Regarding the Saints, you pull out defensive numbers, but how many of those teams had an offense ranked #1 3 of the prior 4 years, including the current year? How many of those teams HOSTED their conference championship game? How many of those teams lost at least 5 defensive starters for at least 4 games in the 2nd half of the season?
Notice that all your stats says "27 of 31" or 28 of 31", but NONE said "31 of 31".
Jus sayin, this might be one of those 4 out of 31 years. Jus sayin.
Yea, your right it could be one of those 4 in 31 years a weak defensive team wins the SB.
However, why would you want to bet on something that's happened 4 times in 31 years and be right 4 times in 31 years, wouldn't it be much wiser to bet against that.
By betting against these teams I posted using this info last season and this season be 3-1 ATS and 3-1 riding the dog on the ML.
That's a recipe for success, by using your theroy and betting for these teams because this "might be" the one year of 4 that it happens you'd be 1-3 ATS, now, which makes more sense, betting for these teams in "hope" that this might be the year or playing the odds and betting against them ?????
I've tracked all 3 "key stats" in every game this season including all of NO games and never at any point did they have a good defense, not at the beginning of the season with all their starters playing, good luck if you plan on backing NO this weekend, you'll highly, highly end with major dissappointment just like the other weak defensive teams in history have done.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Aalon:
Regarding the Saints, you pull out defensive numbers, but how many of those teams had an offense ranked #1 3 of the prior 4 years, including the current year? How many of those teams HOSTED their conference championship game? How many of those teams lost at least 5 defensive starters for at least 4 games in the 2nd half of the season?
Notice that all your stats says "27 of 31" or 28 of 31", but NONE said "31 of 31".
Jus sayin, this might be one of those 4 out of 31 years. Jus sayin.
Yea, your right it could be one of those 4 in 31 years a weak defensive team wins the SB.
However, why would you want to bet on something that's happened 4 times in 31 years and be right 4 times in 31 years, wouldn't it be much wiser to bet against that.
By betting against these teams I posted using this info last season and this season be 3-1 ATS and 3-1 riding the dog on the ML.
That's a recipe for success, by using your theroy and betting for these teams because this "might be" the one year of 4 that it happens you'd be 1-3 ATS, now, which makes more sense, betting for these teams in "hope" that this might be the year or playing the odds and betting against them ?????
I've tracked all 3 "key stats" in every game this season including all of NO games and never at any point did they have a good defense, not at the beginning of the season with all their starters playing, good luck if you plan on backing NO this weekend, you'll highly, highly end with major dissappointment just like the other weak defensive teams in history have done.
1 down 1 to go, Claw... New Orleans will get dropped bigtime by the Vikings this week... and i told everyone about 1000 fucking times that the Jets would beat the Chargers yesterday...
let's see if anyone listens this week... i highly doubt it!
0
1 down 1 to go, Claw... New Orleans will get dropped bigtime by the Vikings this week... and i told everyone about 1000 fucking times that the Jets would beat the Chargers yesterday...
let's see if anyone listens this week... i highly doubt it!
Yea, your right it could be one of those 4 in 31 years a weak defensive team wins the SB.
However, why would you want to bet on something that's happened 4 times in 31 years and be right 4 times in 31 years, wouldn't it be much wiser to bet against that.
By betting against these teams I posted using this info last season and this season be 3-1 ATS and 3-1 riding the dog on the ML.
I've tracked all 3 "key stats" in every game this season including all of NO games and never at any point did they have a good defense, not at the beginning of the season with all their starters playing, good luck if you plan on backing NO this weekend, you'll highly, highly end with major dissappointment just like the other weak defensive teams in history have done.
Takeaways is a key stat, if not the MOST key defensive stat there is. Who is #1 in that category?
Opposing QB passer rating is a key stat. Who led that in the first half of the season? 3 and outs?
You have to keep in mind, the Saints defense is playing with the #1 offense on the other side. Lead the league in takeaways and give the ball to the #1 offense?
I'll bet on the 4 out of 31 this year. Stats are for suckers. You need to concentrate more on matchups.
Of the top 10 defenses in 2009, only the Jets and Vikings remain. Saints already beat the Jets and the Cardinals carved up the Vikings D. So did the Rams. Stats have a way of being overblown, especially considering the Vikings bottom 3 schedule strength.
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Yea, your right it could be one of those 4 in 31 years a weak defensive team wins the SB.
However, why would you want to bet on something that's happened 4 times in 31 years and be right 4 times in 31 years, wouldn't it be much wiser to bet against that.
By betting against these teams I posted using this info last season and this season be 3-1 ATS and 3-1 riding the dog on the ML.
I've tracked all 3 "key stats" in every game this season including all of NO games and never at any point did they have a good defense, not at the beginning of the season with all their starters playing, good luck if you plan on backing NO this weekend, you'll highly, highly end with major dissappointment just like the other weak defensive teams in history have done.
Takeaways is a key stat, if not the MOST key defensive stat there is. Who is #1 in that category?
Opposing QB passer rating is a key stat. Who led that in the first half of the season? 3 and outs?
You have to keep in mind, the Saints defense is playing with the #1 offense on the other side. Lead the league in takeaways and give the ball to the #1 offense?
I'll bet on the 4 out of 31 this year. Stats are for suckers. You need to concentrate more on matchups.
Of the top 10 defenses in 2009, only the Jets and Vikings remain. Saints already beat the Jets and the Cardinals carved up the Vikings D. So did the Rams. Stats have a way of being overblown, especially considering the Vikings bottom 3 schedule strength.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
