
Line |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minus Prior Year Wins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minus Prior Year Wins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in wins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in wins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These charts have to do with projected season wins for the NFL teams, their respective lines , and the results ( that is times these teams have managed to beat the estimates ( Over ) or underperformed ( Under )
( Team Seasons where the season wins equal the line (push bets) are ignored ) from 1996-2008
The second chart depictcs the difference in the line set by the oddsmakers for season win totals in relation to prior season wins , then the results ...
" how a team's prior year record compares to the line set for them this season (for example if a team was 6-10 last year but has a season win line of 8 1/2 this year, then they would count as a +2 1/2 on the "Net vs Line"): "
Finally , the third chart >>>
" The optimal conditions for a "bounce" are when a team has shown a dramatic change in performance and the theory goes (for many reasons) that the next performance will revert closer to the norm. Well, for NFL squads that jumped up by 3 or more games in the prior year, they have gone 62-39 as UNDER plays in the following season, whereas NFL teams that were 3 or more games worse in the last season are 64-36 as OVER plays. "
"teams with dramatic changes from one season to the next in total wins do tend to revert in the subsequent year, at least in so far as versus the season win total expectancy placed on them by the linemakers. "
2MW
RF
These charts have to do with projected season wins for the NFL teams, their respective lines , and the results ( that is times these teams have managed to beat the estimates ( Over ) or underperformed ( Under )
( Team Seasons where the season wins equal the line (push bets) are ignored ) from 1996-2008
The second chart depictcs the difference in the line set by the oddsmakers for season win totals in relation to prior season wins , then the results ...
" how a team's prior year record compares to the line set for them this season (for example if a team was 6-10 last year but has a season win line of 8 1/2 this year, then they would count as a +2 1/2 on the "Net vs Line"): "
Finally , the third chart >>>
" The optimal conditions for a "bounce" are when a team has shown a dramatic change in performance and the theory goes (for many reasons) that the next performance will revert closer to the norm. Well, for NFL squads that jumped up by 3 or more games in the prior year, they have gone 62-39 as UNDER plays in the following season, whereas NFL teams that were 3 or more games worse in the last season are 64-36 as OVER plays. "
"teams with dramatic changes from one season to the next in total wins do tend to revert in the subsequent year, at least in so far as versus the season win total expectancy placed on them by the linemakers. "
2MW
RF
16 Favorites ( 14-2 SU & 12-4 ATS )
16 Underdogs ( 2-14 SU & 8-7-1 ATS )
HD : 0-4 SU & 2-2 ATS
HF : 10-0 SU & 8-2 ATS
RD : 2-10 SU & 6-5-1 ATS
RF : 4-2 SU & 4-2 ATS
Favorites won 12 games SU & ATS ( 75.00 % )
Favorites won 2 games SU & lost ATS ( 12.5 % )
Favorites Lost 2 games SU & ATS ( 12.5 % )
16 Favorites ( 14-2 SU & 12-4 ATS )
16 Underdogs ( 2-14 SU & 8-7-1 ATS )
HD : 0-4 SU & 2-2 ATS
HF : 10-0 SU & 8-2 ATS
RD : 2-10 SU & 6-5-1 ATS
RF : 4-2 SU & 4-2 ATS
Favorites won 12 games SU & ATS ( 75.00 % )
Favorites won 2 games SU & lost ATS ( 12.5 % )
Favorites Lost 2 games SU & ATS ( 12.5 % )
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.