You say your on Chiefs/Mahomes as "Shity as he looked" The Colts put lots of preasure on him Sunday and he still threw for 362 yds lol It just amazes me how this man which is probably the best QB ever with a few exceptions of course and continues to get bashed on this forum Maybe he needs to wear a 20lb gold chain or a couple of 5lb diamond ear rings to get some respect Ahh you gotta love Covers
2
@BET2WIN4
You say your on Chiefs/Mahomes as "Shity as he looked" The Colts put lots of preasure on him Sunday and he still threw for 362 yds lol It just amazes me how this man which is probably the best QB ever with a few exceptions of course and continues to get bashed on this forum Maybe he needs to wear a 20lb gold chain or a couple of 5lb diamond ear rings to get some respect Ahh you gotta love Covers
Quote Originally Posted by SecretAgentMan1: Quote Originally Posted by jefff: p:DW and D and day=Thursday and season>2014 3-20 SU, 6-17 ATS fade Dallas ------conversely on Dallas, teams that went to OT and their opponent didnt with 3 days rest are good fades: p:overtime=1 and op:overtime=0 and p:day=Sunday and day=Thursday 6-22 SU 5-23 ATS fade Det, KC Imo, one of these will win & one will lose. exactly. they are just trends and nothing more
Yes agree Jeff, & thanks for the info.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jefff:
Quote Originally Posted by SecretAgentMan1: Quote Originally Posted by jefff: p:DW and D and day=Thursday and season>2014 3-20 SU, 6-17 ATS fade Dallas ------conversely on Dallas, teams that went to OT and their opponent didnt with 3 days rest are good fades: p:overtime=1 and op:overtime=0 and p:day=Sunday and day=Thursday 6-22 SU 5-23 ATS fade Det, KC Imo, one of these will win & one will lose. exactly. they are just trends and nothing more
Is it true that favorites usually have covered this current century on Thanksgiving day? Somehow my memory is telling me that. I just found this little jewel doing a quick search: Favorites have historically dominated on Thanksgiving. Since 2004, favorites on Thanksgiving are 51-9 straight up (SU) and 40-20 against the spread. In the Wild Card era (since 1990), favorites of 7 points or more on Thanksgiving are 30-5 SU and 25-10 ATS, with the Ravens fitting that bill this week.
Is it true that favorites usually have covered this current century on Thanksgiving day? Somehow my memory is telling me that. I just found this little jewel doing a quick search: Favorites have historically dominated on Thanksgiving. Since 2004, favorites on Thanksgiving are 51-9 straight up (SU) and 40-20 against the spread. In the Wild Card era (since 1990), favorites of 7 points or more on Thanksgiving are 30-5 SU and 25-10 ATS, with the Ravens fitting that bill this week.
2 great games last year...38-35 or something like that... Burrow returns ......51.5 windy night in Bmore...
I hate this announcement on his return and I prefer Flacco to play on Turkey Day. Flacco is 2-0 on turkey games and one of it was with the Ravens on 2011. I was leaning for Bengals at first but I might just fade this game or tease it up to 10.5 as Ravens are shitty ATS recently.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigred84:
2 great games last year...38-35 or something like that... Burrow returns ......51.5 windy night in Bmore...
I hate this announcement on his return and I prefer Flacco to play on Turkey Day. Flacco is 2-0 on turkey games and one of it was with the Ravens on 2011. I was leaning for Bengals at first but I might just fade this game or tease it up to 10.5 as Ravens are shitty ATS recently.
I like Philly and went ahead and grabbed the -6.5.
I also played Isiah Likely o23.5 rec yds since Cincy is historically bad against the TE. Same as I did Sunday with Hunter Henry. Mark Andrews is in the mid 30s, I'd rather go with the more athletic run after catch guy who should get more work too bc Cincy is actually pretty good against WRs so expect Flowers to have a down game
0
I like Philly and went ahead and grabbed the -6.5.
I also played Isiah Likely o23.5 rec yds since Cincy is historically bad against the TE. Same as I did Sunday with Hunter Henry. Mark Andrews is in the mid 30s, I'd rather go with the more athletic run after catch guy who should get more work too bc Cincy is actually pretty good against WRs so expect Flowers to have a down game
I like Philly and went ahead and grabbed the -6.5. I also played Isiah Likely o23.5 rec yds since Cincy is historically bad against the TE. Same as I did Sunday with Hunter Henry. Mark Andrews is in the mid 30s, I'd rather go with the more athletic run after catch guy who should get more work too bc Cincy is actually pretty good against WRs so expect Flowers to have a down game
It was inevitable that the 7 wouldn't last after what transpired on Sunday.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Yanasaur:
I like Philly and went ahead and grabbed the -6.5. I also played Isiah Likely o23.5 rec yds since Cincy is historically bad against the TE. Same as I did Sunday with Hunter Henry. Mark Andrews is in the mid 30s, I'd rather go with the more athletic run after catch guy who should get more work too bc Cincy is actually pretty good against WRs so expect Flowers to have a down game
It was inevitable that the 7 wouldn't last after what transpired on Sunday.
How in the world does Detroit get back up after that rollercoaster game against the Giants and face the Packers on Thursday? While GB was basically in cruise control and didn’t have to work very hard to beat Minnesota…
There could be an adverse effect by being in cruise control last week vs the Vikings. They faced a QB who is not NFL caliber. Now have to face Goff otr on short rest. Food for thought
0
Quote Originally Posted by brn2loslive2win:
How in the world does Detroit get back up after that rollercoaster game against the Giants and face the Packers on Thursday? While GB was basically in cruise control and didn’t have to work very hard to beat Minnesota…
There could be an adverse effect by being in cruise control last week vs the Vikings. They faced a QB who is not NFL caliber. Now have to face Goff otr on short rest. Food for thought
I like Philly and went ahead and grabbed the -6.5. I also played Isiah Likely o23.5 rec yds since Cincy is historically bad against the TE. Same as I did Sunday with Hunter Henry. Mark Andrews is in the mid 30s, I'd rather go with the more athletic run after catch guy who should get more work too bc Cincy is actually pretty good against WRs so expect Flowers to have a down game
I wish ya all the luck in the world on Likely and think it's a decent bet but man he's been MIA since coming back from injuries.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Yanasaur:
I like Philly and went ahead and grabbed the -6.5. I also played Isiah Likely o23.5 rec yds since Cincy is historically bad against the TE. Same as I did Sunday with Hunter Henry. Mark Andrews is in the mid 30s, I'd rather go with the more athletic run after catch guy who should get more work too bc Cincy is actually pretty good against WRs so expect Flowers to have a down game
I wish ya all the luck in the world on Likely and think it's a decent bet but man he's been MIA since coming back from injuries.
Quote Originally Posted by bigred84: 2 great games last year...38-35 or something like that... Burrow returns ......51.5 windy night in Bmore... Honest question, the spread is -6.5(-120) and -7 at most books. Do you think this is a Burrow # or a Flacco #? Or neither, the books might have it in the middle and wait for the news?
I heard Burrow wanted to go Sunday but they decided to wait for this game.
1
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Quote Originally Posted by bigred84: 2 great games last year...38-35 or something like that... Burrow returns ......51.5 windy night in Bmore... Honest question, the spread is -6.5(-120) and -7 at most books. Do you think this is a Burrow # or a Flacco #? Or neither, the books might have it in the middle and wait for the news?
I heard Burrow wanted to go Sunday but they decided to wait for this game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.