*Three teams (1979 Rams, 1982 Dolphins, 2001 Rams) came close to breaking the curse, making it to the Super Bowl. But all three lost. The 2001 Rams argueably came the closest - losing to the Patriots in Super Bowl XXXVI to Adam Vinatieri's last-second game-winning field goal. and #4 falcons +3 dog blew a 25 point lead and lost in OT by 6 to Patriots
seattle has never won a superbowl wearing thier dark blue uniforms they are 0 4 ever they only won one wearing all white or white jerseys
0
*Three teams (1979 Rams, 1982 Dolphins, 2001 Rams) came close to breaking the curse, making it to the Super Bowl. But all three lost. The 2001 Rams argueably came the closest - losing to the Patriots in Super Bowl XXXVI to Adam Vinatieri's last-second game-winning field goal. and #4 falcons +3 dog blew a 25 point lead and lost in OT by 6 to Patriots
seattle has never won a superbowl wearing thier dark blue uniforms they are 0 4 ever they only won one wearing all white or white jerseys
*Three teams (1979 Rams, 1982 Dolphins, 2001 Rams) came close to breaking the curse, making it to the Super Bowl. But all three lost. The 2001 Rams argueably came the closest - losing to the Patriots in Super Bowl XXXVI to Adam Vinatieri's last-second game-winning field goal. and #4 falcons +3 dog blew a 25 point lead and lost in OT by 6 to Patriots seattle has never won a superbowl wearing thier dark blue uniforms they are 0 4 ever they only won one wearing all white or white jerseys
0
Quote Originally Posted by tjones1270:
*Three teams (1979 Rams, 1982 Dolphins, 2001 Rams) came close to breaking the curse, making it to the Super Bowl. But all three lost. The 2001 Rams argueably came the closest - losing to the Patriots in Super Bowl XXXVI to Adam Vinatieri's last-second game-winning field goal. and #4 falcons +3 dog blew a 25 point lead and lost in OT by 6 to Patriots seattle has never won a superbowl wearing thier dark blue uniforms they are 0 4 ever they only won one wearing all white or white jerseys
Without knowing he was doing it, theclaw persuaded me to ditch the 2000s Super Bowl stats I'd been clinging to in favor of reversing course entirely and siding strongly with the powerhouse Seattle Seahawks. And I thank him for pointing out that the Seahawks weren't ABOUT to become yet another Super Bowl favorite that tightens up and knuckles under.
0
Without knowing he was doing it, theclaw persuaded me to ditch the 2000s Super Bowl stats I'd been clinging to in favor of reversing course entirely and siding strongly with the powerhouse Seattle Seahawks. And I thank him for pointing out that the Seahawks weren't ABOUT to become yet another Super Bowl favorite that tightens up and knuckles under.
Without knowing he was doing it, theclaw persuaded me to ditch the 2000s Super Bowl stats I'd been clinging to in favor of reversing course entirely and siding strongly with the powerhouse Seattle Seahawks. And I thank him for pointing out that the Seahawks weren't ABOUT to become yet another Super Bowl favorite that tightens up and knuckles under.
Thanks for the kind words Bator, much appreciated.....................
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
Without knowing he was doing it, theclaw persuaded me to ditch the 2000s Super Bowl stats I'd been clinging to in favor of reversing course entirely and siding strongly with the powerhouse Seattle Seahawks. And I thank him for pointing out that the Seahawks weren't ABOUT to become yet another Super Bowl favorite that tightens up and knuckles under.
Thanks for the kind words Bator, much appreciated.....................
Seahawks did what the did all season, beat the Pats in ......Pts per Plays
Seahawks .408
Pats .194
Seahawks by .214
They have been over .200 for most of the season, including through the playoffs.
Much like I pointed out the talk on all these dogs winning SU and covering the wrong teams were favored in many of them and some were surprise teams from the WC round which was a unquie period of time never seen before or after.
Many forgot about this period as though it was bussiness as usual.
People could not figure all these dogs covering out, I saw through it.
I had a very good read on this SB, as good as I've had for many years.
3
Super Bowl 60
2-0 , won 1.5 units
Seahawks did what the did all season, beat the Pats in ......Pts per Plays
Seahawks .408
Pats .194
Seahawks by .214
They have been over .200 for most of the season, including through the playoffs.
Much like I pointed out the talk on all these dogs winning SU and covering the wrong teams were favored in many of them and some were surprise teams from the WC round which was a unquie period of time never seen before or after.
Many forgot about this period as though it was bussiness as usual.
People could not figure all these dogs covering out, I saw through it.
I had a very good read on this SB, as good as I've had for many years.
I just the NE 2026 season schedule on Get Up and their road teams are a bunch of tough outs. Their Strength of Schedule will get a LOT tougher.
Many Super Bowl losers fail to even reach the playoffs, let alone make it back to the Big Game. NE could certainly join that group of painful failures.
0
@theclaw
I just the NE 2026 season schedule on Get Up and their road teams are a bunch of tough outs. Their Strength of Schedule will get a LOT tougher.
Many Super Bowl losers fail to even reach the playoffs, let alone make it back to the Big Game. NE could certainly join that group of painful failures.
I was only thinking about the big year over year improvement, these tye teams never improve the next season.
Only 1 team even won the same number of games, that was Andrew Luck with Colts but he was only starting from 11 wins.
Pats starting from a very high point of 14 wins.
9 or 10 wins is very possible, 11 might be the max.
Then add in the points you bring up which are likely baked into the past teams to some degree other then SB loser, Pats not going to be as good next year.
0
Good point dog..............
I was only thinking about the big year over year improvement, these tye teams never improve the next season.
Only 1 team even won the same number of games, that was Andrew Luck with Colts but he was only starting from 11 wins.
Pats starting from a very high point of 14 wins.
9 or 10 wins is very possible, 11 might be the max.
Then add in the points you bring up which are likely baked into the past teams to some degree other then SB loser, Pats not going to be as good next year.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.