Posted:
#76
I'm not sure why everyone's screaming bloody murder. Other than the Wyoming play, jdn's numbers are close to the current line.
0
NCAA FOOTBALL Week 2 (13-5-1 YTD 72.222%)
Posted:
#80
Quote Originally Posted by nc1capper:
Wyoming at 20 does not exist - don't know you guy but it seems you just make these numbers up to suit you - it's kind of annoying for the rest of the posters
Wyoming at 20 does not exist - don't know you guy but it seems you just make these numbers up to suit you - it's kind of annoying for the rest of the posters
Really? 4 pages in and people are still saying this? Feels like Groundhog Day.
There's no point even pointing these morons in the direction of the answer now.. better we all just stop now or it will be a lifetime job.
If they're not going to read the thread, then we shouldn't be reading their replies.
There's no point even pointing these morons in the direction of the answer now.. better we all just stop now or it will be a lifetime job.
If they're not going to read the thread, then we shouldn't be reading their replies.
0
Posted:
#81
It's called early lines, dude, and if he made it all up then he is an absolute criminal mastermind, because he must've hacked into the accounts of those of us who tail him and grab the early lines right behind him.
Seriously, on behalf of us here to tail or check in on JDN's tips/analysis, just stay the fk out. None of the regular readers care what you believe, and you're getting in the way of what we DID come to read.
0
Posted:
#82
Quote Originally Posted by nc1capper:
Wyoming at 20 does not exist - don't know you guy but it seems you just make these numbers up to suit you - it's kind of annoying for the rest of the posters
fukk you guy. I've said it 100 times and ill say it 100 more times. I post the lines in a separate thread. Betonline.ag is where that line was posted. I posted that line sunday at 2pm. Many were able to get it before it rose to 23,24 and now 27. If you were giving you're best you would have looked ahead to week two and been prepared to jump on a weak line, as i was. Wyoming at 20 does not exist - don't know you guy but it seems you just make these numbers up to suit you - it's kind of annoying for the rest of the posters
Wyo -20 did exist, and you too could have gotten it, as i posted it and where to purchase it. For all to see.
0
Posted:
#85
JDN isn't the only user on here who confirms betting it at -20 or -21 at BetOnline, and I saw it myself on Sunday but didn't put the bets down until later in the night, to my own dismay on the Wyo line.
For the last time, BOL opened it at -20, third-party site reports don't trump what plenty of users saw, and bet, on the official site itself.
Is there an echo in here or what? FFS, already.
0
Posted:
#86
As an addition..i do notice you get very defensive when someone questions your lines..some of these lines may be available to a select few very large bettors as "feelers" put out for books. They may be available for a very short times but not to general public and certainly not to anyone posting on this site.
The easiest way to keep negativity off this site and to offer credibility to yourself would be to post a photo of your Wyoming betting slip..My guess is we will never see this, only more defensive comments..
I by the way did bet Wyoming at the opening generous number of 24.5..good luck with your wagers...
The easiest way to keep negativity off this site and to offer credibility to yourself would be to post a photo of your Wyoming betting slip..My guess is we will never see this, only more defensive comments..
I by the way did bet Wyoming at the opening generous number of 24.5..good luck with your wagers...
0
Posted:
#87
Whisperman--
The "official" opener & what numbers were a available are not always the same
Get on betonline next Sunday @ 2:45 eastern & watch the lines for yourself, I personally got 21.5 with Wyoming (not 20), he isn't lying about his numbers, they were all available for the taking, many moved 3-5 points, I saw Wyoming at 23.5 & then it went to 21, I missed the 21 & grabbed 21.5, anyone can do this basic stuff, it's not science, just requires some effort
The "official" opener & what numbers were a available are not always the same
Get on betonline next Sunday @ 2:45 eastern & watch the lines for yourself, I personally got 21.5 with Wyoming (not 20), he isn't lying about his numbers, they were all available for the taking, many moved 3-5 points, I saw Wyoming at 23.5 & then it went to 21, I missed the 21 & grabbed 21.5, anyone can do this basic stuff, it's not science, just requires some effort
.
