All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Pittsburgh @ Baltimore - Week 13

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 6576
Posts: 67
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 50021
Posted: #26

Quote Originally Posted by ratherBgambling:

Pitt.

You will see us again...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 3592
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by nuggins:



i wouldn't really call 256 yds w 1 TD and 1 INT as lit up though...Pitt ave. is 240...which of course isn't stellar by no means...what worries me is both the steelers D and O lines...we couldn't get shit for pressure on Fitz yesterday...and the O line has been susceptible for years now...that and ben's penchant for holding the ball too long...

can't say that these 2 teams aren't very familiar w/ each other...hence most games being close...i'll take steelers and 3...which will more than likely go down by fri/sat/sun

Of course you will bro, after all, you are a Pittsburgh fan.  Bet with your head kiddo
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 41
Posted: #28
How can you not take baltimore here? At home!! I know everybody loves Pitt's defense but look at their recent games. They have been getting GASHED by anybody and everybody who can throw the ball (New Orleans, New England, Cinci). This is not the same steelers defense against the pass that we have all come to know. It also looks like they forgot how to close out games. Baltimore too talented and at home win 21-10.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 748
Posted: #29

Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:

Just one question : Why the hell did the Ravens spend 28 million dollars on Anquan Boldin if they aren't going to pass him the ball ?

I agree. You would think that would have meant better stats for Flacco and Rice, yet it hasn't.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 4544
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by Maverick11:


Of course you will bro, after all, you are a Pittsburgh fan.  Bet with your head kiddo


oh i always bet w/ the cranium man...i hardly ever play on my teams...3 times this year so far...i will never play against them for sure, but when the spot is right i'll take my team(s)...one reason being that i know them very well and haven't missed watching a game since 2002..if i could have i would have POUNDED the game vs the Pats...i knew they were going to get toasted by brady...that is the gold standard from years past and will not change so if they play the pats in the playoffs...take the pats....but on that game i pounded the over and even the high juiced alt over...easy cheddar there...

also to Donz " This is not the same steelers defense against the pass that we have all come to know."...act. they have always been pretty suseptible to the pass over the last decade...last yr was simply atrocious w/ out troy...i just don't see flacco dicing them up like the other teams have...knew it was going to happen in Buff but thought the steelers would score more...couldn't take the -6 for sure...i was only on the ML parlayed w/ balt...

i just think +3 is a gift in all regards...but i can be wrong as i have many, many times over...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 4544
Posted: #31
and looking deeper into the stats...steelers are top echelon in regards to INT, FF. Sacks and of course tip top against the run... Balt is right in the middle of the pack in regards to pass O...i'll take the steelers D against the ravens pass and run O any day of the week...tampe held them in check at home...   balt has a good pass D but are very susceptable when spread out and  dink and dumps by Pitt will  open up the run game big time and the opp. for deep passes to wallace...again imo
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 1744
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by Maverick11:


Ravens did get banged up, but each player who left the game was walking around fine after the game Sunday....they will all be fine for Sunday


Not true...  https://www.victoriaadvocate.com/news/2010/nov/30/bc-fbn-wounded-ravens/?sports&nfl

I don't have lean either way, just saying check b4 bet.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 492
Posted: #33
pitt n over
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3420
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by Maverick11:


Flacco lit the Steelers D up earlier this year 
LOL.. I  quess for Flacco putting up 17 for the game is lighting it up...... With 32 seconds left he had 10...... Yea he lead them on that 40 yard drive to get a win.. If Pitt gets a 1st down he would have lit them up for 10..... Dont look at the yards ( Pitt plays a bend but dont break).. look at the points and sorry putting up 17 with a forty yard drive and having the ball all day in this new NFL is lighting it up ONLY for Flacco.. Try again...
Be careful with the axe Eugene.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 3592
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by ArtSchlichterJr:

LOL.. I  quess for Flacco putting up 17 for the game is lighting it up...... With 32 seconds left he had 10...... Yea he lead them on that 40 yard drive to get a win.. If Pitt gets a 1st down he would have lit them up for 10..... Dont look at the yards ( Pitt plays a bend but dont break).. look at the points and sorry putting up 17 with a forty yard drive and having the ball all day in this new NFL is lighting it up ONLY for Flacco.. Try again...

