How do you expect to win $4943.51 on the first 4-team parlay, and then use the winnings from that parlay to bet on an 8-team parlay that contains 4 of the same teams on the previous parlay? I don't know a sportsbook that would let you bet on games that are already finished
Did you actually read the thread???
0
Quote Originally Posted by lpforsythe8:
How do you expect to win $4943.51 on the first 4-team parlay, and then use the winnings from that parlay to bet on an 8-team parlay that contains 4 of the same teams on the previous parlay? I don't know a sportsbook that would let you bet on games that are already finished
Denver could lose, only because Andrew Luck is a beast. Richardson finally gets the playbook, Colts have a stout defense. They won last year @ home vs. Denver, it could happen at Mile High. Denver's defense is good on paper, they haven't shown me yet they're good playing together. That usually takes time.
Buffalo could upset Chicago, because that defensive front seven is damn good. Maybe ML on Bears, but it's a big maybe.
Patriots don't have weapons, too much inconsistency outside Brady. Home dogs are consistently good odds.
Eagles seems too good to be true...
0
Denver could lose, only because Andrew Luck is a beast. Richardson finally gets the playbook, Colts have a stout defense. They won last year @ home vs. Denver, it could happen at Mile High. Denver's defense is good on paper, they haven't shown me yet they're good playing together. That usually takes time.
Buffalo could upset Chicago, because that defensive front seven is damn good. Maybe ML on Bears, but it's a big maybe.
Patriots don't have weapons, too much inconsistency outside Brady. Home dogs are consistently good odds.
What does the opposite of all your picks pay? The only fav that "should be easy" is Philly. The rest are coinflips in reality, being the NFL and week 1.
If I were you, I would definately put these in a round robin.
0
What does the opposite of all your picks pay? The only fav that "should be easy" is Philly. The rest are coinflips in reality, being the NFL and week 1.
If I were you, I would definately put these in a round robin.
Denver could lose, only because Andrew Luck is a beast. Richardson finally gets the playbook, Colts have a stout defense. They won last year @ home vs. Denver, it could happen at Mile High. Denver's defense is good on paper, they haven't shown me yet they're good playing together. That usually takes time.
Ok, seriously?
Name me ONE position on offense where the broncos don't have the better player.
On defense.....?
Perhaps Indy has an edge at inside LB with Jackson, but that's about it.
I'd take Denver's QB, WRs, TE, RB, and O-line easily over anyone on the Colts (please try and tell me who you'd rather have on your offense from the Colts instead of the Broncos). Their OLBs are obviously better, CBs are better (assuming Harris is recovered from ACL), at safety I think Ward is better than Landry, and Moore/Howell is a wash, D-line....think I still go with Denver.
So how exactly are they gonna beat Denver IN Denver?
Oh, and you think Peyton doesn't have a HUGE behind chip on his shoulder wanting to shove a win down Irsay's throat?
Buffalo could upset Chicago, because that defensive front seven is damn good. Maybe ML on Bears, but it's a big maybe.
Buffalo COULD upset Chicago, but they don't have the offense to keep up. And with Alonso out (and his back up suspended) and no more Byrd, I don't know how that D contains Forte and the two beast WRs.
Patriots don't have weapons, too much inconsistency outside Brady. Home dogs are consistently good odds.
Ridley, Vereen, Amendola, Edelman, Gronk, and Lafell will provide plenty of options for Brady. They won with less than that last year. Miami's run game is nothing, especially with Moreno gimpy. Wallace is gimpy as well, not to mention he'll most likely be high to celebrate opening weekend.
Eagles seems too good to be true...
No way they don't beat the jags by at least a TD
0
Quote Originally Posted by FadeThisXen:
Denver could lose, only because Andrew Luck is a beast. Richardson finally gets the playbook, Colts have a stout defense. They won last year @ home vs. Denver, it could happen at Mile High. Denver's defense is good on paper, they haven't shown me yet they're good playing together. That usually takes time.
Ok, seriously?
Name me ONE position on offense where the broncos don't have the better player.
On defense.....?
Perhaps Indy has an edge at inside LB with Jackson, but that's about it.
