Posted:
#51
@undermysac
that is total BS if true....
CD Newsletter week 18(safe house edition)
Posted:
#54
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
I lied about this being short and expedited. I find myself now with 11 different windows open in full handicapping mode. BigD, Pantera's Yesterday Don't Mean Shit is playing at a healthy volume currently.
I lied about this being short and expedited. I find myself now with 11 different windows open in full handicapping mode. BigD, Pantera's Yesterday Don't Mean Shit is playing at a healthy volume currently.
fairly underrated album
oh and nice work on the newsletter 
Posted:
#59
Here's a nice tidbit for you guys, Icon might not like this.
The Chargers have 10 wins this year. The combined record of those teams they beat is 53-105.
The only team they beat that wasn't under .500, is the 8-8 Miami Dolphins.
When the playoffs start, I won't be able to help myself in fading the Bolts 1st rd. I do respect and like Herbert though.
I'm still looking into this LAC/DEN game now, still not sure if I take Denver but leaning hard.
The Bolts have not beaten a divisional opponent twice yet this year.
The books refusing to give the Broncos the hook on the 3 is quite telling imo.
Posted:
#60
Quote Originally Posted by monkeebooger:
Fields officially OUT. Be ready for that line to reopen Vikings -7 minimum
Fields officially OUT. Be ready for that line to reopen Vikings -7 minimum
Dude, only 1 point from Fields to Peterman? Do you guys remember how bad Peterman is? Didn't he throw 6 picks in one half before?
If I'm a bookie I'd slap a Vikings -14 down
Posted:
#70
Quote Originally Posted by Cyrax:
I’m also taking: Broncos / Chargers over 40 ( might be a Cy Special ) Rams +6.5
I’m also taking: Broncos / Chargers over 40 ( might be a Cy Special ) Rams +6.5
Like the Cy Special potential. Denver seems to have a spring to their step since firing the idiot and San Diego always has high scoring potential. The Rams were +3 on the lookahead line so there is value there.
Posted:
#72
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Dude, only 1 point from Fields to Peterman? Do you guys remember how bad Peterman is? Didn't he throw 6 picks in one half before? If I'm a bookie I'd slap a Vikings -14 down
Dude, only 1 point from Fields to Peterman? Do you guys remember how bad Peterman is? Didn't he throw 6 picks in one half before? If I'm a bookie I'd slap a Vikings -14 down
at one point nathan peterman was so bad, his passer rating would go up when he threw an incomplete pass. that's not a joke but is funny as hell. pepperidge farms remembers
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Here's a nice tidbit for you guys, Icon might not like this. The Chargers have 10 wins this year. The combined record of those teams they beat is 53-105. The only team they beat that wasn't under .500, is the 8-8 Miami Dolphins. When the playoffs start, I won't be able to help myself in fading the Bolts 1st rd. I do respect and like Herbert though. I'm still looking into this LAC/DEN game now, still not sure if I take Denver but leaning hard. The Bolts have not beaten a divisional opponent twice yet this year. The books refusing to give the Broncos the hook on the 3 is quite telling imo.
Here's a nice tidbit for you guys, Icon might not like this. The Chargers have 10 wins this year. The combined record of those teams they beat is 53-105. The only team they beat that wasn't under .500, is the 8-8 Miami Dolphins. When the playoffs start, I won't be able to help myself in fading the Bolts 1st rd. I do respect and like Herbert though. I'm still looking into this LAC/DEN game now, still not sure if I take Denver but leaning hard. The Bolts have not beaten a divisional opponent twice yet this year. The books refusing to give the Broncos the hook on the 3 is quite telling imo.
why did the chargers open up as dogs is what i want to know
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
Posted:
#73
@OlDirtyBaztid
I think they opened up as dogs because book assumed Chargers would be careful with players since they've had so many injuries this season. Denver played them really tight earlier in season. I remember that game well, made a lot on it, but had to really sweat it.
Dog didn't last long, quickly went to slight chalk.
Posted:
#75
@Cranky_Hank
I am not betting it. Providence has a chip on shoulder.
Aside from Alabama, UConn has basically had a cakewalk for a schedule. Plus, somehow, someway, they have only played 3 road games so far.
Xavier, who I have in a pool to win their conference and make the final 4, also just handled them well. Xavier plays similar to Friars imo.
Hopkins and Croswell can neutralize Sanogo
Carter and Bynum can handle Hawkins
I really think it is a bad personnel matchup for UConn. They could use Newton or Joey C to get hot from 3 to be able to cover. I am leaving it alone. Don't feel strong enough either way. BOL if ya bet it hope Huskies cover for ya.
Hot Forum Topics
