All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Mock Draft 2010

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2047
Posts: 49
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 264
Posted: #1

Lets see who has who going where !

DT Ndamukong Suh, Nebraska Suh is unanimously considered the best player in the draft.
The Rams will be tempted to try and draft a franchise QB if they get the first pick, but passing on Suh would be a huge mistake. Suh might be the most dominant prospect to ever enter the NFL Draft. He is at the top of everyone's Draft Value Board and was one of five finalists for the Heisman Trophy.
DT Gerald McCoy, Oklahoma (JR) Very active and nice size (6' 4" 305 lbs), he can be a force on the inside.
Not on the same level as Nebraska's Suh, but he will still be a top 10 pick for the 2010 NFL Draft.
S Eric Berry, Tennessee (JR) Berry is the best safety to enter the draft since former Redskin's Sean Taylor.
Eric Berry will be a Pro Bowl safety in the NFL. He has the talent to even play some cornerback if needed.
QB Jimmy Clausen, Notre Dame (JR) Jason Campbell has lost confidence and his days in the nations capitol are over.
Clausen has NFL caliber size (6' 3" 217 lbs) and arm strength. Developed by offensive guru Charlie Weis and playing in a pro style offense will help him in the NFL.
OT Russell Okung, OK State Okung can come in right away and start at left tackle. He plays with an attitude.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 597
Posted: #2

Hmm. I am a steeler and Farve fan..So lets say Minnesota..Mostly a football fan..I like this post.. The Steelers have a ton of questions, I do think they need to solidify their Oline first but of course you can't reach too far if all your players are gone.

Minnesota is pretty solid, could use a corner, tackle or guard and Possibly a safety..willaims at safety was not impressive.

https://www.draftcountdown.com/sub/Mock-Draft-A.php

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 597
Posted: #3

I wasn't impressed with Iupati in the senior bowl even though they were, he was holding a lot.I think you have to be very special to a a first round guard or center. I would prefer a tackle in the first, they say he could play tackle, I didn't see it.

If Spikes LB was around I would be tempted if i were Minnesota, seemed like too good of player to hang around till late first but they say he will, what do I know. Best player available mode, can't see Colt mccoy being there , very tempting.

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 13189
Posted: #4
Have to agree with Suh is the 1st to go.  Too much unknown factors when picking a QB.  Rather go the safe route and pick a dominant defensive lineman.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 1155
Posted: #5
The Nations Capitol is not going with Jimmy Clausen.  Sam Bradford or Colt McCoy would be the better pick.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 401
Posted: #6
Colt Mccoy?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 16954
Posted: #7
I think Jimmy Clausen is going to be pretty damn good I would take him if he is there for Washington. Not sold on Bradford or McCoy one bit.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 27235
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:

I think Jimmy Clausen is going to be pretty damn good I would take him if he is there for Washington. Not sold on Bradford or McCoy one bit.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 96
Posted: #9
Richardtons, the safe route?  Name me the Rams last 3 or 4 picks in the first round? Smith, Long, and Carriker... and Ty hill the year before.  Many of these lineman and "shutdown" corner as hill was supposed to be were all regarded as safe picks.

The NFC south is rather weak in terms of teams with franchise qb's. The rams would be wise to consider Bradford or Clausen #1 overall and get that franchise qb before some other teams in their division do first. This would give them an upper hand in the development and growth of the franchise before teams like SF and Carolina get one.

I'm not a Rams fan at all, but just feel like it makes the most sense. And the "safe" pick hasn't worked out well for them at all.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 947
Posted: #10
Love for the Lions to get Suh. They need so much help, I think it has to start in the trenches one way or another.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 6909
Posted: #11
how much longer can the rams pass on a potential franchise qb...they have drafted guys like tye hill jason brown and chris long passing on potential franchise qbs and have been burned as browns career may be over and the other two have not lived up to potential at all...there is another d lineman in there too they took (maybe carriker name escapes me).  This team has absolutely nothing offensively except Jackson and while you cant take a wr #1 you can certainly trade down or draft a potential qb for the future which they dont have.  To me Suh is the best DT i have ever seen and cant really argue that pick, but i think its time for the rams to take a chance on a qb if one is not acquired this offseason.

As for the Lions they have to understand to build from the lines out which they just dont get.  Either of the Dts or Okung is a must for this team..Berry may be tempting but he wont be able to make such a difference on a team that does not pressure the qb or stop the run and his ability can be minimized from a safety position by opposing o coordinators.  Plus they drafted Delmas last year so you will have two higher priced safeties on a defense with no d line and mediocre lbs at best.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 6909
Posted: #12
i am not sold on any of the qbs,,,,first off tebow and mccoy are trash, career backups if that in the nfl.  bradford has a funky arm motion and no ou qb has been close to successful in the pros with the bob stoops gun offense.  injuries also a concern there...clausen is too soft for me, he reminds me of joey harrinton in a lot of ways, but i would say he is the best bet
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 14174
Posted: #13
who cares. The nfl draft is the most overhyped over talked about thing in sports. What does it matter what your top pick does when 3rd and 4th rounders do just as well. They switch the mock drafts every 5 min. Bunch of tools going to the draft wearing jerseys...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 947
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by Osirus13:

who cares. The nfl draft is the most overhyped over talked about thing in sports. What does it matter what your top pick does when 3rd and 4th rounders do just as well. They switch the mock drafts every 5 min. Bunch of tools going to the draft wearing jerseys...


