@theclaw This Green Bay team has peeked my interest this week. How often are teams favored at home in b2b games, lose both, and then favored otr by 7 or more points the next game? Sdql guys, you're up to the plate. My gambling gut says to eat the chalk immediately here.
Yes I was likely on Packers this week.............
They are not more then a 1 score favorite instead of being a big favorite VS not good teams.
And you bring up another good point.
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
@theclaw This Green Bay team has peeked my interest this week. How often are teams favored at home in b2b games, lose both, and then favored otr by 7 or more points the next game? Sdql guys, you're up to the plate. My gambling gut says to eat the chalk immediately here.
Yes I was likely on Packers this week.............
They are not more then a 1 score favorite instead of being a big favorite VS not good teams.
Bounce Factor ............7-2 ATS Rams -2.5 (-120) over Seahawks --- 2.4 units Seahawks a fade and a fade on my new BF II. 2 methods fading the Seahawks this week.
Why is this a bounce factor play? Both teams have won and covered their last 4 games. Just curious. Thanks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Bounce Factor ............7-2 ATS Rams -2.5 (-120) over Seahawks --- 2.4 units Seahawks a fade and a fade on my new BF II. 2 methods fading the Seahawks this week.
Why is this a bounce factor play? Both teams have won and covered their last 4 games. Just curious. Thanks.
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Bounce Factor ............7-2 ATS Rams -2.5 (-120) over Seahawks --- 2.4 units Seahawks a fade and a fade on my new BF II. 2 methods fading the Seahawks this week. Why is this a bounce factor play? Both teams have won and covered their last 4 games. Just curious. Thanks.
Seattle more dominate in their wins in the BF method. Rams not dominate enough to qualify..............
Good question Jimmy
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy_Cats:
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Bounce Factor ............7-2 ATS Rams -2.5 (-120) over Seahawks --- 2.4 units Seahawks a fade and a fade on my new BF II. 2 methods fading the Seahawks this week. Why is this a bounce factor play? Both teams have won and covered their last 4 games. Just curious. Thanks.
Seattle more dominate in their wins in the BF method. Rams not dominate enough to qualify..............
Seattle is threatening to emerge as an NFC Favorite to go to the SB Im sorry to say.
Appreciate your perspective Jimmy. I do agree and I have Seahawks to win division for like +275 or such but this is not a good spot for them.
Rams are equally as good and likely better overall balance plus Seahawks well over .200 in pts per plays which is not sustainable and coming off big performances recently.
Only 1 way for Seahawks to go and that is down.
With that said maybe they could get past this week with a win and cover but they will regress and it should be soon if history is any indicator, no real question about that. Very, very unlikely they don't.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JimmyGape:
Seattle is threatening to emerge as an NFC Favorite to go to the SB Im sorry to say.
Appreciate your perspective Jimmy. I do agree and I have Seahawks to win division for like +275 or such but this is not a good spot for them.
Rams are equally as good and likely better overall balance plus Seahawks well over .200 in pts per plays which is not sustainable and coming off big performances recently.
Only 1 way for Seahawks to go and that is down.
With that said maybe they could get past this week with a win and cover but they will regress and it should be soon if history is any indicator, no real question about that. Very, very unlikely they don't.
Redskins I believe are the only 2 teams along with Arizona in 2002 to lose 4 straight games by 20 or more. From what I could find that might just be recent.
0
Redskins I believe are the only 2 teams along with Arizona in 2002 to lose 4 straight games by 20 or more. From what I could find that might just be recent.
Redskins I believe are the only 2 teams along with Arizona in 2002 to lose 4 straight games by 20 or more. From what I could find that might just be recent.
Interesting ...........
0
Quote Originally Posted by smellybunty:
Redskins I believe are the only 2 teams along with Arizona in 2002 to lose 4 straight games by 20 or more. From what I could find that might just be recent.
The systems are good but there's mental issues at play especially in a league where coaching and preparation can be deadly...NO QUESTION Buffalo, Miami and GB both lack that and NE doesn't. I'm mad at myself and shocked you didn't pick Miami last week or the Eagles(apologize if you did pick the Eagles, I missed it). Miami, Buffalo and GB should fire their coaches, it's clear that Miami chose to show up last week and played way more intentively and with purpose..where was that in WEEK 1 AND VS CLEVELAND? McDaniels can't inspire consistently. In comes a perfect opponent Buffalo, a division rival off a big win, a great record vs them recently and they were completely flat. THAT'S COACHING ON BOTH SIDES. GB has consistently showed casualness on offense-perfect example-when down 10-0 vs. Philly, they went down the field so fast and precisely and scored a TD in minutes..where the hell was that the prior 45 minutes, vs. Carolina, vs. Cleveland, vs. Dallas, on and on..Vrable and NE, McVay anad the Rams, MCDonald and Seattle, Shanahan and the 49ers never looked like that ALL SEASON. They lost but they showed up every week.
