All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

PLAYOFF system 100% 12-0 fading teams after they

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 14366
Posts: 89
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2524
Posted: #1

BEAT THE DEFENDING CHAMPS  in playoffs  THEY all lost the NEXT PLAYOFF game

 

SO if Falcons  get the Saints in div round  which is very possible

whomever winds up @ falcons in Finals  GOES on TO THE superbowl 

100% over all the superbowl years   0 - 12  S/U 

 

after beating the defeding Champs in playoffs all teams lose the NEXT game !

 

Last two teams to do this were Eagles  after upsetting Giants  went to ZONA  favored by 2 .5  and GOT thier Ears handed to them

and theee worst 9-7 team ever got to the superbowl !

before that it was Broncos  beat the Patriots div round at home

 

which was expected because Pats were trying to get to 3rd st superbowl WIN !

IN came the road warriors Steelers and TOOK them OUT !

SO whomever beats the saints 1st  will lose next game in playoffs

THE WC  in NFC are packers saints

SO the NFC west rep RAMS will be facing Saints or packers 

NFC North rep Bears  will face packers or saints

Falcons Eagles get 1 n 2 seed

and if Falcons make it to finals i think they play at Eagles because Eagles  Beat them in season

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1270
Posted: #2
I think Saints and Eagles in NFC Championship game.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #3
Yes ive heard of this system & its a good one but since I think the Saints will play the Pats in the bowl, this system wont come up.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 16266
Posted: #4
wont atl have homefield over the eagles?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 229
Posted: #5
saints suk
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2524
Posted: #6

Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:

Yes ive heard of this system & its a good one but since I think the Saints will play the Pats in the bowl, this system wont come up.

NO NO PTB has nothing to do with who will be at the Bowl only in playoffs if def champs are in playoffs

 

Sainst are in fer sure so whomever beats sainst in playoffs and has another playoff game left  they are 100% loser S/U and ATS

very possible that Eagles wind up at Falcons after falcons take out saints in div round

Bears packers will be elinated before finals

trust me on those teams not getting out of playoffs

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 66757
Posted: #7
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 251
Posted: #8

i agree, and not because im a homer eagles fan....it just seems that Vick going back to Atl for the NFC 'Ship is inevitable, and if your system is correct then im a happy man......

 

SB XLV

EAGLES - 55

pats - 37

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 3144
Posted: #9
Past doesn't predict the future... 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 7138
Posted: #10
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1425
Posted: #11

Quote Originally Posted by dj_destroyer:

Past doesn't predict the future... 

This trend is money...do not ignore this one

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 793
Posted: #12

Quote Originally Posted by dj_destroyer:

Past doesn't predict the future... 

but history tends to repeat itself  

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1270
Posted: #13
No trend is money....is funny how many times those trends are never brought up until they look attractive enough to be brought up at the right time for the right situations....

Trends like those are designed  to distract the public from the game at hand.

I rest my case.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by Scorpio85:

No trend is money....is funny how many times those trends are never brought up until they look attractive enough to be brought up at the right time for the right situations....

Trends like those are designed  to distract the public from the game at hand.

I rest my case.

That's because you have no case.

This is why heresay is not permissible in court.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 2082
Posted: #15
You gotta go do your homework all over again.  If Atlanta is the number one seed, they will get home field advantage in the playoffs.  The Bears become the 2 seed tonight after the Eagles lost.  Packers are not guaranteed in, the Bears might beat them to prevent them from getting in, and let the Giants in if they win.  The Giants can take out either the Eagles or the Rams/Seahawks.  Most likely, you will see Saints @ NFC West Champ and Pack @ Eagles, but it would be nice to see the Bears and Giants both winning and pushing the Giants into a playoff game in which the Giants defense can give DeSean Jackson a nice shit burger.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2524
Posted: #16

dangersousaction

your wrong about giants

even if they get in they cannot even get to the superbowl

because they would have 5 st road games

no bye weeks no home games

they are eliminated  already

NFC is falcons saints   Bears Packers

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2524
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by Scorpio85:

No trend is money....is funny how many times those trends are never brought up until they look attractive enough to be brought up at the right time for the right situations....

