Look at today's openers versus my projections. If u could have gotten those openers. Once all of today's games go final, I'll run tomorrow's. Falcon Sports
Confused
How can they be YOUR projections? How can you compare theirs to yours?
You have been saying REPEATEDLY you just post "his" plays
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
Quote Originally Posted by MITM:
Look at today's openers versus my projections. If u could have gotten those openers. Once all of today's games go final, I'll run tomorrow's. Falcon Sports
Confused
How can they be YOUR projections? How can you compare theirs to yours?
You have been saying REPEATEDLY you just post "his" plays
Thanks Bitters, it's all in good fun and a little boredom on a Sunday afternoon. A few more days and it's back to the grind for most.
I've had this NBA Mathematical Formula for Totals for several years now but I've made adjustments to make it very current. 80% very current data, 20% season long data.
Still looking like just three Plays, although Minnesota is a 1/2pt away.
I've got Mondays Totals posted, when they put the lines up, check out the ones with a 5pt difference.
The books could put out the best Mathematical Total if they wanted too but they do not. They put out the best perceived Total. It's my opinion that true mathematics should beat them about 56-58% of the time.
GL
Falcon Sports
@Bitters
Thanks Bitters, it's all in good fun and a little boredom on a Sunday afternoon. A few more days and it's back to the grind for most.
I've had this NBA Mathematical Formula for Totals for several years now but I've made adjustments to make it very current. 80% very current data, 20% season long data.
Still looking like just three Plays, although Minnesota is a 1/2pt away.
I've got Mondays Totals posted, when they put the lines up, check out the ones with a 5pt difference.
The books could put out the best Mathematical Total if they wanted too but they do not. They put out the best perceived Total. It's my opinion that true mathematics should beat them about 56-58% of the time.
Let's talk some nba totals, refer to my numbers in post #1 in thread. There u will find the NBA totals generated by my Mathematical Formula. Compare to books number and look for a 5pt difference.
I've managed to make 3 Plays.
Boston Under 233 (projected 228)
OKC Under 233 (projected 228)
Houston Over 215.5 (projected 221)
GL
Falcon Sports
Is this guy a cop?
Let's talk some nba totals, refer to my numbers in post #1 in thread. There u will find the NBA totals generated by my Mathematical Formula. Compare to books number and look for a 5pt difference.
We usually hit a few of these on the nose. Look at the first final on Sunday. There was 203pts scored, the line on this game opened 211. My projection for this game was (203.59). We basically hit this one dead on. The Under should have been played down to 208.5 as I use a 5pt difference. Pretty good on this first one.
Falcon Sports
We usually hit a few of these on the nose. Look at the first final on Sunday. There was 203pts scored, the line on this game opened 211. My projection for this game was (203.59). We basically hit this one dead on. The Under should have been played down to 208.5 as I use a 5pt difference. Pretty good on this first one.
If u had played against Sundays openers, this would have been your Sunday card.
Orlando Under 211
Boston Under 234
Toronto Over 235.5
Houston Over 215.5
Now u can grade that. Notice OKC Under was not a Play off the openers. They opened that at 228, it did not become a Play until it hit 233. This kind of worries me.
Does anyone understand this or is interested in it.
Falcon Sports
If u had played against Sundays openers, this would have been your Sunday card.
Orlando Under 211
Boston Under 234
Toronto Over 235.5
Houston Over 215.5
Now u can grade that. Notice OKC Under was not a Play off the openers. They opened that at 228, it did not become a Play until it hit 233. This kind of worries me.
Does anyone understand this or is interested in it.
Hot Forum Topics
