I agree 123 the pitt O line will wear down the cards def warner might not make it four quarters. I took the steelers at the begining of the season in vegas
0
I agree 123 the pitt O line will wear down the cards def warner might not make it four quarters. I took the steelers at the begining of the season in vegas
Arizona got lucky and beat 3 playoff teams. Wow. That is lucky. Pitt's not lucky at all, replay reversal in Baltimore that gift wrapped division title & 2 seed. Baltimore got to play 18 weeks in a row before the AFC Championship game with the last 3 on the road and knocked Tennesse off which would've beaten Pitt again if they would've faced each other in Tenn. In the second Baltimore game a punt bounced off of Santonio Holmes facemask and went forward the Steelers gained 25 yards on a muffed punt. Their not lucky at all, like the big play in the AFC Championship game when BB just threw up a prayer and Holmes was there to answer it. Arizona played at least 10 perfect quarters out of 12 in the playoffs, I don't see that as being lucky. Can't wait to see them cover three 1,000 receivers and stop Edge as well. Not playing Flacco this week.
Well said
0
Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:
Arizona got lucky and beat 3 playoff teams. Wow. That is lucky. Pitt's not lucky at all, replay reversal in Baltimore that gift wrapped division title & 2 seed. Baltimore got to play 18 weeks in a row before the AFC Championship game with the last 3 on the road and knocked Tennesse off which would've beaten Pitt again if they would've faced each other in Tenn. In the second Baltimore game a punt bounced off of Santonio Holmes facemask and went forward the Steelers gained 25 yards on a muffed punt. Their not lucky at all, like the big play in the AFC Championship game when BB just threw up a prayer and Holmes was there to answer it. Arizona played at least 10 perfect quarters out of 12 in the playoffs, I don't see that as being lucky. Can't wait to see them cover three 1,000 receivers and stop Edge as well. Not playing Flacco this week.
I agree 123 the pitt O line will wear down the cards def warner might not make it four quarters. I took the steelers at the begining of the season in vegas
Ben sacked 51 times this year........
Pitt O line not wearing anyone down
0
Quote Originally Posted by Stifflersmom:
I agree 123 the pitt O line will wear down the cards def warner might not make it four quarters. I took the steelers at the begining of the season in vegas
you dont get it Train... AZ got lucky, they suck but got lucky and beat ATL, Car on the road and philly.. what a lucky team...
pitt on the other hand is great! they didnt get blown out by neither cleveland, baltimore, cincy etc... and played great their 2 playoffs games.. there were some times they got a little unlucky and couldnt do shit.. but they are awesome!!! they win this one by 40..........
unless cards get lucky again
Sometimes you create your own luck my man
Also consider this- The Chargers were injured and limped into Pitt - Balt had a rookie QB - good but still a Rookie.
You dont think Pitt was lucky- let me tell you brother
all teams that make it to the Super Bowl have luck on their side
And I do not know many teams that get blown out by clevl cincy and even Balt- so whats your point on that?
Arizona beat 2 very good teams Carolina and Phili - pretty good defenses in their own right- Carolina was a 2 headed monster at RB and they shut them down. So everything is relative.
And Train has a point, who will ben throw to - Ward is not healthy
Holmes is a legit threat but the others are average at best
And when you say they will beat by 40- that shows alot about you
no team gets blown out by 40 anymore- that is whack statement
ZONA has 3 Very good WR's and they are all hungry. Maybe the best in the League in FITZ. He is actually playing better than Ward - i love ward, but he has shown some slowing lately plus he is hurting bigtime. rushing to get back -
0
Quote Originally Posted by statfreak:
you dont get it Train... AZ got lucky, they suck but got lucky and beat ATL, Car on the road and philly.. what a lucky team...
pitt on the other hand is great! they didnt get blown out by neither cleveland, baltimore, cincy etc... and played great their 2 playoffs games.. there were some times they got a little unlucky and couldnt do shit.. but they are awesome!!! they win this one by 40..........
unless cards get lucky again
Sometimes you create your own luck my man
Also consider this- The Chargers were injured and limped into Pitt - Balt had a rookie QB - good but still a Rookie.
You dont think Pitt was lucky- let me tell you brother
all teams that make it to the Super Bowl have luck on their side
And I do not know many teams that get blown out by clevl cincy and even Balt- so whats your point on that?
Arizona beat 2 very good teams Carolina and Phili - pretty good defenses in their own right- Carolina was a 2 headed monster at RB and they shut them down. So everything is relative.
