No disrespect to Van the man as he is a wealth of information but your taking advice from him? Vanzack is like Phil Helmuth,,they both think they are GOD, yet they lose their a$$es off.
In any event, BOL tonight on your ML...wished I was your bookie...btw, I am a terrible capper. Still chasing the 8 ball just like everybody here. I pick my spots and tonight is $$$$ night for me and the Saints backers.
No disrespect to Van the man as he is a wealth of information but your taking advice from him? Vanzack is like Phil Helmuth,,they both think they are GOD, yet they lose their a$$es off.
In any event, BOL tonight on your ML...wished I was your bookie...btw, I am a terrible capper. Still chasing the 8 ball just like everybody here. I pick my spots and tonight is $$$$ night for me and the Saints backers.
I'm on the saints also like I said earlier, but relax. Hes not saying hes betting everything on the lock of the millennium Falcons ML. +500 is good value for a team like Atlanta. They arent a terrible team, and this is the NFL. Anything can happen
I'm on the saints also like I said earlier, but relax. Hes not saying hes betting everything on the lock of the millennium Falcons ML. +500 is good value for a team like Atlanta. They arent a terrible team, and this is the NFL. Anything can happen
Rob - just having fun with Ranger, nothing personal. He gave me an earful last weekend about backing Philly.
Wow you still don't understand a THING I have said do you? I did not say ANYTHING bad about you backing Philly.
I DID give you an earful about being a know it all that thinks he knows what "vegas wants" but I would love for you to show me ONE post where I talked shit about you taking Philly, and I have absolutely NO PROBLEM with you taking the Saints tonight.
I'm amazed that you can't understand this fairly simple concept.
Rob - just having fun with Ranger, nothing personal. He gave me an earful last weekend about backing Philly.
Wow you still don't understand a THING I have said do you? I did not say ANYTHING bad about you backing Philly.
I DID give you an earful about being a know it all that thinks he knows what "vegas wants" but I would love for you to show me ONE post where I talked shit about you taking Philly, and I have absolutely NO PROBLEM with you taking the Saints tonight.
I'm amazed that you can't understand this fairly simple concept.
Oh, so we are resorting to calling names? I hope you are taking the +pts too,,,so I can laugh at your stupid a$$.
Only idiots are thinking about the ATL ML...please, covers got some dumb a$$ ppl that hyped shit up,,,and doing it for the wrong team too.
This mofo took the +pts last week and we had a talked about that,,,who the fuck are you? This shit ain't none of your biz wax moron. Your getting into the middle of something you have no business of or even talk about.
If you're going to be stupid enough to say that the Washington game has anything to do with the game tonight, it is someone's duty to tell you how dumb you are. I just happened to be there first.
Oh, so we are resorting to calling names? I hope you are taking the +pts too,,,so I can laugh at your stupid a$$.
Only idiots are thinking about the ATL ML...please, covers got some dumb a$$ ppl that hyped shit up,,,and doing it for the wrong team too.
This mofo took the +pts last week and we had a talked about that,,,who the fuck are you? This shit ain't none of your biz wax moron. Your getting into the middle of something you have no business of or even talk about.
If you're going to be stupid enough to say that the Washington game has anything to do with the game tonight, it is someone's duty to tell you how dumb you are. I just happened to be there first.
And NO could win by 50 tonight and it still wouldn't have anything to do with the Washington game last week.
I know your type...thinks Vegas has the low down on these games and that they manipulate the betting public to be on the wrong side. I'm guessing the fact that Washington didn't cover last week IS one of your reasons for being on NO this week. That's probably why you took such offense.
And NO could win by 50 tonight and it still wouldn't have anything to do with the Washington game last week.
I know your type...thinks Vegas has the low down on these games and that they manipulate the betting public to be on the wrong side. I'm guessing the fact that Washington didn't cover last week IS one of your reasons for being on NO this week. That's probably why you took such offense.
Wow you still don't understand a THING I have said do you? I did not say ANYTHING bad about you backing Philly.