Now watch Miami lose today, GB and Buffalo give their best and win...awesome..a win or 2 more and you can fade them again especially as medium to large favs..Neither GB or Buffalo will ever make the SB with these coaches...
0
Claw:
The systems are good but there's mental issues at play especially in a league where coaching and preparation can be deadly...NO QUESTION Buffalo, Miami and GB both lack that and NE doesn't. I'm mad at myself and shocked you didn't pick Miami last week or the Eagles(apologize if you did pick the Eagles, I missed it). Miami, Buffalo and GB should fire their coaches, it's clear that Miami chose to show up last week and played way more intentively and with purpose..where was that in WEEK 1 AND VS CLEVELAND? McDaniels can't inspire consistently. In comes a perfect opponent Buffalo, a division rival off a big win, a great record vs them recently and they were completely flat. THAT'S COACHING ON BOTH SIDES. GB has consistently showed casualness on offense-perfect example-when down 10-0 vs. Philly, they went down the field so fast and precisely and scored a TD in minutes..where the hell was that the prior 45 minutes, vs. Carolina, vs. Cleveland, vs. Dallas, on and on..Vrable and NE, McVay anad the Rams, MCDonald and Seattle, Shanahan and the 49ers never looked like that ALL SEASON. They lost but they showed up every week.
Now watch Miami lose today, GB and Buffalo give their best and win...awesome..a win or 2 more and you can fade them again especially as medium to large favs..Neither GB or Buffalo will ever make the SB with these coaches...
Claw: The systems are good but there's mental issues at play especially in a league where coaching and preparation can be deadly...NO QUESTION Buffalo, Miami and GB both lack that and NE doesn't. I'm mad at myself and shocked you didn't pick Miami last week or the Eagles(apologize if you did pick the Eagles, I missed it). Miami, Buffalo and GB should fire their coaches, it's clear that Miami chose to show up last week and played way more intentively and with purpose..where was that in WEEK 1 AND VS CLEVELAND? McDaniels can't inspire consistently. In comes a perfect opponent Buffalo, a division rival off a big win, a great record vs them recently and they were completely flat. THAT'S COACHING ON BOTH SIDES. GB has consistently showed casualness on offense-perfect example-when down 10-0 vs. Philly, they went down the field so fast and precisely and scored a TD in minutes..where the hell was that the prior 45 minutes, vs. Carolina, vs. Cleveland, vs. Dallas, on and on..Vrable and NE, McVay anad the Rams, MCDonald and Seattle, Shanahan and the 49ers never looked like that ALL SEASON. They lost but they showed up every week. Now watch Miami lose today, GB and Buffalo give their best and win...awesome..a win or 2 more and you can fade them again especially as medium to large favs..Neither GB or Buffalo will ever make the SB with these coaches...
Appreciate your perspective. Alot of what you say is true but I play my methods and no doubt there are methods that counter my methods but if I stay the course with my methods I have a good shot at a winning record...........
1
Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:
Claw: The systems are good but there's mental issues at play especially in a league where coaching and preparation can be deadly...NO QUESTION Buffalo, Miami and GB both lack that and NE doesn't. I'm mad at myself and shocked you didn't pick Miami last week or the Eagles(apologize if you did pick the Eagles, I missed it). Miami, Buffalo and GB should fire their coaches, it's clear that Miami chose to show up last week and played way more intentively and with purpose..where was that in WEEK 1 AND VS CLEVELAND? McDaniels can't inspire consistently. In comes a perfect opponent Buffalo, a division rival off a big win, a great record vs them recently and they were completely flat. THAT'S COACHING ON BOTH SIDES. GB has consistently showed casualness on offense-perfect example-when down 10-0 vs. Philly, they went down the field so fast and precisely and scored a TD in minutes..where the hell was that the prior 45 minutes, vs. Carolina, vs. Cleveland, vs. Dallas, on and on..Vrable and NE, McVay anad the Rams, MCDonald and Seattle, Shanahan and the 49ers never looked like that ALL SEASON. They lost but they showed up every week. Now watch Miami lose today, GB and Buffalo give their best and win...awesome..a win or 2 more and you can fade them again especially as medium to large favs..Neither GB or Buffalo will ever make the SB with these coaches...
Appreciate your perspective. Alot of what you say is true but I play my methods and no doubt there are methods that counter my methods but if I stay the course with my methods I have a good shot at a winning record...........
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.