Posted:
#351
The Cardinals deserved to lose the game ..
Anybody playing tonight's game ? 
CD Newsletter Week 18
Posted:
#353
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: https://www.bleachernation.com/bears/2024/01/05/bears-injury-report-0105/ Only the best CB in the nfl this year, according to pff. This game is going to kill me, and I don't really care about the $. For those of us backing Da Bears, what we need is bigred to announce that JJ is not playing today
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: https://www.bleachernation.com/bears/2024/01/05/bears-injury-report-0105/ Only the best CB in the nfl this year, according to pff. This game is going to kill me, and I don't really care about the $. For those of us backing Da Bears, what we need is bigred to announce that JJ is not playing today
430 yds to 180 got curb stomped....
Posted:
#354
Quote Originally Posted by lilmontetitleno:
Quote Originally Posted by Cranky_Hank: Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Quote Originally Posted by bigred84: They wont fire him today... . If history is an indicator, RR gets fired immediately after todays game,,,,,,,,he was fired months ago,,,,,,,
Quote Originally Posted by Cranky_Hank: Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Quote Originally Posted by bigred84: They wont fire him today... . If history is an indicator, RR gets fired immediately after todays game,,,,,,,,he was fired months ago,,,,,,,
Should have been....
I run a flooring store could do a better job...
Posted:
#358
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
If the Bears draft a qb 1st overall, it better be Pennix Jr. Imo.
And then they'll have to do it with him, but without Marvin Harrison Jr. Drafting at #10 I suppose there will be another wr there that's worthy. I just don't like when a team passes on a generational talent. MHJ could be the next Calvin Johnson.
It is possible that Wash, who sits at #2, trades up to 1 to grab Caleb Williams. They would do this so NE, who sits at #3, doesn't leap frog them for the chance at the USC QB. In this scenario Chi will pick up draft capital, and you would still have your wish of getting Penix.
OR
NE trades up to 1 from 3, and Wash doesn't draft Penix. In this scenario, the Bears would have plenty of draft capital to move up a few spots from #10 to get MHJ, and still get Penix.
bigreds daddy
Posted:
#359
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: If the Bears draft a qb 1st overall, it better be Pennix Jr. Imo. And then they'll have to do it with him, but without Marvin Harrison Jr. Drafting at #10 I suppose there will be another wr there that's worthy. I just don't like when a team passes on a generational talent. MHJ could be the next Calvin Johnson. It is possible that Wash, who sits at #2, trades up to 1 to grab Caleb Williams. They would do this so NE, who sits at #3, doesn't leap frog them for the chance at the USC QB. In this scenario Chi will pick up draft capital, and you would still have your wish of getting Penix. OR NE trades up to 1 from 3, and Wash doesn't draft Penix. In this scenario, the Bears would have plenty of draft capital to move up a few spots from #10 to get MHJ, and still get Penix.
Assuming you think Belichick will be fired or agreement to step down? No way he picks QB if he is still in charge.
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: If the Bears draft a qb 1st overall, it better be Pennix Jr. Imo. And then they'll have to do it with him, but without Marvin Harrison Jr. Drafting at #10 I suppose there will be another wr there that's worthy. I just don't like when a team passes on a generational talent. MHJ could be the next Calvin Johnson. It is possible that Wash, who sits at #2, trades up to 1 to grab Caleb Williams. They would do this so NE, who sits at #3, doesn't leap frog them for the chance at the USC QB. In this scenario Chi will pick up draft capital, and you would still have your wish of getting Penix. OR NE trades up to 1 from 3, and Wash doesn't draft Penix. In this scenario, the Bears would have plenty of draft capital to move up a few spots from #10 to get MHJ, and still get Penix.
2 weeks
Posted:
#365
https://www.covers.com/forum/nfl-betting-21/the-cowboys-are-gonna-stomp-on-the-packers-103808519
Here you go Hugh, fuck the 7.5 just lay it
Posted:
#366
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
If the Rams hold on, they play in Detroit. Packers at Dallas. I would have to lean both road dogs ats. Rams +2.5 Packers +4 That's what I think the lines should be, but they won't be.
