Sleezy question they asked, what is the purpose of asking a loaded baited question given the backdrop with Israel and this war? Classless trashy move by that other candidate who had no shot of winning.
It looks like the GOP dude is wearing his Trump halloween costume a day late.
Sleezy question they asked, what is the purpose of asking a loaded baited question given the backdrop with Israel and this war? Classless trashy move by that other candidate who had no shot of winning.
It looks like the GOP dude is wearing his Trump halloween costume a day late.
Quote Originally Posted by cd329: sorry wasnt talking about that with trump. I was referring to you turning your body into a pretzel to defend anything trump does. Trump must be the perfect human being to you and am sure hes your top idol in life. Get his name tattooed on your forehead if it isnt already there. Its never failed on this forum, where somebody posts something trump has done and you will find a way to defend the guy. Its pretty comical and shows how easily you can be fooled and influenced by a con artist. I sure hope you hang up on the phone scammers, cause they might sell you that ocean front beach house in oklahoma I doubt you can understand that the only fools that have TDS are the people who actually support this con artist. Like i always say, KARMA IS A BITCH. When people do bad things and when they follow and idolize bad people, karma always catches up. tic toc, tic toc, tic toc TDS Trump's Delusional Supporters
exactly
magas truly dont realize that they are the ones with TDS
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by cd329: sorry wasnt talking about that with trump. I was referring to you turning your body into a pretzel to defend anything trump does. Trump must be the perfect human being to you and am sure hes your top idol in life. Get his name tattooed on your forehead if it isnt already there. Its never failed on this forum, where somebody posts something trump has done and you will find a way to defend the guy. Its pretty comical and shows how easily you can be fooled and influenced by a con artist. I sure hope you hang up on the phone scammers, cause they might sell you that ocean front beach house in oklahoma I doubt you can understand that the only fools that have TDS are the people who actually support this con artist. Like i always say, KARMA IS A BITCH. When people do bad things and when they follow and idolize bad people, karma always catches up. tic toc, tic toc, tic toc TDS Trump's Delusional Supporters
exactly
magas truly dont realize that they are the ones with TDS
I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave, yes, but not quite as large as many think.
...but,
moderate sized bets on the gawdawful, corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party(with Vance breaking ties)to keep very narrow Senate control.
For America's sake,I actually hope I lose this Senate bet! But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control >>>> akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game.
As long as Dems win the HOUSE as widely expected, I'll come out well ahead (nice profit! ) even if I lose my bets for the BADGUYS to keep control of the Senate.
As an aside though, regardless who wins the Senate, we will still have gridlock for the next 2 years, guaranteed. No meaningful NEW legislation will get passed AND SIGNED BYthe fascist-asshole "Don Dementia"
Further, even IF the Dems narrowly win the Senate, they won't truly have control of that chamber >>> BECAUSE there will **always** be some "Joe Manchin-type" ASSHOLE who will oppose his own Dem party (and constituents) and phuckitallup on any measure before the Senate. (Fetterman comes to mind)
ALWAYS!
To "idiot proof" a Senate win, Dems flipping a 4 seat minimum will NOT be good enough. They would need AT LEAST a pickup of 5 and probably 6.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
FWIW,
I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave, yes, but not quite as large as many think.
...but,
moderate sized bets on the gawdawful, corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party(with Vance breaking ties)to keep very narrow Senate control.
For America's sake,I actually hope I lose this Senate bet! But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control >>>> akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game.
As long as Dems win the HOUSE as widely expected, I'll come out well ahead (nice profit! ) even if I lose my bets for the BADGUYS to keep control of the Senate.
As an aside though, regardless who wins the Senate, we will still have gridlock for the next 2 years, guaranteed. No meaningful NEW legislation will get passed AND SIGNED BYthe fascist-asshole "Don Dementia"
Further, even IF the Dems narrowly win the Senate, they won't truly have control of that chamber >>> BECAUSE there will **always** be some "Joe Manchin-type" ASSHOLE who will oppose his own Dem party (and constituents) and phuckitallup on any measure before the Senate. (Fetterman comes to mind)
ALWAYS!
