AFL Round 7 - Discussion
At first glance, Doggies and Possibly Kangaroos look value.
At first glance, Doggies and Possibly Kangaroos look value.
Carlton do look great value to pull this one off ....they will be very dissapointed after last weeks effort against the crows and will wanna bounce back here against the Egirls who are really playing attrociously and there is a good chance kerr and staker will be out ......and get ready to watch judd absolutely murder his old team , id say 35 touches , 4 goals will be my prediction..... blues great value get on early
couple of things to consider
- Geelong coming back from perth (but they have had a decent break)
- Hawthorn 5 day rest ....collingwood 7 day rest
- Saints playing awful ...... richmond giving the top teams a good fight
- Adelaide and kangaroo defense holding teams to low totals (Under written all over it).....does this mean a small winning margin for either side here
- Sydneys ability to smother running teams and winning their own hard balls ..... are the bulldogs ferocious enough?
- Melbourne must feel this is it ....finally a winning chance again .....will they take it ..... will freo go back to the same old this week ?
Essendon showed that they are nothing but an offense team ..... do they have the artilary to outgun port ..... and will the loss of chad cornes effect how port go about their buisness .....because the coach seems to think so .....and so do port adelaide putting a player injured out on the ground means they have no confidence without him ? or does it
Carlton do look great value to pull this one off ....they will be very dissapointed after last weeks effort against the crows and will wanna bounce back here against the Egirls who are really playing attrociously and there is a good chance kerr and staker will be out ......and get ready to watch judd absolutely murder his old team , id say 35 touches , 4 goals will be my prediction..... blues great value get on early
couple of things to consider
- Geelong coming back from perth (but they have had a decent break)
- Hawthorn 5 day rest ....collingwood 7 day rest
- Saints playing awful ...... richmond giving the top teams a good fight
- Adelaide and kangaroo defense holding teams to low totals (Under written all over it).....does this mean a small winning margin for either side here
- Sydneys ability to smother running teams and winning their own hard balls ..... are the bulldogs ferocious enough?
- Melbourne must feel this is it ....finally a winning chance again .....will they take it ..... will freo go back to the same old this week ?
Essendon showed that they are nothing but an offense team ..... do they have the artilary to outgun port ..... and will the loss of chad cornes effect how port go about their buisness .....because the coach seems to think so .....and so do port adelaide putting a player injured out on the ground means they have no confidence without him ? or does it
Carlton
Brisbane
Collingwood
St. Kilda
Kangaroos
Sydney
Melbourne
I like essendon but i would go with port adelaide with a gun to my head
Carlton
Brisbane
Collingwood
St. Kilda
Kangaroos
Sydney
Melbourne
I like essendon but i would go with port adelaide with a gun to my head
I hope Leathal Leigh didn't say the usual bullshit and say they could beat the cats. I thought he would be more clever than that.
I agree, I think the tigers have been almost faultless since their shakeup a few weeks ago, when they dropped Bowden and weren't going to take half arsed efforts any longer.
They aren't ramblings, good points. I thought the AFL made it a rule this year that no team could play another who has more than one days extra rest than them (or along those lines)
Its hard to say exactly, without the lines but I think there are value games again this week. You know what the lines will be, you got them spot on last week.
Kangas (looks like the best of the round, at first look)
Hawks (depending on Franklin fitness)
Freo (perhaps)
Port (Cornes big loss but likely play on some level)
Carlton
Richmond (maybe)
I hope Leathal Leigh didn't say the usual bullshit and say they could beat the cats. I thought he would be more clever than that.
I agree, I think the tigers have been almost faultless since their shakeup a few weeks ago, when they dropped Bowden and weren't going to take half arsed efforts any longer.
They aren't ramblings, good points. I thought the AFL made it a rule this year that no team could play another who has more than one days extra rest than them (or along those lines)
Its hard to say exactly, without the lines but I think there are value games again this week. You know what the lines will be, you got them spot on last week.
Kangas (looks like the best of the round, at first look)
Hawks (depending on Franklin fitness)
Freo (perhaps)
Port (Cornes big loss but likely play on some level)
Carlton
Richmond (maybe)
I hope Leathal Leigh didn't say the usual bullshit and say they could beat the cats. I thought he would be more clever than that.