Trends like those are designed  to distract the public from the game at hand.

I rest my case.

 

I NEVER said TREND  I said system

thier is huge differnce between trends and systems

a TREND applies only to ONE team under certain specific conditions

THE packers NEVER lost a HOME playoff game was a trend

that went bye bye 2002 Falcons upset them in wc round

a system applies to all teams every year and will produce the same results when all parameters are met

0-12 in playoffs after beating the champs in playoffs  over past 45 years is a solid 100% system

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by Scorpio85:

No trend is money....is funny how many times those trends are never brought up until they look attractive enough to be brought up at the right time for the right situations....

Trends like those are designed  to distract the public from the game at hand.

I rest my case.

 

What case..........

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by dawniewags:

 

I NEVER said TREND  I said system

thier is huge differnce between trends and systems

a TREND applies only to ONE team under certain specific conditions

THE packers NEVER lost a HOME playoff game was a trend

that went bye bye 2002 Falcons upset them in wc round

a system applies to all teams every year and will produce the same results when all parameters are met

0-12 in playoffs after beating the champs in playoffs  over past 45 years is a solid 100% system

 

 

If a team beats the Saints in the championship game, does this system apply in the super bowl?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 3144
Posted: #20
Philly Flyers were 15-0 in Vancouver over the last 22 years before last night...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 3144
Posted: #21
This is a quote from another thread:

Games that happened 10 years ago (or even 3 years ago) have no bearing on today; the past doesn't predict the future. Trends are usually garbage and are similar to 'backtesting' a system. You may find something is 50-0 that immediately nosedives... which is why you should stick to 'forecasting'. Obviously it is a much greater task as you actually have to put your dick out on the line and not simply refer to past stats. Situational analysis, matchup analysis, motivation dynamics, starting lineups/goalies, recent form, etc. are the things you need to look into. By combining all these, it's easier to make that prediction of what WILL happen, not what HAS happened.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2524
Posted: #22

If a team beats the Saints in the championship game, does this system apply in the super bowl?

NOPE Prime Time Boys 

hasnt happened  but once i think 

Giants upended SF  def champs

because that was SF's  3rd st run for superbowl

Giants of Course Beat the loser Bills

ok heres results from 2001 through 2009 all teams after Beating DEF champs inh playoffs  LOST the NEX game S/U 0-12  1 - 11  ATS

01 Steelers Beat the def champs Ravens at Home  27-10

Next Playoff game at Home - 10  VS Pats  LOST the Game 17-24

 

05 DENVER home Beat Patriots the def champs next Home playoff game - 3 points LOST to Steelers 17 -34

07  Charges Beat INDY  the def champs

NEXT playoff game @ Patriots  +12  pts  LOST the game 12 - 21

08  Eagles @ giants the def champs W  @ cards finals - 3 1/2 favs  LOST the game  25 - 32

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1270
Posted: #23
Im going to guess that its because it has a lot to do with money and where it flows throughout the NFL...I may be very wrong...but I think that is a huge influence with which teams make it so far in the playoffs.....geez im such a conspiracy theorist. haha.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 6307
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:

Yes ive heard of this system & its a good one but since I think the Saints will play the Pats in the bowl, this system wont come up.
I think that's the next SB also.
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 790
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by dawniewags:

...

ok heres results from 2001 through 2009 all teams after Beating DEF champs inh playoffs  LOST the NEX game S/U 0-12  1 - 11  ATS

...


Let me see, there was NINE years from 2001 to 2009 (inclusive), and as I understand the NFL, only one SB Champ,,,  So, my question is...  Where did the other 3 teams come from???  This also assumes no repeat SB champs
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.