Ok so tip toe around a core belief is curious, conservatives are against government interaction and especially the federal government that the capitalist economy is the decider of who wins and loses not the government. Trump allegedly imposing tariffs is pretty much 100% inverse to what conservatives believe and to me it does not work anyway.
Disparity is not a term used in capitalism, any inequality has to either be equalized by efficiencies or technology or that business just does not survive, that is capitalism. If we really were serious about a level playing field and equality and disparity we would stop subsidizing our defense contractors, our farmers and all our ag producers. The reality is that people are clueless about what they support and what their core beliefs are especially since we are not a capitalist economy at all.
If we want to eliminate communist subsidizing of our goods and service the only way to accomplish this is to close trade borders completely and isolate to only service our domestic demand and do not engage with parties which are counter to capitalism, IF we really are interested in disparity, these tariffs are stupid kiddie crap that accomplish nothing..he is not teaching any lessons or making a level playing field when we are subsidizing our own businesses and there are a million ways around tariffs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@unplucked_gem
Ok so tip toe around a core belief is curious, conservatives are against government interaction and especially the federal government that the capitalist economy is the decider of who wins and loses not the government. Trump allegedly imposing tariffs is pretty much 100% inverse to what conservatives believe and to me it does not work anyway.
Disparity is not a term used in capitalism, any inequality has to either be equalized by efficiencies or technology or that business just does not survive, that is capitalism. If we really were serious about a level playing field and equality and disparity we would stop subsidizing our defense contractors, our farmers and all our ag producers. The reality is that people are clueless about what they support and what their core beliefs are especially since we are not a capitalist economy at all.
If we want to eliminate communist subsidizing of our goods and service the only way to accomplish this is to close trade borders completely and isolate to only service our domestic demand and do not engage with parties which are counter to capitalism, IF we really are interested in disparity, these tariffs are stupid kiddie crap that accomplish nothing..he is not teaching any lessons or making a level playing field when we are subsidizing our own businesses and there are a million ways around tariffs.
Weakest part of US-European union deal is the promise of European investment and energy purchases. There is no guarantee because businesses and consumers do most of the trading. Not governments. In first term, China promised to buy more from the US but continue regular purchases. Since US is mostly an importer instead of a exporter, economists think high tariffs are bad. Americans are better off with low prices, higher standard of living, employment and economic growth. Still a bad trade deal is better than no deal because the alternative is a dumb trade war.
1
Weakest part of US-European union deal is the promise of European investment and energy purchases. There is no guarantee because businesses and consumers do most of the trading. Not governments. In first term, China promised to buy more from the US but continue regular purchases. Since US is mostly an importer instead of a exporter, economists think high tariffs are bad. Americans are better off with low prices, higher standard of living, employment and economic growth. Still a bad trade deal is better than no deal because the alternative is a dumb trade war.
The trade war TRUMP STARTED may revert to skyrocketing back to ultra-high level tariffs with China that formed an effective blockade on trade between the world’s two largest economies.
0
Trump team FAILS to secure trade deal
The trade war TRUMP STARTED may revert to skyrocketing back to ultra-high level tariffs with China that formed an effective blockade on trade between the world’s two largest economies.
Business leaders are afraid to speak out against dictator Trump. But publicly traded companies are legally required to tell investors the truth in Securities exchange commission filings. Harley Davidson expects $130-175 million loss from tariffs. Ford $1.5 billion. Nvidia $5.5 billion.
0
Business leaders are afraid to speak out against dictator Trump. But publicly traded companies are legally required to tell investors the truth in Securities exchange commission filings. Harley Davidson expects $130-175 million loss from tariffs. Ford $1.5 billion. Nvidia $5.5 billion.
So now, the disgusting Sex-Offender in the Oval threatens India with tariffs as high as 25%
No longer a threat....the idiot in the Oval made it real.
Imports from India will now face a 25% tariff, Trump announced Wednesday, his latest trade-war declaration in what has become a cornerstone of his second [idiotic regime].
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
So now, the disgusting Sex-Offender in the Oval threatens India with tariffs as high as 25%
No longer a threat....the idiot in the Oval made it real.
Imports from India will now face a 25% tariff, Trump announced Wednesday, his latest trade-war declaration in what has become a cornerstone of his second [idiotic regime].
Senate democrat Schumer calls European deal fake. Europe has admitted that the agreement isn't legally binding and they have no control over whether investments and purchases even happen. Similar to Japan deal which has stuff unlikely to happen or was happening anyway and therefore changes little. Besides, there is chance of US courts ruling that Trump has no authority to negotiate tariffs under International emergency powers act and that all deals could be declared null.
0
Senate democrat Schumer calls European deal fake. Europe has admitted that the agreement isn't legally binding and they have no control over whether investments and purchases even happen. Similar to Japan deal which has stuff unlikely to happen or was happening anyway and therefore changes little. Besides, there is chance of US courts ruling that Trump has no authority to negotiate tariffs under International emergency powers act and that all deals could be declared null.
Senate democrat Schumer calls European deal fake. Europe has admitted that the agreement isn't legally binding and they have no control over whether investments and purchases even happen. Similar to Japan deal which has stuff unlikely to happen or was happening anyway and therefore changes little. Besides, there is chance of US courts ruling that Trump has no authority to negotiate tariffs under International emergency powers act and that all deals could be declared null.
It is not fake, but Trump (or his experts—I wouldn't be surprised if Trump didn't know how the EU worked) is deliberately misrepresenting what it means. Ursula von der Leyen is a marionette puppet. The EU is not a country, so it has no leader who can make decisions on its behalf. Every decision pretty much has to go through a voting process where all member states have to agree on things, and every state has veto rights. As you say, she can't make business decisions on behalf of its member states, but if they all agreed, they could "force" us to buy military equipment, etc. - so if its member states agree to this deal - it will be a reality - but I would question a lot if they will - because as I have said a billion times in here - we could completely annihilate you economically if we wanted - and they are primarily doing this because they want you to either help us with Russia or at least take a chill pill while we try to take care of us not entering a global nuclear war
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Senate democrat Schumer calls European deal fake. Europe has admitted that the agreement isn't legally binding and they have no control over whether investments and purchases even happen. Similar to Japan deal which has stuff unlikely to happen or was happening anyway and therefore changes little. Besides, there is chance of US courts ruling that Trump has no authority to negotiate tariffs under International emergency powers act and that all deals could be declared null.
It is not fake, but Trump (or his experts—I wouldn't be surprised if Trump didn't know how the EU worked) is deliberately misrepresenting what it means. Ursula von der Leyen is a marionette puppet. The EU is not a country, so it has no leader who can make decisions on its behalf. Every decision pretty much has to go through a voting process where all member states have to agree on things, and every state has veto rights. As you say, she can't make business decisions on behalf of its member states, but if they all agreed, they could "force" us to buy military equipment, etc. - so if its member states agree to this deal - it will be a reality - but I would question a lot if they will - because as I have said a billion times in here - we could completely annihilate you economically if we wanted - and they are primarily doing this because they want you to either help us with Russia or at least take a chill pill while we try to take care of us not entering a global nuclear war
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
The trade war 
Hot Forum Topics
