I seem to remember him being an absolute trainwreck, way worse than Trump. I also remember being upset that such an incompetent fool was in the White House but holy shit, I didn't post on a forum dozens of times day, day after day. Liberals are really showing themselves as bad losers. That's all.
Self-reliance is more important than artificial intelligence.
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I seem to remember him being an absolute trainwreck, way worse than Trump. I also remember being upset that such an incompetent fool was in the White House but holy shit, I didn't post on a forum dozens of times day, day after day. Liberals are really showing themselves as bad losers. That's all.
Clinton is usually ranked among the best 20 presidents in various surveys of historians because of strong economic management and high public approval. For examples, American political science association, C-span and Siena college. Based on job performance, Trump is ranked among the worst presidents in US history.
1
Clinton is usually ranked among the best 20 presidents in various surveys of historians because of strong economic management and high public approval. For examples, American political science association, C-span and Siena college. Based on job performance, Trump is ranked among the worst presidents in US history.
I seem to remember him being an absolute trainwreck, way worse than Trump. I also remember being upset that such an incompetent fool was in the White House but holy shit, I didn't post on a forum dozens of times day, day after day. Liberals are really showing themselves as bad losers. That's all.
It's called Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's a real thing..
5
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues:
I seem to remember him being an absolute trainwreck, way worse than Trump. I also remember being upset that such an incompetent fool was in the White House but holy shit, I didn't post on a forum dozens of times day, day after day. Liberals are really showing themselves as bad losers. That's all.
It's called Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's a real thing..
I seem to remember him being an absolute trainwreck, way worse than Trump. I also remember being upset that such an incompetent fool was in the White House but holy shit, I didn't post on a forum dozens of times day, day after day. Liberals are really showing themselves as bad losers. That's all.
Holy shit! You're funny. Sore losers??
We didn't storm the fucking Capital now did we?
No, no that was you deplorables that did that shit, right?
3
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues:
I seem to remember him being an absolute trainwreck, way worse than Trump. I also remember being upset that such an incompetent fool was in the White House but holy shit, I didn't post on a forum dozens of times day, day after day. Liberals are really showing themselves as bad losers. That's all.
Holy shit! You're funny. Sore losers??
We didn't storm the fucking Capital now did we?
No, no that was you deplorables that did that shit, right?
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues: I seem to remember him being an absolute trainwreck, way worse than Trump. I also remember being upset that such an incompetent fool was in the White House but holy shit, I didn't post on a forum dozens of times day, day after day. Liberals are really showing themselves as bad losers. That's all. It's called Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's a real thing..
Sorry pal its called TSHS (TRUMP SUCK HOLE SYNDROME) where no matter what trump does, magas love it. Really is funny to see so many people in love with one of the greatest con artists the world has ever seen.
Someday you might wake up rush, like so many magas are now doing
2
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues: I seem to remember him being an absolute trainwreck, way worse than Trump. I also remember being upset that such an incompetent fool was in the White House but holy shit, I didn't post on a forum dozens of times day, day after day. Liberals are really showing themselves as bad losers. That's all. It's called Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's a real thing..
Sorry pal its called TSHS (TRUMP SUCK HOLE SYNDROME) where no matter what trump does, magas love it. Really is funny to see so many people in love with one of the greatest con artists the world has ever seen.
Someday you might wake up rush, like so many magas are now doing
@Rush51 Trump is low life scum. The fact you can't see that shows you have been brainwashed and conned. This is way past democrats and republicans cause they used to work together and cross the aisle. Trump has no redeeming qualities and only cares for himself and family with some wealthy friends mixed in. Not sure how you don't get tired of his dumb a$$ already but it definitely says alot about it if you are using tired $HIT Like TDS
Not only are they brain washed by their idol trump who they consider a God, they have the exact same awful human traits as trump. Thats the real reason they love him, cause all the nasty evil things he does everyday, they would do the exact same things.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Brooklyncapper:
@Rush51 Trump is low life scum. The fact you can't see that shows you have been brainwashed and conned. This is way past democrats and republicans cause they used to work together and cross the aisle. Trump has no redeeming qualities and only cares for himself and family with some wealthy friends mixed in. Not sure how you don't get tired of his dumb a$$ already but it definitely says alot about it if you are using tired $HIT Like TDS
Not only are they brain washed by their idol trump who they consider a God, they have the exact same awful human traits as trump. Thats the real reason they love him, cause all the nasty evil things he does everyday, they would do the exact same things.
The internet was a hardly a thing while Clinton served - so no wonder you didn’t hang out on internet forums (regardless of how bad you thought he was)
Interacting on the internet first became mainstream with Web 2.0 - that was around 2004
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
The internet was a hardly a thing while Clinton served - so no wonder you didn’t hang out on internet forums (regardless of how bad you thought he was)
Interacting on the internet first became mainstream with Web 2.0 - that was around 2004
Clinton is usually ranked among the best 20 presidents in various surveys of historians because of strong economic management and high public approval. For examples, American political science association, C-span and Siena college. Based on job performance, Trump is ranked among the worst presidents in US history.
