Posted:
#26
They were both warned over and over. I seriously doubt DJ did since he has never banned anybody. Had to be the higher power.
The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth
Posted:
#29
Quote Originally Posted by BIGfnPOO:
starwink and shrimpy are 1 and the same friends...
Ya know buddy that crossed my mind ,xcept one thing though,Shrimp knew Md.starwink and shrimpy are 1 and the same friends...
and then that begs the question why he would give out his personal info, though i never checked it.So in conclusion i highly doubt it.BUTT if you are correct all i can say is 
x 100
Posted:
#30
Quote Originally Posted by BIGfnPOO:
starwink and shrimpy are 1 and the same friends...
starwink and shrimpy are 1 and the same friends...
Mayor this stuff has been going around a long time. Shrimp once told me PDad, Starwinks and Greyhound were the same person. I have talked to Shrimp on the phone before and believe he is one person. There was a thread this morning from Shrimp1958 blaming WSC for all this so I don't know who it was because it was zapped pretty quick.
Posted:
#31
Quote Originally Posted by Kurshka:
Mayor this stuff has been going around a long time. Shrimp once told me PDad, Starwinks and Greyhound were the same person. I have talked to Shrimp on the phone before and believe he is one person. There was a thread this morning from Shrimp1958 blaming WSC for all this so I don't know who it was because it was zapped pretty quick.
Posted:
#33
Shrimp posted starqueer's town and 1st name.Then he fiqured it was ok to post Shrimps exact address, place of employment telephone # and how many pimples he had on his azz.Meanwhile C.T. viewed the whole thing and NOW they claim that they are doing the just thing.
The whole has a lot to do with starqueers accusation that Shrimp gave his personal info to someone... me, dont know if after it was pointed out to him that i was not on his friends list if he insisted that it was someone else then.On these pages, and it's here some where Shrimp POSTED that he sent me a friends request and i explained that i'm just not that into it and i'm really not that pc literate and hoped he would understand.Which he did.We have al read the back - forth between them and i have come to believe Shrimp is right that SQUEER is in fact some kind of paranoid malajusted pc ego freak.Whe Shrimp says he never gave starqueers info out,i believe him.He has no proof that he did.Dude became a stalker.He then accused him of stealing plays from a service,whom did C.T. think he was refering to I know they dont care but whom ever is responsible for his banning is wrong, and this chit we done what is rightand we are just following the rules is bs.Eat my peter gently.
The whole has a lot to do with starqueers accusation that Shrimp gave his personal info to someone... me, dont know if after it was pointed out to him that i was not on his friends list if he insisted that it was someone else then.On these pages, and it's here some where Shrimp POSTED that he sent me a friends request and i explained that i'm just not that into it and i'm really not that pc literate and hoped he would understand.Which he did.We have al read the back - forth between them and i have come to believe Shrimp is right that SQUEER is in fact some kind of paranoid malajusted pc ego freak.Whe Shrimp says he never gave starqueers info out,i believe him.He has no proof that he did.Dude became a stalker.He then accused him of stealing plays from a service,whom did C.T. think he was refering to I know they dont care but whom ever is responsible for his banning is wrong, and this chit we done what is rightand we are just following the rules is bs.Eat my peter gently.
Posted:
#42
Quote Originally Posted by starwink:
Why do you suppose a drunk like me can have so much influence over a productive member like yourself?
And a long time moderator like WSC, is also in collusion, to ban such a valuable member as yourself!!!
Covers.com would have to review the record of such a valuable member as you before it would even consider eliminating the contributions you have given this site.
Why do you suppose a drunk like me can have so much influence over a productive member like yourself?
And a long time moderator like WSC, is also in collusion, to ban such a valuable member as yourself!!!
Covers.com would have to review the record of such a valuable member as you before it would even consider eliminating the contributions you have given this site.
Thanks for Bumping this post!
This was always my FAVORITE Starwink Comment.
It always made me wonder
Posted:
#45
Quote Originally Posted by starwink:
BWS and his crew seems to have gravitated to the Penalty Box. What is up with that my brother?
BWS and his crew seems to have gravitated to the Penalty Box. What is up with that my brother?
Posted in 2014.
The Giant hasn't posted since 2010.
https://www.covers.com/forum/profile/thegiant-182695
Once again, the numbers don't lie............
But Cranky Starwink sure does!
Posted:
#49
Quote Originally Posted by imsomeoneelse:
i got a few secrets up my sleeve,,,,,,,,,,part of this post is true, part of it,,,not all
The only part that could possibly be true would be that starwink and pgdad were the same. I’m not saying they were the same, just saying that nothing else in my post could have been true
bigreds daddy
Posted:
#50
Oh wow
I haven’t heard these names in a long time.
Three truths;
1) Wall had nothing to do with any of this.
2) The aforementioned posters were not the same person.
3) The Walrus was Paul.
Super Bowl thoughts?
I want credit for calling the Bengals preseason but I also called for the Giants to collapse and they knocked my Vikes out. As the song goes, isn’t it ironic…
Hot Forum Topics