Looks like he did haha:
We can beat Cats: Matthews
I hope Leathal Leigh didn't say the usual bullshit and say they could beat the cats. I thought he would be more clever than that.
Looks like he did haha:
We can beat Cats: Matthews
I do actually like Port in this situation, they have the pace to keep up with Ess, have the 'small' forwards that Ess have trouble covering (just like they did against Coll), Ess reducing in confidence every week, Ports onball is much more experienced and better overall, K. Cornes will more than likely get the job on Ess best play maker over the last couple of weeks in Stanton (debatable I know, but when he is on...he is on!), Port have that little extra rest required (IMO) when any side travels interstate, and their record at the Dome is ok I believe.
And unlucky with the netball binomial by the sounds of it, it is always frustrating when you are so close only for a few things to go wrong in the end ![]()
And g-man, the Mathews call on Bris being able to beat the Cats... reminds me of the time he made the statement in 2001 'If bleeds...we can kill it' regarding to the fact they could beat Ess at the time, and they did! The line is a great one from a classic movie in the 'Predator'.
Have we got any sites that give us more data such as; teams away and home record, interstate record, overall record Vs each team, record at particular venues etc etc?????
I do actually like Port in this situation, they have the pace to keep up with Ess, have the 'small' forwards that Ess have trouble covering (just like they did against Coll), Ess reducing in confidence every week, Ports onball is much more experienced and better overall, K. Cornes will more than likely get the job on Ess best play maker over the last couple of weeks in Stanton (debatable I know, but when he is on...he is on!), Port have that little extra rest required (IMO) when any side travels interstate, and their record at the Dome is ok I believe.
And unlucky with the netball binomial by the sounds of it, it is always frustrating when you are so close only for a few things to go wrong in the end ![]()
And g-man, the Mathews call on Bris being able to beat the Cats... reminds me of the time he made the statement in 2001 'If bleeds...we can kill it' regarding to the fact they could beat Ess at the time, and they did! The line is a great one from a classic movie in the 'Predator'.
Have we got any sites that give us more data such as; teams away and home record, interstate record, overall record Vs each team, record at particular venues etc etc?????
I'm starting to think the same about the dons too.
Port hasn't smashed anybody but they've played (Geelong, Sydney, Adelaide, Brisbane, WC, St Kilda) probably played 5 top 8 teams. The Port line is starting to appeal.
I'm starting to think the same about the dons too.
Port hasn't smashed anybody but they've played (Geelong, Sydney, Adelaide, Brisbane, WC, St Kilda) probably played 5 top 8 teams. The Port line is starting to appeal.
Melbourne looks about time to win a match..or at least come within cover.
Melbourne looks about time to win a match..or at least come within cover.
I agree with you, a relatively low spread, 4 goals, any of the 15 sides should be able to beat melbourne by more than that. The only advantage is they have home ground.
Their decision making is appaulling. It was good to see some of their experienced players stand up over the last 2 weeks but its hard to make a difference when its just a couple of players.
I agree with you, a relatively low spread, 4 goals, any of the 15 sides should be able to beat melbourne by more than that. The only advantage is they have home ground.
Their decision making is appaulling. It was good to see some of their experienced players stand up over the last 2 weeks but its hard to make a difference when its just a couple of players.
Big difference from last week though. Last week was the most inexperienced up against close to the most experienced team. With possibly another 3 of WC's most experienced and best players out, I'd have to take the blues
Big difference from last week though. Last week was the most inexperienced up against close to the most experienced team. With possibly another 3 of WC's most experienced and best players out, I'd have to take the blues
Hot Forum Topics
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 289,552
- Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,652
- Saturday 10/31/2026 719
- Week 9 Money 15,985
- PART DEUX 204
- Halloween Treats 4,352
- NCAA WEEK 9 (( 151 )) 9,547
- NCAA WEEK 9 *** Wet Dream on Covers Street *** 10,146
- ***Macwesties * Sat. Oct. 31, 2026 * NCAAF * Week #9 * College Football Plays*** 4,288
- 76ers / Hornets OVER 212 1,210
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
