozone layer, CFC's are alleged to be doing that and there is some disagreement on whether they are or not, but the current "concensus" is that it is. CO2 has never been related to Ozone depletion that I have ever read, if so, please provide links to articles as I am sure it would be fascinating reading.
CO2 does absorb and subsequently emit certain wavelengths of infrared radiation. The simplistic theory is that with enough CO2 molecules in the atmosphere, more "heat" will be absorbed and not allowed to be released into space thus heating the planet. If this were a closed laboratory experiment with all other variables remaining constant then the result would be as described above.
HOWEVER, the planets atmosphere is not a closed system and for each action there are complex reactions that either enhance or counteract the original action.
The primary GHG is water vapor. Depending on what you read, 80-95% of the greenhouse effect that makes the earth habitable is from the water vapor in the atmosphere. As the water vapor density increases, so does the amount of clouds. Clouds reflect the suns radiation reducing the amount of infrared that can be absorbed and re-released by CO2 or any other gases. With less source heat, less residual heat is available and the temps cool. basically we have a built in thermostat.
I believe the planet is bigger and more resilient than we give her credit for and nothing man can do will significantly reduce the amount of CO2 or the temp of the planet.
incidentally, during the last recession, CO2 output from the US decreased as we were using less. What if any measurable reduction was there in CO2? I haven't researched, but I suspect it wasn't measurable if there even was one.
Cheers ![]()
I HATE TO BREAK IT TO THE GLOBAL WARMING BELIEVERS BUT THERE IS ALSO NO SANATA CLAUSE, EASTER BUNNY OR TOOTH FAIRY.
GLOBAL WARMING=BIGGEST SCAM
Oh, I would have to agree with you ..there is no Sanata Clause ...and it looks like there is no Joefan either ....
Well speaking of agreeing it looks like President Obama agree's with me ...... while he was addressing the 8.8 magnitude earthquake in Chile on national T.V. he said the following, quote “We can’t control nature”. ...
woo!..woo!
I HATE TO BREAK IT TO THE GLOBAL WARMING BELIEVERS BUT THERE IS ALSO NO SANATA CLAUSE, EASTER BUNNY OR TOOTH FAIRY.
GLOBAL WARMING=BIGGEST SCAM
Oh, I would have to agree with you ..there is no Sanata Clause ...and it looks like there is no Joefan either ....
Well speaking of agreeing it looks like President Obama agree's with me ...... while he was addressing the 8.8 magnitude earthquake in Chile on national T.V. he said the following, quote “We can’t control nature”. ...
woo!..woo!
Writes the Post: “Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers. . . all point to a radical change in climate conditions and . . . unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone . . . Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones . . . while at many points well-known glaciers have entirely disappeared.”
More evidence of human-caused global warming?
I
I
I
I
V
The above report of runaway Arctic warming is from a Washington Post story published Nov. 2, 1922 and bears an uncanny resemblance to the tales of global warming splattered across the front pages of today's newspapers. It is one of many historical accounts published during the past 140 years describing climate changes and often predicting catastrophic cooling or warming."
Writes the Post: “Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers. . . all point to a radical change in climate conditions and . . . unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone . . . Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones . . . while at many points well-known glaciers have entirely disappeared.”
More evidence of human-caused global warming?
I
I
I
I
V
The above report of runaway Arctic warming is from a Washington Post story published Nov. 2, 1922 and bears an uncanny resemblance to the tales of global warming splattered across the front pages of today's newspapers. It is one of many historical accounts published during the past 140 years describing climate changes and often predicting catastrophic cooling or warming."
What does Global Warming and National Healthcare reform have in common? A way for the goverment to try and CONTROL you. It is so simple and plain as that. Dems want to control and repubs want freedom to live their life. Simple as that.
What does Global Warming and National Healthcare reform have in common? A way for the goverment to try and CONTROL you. It is so simple and plain as that. Dems want to control and repubs want freedom to live their life. Simple as that.
What does Global Warming and National Healthcare reform have in common? A way for the goverment to try and CONTROL you. It is so simple and plain as that. Dems want to control and repubs want freedom to live their life. Simple as that.
What does Global Warming and National Healthcare reform have in common? A way for the goverment to try and CONTROL you. It is so simple and plain as that. Dems want to control and repubs want freedom to live their life. Simple as that.
In which way. Not true republicans. The moderate Repubs we have in office today..yes.
In which way. Not true republicans. The moderate Repubs we have in office today..yes.
What does Global Warming and National Healthcare reform have in common? A way for the goverment to try and CONTROL you. It is so simple and plain as that. Dems want to control and repubs want freedom to live their life. Simple as that.
What does Global Warming and National Healthcare reform have in common? A way for the goverment to try and CONTROL you. It is so simple and plain as that. Dems want to control and repubs want freedom to live their life. Simple as that.
Here is link to an article about the effects of atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the heat trapping effects. And the effect of CO2 on the whole of the greenhouse effect, relative to other gases, primarily H2O.
Basically it says that we have achieved the majority of the heat trapping potential of CO2, and even a doubling, tripling or even 4 fold increase of CO2 concentrations, will have a negligible effect on the temp of the earth.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/08/the-logarithmic-effect-of-carbon-dioxide/#more-17114
Here is link to an article about the effects of atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the heat trapping effects. And the effect of CO2 on the whole of the greenhouse effect, relative to other gases, primarily H2O.
Basically it says that we have achieved the majority of the heat trapping potential of CO2, and even a doubling, tripling or even 4 fold increase of CO2 concentrations, will have a negligible effect on the temp of the earth.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/08/the-logarithmic-effect-of-carbon-dioxide/#more-17114

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.