Did I say YOU were using a trend? No. Did I say Pittsburgh was going to score 6 and Cleveland 13? No. Did I mention the weather once in any of my posts. No.
No one really has that information? So the Covers numbers are all made up through some elaborate logarithm out to deceive people?
Over 60% every year, huh? Guess this one probably didn't hurt your bankroll much at all then. I guess that's the bright side here.
I have my system, you have yours. Mine was right tonight. Is it foolproof? No. But this one was screaming under.
I was trying to play nice. If you want to take out your frustrations on me, go ahead. I'm used to it. I'm married.
0
Did I say YOU were using a trend? No. Did I say Pittsburgh was going to score 6 and Cleveland 13? No. Did I mention the weather once in any of my posts. No.
No one really has that information? So the Covers numbers are all made up through some elaborate logarithm out to deceive people?
Over 60% every year, huh? Guess this one probably didn't hurt your bankroll much at all then. I guess that's the bright side here.
I have my system, you have yours. Mine was right tonight. Is it foolproof? No. But this one was screaming under.
I was trying to play nice. If you want to take out your frustrations on me, go ahead. I'm used to it. I'm married.
Did I say YOU were using a trend? No. Did I say Pittsburgh was going to score 6 and Cleveland 13? No. Did I mention the weather once in any of my posts. No.
No one really has that information? So the Covers numbers are all made up through some elaborate logarithm out to deceive people?
Over 60% every year, huh? Guess this one probably didn't hurt your bankroll much at all then. I guess that's the bright side here.
I have my system, you have yours. Mine was right tonight. Is it foolproof? No. But this one was screaming under.
I was trying to play nice. If you want to take out your frustrations on me, go ahead. I'm used to it. I'm married.
I don't consider what your doing a system! You made a play based off line movement... So I'm assuming if this is your system, you lost on Monday night football and didn't play the Packers... Otherwise you would be contradicting yourself
0
Quote Originally Posted by johnobvious:
Did I say YOU were using a trend? No. Did I say Pittsburgh was going to score 6 and Cleveland 13? No. Did I mention the weather once in any of my posts. No.
No one really has that information? So the Covers numbers are all made up through some elaborate logarithm out to deceive people?
Over 60% every year, huh? Guess this one probably didn't hurt your bankroll much at all then. I guess that's the bright side here.
I have my system, you have yours. Mine was right tonight. Is it foolproof? No. But this one was screaming under.
I was trying to play nice. If you want to take out your frustrations on me, go ahead. I'm used to it. I'm married.
I don't consider what your doing a system! You made a play based off line movement... So I'm assuming if this is your system, you lost on Monday night football and didn't play the Packers... Otherwise you would be contradicting yourself
Did I say YOU were using a trend? No. Did I say Pittsburgh was going to score 6 and Cleveland 13? No. Did I mention the weather once in any of my posts. No.
No one really has that information? So the Covers numbers are all made up through some elaborate logarithm out to deceive people?
Over 60% every year, huh? Guess this one probably didn't hurt your bankroll much at all then. I guess that's the bright side here.
I have my system, you have yours. Mine was right tonight. Is it foolproof? No. But this one was screaming under.
I was trying to play nice. If you want to take out your frustrations on me, go ahead. I'm used to it. I'm married.
And you don't need to be intelligent to realize this game was "screaming under".... The predicted forecast, the drastic line movement, it was obvious... It ended up being the right play... My point being I said in the beginning of my thread Cleveland would score 13, no-way in hell did I ever think Pitt would score only 6 points, nor did anyone who has a brain.
Let me ask you this... Was this game still screaming under when the line went from 32 1/2 to 34 before kickoff? Don't think so! The weather wasn't nearly as bad as predicted...
0
Quote Originally Posted by johnobvious:
Did I say YOU were using a trend? No. Did I say Pittsburgh was going to score 6 and Cleveland 13? No. Did I mention the weather once in any of my posts. No.
No one really has that information? So the Covers numbers are all made up through some elaborate logarithm out to deceive people?
Over 60% every year, huh? Guess this one probably didn't hurt your bankroll much at all then. I guess that's the bright side here.
I have my system, you have yours. Mine was right tonight. Is it foolproof? No. But this one was screaming under.
I was trying to play nice. If you want to take out your frustrations on me, go ahead. I'm used to it. I'm married.
And you don't need to be intelligent to realize this game was "screaming under".... The predicted forecast, the drastic line movement, it was obvious... It ended up being the right play... My point being I said in the beginning of my thread Cleveland would score 13, no-way in hell did I ever think Pitt would score only 6 points, nor did anyone who has a brain.
Let me ask you this... Was this game still screaming under when the line went from 32 1/2 to 34 before kickoff? Don't think so! The weather wasn't nearly as bad as predicted...
Did I say YOU were using a trend? No. Did I say Pittsburgh was going to score 6 and Cleveland 13? No. Did I mention the weather once in any of my posts. No.
No one really has that information? So the Covers numbers are all made up through some elaborate logarithm out to deceive people?
Over 60% every year, huh? Guess this one probably didn't hurt your bankroll much at all then. I guess that's the bright side here.
I have my system, you have yours. Mine was right tonight. Is it foolproof? No. But this one was screaming under.
I was trying to play nice. If you want to take out your frustrations on me, go ahead. I'm used to it. I'm married.
You were lucky and I was un-lucky its that simple... If you thought your under was going to hit at half time your simply lieing... All of the red zone opportunities, etc... Congrats on your win, but maybe you should make your own threads, and we'll see how your system is
0
Quote Originally Posted by johnobvious:
Did I say YOU were using a trend? No. Did I say Pittsburgh was going to score 6 and Cleveland 13? No. Did I mention the weather once in any of my posts. No.
No one really has that information? So the Covers numbers are all made up through some elaborate logarithm out to deceive people?
Over 60% every year, huh? Guess this one probably didn't hurt your bankroll much at all then. I guess that's the bright side here.
I have my system, you have yours. Mine was right tonight. Is it foolproof? No. But this one was screaming under.
I was trying to play nice. If you want to take out your frustrations on me, go ahead. I'm used to it. I'm married.
You were lucky and I was un-lucky its that simple... If you thought your under was going to hit at half time your simply lieing... All of the red zone opportunities, etc... Congrats on your win, but maybe you should make your own threads, and we'll see how your system is
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.