He threw on the "#1 D" at will...you must be from Pittsburgh too considering you have your location listed as Poland
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 3592
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by gmitran:



Not true...  https://www.victoriaadvocate.com/news/2010/nov/30/bc-fbn-wounded-ravens/?sports&nfl

I don't have lean either way, just saying check b4 bet.

They will be fine 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 2087
Posted: #37
The ramifications are huge in this game...You are talking about the loser going from a possible #2 seed in the AFC to #6.  That is huge! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3420
Posted: #38
[Quote: Originally Posted by Maverick11]

He threw on the "#1 D" at will...you must be from Pittsburgh too considering you have your location listed as Poland
[/Quote Well once again I hope he throws all over them again and has TEN points with 32 seconds left.. Hell give him 17.. If he throws his usual INT..  Not looking for a fantasy QB looking for one who puts up points.. If you think 17 is large (probably do with Joe at the helm).. so be it.. But most teams with a good QB think thats an off night.. You look at the yards and grade the QB thats fine for the fantasy guys.. 17 points is not lighting  up defense that plays a bend but not break scheme.. class over.. There really is no arguement here its cut and dry.. Thats why you answer with no substance to the question of lighting them up to me or any other poster.. Its just you live in Pitt blah.blah.blah..freaking fantasy players.. 17 points SUCK in the new NFL..
Be careful with the axe Eugene.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 168
Posted: #39

Ravens by 10 or more.  Big.

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2081
Posted: #40

Everyone raves about the Steelers defense.

I don't see it. Overrated.

I think the over is the play.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 4241
Posted: #41

Pitt pass D has been bad...Raven D not what it used to be...Like the over

i am a homer and will be at the game not sure how anybody would play the line but teasing Pitt up has to be money. Its a FG game.

Pitt +9

Over 33

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 1452
Posted: #42
I think teasing either side in this game along with another game is the way to go.  In a 7 point tease, I like will likely play both baltimore +4 with eagles -1; and pitt +10 with eagles -1.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 482
Posted: #43
Three point game either way. Tease it.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 9201
Posted: #44

I personally wouldn't touch an over in this series.. These game are constantly 13-10 contests

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 5105
Posted: #45

Quote Originally Posted by iLst:

Steelers got caught looking ahead and they played an extra quarter of football in doing so and now they're on the road playing the most physical team on the road. Ravens -3.

my man have you seen pittsburghs defense, dude they crunch people , i mean all year long i been watching this de, ya they had a hiccup against new england, but so did bmore, now im big on lewis ,suggs,and ed reed, but when your talkin steelers , there the bullies on block, ravens know it ,too. did you hear harbaugh, he said no other game on our schedule is quite like this one, its the hardest hitting game rivalry in the nfl, as a fan i get it the STEELERS ARE MORE PHYSICAL WATCH EM YOU LL SEE

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 737
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by nuggins:



...what worries me is both the steelers D and O lines...we couldn't get shit for pressure on Fitz yesterday...and the O line has been susceptible for years now...that and ben's penchant for holding the ball too long...



That is the problem for Pitt backers.  Will Pitt be able to get to Flacco with Eason & Hood?  Will the OL be able to keep Suggs off Ben?  Other than Pouncey, Flozell Adams has been their best OL this year... and that is scary.   
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1148
Posted: #47
Ravens lose.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2800
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:

Just one question : Why the hell did the Ravens spend 28 million dollars on Anquan Boldin if they aren't going to pass him the ball ?


well most teams try too shut down your best player which opens up 1 on 1 for others like mason heap etc thats y mason had 9 catches and heap got his
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1446
Posted: #49
It is scary since Ben is wearing a boot at the moment but the play would be Pittsburgh +3.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2800
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by 40Down:

I agree. You would think that would have meant better stats for Flacco and Rice, yet it hasn't.



huh 25/35 289 yards and 2 tds huh what do u want 35 /35 900 yards lol

oh yea and rice 20 for 85 yds last week i no he didnt break 100 but who wouldnt take that

i guess you are comparing flacco too brady numbers huh he aint no fcking brady
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.