interestingky enough - today after yet another loss with them, side or totals as you rightfully pointed out - i asked myself the same question. you see, i have my weaknesses and demons too as any normal person and i fight them but this washington bs is getting me too. without betting their games i'd be in around 70%(!!!!!!) winning rate. you right and everyone else taking criticism on me picking them is right too. i most probably have a hard time believing that shanahan and the co can be so heartless with their fans to present next to nothing week after week and i am sure vegas too is going nuts about them losing a bunch on their ineptness.
reading back what i wrote - sounds like a mambo bs but nevertheless the way i feel about me picking washington games is exactly that mambo bs.
This is the sound of a real man talking. Big enough to take a look at one's own foibles. More power to you, dude.
0
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
interestingky enough - today after yet another loss with them, side or totals as you rightfully pointed out - i asked myself the same question. you see, i have my weaknesses and demons too as any normal person and i fight them but this washington bs is getting me too. without betting their games i'd be in around 70%(!!!!!!) winning rate. you right and everyone else taking criticism on me picking them is right too. i most probably have a hard time believing that shanahan and the co can be so heartless with their fans to present next to nothing week after week and i am sure vegas too is going nuts about them losing a bunch on their ineptness.
reading back what i wrote - sounds like a mambo bs but nevertheless the way i feel about me picking washington games is exactly that mambo bs.
This is the sound of a real man talking. Big enough to take a look at one's own foibles. More power to you, dude.
interestingky enough - today after yet another loss with them, side or totals as you rightfully pointed out - i asked myself the same question. you see, i have my weaknesses and demons too as any normal person and i fight them but this washington bs is getting me too. without betting their games i'd be in around 70%(!!!!!!) winning rate. you right and everyone else taking criticism on me picking them is right too. i most probably have a hard time believing that shanahan and the co can be so heartless with their fans to present next to nothing week after week and i am sure vegas too is going nuts about them losing a bunch on their ineptness.
reading back what i wrote - sounds like a mambo bs but nevertheless the way i feel about me picking washington games is exactly that mambo bs.
Much respect for you, sir
0
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
interestingky enough - today after yet another loss with them, side or totals as you rightfully pointed out - i asked myself the same question. you see, i have my weaknesses and demons too as any normal person and i fight them but this washington bs is getting me too. without betting their games i'd be in around 70%(!!!!!!) winning rate. you right and everyone else taking criticism on me picking them is right too. i most probably have a hard time believing that shanahan and the co can be so heartless with their fans to present next to nothing week after week and i am sure vegas too is going nuts about them losing a bunch on their ineptness.
reading back what i wrote - sounds like a mambo bs but nevertheless the way i feel about me picking washington games is exactly that mambo bs.
phixer and mk has same plays...makes u wonder..hmmmm
Makes you wander what genius? MK and Phixer combined took 12 plays since MK is back and only 1 play - Washington was a mutual one. As well as with the Keynumber in case you wanna know. 3 winning cappers each with their winning records. Are phishing for something?
0
Quote Originally Posted by intel-1:
phixer and mk has same plays...makes u wonder..hmmmm
Makes you wander what genius? MK and Phixer combined took 12 plays since MK is back and only 1 play - Washington was a mutual one. As well as with the Keynumber in case you wanna know. 3 winning cappers each with their winning records. Are phishing for something?
