Calling for an arrest like this proves that you're biased. Or it proves that you know very little about the legal system. Or both.
Saying that only Martin is the victim of a smear campain when they are both victims of the smear campain. Come on! Be honest. You have your mind already made up.
Here's the problem...
I'm calling for the TRUTH. I'm calling for justice, not a lynch mob. I think a proper investigation and trial is how to obtain the truth. I even said, "if he's found innocent, so be it."
Also, where did I say "only Martin" was the victim of a smear campaign?
Tisk tisk. Putting words in my mouth won't help your diminishing credibility
I have a problem with the campaign and the propaganda pylons remember? It would seem rightfully so... They showed up in this thread after all, doing just what I said they would.
I must be psychic
0
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
Calling for an arrest like this proves that you're biased. Or it proves that you know very little about the legal system. Or both.
Saying that only Martin is the victim of a smear campain when they are both victims of the smear campain. Come on! Be honest. You have your mind already made up.
Here's the problem...
I'm calling for the TRUTH. I'm calling for justice, not a lynch mob. I think a proper investigation and trial is how to obtain the truth. I even said, "if he's found innocent, so be it."
Also, where did I say "only Martin" was the victim of a smear campaign?
Tisk tisk. Putting words in my mouth won't help your diminishing credibility
I have a problem with the campaign and the propaganda pylons remember? It would seem rightfully so... They showed up in this thread after all, doing just what I said they would.
You don't have to look very far to find the propaganda pylons doing the work of the right wing machine for them, smearing Trayvon and unilaterally defending Zimmerman.
Yo where is dl to keep score around here?
What is this like a +10, +15?
0
Quote Originally Posted by DiscoD69:
You don't have to look very far to find the propaganda pylons doing the work of the right wing machine for them, smearing Trayvon and unilaterally defending Zimmerman.
Wouldn't an arrest and a proper investigation & trial shed some light on the 'facts?'
Wait a minute. What if the investigation turns up to exhonerate the person you're investigating? Wouldn't that mean that you had improperly jailed that person, just to find out the facts?
...and you say its my oppinion that doesn't carry much weight around here?
Perhaps you just have friends that are as clueless as you are.
Good point... that NEVER happens.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
QUOTE Originally Posted by DiscoD69:
Wouldn't an arrest and a proper investigation & trial shed some light on the 'facts?'
Wait a minute. What if the investigation turns up to exhonerate the person you're investigating? Wouldn't that mean that you had improperly jailed that person, just to find out the facts?
...and you say its my oppinion that doesn't carry much weight around here?
Perhaps you just have friends that are as clueless as you are.
Are you suggesting that arresting officers or officers at the scene are trained not to discuss the case with a suspect?
=================
Um, no.
When being interviewed voluntarily or interrogated?
Are you suggesting officers are expected to interrogate suspects at the scene?
But which cases? Possible rapes? Homicides, DUI's?
Of course that would make a difference.
All true. Certainly a DUI/DWI/OUI case is treated differently than say, a murder.
But until the suspect is arrested, Miranda does not apply. Information obtained in the form of questions is invaluable and generally considered the most accurate.
In a case like Zimmerman, it would also have possibly triggered suppression concerns had there been an admission. He was injured, distraught, and scared. Reeks of involuntariness. But the statement would have been vital, none the less.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
Are you suggesting that arresting officers or officers at the scene are trained not to discuss the case with a suspect?
=================
Um, no.
When being interviewed voluntarily or interrogated?
Are you suggesting officers are expected to interrogate suspects at the scene?
But which cases? Possible rapes? Homicides, DUI's?
Of course that would make a difference.
All true. Certainly a DUI/DWI/OUI case is treated differently than say, a murder.
But until the suspect is arrested, Miranda does not apply. Information obtained in the form of questions is invaluable and generally considered the most accurate.
In a case like Zimmerman, it would also have possibly triggered suppression concerns had there been an admission. He was injured, distraught, and scared. Reeks of involuntariness. But the statement would have been vital, none the less.
Probably because it is not against the law to disobey a dispatcher. Just a big fat guess.
I see an expert on police dispatchers jobs now
do you know if that dispatcher is actually a trained police officer assigned to dispatch? Do you also know if the supervising police officer in the dispatch room made that call?
Face you are not an expert on every subject.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
Probably because it is not against the law to disobey a dispatcher. Just a big fat guess.
I see an expert on police dispatchers jobs now
do you know if that dispatcher is actually a trained police officer assigned to dispatch? Do you also know if the supervising police officer in the dispatch room made that call?
to dj obviously, nobody's talking to esplanade that's for sure.
The thing that's funny is you NEED dj to carry your water. Man up. Unlike you, some people don't need anyone else to validate their opinion. An education upgrade might help your cause.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DiscoD69:
to dj obviously, nobody's talking to esplanade that's for sure.
The thing that's funny is you NEED dj to carry your water. Man up. Unlike you, some people don't need anyone else to validate their opinion. An education upgrade might help your cause.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.