It is just something that gives a little football "fix" in the off season, no harm in that.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 597
Posted: #15

Quote Originally Posted by Osirus13:

who cares. The nfl draft is the most overhyped over talked about thing in sports. What does it matter what your top pick does when 3rd and 4th rounders do just as well. They switch the mock drafts every 5 min. Bunch of tools going to the draft wearing jerseys...

You really ruined my combine watching and my draft watch. Now your going to tell all the time, i watch of preseason with players who will get cut isn't important

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 14174
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by twoheart:



It is just something that gives a little football "fix" in the off season, no harm in that.
See there is harm in that to me. I like all sports and when 1 ends i like to move on to the next. That would be college bball,nba,mlb at this point. 24 hours of nfl coverage in the offseason is too much to me and the draft causes that.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 2180
Posted: #17
There were a few posters on this site a couple of weeks ago saying how they don't like the Super Bowl and it's over rated and this and that.Then don't watch it.So Osirus if you don't like the draft, don't watch it.Personally I think if someone doesn't like the Super Bowl or if they don't like the draft they don't really like the NFL.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 597
Posted: #18

It is true..While i latch onto other sports and have played a lot of them with mixed results, I did coach football successfully but recently gave it up, so I watch games as a coach and it is fun to guess what teams need and try to evaluate talen for themt, being that these guys see a lot more games and film than me, you would think they are better but the step up in levels is difficult for everyone to predict. 

1.St.Louis SUh, I guess , I only saw him play 5 times or so but I will take their word for it.
This team has a lot of holes to fill

2.Detroit- mcCoy- defensive coach, solid defensive player could be no brainer...

I could go on and on but one thing I disagree with is that Dez Bryant will last until the 10th pick......one of the top teams need a difference makers and he seems to be one, I don't know what off the field issues he has so that could be an issue.

Seattle taking a back? It is hard to take a HB unless he is really special in the top 20 because so many good backs come after that.

Pittsburgh with Cody, I doubt it if they franchise Hampton, I would think they would groom hood last years first.

OLB Graham seems to be moving up depending on his combine.

This is an interesting draft in the way that teams seem to be all over the place and it could be that there is a lot of good talent or a lot of questionable talent.

https://www.nfl.com/draft/story?id=09000d5d8166b4a7&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2429
Posted: #19
Mock drafts are meaningless teams could make so many moves leading up to the draft the speculation is retarded.  I bet the percentage of actual picks gotten right by these so called experts is under 40 % no reason to even talk about it until a week before the draft it is unnecessary.  
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 597
Posted: #20
As much as I would love to talk about the Bengals picking up formerly suspened players, I think I prefer the draft.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2429
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by carj:

As much as I would love to talk about the Bengals picking up formerly suspened players, I think I prefer the draft.

Those are actual moves made which = facts... not female chatter aka speculation over what's gonna happen 3 months from now when all kinds of crazy moves are going to be made by many teams leading up to that point!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 597
Posted: #22
There is a reason the Nfl network carries draft talk everyday, it's because pro and college football fans like to hear about the draft. I am sure they use 2 minutes on two rejected and suspened former players,you could hear about those two guys on TMZ if you need your fix . Some of us actually have college football knowledge and like to see who actually can make the step up.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2429
Posted: #23
hahaha dude relax ur nut sack I can tell you have no idea how the NFL works the fucking combine didn't even take place everyone and their mother puts out a mock draft.... If you love the draft and are such a college guru I challenge you to make a 3 round mock draft if you get 40.1% or better right ill mail you 50 bucks!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 597
Posted: #24
Lol , I  have seen your Pro knowledge and it  is very questionable, building up Indy and cincy doesn't make the Jets a better team . Like I said you waste your time on transactions that mean nothing, i prefer to deal what the draft like the majority of fans.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2429
Posted: #25
Building up Indy???? Cinci?????? You my friend are a moron ALLL I SAID WAS THAT IT WAS A GOOOOD MOVE SIGNING MATT JONES which it was he has talent he is VERY BIG.... The DRAFT is very important look at teams like the COLTS, PATS, STEELERS they all draft very good but like I said the COMBINE which is most important to players draft statuses didn't even happen yet EARLY speculation means NOTHING!

As for the JETS they are a good team I don't have to build up anyone to defend them they have finally earned their own respect and anyone who thinks they will FADE next year knows absolutely nothing about football.  The JETS will be around for a long time they have a great nucleus of young players and they have no GLARING need that can't be addressed in the offseason Sanchez is the real deal good luck talking about the Draft ill see you after the combine.... Good day sir!
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.