All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

WildCard Weekend

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 16213
Posts: 144
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 81
Posted: #51
[Quote: Originally Posted by alecboyh]

Agree on Who dat and the Pack ...

I cant make a case for either Jets and Colts, the hardest game for me to cap, I mean two weeks ago Jay Cutler looked like Joe Montana and picked apart the Jets defense, guess what Manning could do, besides Peyton loves to be blitzed, and you bet Rex Ryan will blitz Peyton a lot ...

In Chiefs case, you said Balty was overrated but guess what for me the overrated team is KC, just one win against a winning team: Chargers and that was in Week One ... for me, the Chiefs is the classic team that took advantage of its soft schedule, and they couldnt even take care of its division with a 2 - 4 record, Oakland just kicked KC ass at Arrowhead, just hard for me to support an overrated team ...

GL URISS !!!

[/Quote Agree with the KC bit 100%.They had trouble with Buffalo & Denver @ Arrowhead.Plus any defense that gives up 49 to Denver has to concern you.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 6421
Posted: #52
i like your thinking here, u.  curious to read your write-up on the philly-green bay game.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 237
Posted: #53
Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:



I'm insane yet you are playing a ML on a line at 2 1/2... paying more juice when you don't have to...dumb ass

hahaha. I actually thought you were a respectable poster.  Guess not. 

I got the ML at -135 when your paying -110 and having to cover 2.5. So i might lose 25 more dollars if they dont win the game but i sure as hell wont get shafted 110 dollars when the win by 2.  You  must be an inexperienced rookie because the odds of Baltimore winning by 2 or less are actually substantial.  Not to mention the line is now -170 and -3 with -120 juice. Stupid ol me. Its going to be great when the gambling gods produce a 2 point Baltimore win. Ill be counting my money and laughing at you. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 21426
Posted: #54
GL Buddy
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by stakkibotris:


hahaha. I actually thought you were a respectable poster.  Guess not. 

I got the ML at -135 when your paying -110 and having to cover 2.5. So i might lose 25 more dollars if they dont win the game but i sure as hell wont get shafted 110 dollars when the win by 2.  You  must be an inexperienced rookie because the odds of Baltimore winning by 2 or less are actually substantial.  Not to mention the line is now -170 and -3 with -120 juice. Stupid ol me. Its going to be great when the gambling gods produce a 2 point Baltimore win. Ill be counting my money and laughing at you. 


You called me insane, yet I am supposed to respond respectfully???  I really could careless about you $100 bets ... You are paying 135 to winn a 100 and are calling me a rookie ...  You also say there is a "substanial possibilty" of the game falling within in a 2 pt spread...  Dear God... here's and idea, take you $100 and go buy a video game
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by stakkibotris:


hahaha. I actually thought you were a respectable poster.  Guess not. 

I got the ML at -135 when your paying -110 and having to cover 2.5. So i might lose 25 more dollars if they dont win the game but i sure as hell wont get shafted 110 dollars when the win by 2.  You  must be an inexperienced rookie because the odds of Baltimore winning by 2 or less are actually substantial.  Not to mention the line is now -170 and -3 with -120 juice. Stupid ol me. Its going to be great when the gambling gods produce a 2 point Baltimore win. Ill be counting my money and laughing at you. 


Of the 16 games Baltimore played this year ONE game fell within 2 points (week one with the Jets)... In last year and the previous year  of the 37 games baltimore played NOT ONE game fell 2 points or less... So, with 53 games played in the last 3 years ONE GAME fell between 2 points or less  Yet all of the sudden this game there is a "substantial" possibility of Baltimore winning by either ONE or TWO points... Like I said paying 135 when you don't have to is idiotic... Where do you people come from honestly?  If you are gonna come at me in the future, I HIGHLY suggest you do some research.....................dumb ass
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 1023
Posted: #57
No Ivory and no Thomas doesn't scare you for New Orleans? They could struggle to run.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 2355
Posted: #58

Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:

New York Jets ML +115
Green Bay Packers ML+125
New Orleans Saints -10 (-120)
Kansas City Chiefs +120


I will do write - ups as soon as I get the chance but these plays are locked and loaded.... BOL

I think the Pack will win, but that is about it.

NO will have next to no running game.  10 points is a lot to ask a one dimension passing team to cover. The Saints will be playing in a really really loud stadium and will end up taking some bad false start penalties.   

The Jets' D is overrated and Manning will pick them apart. The Jets will be forced to throw and Sanchez will end up making a costly error or two.

Baltimore's experience will make all of the difference. Who have the Chiefs beat this year? I am sorry, but they are highly overrated...

At very best, I see you going 2 for 4...This is just my opinion. I definitely have been wrong before.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 38
Posted: #59
ur going 4 for 4 dad.  Jets are my fav pick, then kc.  Im gonna take the points tho since my local is giving me shitty moneylines n I can get the jets +3 right now. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 81
Posted: #60
Baltimore looks so easy I can't help but feel I'm being set up by the boys in Vegas.These guys aren't stupid and know a %#@& of a lot more than any of us ever will(right down to when the left guard last did his girl friend & how it will affect his play)The more I look at the game,I can't come up with a scenario where K.C.'s in the game.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #61
Philidelphia Eagles VS Green Bay Packers:

   I like the Packers to really make some noise in the playoffs this year.  This is a team who gives up 15 points a game, which is 2nd only to the Steelers.  I expect the Packers to be able to contain Vick and get pressure on him.  If you have watched any of the Eagles last 4 or 5 games Vick has taken a beating.  His throws have been very erratic as well.  I am not a believer in this Eagles team, sorry... I think they are a ONE man show, and if you contain or stop him you will win, that simple.  The Eagles defensively are nothing but average.  Rodgers (arguably the 2nd best QB in the NFL next to Brady) will light up that secondary.  The Packers have the most equip team to make a Super Bowl push in the NFC in my opinion... They don't run well but they bubble screen better than anyone one in the league to make up for it.   I expect the Packers to win this game and put a stamp on the playoffs that they are the team to beat, which they will have to do on the road in all their games...
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 18598
Posted: #62
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 4106
Posted: #63

how was KC's schedule compared to Balt.?

