I don't know if I'm going to bet the game, but you do realize the Jets lost 34-0 last week AT HOME, right? Whereas Houston has won 3 of their 4 games by 20+. I understand those were mostly against crap teams, but I think New York qualifies as a crap team.
This is a statement game for Houston being on national TV, just as it is an important game for the Jets of not being embarrassed.
I'm really thinking this is where the Texans make their mark...but giving up 11 for a road team doesn't sit well with me. Ugh.
0
I don't know if I'm going to bet the game, but you do realize the Jets lost 34-0 last week AT HOME, right? Whereas Houston has won 3 of their 4 games by 20+. I understand those were mostly against crap teams, but I think New York qualifies as a crap team.
This is a statement game for Houston being on national TV, just as it is an important game for the Jets of not being embarrassed.
I'm really thinking this is where the Texans make their mark...but giving up 11 for a road team doesn't sit well with me. Ugh.
The Chiefs are not worse than the Jets. The Texans are better than Baltimore, and the Chiefs 'easily' covered the spread by a whole 3 points. I hammered the Chiefs yesterday but you can't compare the 2 teams. The Chiefs were averaging about 100 more yards on offense than defense going into yesterdays game, and only lost a lot of those earlier games because of a massive statistical anomily in turnover differential. The Chiefs have weopons on offense in Bowe and Charles. The Jets have Schilens and Green. It's not even a comparison. All the more of a point that Texans at -10 is a bargain.
0
The Chiefs are not worse than the Jets. The Texans are better than Baltimore, and the Chiefs 'easily' covered the spread by a whole 3 points. I hammered the Chiefs yesterday but you can't compare the 2 teams. The Chiefs were averaging about 100 more yards on offense than defense going into yesterdays game, and only lost a lot of those earlier games because of a massive statistical anomily in turnover differential. The Chiefs have weopons on offense in Bowe and Charles. The Jets have Schilens and Green. It's not even a comparison. All the more of a point that Texans at -10 is a bargain.
THANK YOU FOR POSTING NO PLAY! seriously tho, everyone on covers freaking out and second guessing themselves about this game..if anyone here was serious about making money they wouldn't have to bet every single game. pick your spots and do your homework but if u second guess yourself (which covers completely influences) then save ur money for this beautiful large card on sunday. I was gonna take the jets for a unit because im more of a situational bettor but fuck that NO PLAY and thank you for talking me out of wasting money just for action
0
THANK YOU FOR POSTING NO PLAY! seriously tho, everyone on covers freaking out and second guessing themselves about this game..if anyone here was serious about making money they wouldn't have to bet every single game. pick your spots and do your homework but if u second guess yourself (which covers completely influences) then save ur money for this beautiful large card on sunday. I was gonna take the jets for a unit because im more of a situational bettor but fuck that NO PLAY and thank you for talking me out of wasting money just for action
Also stop talking about how they are a 2-2 team. They are a 2-2 team with their best defensive player (the guy the entire scheme is built around) and their only offensive weapon. Those guys are gone now as is Keller and Hill. Do you totally discount the fact that arguably the 3 most important players on the team are out?
Revis didn't win those games single-handedly. They won two games and completely dominated one. They are not a good team but like I said, this is about the 10 pts even with the injuries you mentioned.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GraniteStateKid:
Also stop talking about how they are a 2-2 team. They are a 2-2 team with their best defensive player (the guy the entire scheme is built around) and their only offensive weapon. Those guys are gone now as is Keller and Hill. Do you totally discount the fact that arguably the 3 most important players on the team are out?
Revis didn't win those games single-handedly. They won two games and completely dominated one. They are not a good team but like I said, this is about the 10 pts even with the injuries you mentioned.
there is absolutely no reason to back a fat (don't care how much he lost, at heart he's a fat guy), loud-mouthed, toe-sucking pervert who has no businees being a head coach.
plus, there is no way in hell espn will allow the jets to be within two touchdowns--this would kill all of their tuesday morning talk shows centered around whether it's now 'tebow-time'. this is the lock, not the game itself.
Let's not cap a game using Rex Ryan and his foot fetish as a basis...
0
Quote Originally Posted by redbook1:
there is absolutely no reason to back a fat (don't care how much he lost, at heart he's a fat guy), loud-mouthed, toe-sucking pervert who has no businees being a head coach.
plus, there is no way in hell espn will allow the jets to be within two touchdowns--this would kill all of their tuesday morning talk shows centered around whether it's now 'tebow-time'. this is the lock, not the game itself.
Let's not cap a game using Rex Ryan and his foot fetish as a basis...