And Train has a point, who will ben throw to - Ward is not healthy
Holmes is a legit threat but the others are average at best
And when you say they will beat by 40- that shows alot about you
no team gets blown out by 40 anymore- that is whack statement
ZONA has 3 Very good WR's and they are all hungry. Maybe the best in the League in FITZ. He is actually playing better than Ward - i love ward, but he has shown some slowing lately plus he is hurting bigtime. rushing to get back -
Az = story of the year. Its hart-warming, its campfire shit even- makes a great story to tell the grand kids in Scottsdale when the cards don't make it back for another 40 years. But betters could give a shit less about fairy tales and when it comes to money Pitt has every edge in this game. I could drop some convincing stats but the circumstances alone point to a Pitt cover. Its pretty similar to their SB win a couple years ago- a happy to be there team, with a good passing attack and decent rushing dimension. (OK Alexander was great that year but Pitt made him look flat) The point is Pitt has a irie way of making teams one-dimensional and it might not happen in the first half, Wisenhunt will have some tricks up his sleave and I think they can contend for thirty minutes. But, the cards (other than warner who is prehistoric) are young and once that overwhelming D starts causing problems watch for the wheels to come off and Pitt hammer it home by 10. 1st half: Pitt 13 AZ 10 Game: Pitt 27 AZ 16 GL all.
0
Az = story of the year. Its hart-warming, its campfire shit even- makes a great story to tell the grand kids in Scottsdale when the cards don't make it back for another 40 years. But betters could give a shit less about fairy tales and when it comes to money Pitt has every edge in this game. I could drop some convincing stats but the circumstances alone point to a Pitt cover. Its pretty similar to their SB win a couple years ago- a happy to be there team, with a good passing attack and decent rushing dimension. (OK Alexander was great that year but Pitt made him look flat) The point is Pitt has a irie way of making teams one-dimensional and it might not happen in the first half, Wisenhunt will have some tricks up his sleave and I think they can contend for thirty minutes. But, the cards (other than warner who is prehistoric) are young and once that overwhelming D starts causing problems watch for the wheels to come off and Pitt hammer it home by 10. 1st half: Pitt 13 AZ 10 Game: Pitt 27 AZ 16 GL all.
Look, I'm a 49er fan, and as much as I would hate to see the Steelers get the first 6 pack of Lombardi's, I know that it is inevitable. The Stelers will win this SU, but I don't see them covering the spread. Have we all forgotten that Ken Wisenhunt was Pitts OC when they made their last trip to the SB? You don't think that he knows how to pressure and get to Big Ben? You must be naive.
My plays - the OVER (47) as well as a small teaser play on Pittsburgh (-1) + OVER (44).
Good Luck Fellas!
Deuces!
0
Look, I'm a 49er fan, and as much as I would hate to see the Steelers get the first 6 pack of Lombardi's, I know that it is inevitable. The Stelers will win this SU, but I don't see them covering the spread. Have we all forgotten that Ken Wisenhunt was Pitts OC when they made their last trip to the SB? You don't think that he knows how to pressure and get to Big Ben? You must be naive.
My plays - the OVER (47) as well as a small teaser play on Pittsburgh (-1) + OVER (44).
Thats what I see as well....basically Pitt doing a back door cover in the last 4 minutes or something. There will be a couple of BS calls that once again benefit the Steelers.
Have any of you ever heard of the rumors that some of the Rooney brothers are involved in gambling rings?
It wouldn't surprise me at all...
0
Thats what I see as well....basically Pitt doing a back door cover in the last 4 minutes or something. There will be a couple of BS calls that once again benefit the Steelers.
Have any of you ever heard of the rumors that some of the Rooney brothers are involved in gambling rings?
Aww killer, sounds like someone got burned when they played the ravenesses vs. Pittsburgh.
Panther123, Dead on as always bro.
Could've had my 2 hometown teams in the SB (I'm originally from Baltimore and now live in Chandler, AZ). I would've went to Tampa if Baltimore had won. That said, I'm a handicapper first, fan second. I would fear Baltimore's defense with some rest in the Superbowl more than Pitts. Remembering Superbowl 36 quite well, Ray Lewis would have them absolutely ferocious AGAIN. Pitt got a nice road with the reversal in Baltimore, division title, bye week, Baltimore knocks off Tenn. Can you agree with me or am I crazzzzzier than usual.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SykesSystem:
Aww killer, sounds like someone got burned when they played the ravenesses vs. Pittsburgh.
Panther123, Dead on as always bro.
Could've had my 2 hometown teams in the SB (I'm originally from Baltimore and now live in Chandler, AZ). I would've went to Tampa if Baltimore had won. That said, I'm a handicapper first, fan second. I would fear Baltimore's defense with some rest in the Superbowl more than Pitts. Remembering Superbowl 36 quite well, Ray Lewis would have them absolutely ferocious AGAIN. Pitt got a nice road with the reversal in Baltimore, division title, bye week, Baltimore knocks off Tenn. Can you agree with me or am I crazzzzzier than usual.
I can see Pittsburgh pulling it out in the last couple of minutes or getting rolled over. There is the Cards regular season team and this playoff team. The playoff team bucked all of the regular season stats and trends (running game, east coast win, defense). This playoff team is tough. Pittsburgh has been steady from the beginning.
