Sorry, eddy. I used six weeks history for a quick check (my OU number is the closing line at Wagerline.com). Yes, last week went 12-4, but the previous week was 8-8 and the week before was 7-9. The system is generally about .500 with a few really good and really bad weeks thrown in. I even tried only looking at games where your projected score was more than three points from the OU with the same results.
In general, when I discover some great, easy system like this, I always ask myself, "If it were this easy, wouldn't somebody a lot smarter than me have figured it out by now?" Then, when I go back and check previous results, I find that I just stumbled on a week that was an anomoly.
Oh well, good luck finding the next big play.
Sorry, eddy. I used six weeks history for a quick check (my OU number is the closing line at Wagerline.com). Yes, last week went 12-4, but the previous week was 8-8 and the week before was 7-9. The system is generally about .500 with a few really good and really bad weeks thrown in. I even tried only looking at games where your projected score was more than three points from the OU with the same results.
In general, when I discover some great, easy system like this, I always ask myself, "If it were this easy, wouldn't somebody a lot smarter than me have figured it out by now?" Then, when I go back and check previous results, I find that I just stumbled on a week that was an anomoly.
Oh well, good luck finding the next big play.
that was confusing... let me try this again...
i'm talking only about the "system" you mention at the top of this thread... nothing else...
do you only use points FOR and not points AGAINST? or are you tallying all of them together?
for example, using what i think your system is, for the Atl/TB game (going back 6 games for both teams), i get a projected total of about 50 using you system... is that what you get?
that was confusing... let me try this again...
i'm talking only about the "system" you mention at the top of this thread... nothing else...
do you only use points FOR and not points AGAINST? or are you tallying all of them together?
for example, using what i think your system is, for the Atl/TB game (going back 6 games for both teams), i get a projected total of about 50 using you system... is that what you get?
The difference is not that great ( - 1.6 ) because Cincinnati is giving up a ton of points ..Washington has had to face the NYG & Baltimore last 2 games , so the prior 5 games might give a better indication of their offensive output . They averaged 15 PPG during those games scoring the most against Detroit ( 25 ) . I think it would be fair to tag Wash for 20 pts vs Cinn. As for Cincy's offense , well they are ranked dead last . Like Washington , they have had some tough games recently playing Baltimore , Pittsburgh ( 2 X ) , Philadelphia . Indi...
Regardless , It would be hard to give them more than 13 ( their average vs Houston & Jacksonville .
I expect no more than 4 TD's in this game , if you add 3 field goals you have 37. That 36.5 might as well be a 34.5 .Would you still take them at that number ...? Then again 3 TD's & 3 FG's is all that these offenses might be capable of producing ..., but I would feel more comfortable getting 37 here
The difference is not that great ( - 1.6 ) because Cincinnati is giving up a ton of points ..Washington has had to face the NYG & Baltimore last 2 games , so the prior 5 games might give a better indication of their offensive output . They averaged 15 PPG during those games scoring the most against Detroit ( 25 ) . I think it would be fair to tag Wash for 20 pts vs Cinn. As for Cincy's offense , well they are ranked dead last . Like Washington , they have had some tough games recently playing Baltimore , Pittsburgh ( 2 X ) , Philadelphia . Indi...
Regardless , It would be hard to give them more than 13 ( their average vs Houston & Jacksonville .
I expect no more than 4 TD's in this game , if you add 3 field goals you have 37. That 36.5 might as well be a 34.5 .Would you still take them at that number ...? Then again 3 TD's & 3 FG's is all that these offenses might be capable of producing ..., but I would feel more comfortable getting 37 here
If we look at the points scored for every team in the National Football League, we would come up with an average of roughly 22 points. Now we know that a team averaging 2o points a game is slightly below average.
Other bettors prefer using medians as opposed to averages, as one or two extremely high-scoring or low-scoring teams can make the average slightly misleading.
Medians are simply numbers that separate a higher group of numbers in a sample from the lower half of the numbers in the same sample. The number in the middle, essentially.
In the following group of seven numbers (3, 7, 11, 15, 18, 21, 23), the median is 15. The average of the numbers is 14.
Once you have your league or median, whichever you feel more comfortable with, you are ready to predict totals.
As you recall, the Vikings averaged 24 points and allowed 16 a game, while the Bears scored 18 and allowed 20. Now that we have a number (22) to compare those statistics against, we see that the Vikings offense is several points better than average, while the Bears are four points worse than the average offensive team. Defensively, both teams are better than average, with the Vikings allowing six points fewer than the average team, while the Bears allow two points less than the average team.
Now, our predicted total of 39 points, which we got by adding points for and points allowed by each team and dividing by two, seems a little high. What we need to do now is factor in the difference of the league average, which isn't as difficult as it sounds.
Our predicted average (39 points) is five points less than the league average score, so we want to subtract five points from our predicted score of 39, which gives us 34. That becomes our predicted total. Likewise if our averages yielded a predicted total of 48 points, we would add the four points to our predicted total and come up with a number of 52.
Naturally, this isn't the only step needed to win at totals, but it does give the bettor a solid foundation and can quickly point out bad numbers.
One thing I do include in my totals handicapping is the average difference between the over/under odds and the actual scores. The linesmakers tend to shade the numbers slightly to the over, especially on the nationally televised games, as more bettors feel inclined to make a wager on those games, regardless if they have an opinion or not. Since most bettors are more likely to choose the over, the number is probably .5 to 1 point higher than it actually should be. Of course, that doesn't mean there aren't good opportunities to bet the over in nationally televised games, just to pick and choose your spots.
If we look at the points scored for every team in the National Football League, we would come up with an average of roughly 22 points. Now we know that a team averaging 2o points a game is slightly below average.
Other bettors prefer using medians as opposed to averages, as one or two extremely high-scoring or low-scoring teams can make the average slightly misleading.
Medians are simply numbers that separate a higher group of numbers in a sample from the lower half of the numbers in the same sample. The number in the middle, essentially.
In the following group of seven numbers (3, 7, 11, 15, 18, 21, 23), the median is 15. The average of the numbers is 14.
Once you have your league or median, whichever you feel more comfortable with, you are ready to predict totals.
As you recall, the Vikings averaged 24 points and allowed 16 a game, while the Bears scored 18 and allowed 20. Now that we have a number (22) to compare those statistics against, we see that the Vikings offense is several points better than average, while the Bears are four points worse than the average offensive team. Defensively, both teams are better than average, with the Vikings allowing six points fewer than the average team, while the Bears allow two points less than the average team.
Now, our predicted total of 39 points, which we got by adding points for and points allowed by each team and dividing by two, seems a little high. What we need to do now is factor in the difference of the league average, which isn't as difficult as it sounds.
Our predicted average (39 points) is five points less than the league average score, so we want to subtract five points from our predicted score of 39, which gives us 34. That becomes our predicted total. Likewise if our averages yielded a predicted total of 48 points, we would add the four points to our predicted total and come up with a number of 52.
Naturally, this isn't the only step needed to win at totals, but it does give the bettor a solid foundation and can quickly point out bad numbers.
One thing I do include in my totals handicapping is the average difference between the over/under odds and the actual scores. The linesmakers tend to shade the numbers slightly to the over, especially on the nationally televised games, as more bettors feel inclined to make a wager on those games, regardless if they have an opinion or not. Since most bettors are more likely to choose the over, the number is probably .5 to 1 point higher than it actually should be. Of course, that doesn't mean there aren't good opportunities to bet the over in nationally televised games, just to pick and choose your spots.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.