I DID give you an earful about being a know it all that thinks he knows what "vegas wants" but I would love for you to show me ONE post where I talked shit about you taking Philly, and I have absolutely NO PROBLEM with you taking the Saints tonight.
I'm amazed that you can't understand this fairly simple concept.
Go back and read your posts in my thread...I bumped it up for you. Tell me you were not being an a$$????????
Why can't you understand that concept??? Now tell me if I am wrong about that pick????
Answer me this,,,,did the college game last night play a factor into tonight's game???? I will know if you know anything about sports betting base on this answer so choose your answer wisely my friend...cause right now,,,it appears you are a covers.com boy and your hyping up false information IMHO.
Wow you still don't understand a THING I have said do you? I did not say ANYTHING bad about you backing Philly.
I DID give you an earful about being a know it all that thinks he knows what "vegas wants" but I would love for you to show me ONE post where I talked shit about you taking Philly, and I have absolutely NO PROBLEM with you taking the Saints tonight.
I'm amazed that you can't understand this fairly simple concept.
Go back and read your posts in my thread...I bumped it up for you. Tell me you were not being an a$$????????
Why can't you understand that concept??? Now tell me if I am wrong about that pick????
Answer me this,,,,did the college game last night play a factor into tonight's game???? I will know if you know anything about sports betting base on this answer so choose your answer wisely my friend...cause right now,,,it appears you are a covers.com boy and your hyping up false information IMHO.
If you're going to be stupid enough to say that the Washington game has anything to do with the game tonight, it is someone's duty to tell you how dumb you are. I just happened to be there first.
Never said Skins game has anything to do with tonight's game...but don't you think the +pts factor is a trap? Oh wait,,,I am not suppose to use the word "trap" on covers or else I will be outkast by the covers.com crew.
If you're going to be stupid enough to say that the Washington game has anything to do with the game tonight, it is someone's duty to tell you how dumb you are. I just happened to be there first.
Never said Skins game has anything to do with tonight's game...but don't you think the +pts factor is a trap? Oh wait,,,I am not suppose to use the word "trap" on covers or else I will be outkast by the covers.com crew.
This is great listening to you guys go back and forth....I just hopped on this thread and I have been laughing the entire time, talking about this outcome and that outcome. This it the only NFL game tonight, and you can throw away everything about past preformances....its Atlanta and NO, divisional game, anyone can win this game. Just like 42 people lost in my survivor pool cause they back Philly against Oakland (-15 pt spread)...and you only had to pick the winner. Atlanta ML is not a bad play as long as you dont throw a boat load on it, but a few bucks is worth the shot.
This is great listening to you guys go back and forth....I just hopped on this thread and I have been laughing the entire time, talking about this outcome and that outcome. This it the only NFL game tonight, and you can throw away everything about past preformances....its Atlanta and NO, divisional game, anyone can win this game. Just like 42 people lost in my survivor pool cause they back Philly against Oakland (-15 pt spread)...and you only had to pick the winner. Atlanta ML is not a bad play as long as you dont throw a boat load on it, but a few bucks is worth the shot.
No disrespect to Van the man as he is a wealth of information but your taking advice from him? Vanzack is like Phil Helmuth,,they both think they are GOD, yet they lose their a$$es off.
In any event, BOL tonight on your ML...wished I was your bookie...btw, I am a terrible capper. Still chasing the 8 ball just like everybody here. I pick my spots and tonight is $$$$ night for me and the Saints backers.
I just let Phil Helmuth know what you said about him, and he is very upset.
Either of us would show you our betting accounts for a minimum 10K wager that I have made a profit in any 12 month betting period in the last 7 years. Phil is nervous you will select 2004 for him, but I welcome your 10k, so let me know how you would like to proceed.
I never met a hater better than me. I am on twitter
No disrespect to Van the man as he is a wealth of information but your taking advice from him? Vanzack is like Phil Helmuth,,they both think they are GOD, yet they lose their a$$es off.
In any event, BOL tonight on your ML...wished I was your bookie...btw, I am a terrible capper. Still chasing the 8 ball just like everybody here. I pick my spots and tonight is $$$$ night for me and the Saints backers.
