goaldlocks or whatever your name is, you're a joke! light up the steeler defense like a christmas tree? only an idiot with minimal objectivity says sh*t like that. good luck on your plays. see you after the game.
great writeup mice. with you 100%.
pitt played imo 2 of the best defenses in the league, ravens and the jets. atl's defense is a joke and a mirage through the year and chicago, please. stats for gb and pitt are all very close. the difference between these 2 teams...who would you rather bet on, a team with proven winners or the "up and comers"? with a guy with 2 rings at the helm who somehow finds ways to win vs the guy in his 1st time super bowl appearance. betting against polamalu, harrison, woodley? really?...rodgers better not make any mistakes or this could be a beating the other way. pitt should be able to run all day. o-line is patchwork and they still get it done. they'll run behind flozell repeatedly.
goaldlocks or whatever your name is, you're a joke! light up the steeler defense like a christmas tree? only an idiot with minimal objectivity says sh*t like that. good luck on your plays. see you after the game.
great writeup mice. with you 100%.
pitt played imo 2 of the best defenses in the league, ravens and the jets. atl's defense is a joke and a mirage through the year and chicago, please. stats for gb and pitt are all very close. the difference between these 2 teams...who would you rather bet on, a team with proven winners or the "up and comers"? with a guy with 2 rings at the helm who somehow finds ways to win vs the guy in his 1st time super bowl appearance. betting against polamalu, harrison, woodley? really?...rodgers better not make any mistakes or this could be a beating the other way. pitt should be able to run all day. o-line is patchwork and they still get it done. they'll run behind flozell repeatedly.
WhiteMice-
I love the under play. I can't decide which side I like better, so I am just going to stick with that total play myself. Just have to remember bigger game does not equal bigger bets.
WhiteMice-
I love the under play. I can't decide which side I like better, so I am just going to stick with that total play myself. Just have to remember bigger game does not equal bigger bets.
goaldlocks or whatever your name is, you're a joke! light up the steeler defense like a christmas tree? only an idiot with minimal objectivity says sh*t like that. good luck on your plays. see you after the game.
great writeup mice. with you 100%.
pitt played imo 2 of the best defenses in the league, ravens and the jets. atl's defense is a joke and a mirage through the year and chicago, please. stats for gb and pitt are all very close. the difference between these 2 teams...who would you rather bet on, a team with proven winners or the "up and comers"? with a guy with 2 rings at the helm who somehow finds ways to win vs the guy in his 1st time super bowl appearance. betting against polamalu, harrison, woodley? really?...rodgers better not make any mistakes or this could be a beating the other way. pitt should be able to run all day. o-line is patchwork and they still get it done. they'll run behind flozell repeatedly.
goaldlocks or whatever your name is, you're a joke! light up the steeler defense like a christmas tree? only an idiot with minimal objectivity says sh*t like that. good luck on your plays. see you after the game.
great writeup mice. with you 100%.
pitt played imo 2 of the best defenses in the league, ravens and the jets. atl's defense is a joke and a mirage through the year and chicago, please. stats for gb and pitt are all very close. the difference between these 2 teams...who would you rather bet on, a team with proven winners or the "up and comers"? with a guy with 2 rings at the helm who somehow finds ways to win vs the guy in his 1st time super bowl appearance. betting against polamalu, harrison, woodley? really?...rodgers better not make any mistakes or this could be a beating the other way. pitt should be able to run all day. o-line is patchwork and they still get it done. they'll run behind flozell repeatedly.
goaldlocks or whatever your name is, you're a joke! light up the steeler defense like a christmas tree? only an idiot with minimal objectivity says sh*t like that. good luck on your plays. see you after the game.
great writeup mice. with you 100%.
pitt played imo 2 of the best defenses in the league, ravens and the jets. atl's defense is a joke and a mirage through the year and chicago, please. stats for gb and pitt are all very close. the difference between these 2 teams...who would you rather bet on, a team with proven winners or the "up and comers"? with a guy with 2 rings at the helm who somehow finds ways to win vs the guy in his 1st time super bowl appearance. betting against polamalu, harrison, woodley? really?...rodgers better not make any mistakes or this could be a beating the other way. pitt should be able to run all day. o-line is patchwork and they still get it done. they'll run behind flozell repeatedly.
This is the funniest thing I have read this NFL season.
![]()
goaldlocks or whatever your name is, you're a joke! light up the steeler defense like a christmas tree? only an idiot with minimal objectivity says sh*t like that. good luck on your plays. see you after the game.
great writeup mice. with you 100%.
pitt played imo 2 of the best defenses in the league, ravens and the jets. atl's defense is a joke and a mirage through the year and chicago, please. stats for gb and pitt are all very close. the difference between these 2 teams...who would you rather bet on, a team with proven winners or the "up and comers"? with a guy with 2 rings at the helm who somehow finds ways to win vs the guy in his 1st time super bowl appearance. betting against polamalu, harrison, woodley? really?...rodgers better not make any mistakes or this could be a beating the other way. pitt should be able to run all day. o-line is patchwork and they still get it done. they'll run behind flozell repeatedly.
This is the funniest thing I have read this NFL season.
![]()
Mice - to me any coach can win this game after i saw Tom Coughlin, yes Tom Coughlin beat Bill B
Watching Tom Coughlin over the years on the sideline at Giants stadium staring into the abyss about what went wrong is just priceless, and Paulie from the bronx telling me during his early years , "this guy , this coughlin , he ain't never going to take the giants to the promised land " and for the first 3 years and 12 games or so he looke dead on , then Coughlin delivered his team to the promised land !!!
McCarthy > Coughlin
Bill B > Tomlin
That's the way i see it Mice , IF Coughlin can beat Bill B in this game McCarthy can definitly beat Tomlin, doesn't mean he will ,but i know he can
Mice - to me any coach can win this game after i saw Tom Coughlin, yes Tom Coughlin beat Bill B
Watching Tom Coughlin over the years on the sideline at Giants stadium staring into the abyss about what went wrong is just priceless, and Paulie from the bronx telling me during his early years , "this guy , this coughlin , he ain't never going to take the giants to the promised land " and for the first 3 years and 12 games or so he looke dead on , then Coughlin delivered his team to the promised land !!!
McCarthy > Coughlin
Bill B > Tomlin
That's the way i see it Mice , IF Coughlin can beat Bill B in this game McCarthy can definitly beat Tomlin, doesn't mean he will ,but i know he can
pitt faced only 2 significant pass teams this year, new orleans and new england, lost to both by double digits, pitt secondary is weak and itll show.... also ben "big game" persona is way overhyped, the guy simply does not play well in big games, atleast not for 60mins, he does however make big plays when needed..... this SB tho, he wil be facing a much better oppponent than previous 2 and he will need to be "big" for all 60mins, something hes never done.... ill take the "real" qb in this game, gb wins by double digits
![]()
pitt faced only 2 significant pass teams this year, new orleans and new england, lost to both by double digits, pitt secondary is weak and itll show.... also ben "big game" persona is way overhyped, the guy simply does not play well in big games, atleast not for 60mins, he does however make big plays when needed..... this SB tho, he wil be facing a much better oppponent than previous 2 and he will need to be "big" for all 60mins, something hes never done.... ill take the "real" qb in this game, gb wins by double digits
![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.