To "idiot proof" a Senate win, Dems flipping a 4 seat minimum will NOT be good enough. They would need AT LEAST a pickup of 5 and probably 6.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: FWIW, I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave, yes, but not quite as large as many think. ...but, moderate sized bets on the gawdawful, corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party (with Vance breaking ties) to keep very narrow Senate control. For America's sake, I actually hope I lose this Senate bet! But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control >>>> akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game. As long as Dems win the HOUSE as widely expected, I'll come out well ahead (nice profit! ) even if I lose my bets for the BADGUYS to keep control of the Senate. As an aside though, regardless who wins the Senate, we will still have gridlock for the next 2 years, guaranteed. No meaningful NEW legislation will get passed AND SIGNED BY the fascist-asshole "Don Dementia" Further, even IF the Dems narrowly win the Senate, they won't truly have control of that chamber >>> BECAUSE there will **always** be some "Joe Manchin-type" ASSHOLE who will oppose his own Dem party (and constituents) and phuckitallup on any measure before the Senate. (Fetterman comes to mind) ALWAYS! To "idiot proof" a Senate win, Dems flipping a 4 seat minimum will NOT be good enough. They would need AT LEAST a pickup of 5 and probably 6.
University of Virginia's professor of politics Larry Sabato with his "Sabados Crystal" has predicted Dems 53, GOP 47 after this midterms. Sabdos Crystal is well known nonpartisan online political newsletter and forecasting website. If Sabato's prediction is correct, Dems will have 52 (exclude Fetterman) vs GOP 47. I don't know that will materialize, but we shall see in a few days.
Good luck to your bets, Fubah!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: FWIW, I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave, yes, but not quite as large as many think. ...but, moderate sized bets on the gawdawful, corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party (with Vance breaking ties) to keep very narrow Senate control. For America's sake, I actually hope I lose this Senate bet! But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control >>>> akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game. As long as Dems win the HOUSE as widely expected, I'll come out well ahead (nice profit! ) even if I lose my bets for the BADGUYS to keep control of the Senate. As an aside though, regardless who wins the Senate, we will still have gridlock for the next 2 years, guaranteed. No meaningful NEW legislation will get passed AND SIGNED BY the fascist-asshole "Don Dementia" Further, even IF the Dems narrowly win the Senate, they won't truly have control of that chamber >>> BECAUSE there will **always** be some "Joe Manchin-type" ASSHOLE who will oppose his own Dem party (and constituents) and phuckitallup on any measure before the Senate. (Fetterman comes to mind) ALWAYS! To "idiot proof" a Senate win, Dems flipping a 4 seat minimum will NOT be good enough. They would need AT LEAST a pickup of 5 and probably 6.
University of Virginia's professor of politics Larry Sabato with his "Sabados Crystal" has predicted Dems 53, GOP 47 after this midterms. Sabdos Crystal is well known nonpartisan online political newsletter and forecasting website. If Sabato's prediction is correct, Dems will have 52 (exclude Fetterman) vs GOP 47. I don't know that will materialize, but we shall see in a few days.
I hope the DEMS boot his sorry butt to the curb next year, the guy is a wacky bizarre goof who blatantly does not support or forward the party he falsely belongs to.
I hope the DEMS boot his sorry butt to the curb next year, the guy is a wacky bizarre goof who blatantly does not support or forward the party he falsely belongs to.
I hope the DEMS boot his sorry butt to the curb next year,
the guy is a wacky bizarre goof who blatantly does not support or forward the party he falsely belongs to.
@wallstreetcappers
100% AGREED! Fetterman could single-handedly ruin what the electorate wants. He's a bonfide asshole, almost worse than trump! Can't EVER count on his vote, so this is why the DEMS need to pickup at least 5 Senate seats --- which unfortunately, I firmly believe they will NOT achieve.
Personally, I am upset with those DEMS who are suggesting the HOUSE not focus on impeaching people and multiple investigations. Those idiots are suggesting they focus on helpful legislation for America! WTF??? Have they been off-planet for the past several years?!?!? The asshole in the Oval *WILL* veto any and all legislation. GUARANTEED gridlock! As a gambler this is as close to a "LOCK" as anything I've ever witnessed. It would be a waste of time to work on issues which we KNOW trump WILL NOT SIGN. Time much better spent on investigations and impeaching the jerks in his orbit/cabinet who are in position to continue harming America over the next 2 years. And the quicker the better.
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
I hope the DEMS boot his sorry butt to the curb next year,
the guy is a wacky bizarre goof who blatantly does not support or forward the party he falsely belongs to.
