And as far as independent thoughts....DL36 even praised me for such a few years ago on my article on my idea to deal with the yearly flooding in the Midwest. You or he cannot take that back. That was back far enough in his history that you could believe most of what he says unlike now, when he chooses to sacrifice integrity for popularity.
Please tell me this was said in parody. Please please tell me that your response to being considered a right wing lemming isn't that DL36 said five years ago that he liked your appraoch to solving the flooding in the Midwest.
Please.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
And as far as independent thoughts....DL36 even praised me for such a few years ago on my article on my idea to deal with the yearly flooding in the Midwest. You or he cannot take that back. That was back far enough in his history that you could believe most of what he says unlike now, when he chooses to sacrifice integrity for popularity.
Please tell me this was said in parody. Please please tell me that your response to being considered a right wing lemming isn't that DL36 said five years ago that he liked your appraoch to solving the flooding in the Midwest.
Please tell me this was said in parody. Please please tell me that your response to being considered a right wing lemming isn't that DL36 said five years ago that he liked your appraoch to solving the flooding in the Midwest.
Please.
Why are you getting independent thinking confused with party affiliation?
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Please tell me this was said in parody. Please please tell me that your response to being considered a right wing lemming isn't that DL36 said five years ago that he liked your appraoch to solving the flooding in the Midwest.
Please.
Why are you getting independent thinking confused with party affiliation?
One of the arguments used against FOX News is they use the phrase "Fair and Balanced."
I was reading one of Scal's threads in the Penalty Box about the George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin shooting. He scolded FOX News for having George Zimmerman on to tell his side of the story.
The reason I'm bringing it up is because FOX had Trayvon's parents on. More than once. Bowlslit said something important in that thread that made me think on why FOX is #1.
Zimmerman went on FOX because he knew he would be treated fair.
Trayvon's parents also went on FOX because they knew they would be treated fair.
0
One of the arguments used against FOX News is they use the phrase "Fair and Balanced."
I was reading one of Scal's threads in the Penalty Box about the George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin shooting. He scolded FOX News for having George Zimmerman on to tell his side of the story.
The reason I'm bringing it up is because FOX had Trayvon's parents on. More than once. Bowlslit said something important in that thread that made me think on why FOX is #1.
Zimmerman went on FOX because he knew he would be treated fair.
Trayvon's parents also went on FOX because they knew they would be treated fair.
If you notice, I paint most news as biased. You are too busy parroting Faux to do such a thing.
Surely I could find a video of Faux berating some liberal guest, and MostShamefulNewsBC treating a guest well, but you and Can would claim it was doctored.
Too bad Jim Carey and Jeff Daniels took your roles or you could be
0
Haha.
If you notice, I paint most news as biased. You are too busy parroting Faux to do such a thing.
Surely I could find a video of Faux berating some liberal guest, and MostShamefulNewsBC treating a guest well, but you and Can would claim it was doctored.
Too bad Jim Carey and Jeff Daniels took your roles or you could be
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.