I'd take Denver's QB, WRs, TE, RB, and O-line easily over anyone on the Colts (please try and tell me who you'd rather have on your offense from the Colts instead of the Broncos). Their OLBs are obviously better, CBs are better (assuming Harris is recovered from ACL), at safety I think Ward is better than Landry, and Moore/Howell is a wash, D-line....think I still go with Denver.
So how exactly are they gonna beat Denver IN Denver?
Oh, and you think Peyton doesn't have a HUGE behind chip on his shoulder wanting to shove a win down Irsay's throat?
Buffalo could upset Chicago, because that defensive front seven is damn good. Maybe ML on Bears, but it's a big maybe.
Buffalo COULD upset Chicago, but they don't have the offense to keep up. And with Alonso out (and his back up suspended) and no more Byrd, I don't know how that D contains Forte and the two beast WRs.
Patriots don't have weapons, too much inconsistency outside Brady. Home dogs are consistently good odds.
Ridley, Vereen, Amendola, Edelman, Gronk, and Lafell will provide plenty of options for Brady. They won with less than that last year. Miami's run game is nothing, especially with Moreno gimpy. Wallace is gimpy as well, not to mention he'll most likely be high to celebrate opening weekend.
If I were you, I would definately put these in a round robin.
Yeah, why don't you just take the 4 teams you like, take your $7,000 and change you're wagering with, and round robin 'em? This seems like a lot smarter wager, and you're odds of actually winning $$$$ goes way up. I don't know why you're fixated on this $100,000 number, but you'll go real broke real fast with that kind of wagering mentality.......
Good luck
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
If I were you, I would definately put these in a round robin.
Yeah, why don't you just take the 4 teams you like, take your $7,000 and change you're wagering with, and round robin 'em? This seems like a lot smarter wager, and you're odds of actually winning $$$$ goes way up. I don't know why you're fixated on this $100,000 number, but you'll go real broke real fast with that kind of wagering mentality.......
Also Train, I find it funny that you bash my proposed bets that are about a 30% and 5% chance of winning, while you post underdog parlays with <0.5% chance of winning. That makes sense.
0
Also Train, I find it funny that you bash my proposed bets that are about a 30% and 5% chance of winning, while you post underdog parlays with <0.5% chance of winning. That makes sense.
How do you expect to win $4943.51 on the first 4-team parlay, and then use the winnings from that parlay to bet on an 8-team parlay that contains 4 of the same teams on the previous parlay? I don't know a sportsbook that would let you bet on games that are already finished
You need to re-read what he wrote.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lpforsythe8:
How do you expect to win $4943.51 on the first 4-team parlay, and then use the winnings from that parlay to bet on an 8-team parlay that contains 4 of the same teams on the previous parlay? I don't know a sportsbook that would let you bet on games that are already finished
Matty I understand your logic. I get it! The problem I see here and to me it's a HUGE one is that this isn't last year bro, this is a new year and it's week 1.
Would you agree that the 2 most unpredictable weeks in NFL is Week 1 and Week 17? Do you agree?
Well if you said yes and you should've then do yourself a favor and save your money. Whatever the odds are on hitting an 8 game parlay in NFL, you might as well double those odds for week 1.
A steak dinner isn't a good consolation.
You feel me bro?
0
Matty I understand your logic. I get it! The problem I see here and to me it's a HUGE one is that this isn't last year bro, this is a new year and it's week 1.
Would you agree that the 2 most unpredictable weeks in NFL is Week 1 and Week 17? Do you agree?
Well if you said yes and you should've then do yourself a favor and save your money. Whatever the odds are on hitting an 8 game parlay in NFL, you might as well double those odds for week 1.
Van... LVHSC again this year? Cant wait! Same entry name? Would love to check my wagers with your thoughts all season.Gl*handshake*
Im already signed up - same name - you?
Not this year. Involved in a few other things which are tying up some funds. I think i will do it next year. But i will track my own picks and match it up for fun. Best of luck and into the top 5 this year! Hell i hope you win it!
0
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Quote Originally Posted by DogHouse:
Van... LVHSC again this year? Cant wait! Same entry name? Would love to check my wagers with your thoughts all season.Gl*handshake*
Im already signed up - same name - you?
Not this year. Involved in a few other things which are tying up some funds. I think i will do it next year. But i will track my own picks and match it up for fun. Best of luck and into the top 5 this year! Hell i hope you win it!
Hot Forum Topics
