IDENTIFICATION: At least 90% of all comparable words must be very similar aurally and spectrally, producing not less than twenty (20) matching words. The voice samples must not be more than six (6) years apart.
PROBABLE IDENTIFICATION: At least 80% of the comparable words must be very similar aurally and spectrally, producing not less than fifteen (15) matching words.
POSSIBLE IDENTIFICATION: At least 80% of comparable words must be very similar aurally and spectrally, producing not less than ten (10) matching words.
INCONCLUSIVE: Falls below either the Possible Identification or Possible Elimination confidence levels and/or the examiner does not believe a meaningful decision is obtainable due to various limiting factors.
POSSIBLE ELIMINATION: At least 80% of comparable words must be very dissimilar aurally and spectrally, producing not less than ten (10) words that do not match.
PROBABLE ELIMINATION: At least 80% of the comparable words must be dissimilar aurally and spectrally, producing not less than fifteen (15) words that do not match.
ELIMINATION: At least 90% of the comparable words must be very dissimilar aurally and spectrally, producing not less than twenty (20) words that do not match.”

If these are the criteria, then 48% would be inconclusive. It seems odd that Tom Owen would state an opinion that it was Zimmerman’s voice.

Depeche,cashin and myself are not arguing ..we are having a discussion ...

D,enlighten me on the methodology and/or results..maybe I don't understand ...

Pretty hard to dispute this.

Video

Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

This case has corruption written all over it.
That’s why they said there wasn’t enough evidence and
Angela Corey took over the case.

Except for the simple fact that witness statements corroborate Zimmerman's account of the events.

MINOR DETAIL

D, what I'm saying is, it's my understanding ,that the technique of voice ID by means of aural and spectrograpgic comparison is still an unsettled topic in Law ...

..and if it were admitted by a judge.. it's effect would depend on how much weight the judge would assign to this as evidence...in his instrustions to the jury...

Audio Experts: Voice Crying For Help on Trayvon Martin 911 Tape NOT George Zimmerman

The new reports, from the Orlando Sentinel,  also says:

Owen, a court-qualified expert witness and former chief engineer for the New York Public Library's Rodgers and Hammerstein Archives of Recorded Sound, is an authority on biometric voice analysis — a computerized process comparing attributes of voices to determine whether they match.

After the Sentinel contacted Owen, he used software called Easy Voice Biometrics to compare Zimmerman's voice to the 911 call screams.

my guess is you wont listen to anything that doesn't fit with your projections of what you think happened.

But if you heard something from 'early on' that went agaisnt Zimmerman you will no doubt not dispute that. Right?

The 911 call is from 'early on' does that make it suspect as well?

Oh the irony.

First off, I'm not disputing the 911 call. I am disputing the notion that just because something came out 'early on' does not make it bad information.

Second, I would think that Trayvons father would be more focused in the first few days after the incident. More importantly there is a higher chance that he would be forthright.

He and Trayvons public image have more to gain after the gangster stuff came out about Trayvon. So I could see them changing their story to try to make him look more like a saint.

Thats why the medical evidence that hasn't been released is soo  very important to me.

If Zimmerman truely had a bloody/broken nose and cuts on the back of his head then common sense tells me, combined with Trayvons fathers denial, that it was Zimmerman who was screaming and not Trayvon.

I

Please show me how I ignored evidence.

All of the opposite side of me invokes merely projections and ignores common sense.

FWIW

Early on, when this story came out and before I had a chance to do my own personal investigation based on whats out there, I was actually on the other side.

I actually changed sides based on what I learned about the case.

In my heart of hearts, I am 98% convinced that Zimmerman is telling the truth. And when the medical comes out that shows that he had a broken/bloody nose and lacerations on the back of his head that will convince me the last 2%.

To me it makes more sense that Zimmerman is screaming for help rather than Treyvon.

Yes, I'm sure thats it.

Quote Originally Posted by ilsp2003:






1) where and when did Trayvon's father say that the voice on 911 tape
calling for help was not Trayvon's voice ?


2)
Thats why the medical evidence that hasn't been released is soo  very important to me.


dude relax

you are making this murder case a personal issue

are you related to George Zimmerman ?

or

are you a friend with a "gut feeling" like Joe Oliver ?

you are entitled to your own  opinion not your  own facts

for the sake of justice, the facts are important

 
3) If Zimmerman truely had a bloody/broken nose and cuts on the back of his head then common sense tells me, combined with Trayvons fathers denial, that it was Zimmerman who was screaming and not Trayvon.


Stanford Police video of Zimmerman's arrest shows no blood stains, no evidence of Broken nose

the paramedics cleaned him up ?

what does your common sense have to do with the investigation

again dude  please relax 

Relax?

I'm not the one who has to fear for his life/job. Zimmerman and Joe Oliver do. Or anyone that speaks out for Zimmerman.

Notice that no one threatens Mary Cutcher or any of the other witnesses?

Its the people on your side that need to relax not mine!

Exibit A

DJBrow

What’s funny is that detective Chris Serino who created an
affidavit, already investigated Zimmerman’s account,
reviewed witness accounts, reviewed all the evidence and
wanted to charge Zimmerman with Manslaughter. Then
a conversation between Sanford police Chief Bill Lee,
Capt. Robert O’Connor, and State Attorney Norm Wolfinger,
the decision was made to "cut Zimmerman loose.”
I believe State Attorney Norm Wolfinger had a relationship with
Zimmerman’ s father a retired Supreme Court Magistrate Judge
and his mother a court clerk.
Like I said, this case has corruption written all over it.
That’s why they said there wasn’t enough evidence and
Angela Corey took over the case.
What’s sad is that they could have already destroyed all the evidence
and NO matter what Angela Corey, the FBI, and detectives come up
with it might just be too late.

Rife with speculation and projections with no evidence to even hint of supporting.

Let me also add DJbrow that I haven't seen post what side you're on. Is it because you lack the stones or because you are secretly on Zimmermans/the evidence side and don't want to dissapoint your fellow liberals.