@wallstreetcappers
100% AGREED! Fetterman could single-handedly ruin what the electorate wants. He's a bonfide asshole, almost worse than trump! Can't EVER count on his vote, so this is why the DEMS need to pickup at least 5 Senate seats --- which unfortunately, I firmly believe they will NOT achieve.
Personally, I am upset with those DEMS who are suggesting the HOUSE not focus on impeaching people and multiple investigations. Those idiots are suggesting they focus on helpful legislation for America! WTF??? Have they been off-planet for the past several years?!?!? The asshole in the Oval *WILL* veto any and all legislation. GUARANTEED gridlock! As a gambler this is as close to a "LOCK" as anything I've ever witnessed. It would be a waste of time to work on issues which we KNOW trump WILL NOT SIGN. Time much better spent on investigations and impeaching the jerks in his orbit/cabinet who are in position to continue harming America over the next 2 years. And the quicker the better.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: FWIW, I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave, yes, but not quite as large as many think. ...but, moderate sized bets on the gawdawful, corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party (with Vance breaking ties) to keep very narrow Senate control. For America's sake, I actually hope I lose this Senate bet! But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control >>>> akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game. As long as Dems win the HOUSE as widely expected, I'll come out well ahead (nice profit! ) even if I lose my bets for the BADGUYS to keep control of the Senate. As an aside though, regardless who wins the Senate, we will still have gridlock for the next 2 years, guaranteed. No meaningful NEW legislation will get passed AND SIGNED BY the fascist-asshole "Don Dementia" Further, even IF the Dems narrowly win the Senate, they won't truly have control of that chamber >>> BECAUSE there will **always** be some "Joe Manchin-type" ASSHOLE who will oppose his own Dem party (and constituents) and phuckitallup on any measure before the Senate. (Fetterman comes to mind) ALWAYS! To "idiot proof" a Senate win, Dems flipping a 4 seat minimum will NOT be good enough. They would need AT LEAST a pickup of 5 and probably 6.
University of Virginia's professor of politics Larry Sabato with his "Sabados Crystal" has predicted Dems 53, GOP 47 after this midterms. Sabdos Crystal is well known nonpartisan online political newsletter and forecasting website. If Sabato's prediction is correct, Dems will have 52 (exclude Fetterman) vs GOP 47. I don't know that will materialize, but we shall see in a few days. Good luck to your bets, Fubah!
@Europa
I hope he's spot on. For AMERICA's sake, I really hope I lose that bet I made on the MAGA BADGUYS.
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: FWIW, I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave, yes, but not quite as large as many think. ...but, moderate sized bets on the gawdawful, corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party (with Vance breaking ties) to keep very narrow Senate control. For America's sake, I actually hope I lose this Senate bet! But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control >>>> akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game. As long as Dems win the HOUSE as widely expected, I'll come out well ahead (nice profit! ) even if I lose my bets for the BADGUYS to keep control of the Senate. As an aside though, regardless who wins the Senate, we will still have gridlock for the next 2 years, guaranteed. No meaningful NEW legislation will get passed AND SIGNED BY the fascist-asshole "Don Dementia" Further, even IF the Dems narrowly win the Senate, they won't truly have control of that chamber >>> BECAUSE there will **always** be some "Joe Manchin-type" ASSHOLE who will oppose his own Dem party (and constituents) and phuckitallup on any measure before the Senate. (Fetterman comes to mind) ALWAYS! To "idiot proof" a Senate win, Dems flipping a 4 seat minimum will NOT be good enough. They would need AT LEAST a pickup of 5 and probably 6.
University of Virginia's professor of politics Larry Sabato with his "Sabados Crystal" has predicted Dems 53, GOP 47 after this midterms. Sabdos Crystal is well known nonpartisan online political newsletter and forecasting website. If Sabato's prediction is correct, Dems will have 52 (exclude Fetterman) vs GOP 47. I don't know that will materialize, but we shall see in a few days. Good luck to your bets, Fubah!
