Public option gets defeated
Insurance companies spend a quarter of their money fighting against the people that pay the premiums to them.
Insurance companies spend a quarter of their money fighting against the people that pay the premiums to them.
(AFP) – Sep 14, 2009
SAN FRANCISCO — Most US doctors approve of a "public option" to supplement private health care insurance in the United States, as proposed by President Barack Obama, a poll showed Monday.
A total of 62.9 percent of physicians who participated in the survey by the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) said they favored a public option, or government insurance plan, against 27.3 percent backing a private system alone.
Another 9.6 percent favored a completely government-owned health care coverage system.
"It's clear that the majority of US physicians support both public and private options to expand coverage," NEJM said, noting that between 52 and 69 percent of Americans favor a supplemental public option.
The journal described physicians as "critical stakeholders" in health care reform.
Obama has vowed to pass legislation by the end of the year that would spread coverage to America's 47 million uninsured by making insurance obligatory and affordable for all.
But he has faced strong criticism, especially from Republicans, who have jumped on the 900-billion-dollar price tag and stoked fears that a mooted public option would lead to a federal takeover of health care -- anathema to many Americans who abhor the idea of big government.
The NEJM poll found that 58.3 percent of physicians favor expanding Medicare, the public health insurance plan for seniors over 65 years old, to people aged 55 and over.
This option is among a set of proposals being considered by the Senate Finance Committee, which has played a key role in legislating the health reform plan.
In the traditionally more conservative South, 58.9 percent of US physicians favored a public option, compared to 69.7 percent in the generally more progressive Northeast.
NEJM surveyed 2,130 general physicians, specialists and surgeons who work in a private practice or with hospital groups.
A Washington Post-ABC News opinion poll meanwhile showed Americans remained almost deadlocked in their opinion of the health care initiative, with 46 percent in favor of the proposed changes and 48 percent opposed.
(AFP) – Sep 14, 2009
SAN FRANCISCO — Most US doctors approve of a "public option" to supplement private health care insurance in the United States, as proposed by President Barack Obama, a poll showed Monday.
A total of 62.9 percent of physicians who participated in the survey by the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) said they favored a public option, or government insurance plan, against 27.3 percent backing a private system alone.
Another 9.6 percent favored a completely government-owned health care coverage system.
"It's clear that the majority of US physicians support both public and private options to expand coverage," NEJM said, noting that between 52 and 69 percent of Americans favor a supplemental public option.
The journal described physicians as "critical stakeholders" in health care reform.
Obama has vowed to pass legislation by the end of the year that would spread coverage to America's 47 million uninsured by making insurance obligatory and affordable for all.
But he has faced strong criticism, especially from Republicans, who have jumped on the 900-billion-dollar price tag and stoked fears that a mooted public option would lead to a federal takeover of health care -- anathema to many Americans who abhor the idea of big government.
The NEJM poll found that 58.3 percent of physicians favor expanding Medicare, the public health insurance plan for seniors over 65 years old, to people aged 55 and over.
This option is among a set of proposals being considered by the Senate Finance Committee, which has played a key role in legislating the health reform plan.
In the traditionally more conservative South, 58.9 percent of US physicians favored a public option, compared to 69.7 percent in the generally more progressive Northeast.
NEJM surveyed 2,130 general physicians, specialists and surgeons who work in a private practice or with hospital groups.
A Washington Post-ABC News opinion poll meanwhile showed Americans remained almost deadlocked in their opinion of the health care initiative, with 46 percent in favor of the proposed changes and 48 percent opposed.
There are far to many poor and middle class families out there without health insurance.
I wish they would just hurry up and figure it out, get the damn thing passed already.
Doesn't matter if the government sucks at running it, or losses money running it, we can just print more money to fund it, i'm completely serious, it works for everything else in this country that fails, so why not healthcare as well?
There are far to many poor and middle class families out there without health insurance.
I wish they would just hurry up and figure it out, get the damn thing passed already.
Doesn't matter if the government sucks at running it, or losses money running it, we can just print more money to fund it, i'm completely serious, it works for everything else in this country that fails, so why not healthcare as well?
I know this is harsh but one hopes you one day really will need your insurance, and they then cut you off halfway through your treatment and leaves you with 80.000 + $ in debt.
I wonder what you will say then.
I know this is harsh but one hopes you one day really will need your insurance, and they then cut you off halfway through your treatment and leaves you with 80.000 + $ in debt.
I wonder what you will say then.
-----------
unscientific isnt it?
participation was voluntary. those who participated felt strong enough to do so
aeternus - you cant keep printing money without dire consequences. we've gotten away with it so far but wont forever. however, how is it the right of an american citizen to receive healthcare. we have a "right" to equal access to healthcare (part of pursuit of happiness) but we dont have a right to the product
doesnt matter...the public option is dead on arrival
lift the intrastate barriers and competition will bring prices down provided government regulates against collusion and price fixing (we cant trust that either)
-----------
unscientific isnt it?
participation was voluntary. those who participated felt strong enough to do so
aeternus - you cant keep printing money without dire consequences. we've gotten away with it so far but wont forever. however, how is it the right of an american citizen to receive healthcare. we have a "right" to equal access to healthcare (part of pursuit of happiness) but we dont have a right to the product
doesnt matter...the public option is dead on arrival
lift the intrastate barriers and competition will bring prices down provided government regulates against collusion and price fixing (we cant trust that either)
As usual you get the point of an argument. Obviously i do not wish Cd329 go down with cancer or what not, however he seems totally ignorant as to what is going on with people who "think" they have health coverage only to be cut of the funding half way through.
As usual you get the point of an argument. Obviously i do not wish Cd329 go down with cancer or what not, however he seems totally ignorant as to what is going on with people who "think" they have health coverage only to be cut of the funding half way through.
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