0
Posted:
#89
Sorry if I missed it, but are these lines originally from 5Dimes (which is what I use) or Betonline? I saw your other post, that is why I am asking.
On a side note, I don't know why people are hating at all. You help people out with picks who have no clue otherwise, people don't have to read your threads, tail you or anything of the sort. Thought you had to be a grown behind man (or woman) to bet, so why are there so many cry babies (pardon my obscene vernacular) on here?
Thanks for posting. And if you decide to pull a Gilmo, and go to Twitter, I will follow.
On a side note, I don't know why people are hating at all. You help people out with picks who have no clue otherwise, people don't have to read your threads, tail you or anything of the sort. Thought you had to be a grown behind man (or woman) to bet, so why are there so many cry babies (pardon my obscene vernacular) on here?
Thanks for posting. And if you decide to pull a Gilmo, and go to Twitter, I will follow.
0
Posted:
#90
Quote Originally Posted by whisperman:
As an addition..i do notice you get very defensive when someone questions your lines..some of these lines may be available to a select few very large bettors as "feelers" put out for books. They may be available for a very short times but not to general public and certainly not to anyone posting on this site.
The easiest way to keep negativity off this site and to offer credibility to yourself would be to post a photo of your Wyoming betting slip..My guess is we will never see this, only more defensive comments..
I by the way did bet Wyoming at the opening generous number of 24.5..good luck with your wagers...
As an addition..i do notice you get very defensive when someone questions your lines..some of these lines may be available to a select few very large bettors as "feelers" put out for books. They may be available for a very short times but not to general public and certainly not to anyone posting on this site.
The easiest way to keep negativity off this site and to offer credibility to yourself would be to post a photo of your Wyoming betting slip..My guess is we will never see this, only more defensive comments..
I by the way did bet Wyoming at the opening generous number of 24.5..good luck with your wagers...
- Ticket Number:
- 241618954
- Accepted Date:
- 9/1/2013 - EST
- Graded Date:
- 1/1/0001
- Wager Type:
- Spread (or run line)
- Wager Status:
- Pending
- Risk:
- $66.00 (USD)
- To Win Amount:
- $60.00 (USD)
- Description:
-
Football - NCAA - Idaho vs. Wyoming - Wyoming
- Item #:
- 1
- Wager Type:
- Spread
- Outcome:
- Pending
- Sport / Period:
- Football NCAA / Game
- Line:
- Football - NCAA - Idaho vs. Wyoming - Wyoming 9/7/2013 8:00:01 PM- (EST)
-20 -110
0
Posted:
#92
Quote Originally Posted by whisperman:
As an addition..i do notice you get very defensive when someone questions your lines..some of these lines may be available to a select few very large bettors as "feelers" put out for books. They may be available for a very short times but not to general public and certainly not to anyone posting on this site.
As an addition..i do notice you get very defensive when someone questions your lines..some of these lines may be available to a select few very large bettors as "feelers" put out for books. They may be available for a very short times but not to general public and certainly not to anyone posting on this site.
This statement is 100% wrong, and the JDN (and many others) are 'defensive' is because box like you just keep sprouting the same garbage, no matter how times the simple facts are provided to you. You, for instance, will probably completely ignore WahooS' reply, too, and that's why we're all sick of people like you wasting so much time in here. No one who tails JDN is going to stop, and none of you trolls are going to ever say 'oops, my bad, shoulda got my facts in order first', so it goes on and on.
You trolls really need to find something else to do.
0
gives you.. and use it or lose it but don't turn his thread into your mess. Research these games for all of us takes time and effort, which some of us don't always have...thanks jd
Posted:
#94
Quote Originally Posted by jdnmoney:
I learned alot of things over the weekend. mostly i learned that that a 13-5 week is considered garbage around here, and posting winners up to 70 days in advance is not good enough.
I learned alot of things over the weekend. mostly i learned that that a 13-5 week is considered garbage around here, and posting winners up to 70 days in advance is not good enough.
i continue to be amazed that i post links to my previous threads, post lines that need to be pounded right away, and post where to bet them. I post winning plays so far in advance that anyone can play them, and not just day of the game 15 minutes before kickoff.