If the Rams hold on, they play in Detroit. Packers at Dallas. I would have to lean both road dogs ats. Rams +2.5 Packers +4 That's what I think the lines should be, but they won't be.
sac---I'm not good at guessing lines, but there aren't enough points at Bookmaker to get me to play on the Packers in that game. I think they're a bad football team with a mediocre ( at best ) quarterback.
Posted:
#367
Quote Originally Posted by 1129ken:
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: If the Rams hold on, they play in Detroit. Packers at Dallas. I would have to lean both road dogs ats. Rams +2.5 Packers +4 That's what I think the lines should be, but they won't be. sac---I'm not good at guessing lines, but there aren't enough points at Bookmaker to get me to play on the Packers in that game. I think they're a bad football team with a mediocre ( at best ) quarterback.
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: If the Rams hold on, they play in Detroit. Packers at Dallas. I would have to lean both road dogs ats. Rams +2.5 Packers +4 That's what I think the lines should be, but they won't be. sac---I'm not good at guessing lines, but there aren't enough points at Bookmaker to get me to play on the Packers in that game. I think they're a bad football team with a mediocre ( at best ) quarterback.
U think Love isnt good.....
He was a bad man at Utah State.....
Finally playing like he did there....
Posted:
#372
Quote Originally Posted by bigred84:
Quote Originally Posted by 1129ken: Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: If the Rams hold on, they play in Detroit. Packers at Dallas. I would have to lean both road dogs ats. Rams +2.5 Packers +4 That's what I think the lines should be, but they won't be. sac---I'm not good at guessing lines, but there aren't enough points at Bookmaker to get me to play on the Packers in that game. I think they're a bad football team with a mediocre ( at best ) quarterback. U think Love isnt good..... He was a bad man at Utah State..... Finally playing like he did there....
Quote Originally Posted by 1129ken: Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: If the Rams hold on, they play in Detroit. Packers at Dallas. I would have to lean both road dogs ats. Rams +2.5 Packers +4 That's what I think the lines should be, but they won't be. sac---I'm not good at guessing lines, but there aren't enough points at Bookmaker to get me to play on the Packers in that game. I think they're a bad football team with a mediocre ( at best ) quarterback. U think Love isnt good..... He was a bad man at Utah State..... Finally playing like he did there....
I agree that he wasn't particularly good at Utah State but I don't think I'd call him "bad." Even though he was 3-9, 6-7, and 7-6 for 3 of his 4 years there, he was quite good one year at 11-2. So overall, not bad. Maybe you're confusing him with the other highly touted guy coming out of the state of Utah, you know, the guy who went to the Jets. Right now, I see Love as a guy who is playing mediocre football, at best, as his team needed a "good" quarterback down the stretch. He couldn't clinch until today, and had a hard time putting away the Bears ( 3-7 ). He did beat the Vikings but do you really see him beating them with Jaren Hall at quarterback as meaningful ? I don't. The week before that he led his team past Carolina by 3. Ugh. Prior to that were losses to Tampa and the Giants. Double ugh. He didn't beat a single playoff team down the stretch. So I don't see him playing like he did at Utah State as a particularly endearing quality, and I don't think you should anoint him just yet as a "good" quarterback. Maybe someday, but right now, no.
Posted:
#374
Quote Originally Posted by 1129ken:
I agree that he wasn't particularly good at Utah State but I don't think I'd call him "bad." Even though he was 3-9, 6-7, and 7-6 for 3 of his 4 years there, he was quite good one year at 11-2. So overall, not bad. Maybe you're confusing him with the other highly touted guy coming out of the state of Utah, you know, the guy who went to the Jets. Right now, I see Love as a guy who is playing mediocre football, at best, as his team needed a "good" quarterback down the stretch. He couldn't clinch until today, and had a hard time putting away the Bears ( 3-7 ). He did beat the Vikings but do you really see him beating them with Jaren Hall at quarterback as meaningful ? I don't. The week before that he led his team past Carolina by 3. Ugh. Prior to that were losses to Tampa and the Giants. Double ugh. He didn't beat a single playoff team down the stretch. So I don't see him playing like he did at Utah State as a particularly endearing quality, and I don't think you should anoint him just yet as a "good" quarterback. Maybe someday, but right now, no.
Thats a quality, thorough response to bigreds typical condescending post.
Well done
bigreds daddy
Hot Forum Topics