@Europa
I hope he's spot on. For AMERICA's sake, I really hope I lose that bet I made on the MAGA BADGUYS.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: FWIW, I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave, yes, but not quite as large as many think. ...but, moderate sized bets on the gawdawful, corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party (with Vance breaking ties) to keep very narrow Senate control. For America's sake, I actually hope I lose this Senate bet! But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control >>>> akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game. As long as Dems win the HOUSE as widely expected, I'll come out well ahead (nice profit!! ) even if I lose my bets for the BADGUYS to keep control of the Senate.
DEMOCRATS RETAKE THE HOUSE!!
Fubah2 wins HUGE!!!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: FWIW, I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave, yes, but not quite as large as many think. ...but, moderate sized bets on the gawdawful, corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party (with Vance breaking ties) to keep very narrow Senate control. For America's sake, I actually hope I lose this Senate bet! But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control >>>> akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game. As long as Dems win the HOUSE as widely expected, I'll come out well ahead (nice profit!! ) even if I lose my bets for the BADGUYS to keep control of the Senate.
I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave yes, but not quite as large as many think.
...but moderate sized bets on the corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party(with Vance breaking ties)to keep very narrow Senate control.
For America's sake,I actually hope I lose this Senate bet.
But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control (akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game)
I've never been so HAPPY about *LOSING* a bet in my life!!!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
FWIW,
I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave yes, but not quite as large as many think.
...but moderate sized bets on the corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party(with Vance breaking ties)to keep very narrow Senate control.
For America's sake,I actually hope I lose this Senate bet.
But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control (akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game)
I've never been so HAPPY about *LOSING* a bet in my life!!!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: FWIW, I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave yes, but not quite as large as many think. ...but moderate sized bets on the corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party (with Vance breaking ties) to keep very narrow Senate control. For America's sake, I actually hope I lose this Senate bet. But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control (akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game) I've never been so HAPPY about *LOSING* a bet in my life!!!
Americans have spoken, Fubah!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: FWIW, I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave yes, but not quite as large as many think. ...but moderate sized bets on the corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party (with Vance breaking ties) to keep very narrow Senate control. For America's sake, I actually hope I lose this Senate bet. But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control (akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game) I've never been so HAPPY about *LOSING* a bet in my life!!!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: FWIW, I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave yes, but not quite as large as many think. ...but moderate sized bets on the corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party (with Vance breaking ties) to keep very narrow Senate control. For America's sake, I actually hope I lose this Senate bet. But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control (akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game)
I've never been so HAPPY about *LOSING* a bet in my life!!!
Americans have spoken, Fubah!
@Europa
AMEN, bro!
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: FWIW, I have placed VERY HEAVY BETS (at high odds!) on Dems taking control of the HOUSE (regardless margins). A blue wave yes, but not quite as large as many think. ...but moderate sized bets on the corrupt/pro-fascism/largely-racist party (with Vance breaking ties) to keep very narrow Senate control. For America's sake, I actually hope I lose this Senate bet. But by trading in my optimism for realism I reluctantly conclude the undeserving, pro-trumpism party will find a way to cling to Senate control (akin to an unearned run in the bottom of the 9th of a tie game)
I've never been so HAPPY about *LOSING* a bet in my life!!!
Polls underestimated extraordinary blue wave. Especially democrats winning in republican strongholds. Voters delivered historic rebuke of unpopular Trump and GOP. Although midterm elections are usually referendums on presidents, delusional Trump blames media and bad candidates instead of his bad policies for losses. For examples, corruption, tariffs and Iran war.
Polls underestimated extraordinary blue wave. Especially democrats winning in republican strongholds. Voters delivered historic rebuke of unpopular Trump and GOP. Although midterm elections are usually referendums on presidents, delusional Trump blames media and bad candidates instead of his bad policies for losses. For examples, corruption, tariffs and Iran war.
Polls underestimated extraordinary blue wave. Especially democrats winning in republican strongholds. Voters delivered historic rebuke of unpopular Trump and GOP. Although midterm elections are usually referendums on presidents, delusional Trump blames media and bad candidates instead of his bad policies for losses. For examples, corruption, tariffs and Iran war.
agree here , fuck Netanyahu
The Pastor of Disaster
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Polls underestimated extraordinary blue wave. Especially democrats winning in republican strongholds. Voters delivered historic rebuke of unpopular Trump and GOP. Although midterm elections are usually referendums on presidents, delusional Trump blames media and bad candidates instead of his bad policies for losses. For examples, corruption, tariffs and Iran war.