I just let Phil Helmuth know what you said about him, and he is very upset.
Either of us would show you our betting accounts for a minimum 10K wager that I have made a profit in any 12 month betting period in the last 7 years. Phil is nervous you will select 2004 for him, but I welcome your 10k, so let me know how you would like to proceed.
I am not so sure. But Phil is so pissed about this thread I might have to throw a few bucks on it just to appease him. I told him we could both wear our bracelets (his WSOP, my WSOH) tonight when we hit on chicks. He likes that.
I never met a hater better than me. I am on twitter
I am not so sure. But Phil is so pissed about this thread I might have to throw a few bucks on it just to appease him. I told him we could both wear our bracelets (his WSOP, my WSOH) tonight when we hit on chicks. He likes that.
I am not so sure. But Phil is so pissed about this thread I might have to throw a few bucks on it just to appease him. I told him we could both wear our bracelets (his WSOP, my WSOH) tonight when we hit on chicks. He likes that.
I am not so sure. But Phil is so pissed about this thread I might have to throw a few bucks on it just to appease him. I told him we could both wear our bracelets (his WSOP, my WSOH) tonight when we hit on chicks. He likes that.
I am not so sure. But Phil is so pissed about this thread I might have to throw a few bucks on it just to appease him. I told him we could both wear our bracelets (his WSOP, my WSOH) tonight when we hit on chicks. He likes that.
I am not so sure. But Phil is so pissed about this thread I might have to throw a few bucks on it just to appease him. I told him we could both wear our bracelets (his WSOP, my WSOH) tonight when we hit on chicks. He likes that.
Vanzack, thanks for the laugh. Texting Phil as we speak. Rangerz, hit ATL M/L too (+475), well worth small play. Got 'em @ +11.5 & +12.5 too. 2 team teaser @ +17.5, under 61. Great value here, win, lose or draw. Good Luck!!!
"I'm afraid all we may have done is awakened a sleeping giant."
Vanzack, thanks for the laugh. Texting Phil as we speak. Rangerz, hit ATL M/L too (+475), well worth small play. Got 'em @ +11.5 & +12.5 too. 2 team teaser @ +17.5, under 61. Great value here, win, lose or draw. Good Luck!!!
Vanzack, thanks for the laugh. Texting Phil as we speak. Rangerz, hit ATL M/L too (+475), well worth small play. Got 'em @ +11.5 & +12.5 too. 2 team teaser @ +17.5, under 61. Great value here, win, lose or draw. Good Luck!!!
Vanzack, thanks for the laugh. Texting Phil as we speak. Rangerz, hit ATL M/L too (+475), well worth small play. Got 'em @ +11.5 & +12.5 too. 2 team teaser @ +17.5, under 61. Great value here, win, lose or draw. Good Luck!!!
Never said Skins game has anything to do with tonight's game...but don't you think the +pts factor is a trap? Oh wait,,,I am not suppose to use the word "trap" on covers or else I will be outkast by the covers.com crew.
Nope, I didn't think it was a trap.
I don't even know why I bother, but vanzack is right. People do prefer their own mythical reality to the truth. I should know better....people manufacture their own reasons to make sense of things they do not understand.
Linesmakers sometimes get them right....sometimes they get them completely wrong. If they were so damn omnicient, they would get them right a lot more then they do, don't you think?
I guess there are some people who will never be convinced that 9/11 was NOT an inside job....same types who will never come to terms with gambling reality.
Never said Skins game has anything to do with tonight's game...but don't you think the +pts factor is a trap? Oh wait,,,I am not suppose to use the word "trap" on covers or else I will be outkast by the covers.com crew.
Nope, I didn't think it was a trap.
I don't even know why I bother, but vanzack is right. People do prefer their own mythical reality to the truth. I should know better....people manufacture their own reasons to make sense of things they do not understand.
Linesmakers sometimes get them right....sometimes they get them completely wrong. If they were so damn omnicient, they would get them right a lot more then they do, don't you think?
I guess there are some people who will never be convinced that 9/11 was NOT an inside job....same types who will never come to terms with gambling reality.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.