I don't know if I'm going to bet the game, but you do realize the Jets lost 34-0 last week AT HOME, right? Whereas Houston has won 3 of their 4 games by 20+. I understand those were mostly against crap teams, but I think New York qualifies as a crap team.
This is a statement game for Houston being on national TV, just as it is an important game for the Jets of not being embarrassed.
I'm really thinking this is where the Texans make their mark...but giving up 11 for a road team doesn't sit well with me. Ugh.
The Jets losing 34-0 is A GOOD thing if you want to grab the 10.
I would much rather have them get killed, go through grueling practices in a soul-searching week to save face on national television than have to simply lost by 4 in a hard fought game last week.
And if giving up 10 doesn't sit well with you...GOOD. That is the point of this thread.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DrinknByTheBay:
I don't know if I'm going to bet the game, but you do realize the Jets lost 34-0 last week AT HOME, right? Whereas Houston has won 3 of their 4 games by 20+. I understand those were mostly against crap teams, but I think New York qualifies as a crap team.
This is a statement game for Houston being on national TV, just as it is an important game for the Jets of not being embarrassed.
I'm really thinking this is where the Texans make their mark...but giving up 11 for a road team doesn't sit well with me. Ugh.
The Jets losing 34-0 is A GOOD thing if you want to grab the 10.
I would much rather have them get killed, go through grueling practices in a soul-searching week to save face on national television than have to simply lost by 4 in a hard fought game last week.
And if giving up 10 doesn't sit well with you...GOOD. That is the point of this thread.
The Chiefs are not worse than the Jets. The Texans are better than Baltimore, and the Chiefs 'easily' covered the spread by a whole 3 points. I hammered the Chiefs yesterday but you can't compare the 2 teams. The Chiefs were averaging about 100 more yards on offense than defense going into yesterdays game, and only lost a lot of those earlier games because of a massive statistical anomily in turnover differential. The Chiefs have weopons on offense in Bowe and Charles. The Jets have Schilens and Green. It's not even a comparison. All the more of a point that Texans at -10 is a bargain.
Forget the weapons. Cassel can't play and Quinn is there QB.
Are you really going to tell me the Jets are underdogs on a neutral field against the Jets?
No way. The Jets have a better record, are better defensively, and have a better. That's worth at least 2.5 to 3 on a neutral field against KC.
(I was on KC too yesterday as well btw).
0
Quote Originally Posted by GraniteStateKid:
The Chiefs are not worse than the Jets. The Texans are better than Baltimore, and the Chiefs 'easily' covered the spread by a whole 3 points. I hammered the Chiefs yesterday but you can't compare the 2 teams. The Chiefs were averaging about 100 more yards on offense than defense going into yesterdays game, and only lost a lot of those earlier games because of a massive statistical anomily in turnover differential. The Chiefs have weopons on offense in Bowe and Charles. The Jets have Schilens and Green. It's not even a comparison. All the more of a point that Texans at -10 is a bargain.
Forget the weapons. Cassel can't play and Quinn is there QB.
Are you really going to tell me the Jets are underdogs on a neutral field against the Jets?
No way. The Jets have a better record, are better defensively, and have a better. That's worth at least 2.5 to 3 on a neutral field against KC.
THANK YOU FOR POSTING NO PLAY! seriously tho, everyone on covers freaking out and second guessing themselves about this game..if anyone here was serious about making money they wouldn't have to bet every single game. pick your spots and do your homework but if u second guess yourself (which covers completely influences) then save ur money for this beautiful large card on sunday. I was gonna take the jets for a unit because im more of a situational bettor but fuck that NO PLAY and thank you for talking me out of wasting money just for action
I think the key is this: Don't be compelled to play the MNF game just because it's an MNF game.
There is this betting magnetism to it because the whole betting world focuses on it.
Just enjoy the game and stay away from this madness. There are 16 games next week for you to consider otherwise.
It takes a lot of discipline to lay off these prime time games and you should be commended for doing it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jerzeyboy56:
THANK YOU FOR POSTING NO PLAY! seriously tho, everyone on covers freaking out and second guessing themselves about this game..if anyone here was serious about making money they wouldn't have to bet every single game. pick your spots and do your homework but if u second guess yourself (which covers completely influences) then save ur money for this beautiful large card on sunday. I was gonna take the jets for a unit because im more of a situational bettor but fuck that NO PLAY and thank you for talking me out of wasting money just for action
I think the key is this: Don't be compelled to play the MNF game just because it's an MNF game.
There is this betting magnetism to it because the whole betting world focuses on it.
Just enjoy the game and stay away from this madness. There are 16 games next week for you to consider otherwise.
It takes a lot of discipline to lay off these prime time games and you should be commended for doing it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