ok. we have another complicated "against our own will" pick possibility tonight. when i look at the line and how the bettors are divided i ask myself who are all those who back denver -10 and who are those 30+% who back sd in denver. it's like a jamaican ice hockey team playing in montreal. so, what are we saying that the jamaicans (sd) have a chance here or payton manning and the co have to make a tremendous "effort" not to win by more than 10. to denver ot not to denver - that is the question. its only a beginning of thbe discussion and as the evening will come on us i will have more insights
0
ok. we have another complicated "against our own will" pick possibility tonight. when i look at the line and how the bettors are divided i ask myself who are all those who back denver -10 and who are those 30+% who back sd in denver. it's like a jamaican ice hockey team playing in montreal. so, what are we saying that the jamaicans (sd) have a chance here or payton manning and the co have to make a tremendous "effort" not to win by more than 10. to denver ot not to denver - that is the question. its only a beginning of thbe discussion and as the evening will come on us i will have more insights
i'd be looking for the time of the first score in this instance. also halftime would be a prefered place to place a bet as denver is very readable at the halftimes
0
i'd be looking for the time of the first score in this instance. also halftime would be a prefered place to place a bet as denver is very readable at the halftimes
Looks like mkbini is banned...there are no recent posts from him in that thread either...do you mind just linking to wherever people are getting his plays? I'm sure this isn't that tough to figure out but could you just help out those of us who are curious?
0
Looks like mkbini is banned...there are no recent posts from him in that thread either...do you mind just linking to wherever people are getting his plays? I'm sure this isn't that tough to figure out but could you just help out those of us who are curious?
ok. we have another complicated "against our own will" pick possibility tonight. when i look at the line and how the bettors are divided i ask myself who are all those who back denver -10 and who are those 30+% who back sd in denver. it's like a jamaican ice hockey team playing in montreal. so, what are we saying that the jamaicans (sd) have a chance here or payton manning and the co have to make a tremendous "effort" not to win by more than 10. to denver ot not to denver - that is the question. its only a beginning of thbe discussion and as the evening will come on us i will have more insights
This is going to be one of those games where no one will be happy when the clock hits 0:00 in the 4th-
0
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
ok. we have another complicated "against our own will" pick possibility tonight. when i look at the line and how the bettors are divided i ask myself who are all those who back denver -10 and who are those 30+% who back sd in denver. it's like a jamaican ice hockey team playing in montreal. so, what are we saying that the jamaicans (sd) have a chance here or payton manning and the co have to make a tremendous "effort" not to win by more than 10. to denver ot not to denver - that is the question. its only a beginning of thbe discussion and as the evening will come on us i will have more insights
This is going to be one of those games where no one will be happy when the clock hits 0:00 in the 4th-
This is going to be one of those games where no one will be happy when the clock hits 0:00 in the 4th-
there is a counter party to every transaction in this biz - there will be plenty of satisfied people. that's how zero-sum games work. some people just born to be constantly on the wrong side..
0
Quote Originally Posted by Turbovtk:
This is going to be one of those games where no one will be happy when the clock hits 0:00 in the 4th-
there is a counter party to every transaction in this biz - there will be plenty of satisfied people. that's how zero-sum games work. some people just born to be constantly on the wrong side..
there is a counter party to every transaction in this biz - there will be plenty of satisfied people. that's how zero-sum games work. some people just born to be constantly on the wrong side..
Its not always zero sum!
0
Quote Originally Posted by tuco:
there is a counter party to every transaction in this biz - there will be plenty of satisfied people. that's how zero-sum games work. some people just born to be constantly on the wrong side..
Phixer ive been following your thread for a few weeks and i really like the way you think about your bets, Being that you pick the same way i do. The logical fix in this game is to take the points with the chargers. It only tells me that the broncos go up by 17 and magically philip rivers connects on a garbage time TD. Similar to last years Joe flacco-Jacoby jones BS touchdown.
The safe bet IMHO is to tease the line -1 point to 9 1/2. As losing by a half of a point is something thats been killing me :).
The bank safe bet is the over IMHO.
0
Phixer ive been following your thread for a few weeks and i really like the way you think about your bets, Being that you pick the same way i do. The logical fix in this game is to take the points with the chargers. It only tells me that the broncos go up by 17 and magically philip rivers connects on a garbage time TD. Similar to last years Joe flacco-Jacoby jones BS touchdown.
The safe bet IMHO is to tease the line -1 point to 9 1/2. As losing by a half of a point is something thats been killing me :).