In looking at Pittsburgh's games, the TEN game really makes me think ZONA has a chance. Big game for homefield and Collins was able to throw it all over with those crappy WRs. Weather, field, Collins performance are all comparable to what Pitt will be seeing this Sunday. Big difference is ZONA D compared to TEN D but IF ZONA gets up, they can run away with it. I am not dismissing Pitt's great wins and they shut down some great QBs, but Warner is doing some great things.
0
I can see Pittsburgh pulling it out in the last couple of minutes or getting rolled over. There is the Cards regular season team and this playoff team. The playoff team bucked all of the regular season stats and trends (running game, east coast win, defense). This playoff team is tough. Pittsburgh has been steady from the beginning.
In looking at Pittsburgh's games, the TEN game really makes me think ZONA has a chance. Big game for homefield and Collins was able to throw it all over with those crappy WRs. Weather, field, Collins performance are all comparable to what Pitt will be seeing this Sunday. Big difference is ZONA D compared to TEN D but IF ZONA gets up, they can run away with it. I am not dismissing Pitt's great wins and they shut down some great QBs, but Warner is doing some great things.
The Rooneys are the bosses in a gambling ring. They told me to take San Diego during the regular season and they personally called the ref while he was under the hood and told him not to count the TD with no time on the clock.
I overheard the phone call while I was drinking scotch with them.
0
The Rooneys are the bosses in a gambling ring. They told me to take San Diego during the regular season and they personally called the ref while he was under the hood and told him not to count the TD with no time on the clock.
I overheard the phone call while I was drinking scotch with them.
ARZ almost lost to the 49ers at home, so I'm gonna bet on Pittsburgh ML, cause ARZ is due for a bad game. Plus, the refs want a team with alot of fans to win, cause NFL will make more $$ if Pitt wins.
0
ARZ almost lost to the 49ers at home, so I'm gonna bet on Pittsburgh ML, cause ARZ is due for a bad game. Plus, the refs want a team with alot of fans to win, cause NFL will make more $$ if Pitt wins.
Could've had my 2 hometown teams in the SB (I'm originally from Baltimore and now live in Chandler, AZ). I would've went to Tampa if Baltimore had won. That said, I'm a handicapper first, fan second. I would fear Baltimore's defense with some rest in the Superbowl more than Pitts. Remembering Superbowl 36 quite well, Ray Lewis would have them absolutely ferocious AGAIN. Pitt got a nice road with the reversal in Baltimore, division title, bye week, Baltimore knocks off Tenn. Can you agree with me or am I crazzzzzier than usual.
You are More crazzzzzier than usual for sure - you are making no sense in this post what do you want me to agree with you on? I dont get it
0
Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:
Could've had my 2 hometown teams in the SB (I'm originally from Baltimore and now live in Chandler, AZ). I would've went to Tampa if Baltimore had won. That said, I'm a handicapper first, fan second. I would fear Baltimore's defense with some rest in the Superbowl more than Pitts. Remembering Superbowl 36 quite well, Ray Lewis would have them absolutely ferocious AGAIN. Pitt got a nice road with the reversal in Baltimore, division title, bye week, Baltimore knocks off Tenn. Can you agree with me or am I crazzzzzier than usual.
You are More crazzzzzier than usual for sure - you are making no sense in this post what do you want me to agree with you on? I dont get it
First, Romolicious, or whatever the hell it is, thats about a moronic statement you can make, how old are you anyway.
Second, someone else mentioned pittsburgh bit banged up - well, they are as healthy as they been all year...even ward, he will play and he will have good game...
0
First, Romolicious, or whatever the hell it is, thats about a moronic statement you can make, how old are you anyway.
Second, someone else mentioned pittsburgh bit banged up - well, they are as healthy as they been all year...even ward, he will play and he will have good game...
Oh....and those lucky Pats to win vs the Rams as 14 point dogs
Quote Originally Posted by statfreak:
you dont get it Train... AZ got lucky, they suck but got lucky and beat ATL, Car on the road and philly.. what a lucky team...
pitt on the other hand is great! they didnt get blown out by neither cleveland, baltimore, cincy etc... and played great their 2 playoffs games.. there were some times they got a little unlucky and couldnt do shit.. but they are awesome!!! they win this one by 40..........
unless cards get lucky again
0
Giants must've been lucky last year also
Oh....and those lucky Pats to win vs the Rams as 14 point dogs
Quote Originally Posted by statfreak:
you dont get it Train... AZ got lucky, they suck but got lucky and beat ATL, Car on the road and philly.. what a lucky team...
pitt on the other hand is great! they didnt get blown out by neither cleveland, baltimore, cincy etc... and played great their 2 playoffs games.. there were some times they got a little unlucky and couldnt do shit.. but they are awesome!!! they win this one by 40..........
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.