All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

The ref speaks on the SD/Pitt controversy

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 7219
Posts: 111
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 10225
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by CharlieScene:

It's the 7th playoff entrance tie-breaker = points scored.

Everyone now saying it should have been a TD.

Just what I have been saying all night!!

 

FUCKING POINTS DO MATTER!.how in the hell can they say it would have not mattered?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 482
Posted: #27
OMG - I just saw that on the halftime show. How could you possibly think this was a forward pass. Someone had to have had alternative motives there. It is not possible to think that was a forward pass...and it was reviewed? how is that possible?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 10225
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by whogivesafck:

one  shut the fuck up  about the pitt game  you cant change it

 

move on  you all sound like a bunch of pussies  that never gambled b4.

Go fuck off!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 2891
Posted: #29
There is NO WAY IN HELL they will change the final score. That is just plain laughable.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 2748
Posted: #30
People probably lost their houses on this game too lol

After thinking they won too just like me.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 711
Posted: #31
ya..collinsworth just said it at halftime...since its the 7th tie breaker, the nfl will not be changing the score.  Even though it was clearly a lateral.   
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2003
Posts: 1580
Posted: #32
The ref's ain't happy unless they are in control.

That was the biggest bullshit call I've ever seen.

It was clearly a backward lateral that was intercepted. 

I can't believe it. They actually sent out the extra point team from Pgh and then said it was not a touchdown after it was reviewed and ruled a touchdown.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 165
Posted: #33
Yeah well does anyone remember the chargers loosing because of a stupid call against denver?  I had a shitload of money on that moneyline and I did not come crying because of the call.  Its called karma bitch
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 3436
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by liftedorthesoil:

Yeah well does anyone remember the chargers loosing because of a stupid call against denver?  I had a shitload of money on that moneyline and I did not come crying because of the call.  Its called karma bitch

 

Wrong!!  I was waiting for someone to say that this is the same thing that happened in the Denver/San Diego game.  It isn't - not even close.  What happened in this game was that a TD was actually scored on the play.  In the Denver game, you dont know what would have happened.  In this game, we know what happened.  There was a TD scored.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 2894
Posted: #35
Big Z, the lateral they are talking about is the one CBS did not show.. The one from LT to Chambers with 0:02 on the clock.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2004
Posts: 23278
Posted: #36
This is exactly what i thought would happen. This is a perfect way for the nfl to hide their corruption.  The ref admits a mistake and then the nfl says sorry.
People will then accept that and move on.  This league is good real good.  They are on par with the cia in being able to carry things out
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2004
Posts: 23278
Posted: #37
why even have replay if you cant get the call right during the game, but as soon as the game is over you figure out the correct call
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 17229
Posted: #38
I like how CNNSI put this last line all the way on the bottom thinking nobody would notice?

"...The call affected betting on the game since the Steelers were 5-point favorites and would have covered if the touchdown counted."
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 165
Posted: #39
What do you mean you do not know how the game would of ended san diego would have beat denver.  There was only a minute left they could sit on the ball.  Its called karma
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 9
Posted: #40
<a href="https://football.gearlive.com/fourthdown/article/q308-its-why-they-call-it-gambling-11160725/">It's called gambling for a reason</a>
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 511
Posted: #41
Thw NFL can do whatever it wants to and they think they are always right. What a crock of shit.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2002
Posts: 1012
Posted: #42
The NFL can't change the score . . . .
Did they change the score in the Denver / San Diego game when the referee stated that he made the wrong call????????
 
The final is PIT 11 & SD 10 . . . . Deal with it. and stop
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2002
Posts: 99
Posted: #43

its called fix for a reason

when a person Gambles and you win you expect to get paid

this  pigshit  Mother fucken ref  must have had a big fucken wad on SD!

cocksuckin  CockRoach!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 2779
Posted: #44
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 2728
Posted: #45
i had Pitt as the last leg of a 4 team round robin...total bullshit ....would have been worth close to $3000 for me
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2004
Posts: 36392
Posted: #46
honestly, we should all have our heads examined for continuing to wager on these leagues.......the evidence couldn't be any more loud and clear
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 44
Posted: #47

[Quote: Originally Posted by CharlieScene] I'm thinking Goodell is going to have to make a statement tomorrow explaining this now that the ref said it should have count...)

 

Goodell just released the following statement:

" The NFL would like to apogize to all gamblers for the mess up call during the Pittsburgh/San Diego game.  We are urging all gamblers to forward your losing ticket to NFL headquarters in New York for a reimbursement." 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 8956
Posted: #48
you guys are stupid
 
the TD shouldnt have counted because the first lateral on the play (not the polamalu recovery) was a forward pass
 
open and shut case ...i watched it on tivo....it was a forward pass.
 
 
morons ...conspiracy,,,,,,,,,,,fix .....lmao
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 425
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by usakangy:

Big Z, the lateral they are talking about is the one CBS did not show.. The one from LT to Chambers with 0:02 on the clock.
PAL, MY FRIEND HAD MONEY ON SD.  HE SAID HE HAS WATCHED THE GAME ONTEVO OVER AND OVER AND IT WAS THE WORST CALL HE HAS EVER SEEN 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 2891
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by ICAPSports:

honestly, we should all have our heads examined for continuing to wager on these leagues.......the evidence couldn't be any more loud and clear

I agree. When you bet on sports where the athletes get paid then these types of situations will occur much more often it seems. It is much easier for me to cap a college game than any professional sport.

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.