 

Not too favorable I think

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 4106
Posted: #64
 have you seen KC schedule?  ever wonder why they are #1 in rushing?

buffalo
st louis
arizona
san fran
oakland
denver
houston
cleveland
jacksonville

from another board
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by EDDIEW:

 have you seen KC schedule?  ever wonder why they are #1 in rushing?

buffalo
st louis
arizona
san fran
oakland
denver
houston
cleveland
jacksonville

from another board


I am well aware
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #66
San Fran???  They are one of the best run stopping teams in the NFL, I believe 5th or 6th....  Oh and KC ran for 207 in that game... They also ran for 135 against the Chargers in their first meeting, Chargers top 3 in against the run...  I believe KC knows how to run, I could careless what their schedule was
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 1843
Posted: #67

Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:



And I EXPECT Cassel not to make mistakes , AS HE HAS SHOWN ALL YEAR with only 7 picks...

With their soft schedule and propensity to be a running atack, it's easy to have only 7 picks.

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by callmetim:

With their soft schedule and propensity to be a running atack, it's easy to have only 7 picks.

 



yeah its very easy to be a QB in the NFL... get a clue... looks like the ravens fans are taking this game to heart
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 1843
Posted: #69

Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:



yeah its very easy to be a QB in the NFL... get a clue... looks like the ravens fans are taking this game to heart

 

The last time I checked, I paid with my wallet and not my heart. I could care less if they win or lose. I only care if they cover. I agree with you on quite a number of points, and I think you missed one important negative element about the Ravens - they play to the level of their competition. I've watched every game this year and I think they loaded up the offense with excellent receivers and found out Flacco is marginal...at best. The man drops back to pass and he stares dead at his primary receiver. DUH.

However, KC is having to face a team that has veterans with a load of experience in games like these and they'll have to rely on a guy who was 11 for 33 last week when his mentor informed him he's leaving. The majority of the Ravens have been there and won at Miami, at Tennessee and at New England in the postseason since 2008.

I'm just not drinking the KC Kool-Aid.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by callmetim:

 

The last time I checked, I paid with my wallet and not my heart. I could care less if they win or lose. I only care if they cover. I agree with you on quite a number of points, and I think you missed one important negative element about the Ravens - they play to the level of their competition. I've watched every game this year and I think they loaded up the offense with excellent receivers and found out Flacco is marginal...at best. The man drops back to pass and he stares dead at his primary receiver. DUH.

However, KC is having to face a team that has veterans with a load of experience in games like these and they'll have to rely on a guy who was 11 for 33 last week when his mentor informed him he's leaving. The majority of the Ravens have been there and won at Miami, at Tennessee and at New England in the postseason since 2008.

I'm just not drinking the KC Kool-Aid.



now thats a better argument than saying its easy to have only 7 picks
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #71
KC is now +150
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 1843
Posted: #72
Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:



now thats a better argument than saying its easy to have only 7 picks


I bow to your greatness wise one.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1958
Posted: #73
good thoughts, keep up the good work
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 237
Posted: #74
Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:



You called me insane, yet I am supposed to respond respectfully???  I really could careless about you $100 bets ... You are paying 135 to winn a 100 and are calling me a rookie ...  You also say there is a "substanial possibilty" of the game falling within in a 2 pt spread...  Dear God... here's and idea, take you $100 and go buy a video game


Only 42.5% of the time will I even have to pay the extra 25.  Odds are I wont be effected by my extra juice.  Not to mention the real odds are more like Baltimore to win 65% of the time.  Its over-thinking dbags, i.e. yourself, that keep these lines to my liking.  Baltimore will beat KC and you will be looking like the little dumb shit you are and I wont be sweating the extra juice.  Good luck with your KC bet hahahaha. Matt Cassel v. the Ravens lol.  Your funny, man your funny. 
P.S. if you take offense to be called insane because of a bet you've made then your just a straight bitch.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #75
Quote Originally Posted by stakkibotris:



Only 42.5% of the time will I even have to pay the extra 25.  Odds are I wont be effected by my extra juice.  Not to mention the real odds are more like Baltimore to win 65% of the time.  Its over-thinking dbags, i.e. yourself, that keep these lines to my liking.  Baltimore will beat KC and you will be looking like the little dumb shit you are and I wont be sweating the extra juice.  Good luck with your KC bet hahahaha. Matt Cassel v. the Ravens lol.  Your funny, man your funny. 
P.S. if you take offense to be called insane because of a bet you've made then your just a straight bitch.


And this is why high-school and college kids shouldn't be allowed on this site  i still can't get over u saying this game will likely fall withing the 2 pt spread... ONE Baltimore game in 3 years (53 games) has that happened... children
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.