The rest of that post doesn't have anything to do with the
thread topic therefore I don't give a rats fuc k about it.
At what point in this holding of the Pennsylvania's federal court decision
do you have the stupidity to type: it may technically be unconstitutional to teach
ID in school has nothing to do with what someones opinion...
It is unconstitutional
I never asked for your opinion on anything..... I don't give a garbage what you're opinion is of this law.... Your opinion does not matter, what matters is the law...
MODS and gentlemen of covers how clear is this holding that it is against the US Constitution to teach Intelligent Design in a public school biology classroom:
Judge John Edward Jones III:
(Not only is Mr. Jones III a devout Lutheran, he is a republican appointed by Bush..)
"Teaching intelligent design in public school biology classes violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States (and Article I, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania State Constitution) because intelligent design is not science and "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents."
The rest of that post doesn't have anything to do with the
thread topic therefore I don't give a rats fuc k about it.
At what point in this holding of the Pennsylvania's federal court decision
do you have the stupidity to type: it may technically be unconstitutional to teach
ID in school has nothing to do with what someones opinion...
It is unconstitutional
I never asked for your opinion on anything..... I don't give a garbage what you're opinion is of this law.... Your opinion does not matter, what matters is the law...
MODS and gentlemen of covers how clear is this holding that it is against the US Constitution to teach Intelligent Design in a public school biology classroom:
Judge John Edward Jones III:
(Not only is Mr. Jones III a devout Lutheran, he is a republican appointed by Bush..)
"Teaching intelligent design in public school biology classes violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States (and Article I, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania State Constitution) because intelligent design is not science and "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents."
Bowlsit.....,
Have you ever been adjudicated mentally defective (which includes a determination by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority that you are a danger to yourself or to others or are incompetent to manage your own affairs) OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution?
Your question should read..........
Why the need to make this thread at all SINCE it is so cut and dry unconstitutional?
NOT IF... You stupid piece of shi t 
How many times do we need to go over this.........................
The sad thing is you STILL DON'T GET IT after countless re postings of this holding..........
You can't be serious. Like critical thinking has anything to do with this in the least. "Now, that I think critically about this, that jesus character must be the real deal.........."
ID is the absence of critical thinking. It is indoctrination.
You can't be serious. Like critical thinking has anything to do with this in the least. "Now, that I think critically about this, that jesus character must be the real deal.........."
ID is the absence of critical thinking. It is indoctrination.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