And how could a "survey" be anything but accurate? I also remember how accurate the "polls" we're during the last presidential election.
Self-reliance is more important than artificial intelligence.
2
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Clinton is usually ranked among the best 20 presidents in various surveys of historians because of strong economic management and high public approval. For examples, American political science association, C-span and Siena college. Based on job performance, Trump is ranked among the worst presidents in US history.
And how could a "survey" be anything but accurate? I also remember how accurate the "polls" we're during the last presidential election.
Can you read? I am assuming you can since you are posting in a forum....
I'll say it again slowly..... "Clinton would be considered RIGHT WING based on TODAY's politics".
As in, if you took Clinton's 90s democratic policies and put him and his policies into today's politics, everyone on the left would be calling him a right wing fascist.
Yes. True story
You will not survive here. You are not a wolf, and this is the land of wolves now...
3
@C-70Blues
Can you read? I am assuming you can since you are posting in a forum....
I'll say it again slowly..... "Clinton would be considered RIGHT WING based on TODAY's politics".
As in, if you took Clinton's 90s democratic policies and put him and his policies into today's politics, everyone on the left would be calling him a right wing fascist.
And how could a "survey" be anything but accurate?
Survey is based on abilities and accomplishments instead of popularity. Presidential experts such as historians are more knowledgeable than most Americans. Historians rank all presidents on many things. For examples, vision, intelligence, integrity, pursuit of equal justice for all, economic management, persuasion, congress relations, foreign relations, lack of mistakes, luck, moral authority, crisis management, administrative skill, performance under circumstances and others.
1
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues:
And how could a "survey" be anything but accurate?
Survey is based on abilities and accomplishments instead of popularity. Presidential experts such as historians are more knowledgeable than most Americans. Historians rank all presidents on many things. For examples, vision, intelligence, integrity, pursuit of equal justice for all, economic management, persuasion, congress relations, foreign relations, lack of mistakes, luck, moral authority, crisis management, administrative skill, performance under circumstances and others.
"Clinton would be considered RIGHT WING based on TODAY's politics". As in, if you took Clinton's 90s democratic policies and put him and his policies into today's politics, everyone on the left would be calling him a right wing fascist.
Clinton is a moderate who appeals to the middle. However Europeans see current democrats as center right and republicans as far right (fascist) on political spectrum.
1
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
"Clinton would be considered RIGHT WING based on TODAY's politics". As in, if you took Clinton's 90s democratic policies and put him and his policies into today's politics, everyone on the left would be calling him a right wing fascist.
Clinton is a moderate who appeals to the middle. However Europeans see current democrats as center right and republicans as far right (fascist) on political spectrum.
Completely irrelevant to the conversation.....who fooking cares how "europeans see". Are the Euros the "authority" now on the American political spectrum? Europe is and always has been more liberal but again, its irrelevant to the statement.
All one has to do is pull up Clinton policy from the 90s versus current DNC policy. It's night and day. Go ahead for us Third and list these out to compare.....we'll be waiting....
You will not survive here. You are not a wolf, and this is the land of wolves now...
1
@thirdperson
However Europeans see
Completely irrelevant to the conversation.....who fooking cares how "europeans see". Are the Euros the "authority" now on the American political spectrum? Europe is and always has been more liberal but again, its irrelevant to the statement.
All one has to do is pull up Clinton policy from the 90s versus current DNC policy. It's night and day. Go ahead for us Third and list these out to compare.....we'll be waiting....
Somehow I feel Monica Lewensky is reading this thread and smiling and whispering: I banged your president nine times and I've been in the oval office....call me!
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
Somehow I feel Monica Lewensky is reading this thread and smiling and whispering: I banged your president nine times and I've been in the oval office....call me!
@thirdperson However Europeans see Completely irrelevant to the conversation.....who fooking cares how "europeans see". Are the Euros the "authority" now on the American political spectrum? Europe is and always has been more liberal but again, its irrelevant to the statement. All one has to do is pull up Clinton policy from the 90s versus current DNC policy. It's night and day. Go ahead for us Third and list these out to compare.....we'll be waiting....
I think it is because our political spectrum is a lot more diverse - Denmark for instance has 11 parties in power at the moment - so we can better determine where on the political spectrum a political party is - because we have both extremes and everything inbetween - but I don’t know what I for instance could bring to the table regarding Clinton - I don’t know anything about the guy apart from the scandals around him
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
@thirdperson However Europeans see Completely irrelevant to the conversation.....who fooking cares how "europeans see". Are the Euros the "authority" now on the American political spectrum? Europe is and always has been more liberal but again, its irrelevant to the statement. All one has to do is pull up Clinton policy from the 90s versus current DNC policy. It's night and day. Go ahead for us Third and list these out to compare.....we'll be waiting....
I think it is because our political spectrum is a lot more diverse - Denmark for instance has 11 parties in power at the moment - so we can better determine where on the political spectrum a political party is - because we have both extremes and everything inbetween - but I don’t know what I for instance could bring to the table regarding Clinton - I don’t know anything about the guy apart from the scandals around him
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.