I cannot believe that someone felt the need to call out my integrity on the forum. i am as accountable as anyone around here and i am committed to providing insightful analysis and winning plays.
I do have a chip on my shoulder because i see many people who post 60% winning claims but have yet to post any plays on covers. or they say they have been good for "years" but there record reflects otherwise. I have a hard enough time filtering through the garbage around this forum, and i really was offended to get roped into people thinking my claims, lines and winning % is a fallacy.
all i can say is that i will continue to provide any insight on plays that i can, along with continuing to work hard to advise winning plays here on the forum.
JD....just keep up the good work brother and dont let the haters get to u....if u post the kickoff classic play for 2014 right after the bcs championship this year u will still get crap about it,lol...just as if u wait until 5 min before kickoff,same crap lol....dont worry about the haters...just keep doing your work as usual and let your % speak for themselves....
0
Posted:
#95
Agreed, don't let these happy behind person suckers ever convince you to stop sharing your very much appreciated hard work and generosity with the silent majority
They prove that the broken axel is always the loudest.
Everyone who has a brain and understands basic line-shopping knows what's up.
0
Posted:
#96
Quote Originally Posted by MoonBoy:
Agreed, don't let these happy behind person suckers ever convince you to stop sharing your very much appreciated hard work and generosity with the silent majority
Agreed, don't let these happy behind person suckers ever convince you to stop sharing your very much appreciated hard work and generosity with the silent majority
They prove that the broken axel is always the loudest.
Everyone who has a brain and understands basic line-shopping knows what's up.
0
Posted:
#97
Quote Originally Posted by jdnmoney:
I learned alot of things over the weekend. mostly i learned that that a 13-5 week is considered garbage around here, and posting winners up to 70 days in advance is not good enough.
I learned alot of things over the weekend. mostly i learned that that a 13-5 week is considered garbage around here, and posting winners up to 70 days in advance is not good enough.
i continue to be amazed that i post links to my previous threads, post lines that need to be pounded right away, and post where to bet them. I post winning plays so far in advance that anyone can play them, and not just day of the game 15 minutes before kickoff.
I cannot believe that someone felt the need to call out my integrity on the forum. i am as accountable as anyone around here and i am committed to providing insightful analysis and winning plays.
I do have a chip on my shoulder because i see many people who post 60% winning claims but have yet to post any plays on covers. or they say they have been good for "years" but there record reflects otherwise. I have a hard enough time filtering through the garbage around this forum, and i really was offended to get roped into people thinking my claims, lines and winning % is a fallacy.
all i can say is that i will continue to provide any insight on plays that i can, along with continuing to work hard to advise winning plays here on the forum.
Just when the dust seems to have settled, the morons flock in like herds of sheep. Keep up the good work. If 70% isn't good enough for them, they'll eventually run somewhere else.
jdn0
Posted:
#100
MoneyMan! It looks like you had a pretty successful Week 1! Congrats! I love counting money as well! I went 4-1 with a bad call on SMU. I thought the Home Field might help them out!
I wish I could have gotten Wyoming at -20 but my book has it at -28 now and I played it at that. Wyoming is going to come out on a vengeance Saturday after a very close, hard fought loss. I feel sorry for Idaho. Wyoming -28 (2 Units)
These are a couple plays I made but I don't know if you're interested.
USA vs Tulane -6 (4 Units) - I plan on fading USA every week. They have WKy next week. This game will be beyond brutal. Trust me, I live in Mobile, AL. Tulane looks very improved and USA lost to a sub-division team....
Western Kentucky +13.5 vs Tennesse (2 Units) - I'm kind of iffy on this one but I think Petrino can expose any team when given the chance.
Tenative: Under 48.5 on Friday Nights WF vs BC game!
I really want to play Texas -7 and Miami +3 but I hope I can hold off the demons.
Also, you don't have to explain anything to these cats who follow you then hate you! They submitted the picks. You didn't make them. I wouldn't explain anything to anyone if I were you! JUST KEEP WINNING!! Winning shuts everyone up!
A saying I heard a long time ago is, "Don't argue with ignorance, because people make mistake you for the ignorant one!"
Let's Tax These Bookies!! RTR
0
Hot Forum Topics
