Hawks v Crocs

I see the under has been smashed for this game......

Wollongong scored 83 points DESPITE shooting 40% (not very good), and 30% from 3 and only 61% from the stripe......

Crocs scored 79 playing a Taipans team that has been know ever since its inception to play low scoring scrappy defensive games....Crocs shot 45% (not bad), 33% from 3 point land.....

Wouldnt one expect Wollongong for starters to improve on those shooting percentages from there rusty 1 game?

The Hawks at home generally dont play scrappy grinding games like the Taipans do, so i would expect the Crocs to score more....

BUT, the under has been hit.........

And ACE - if u look at the back end of games last year, (the last 10 the Hawks played at home), they have been very high scoring even with there leading scorer and assist "getter" gone......

Give me the rational here......considering the PUBLIC were EXPECTING perth and the Breakers to improve on bad shooting, the public here are expecting bad shooting to go even worse?

Cmon, anyone give me a rational for this.....

I like Townsville to win , i was thinking of going for HT/FT double @ $4.50  or -4.5 @ $5.05

If this game goes over......I will shut up and never ever mention fix and NBL in the same sentence ever again........if it goes under, no one can say a word........

There is zero rational for this under......Both teams combined last week for 162 despite shooting pretty poorly.....The public expect the poor shooting to go even worse? But they expected the poor shooting of Perth and NZ to miracolously to jump?

No one give me the "look at what NZ scored last year".Well look at what Wollongong scored in the last 10 home games last year even without there leading scorer

Backing overs in NBL you're doomed to failure. As has been the case in the last two years. Until there is drastic improvements consistently, I will never be touching an over.

And I'll add, I'll prove that by the end of the season by being in a profit. Unless of course, a miracle happens and they start scoring high like they did in 06-07.

Bullets & Kings

Rostos ignore the tout stuff and have a look at this

https://www.sportpunter.com/2010/10/nbl-unders-%E2%80%93-always-underrated-now-almost-sure-things/

I don't buy that the 3 point line comment.

The Hawks only scored 83 points or higher in consecutive weeks around 3 times last season

Very rarely did they put up 80+ in consecutive weeks



Most of there back to back home games last season finished under tonight's total of 163.5






No reason this game may go under

In the first two semi's last season between these teams the final score didn't even go close to tonight's total of 163.5


No reason this game may go under

Under down to $1.75 at sportsbet

Sportstab i mean

Ace, have u got a link to last years results?

No reason for the under but you didn't bother to research anything or can't find old results



Kneegrow please

I just want a link to the results.......

I remember pretty much everything last year buddy, including a number of times the Hawks hit the very high 90's at the back end of last years games

Just give us the link

Also, since when do punters bring up last years results? I thought u were better than that.....

Do that in the NRL and u wull be toast........

Newcastle were unbeatable at home last year.......What happened this year?

Since when do punters say they are finished with the NBL and then come back and start a new thread a few days later



Headcase

Rick Stone happened

"And ACE - if u look at the back end of games last year, (the last 10 the Hawks played at home), they have been very high scoring even with there leading scorer and assist "getter" gone...."




Only Rostos can mentioned what happened last year?

Lots of fouls early in this game

Learn English, Learn how to read....

Where on earth did i say i placed a bet?

Show me where i said i placed a bet or my lean?

Why would anyone even have a lean when they said they were done



Im done but i have a lean

Where is my lean?

Where is it baby? Where?