EarthWake… post 17 was a response to you. I forgot to add your name to the top of it. You probably know that, but I don’t want to seem disrespectful towards you.
Well… CMJ, I am one of the very few that like the Browns coach, FG kicker, defense and surprisingly the Browns offense. I think Brandon Weeden and Trent Richardson are the real deal (healthy). I like the all # 2’s WR core, the young offensive line, and what they’ve done for the future of their TE position. I don’t plan on betting on them early (subject to change), but I’m leaning towards betting on them mid way into the season if what I’ve studied about them pans out.
CMJ, Dallas had never been good on paper or on the field the last 17 years. They beat the Eagles 3-times one-year and that was the best accomplishment they’ve had in 17 years. Dallas has a beast-receiving core, a top 10 defense, but a weak o-line and injuries. I don’t know if they will be a 4 win team or a 10 win team with all those injuries and the offensive line.
The one thing I do know is that Dallas has a good enough team to beat the Giants. I’m going to say something that may shock the hell out of you, CMJ. Ready for it, I got the Giants possibly finishing third or dead last in the NFC east. I think the Giants are weak and vulnerable this year. The Redskins will struggle on the road, but at home, they will be tough to beat.
The Eagles will win the NFC East no matter who is at QB. They are loaded from top to bottom. I hate to say this, but I think the Eagles are going to fly all over the field on offense and defense in a dominant fashion this season. I’ve looked at the Eagles depth chart and I don’t see any weaknesses. The only reason they didn’t make the playoffs last year was fluky plays and tipped balls.
If Vick goes down, I think he loses his starting spot to Foles. Then, Foles steps right in and runs the offense with ease. I don’t think there is an offense with more speed than the Eagles. As a Cowboys fan, I’m afraid of the Redskins and Eagles, not the Giants.
0
EarthWake… post 17 was a response to you. I forgot to add your name to the top of it. You probably know that, but I don’t want to seem disrespectful towards you.
Well… CMJ, I am one of the very few that like the Browns coach, FG kicker, defense and surprisingly the Browns offense. I think Brandon Weeden and Trent Richardson are the real deal (healthy). I like the all # 2’s WR core, the young offensive line, and what they’ve done for the future of their TE position. I don’t plan on betting on them early (subject to change), but I’m leaning towards betting on them mid way into the season if what I’ve studied about them pans out.
CMJ, Dallas had never been good on paper or on the field the last 17 years. They beat the Eagles 3-times one-year and that was the best accomplishment they’ve had in 17 years. Dallas has a beast-receiving core, a top 10 defense, but a weak o-line and injuries. I don’t know if they will be a 4 win team or a 10 win team with all those injuries and the offensive line.
The one thing I do know is that Dallas has a good enough team to beat the Giants. I’m going to say something that may shock the hell out of you, CMJ. Ready for it, I got the Giants possibly finishing third or dead last in the NFC east. I think the Giants are weak and vulnerable this year. The Redskins will struggle on the road, but at home, they will be tough to beat.
The Eagles will win the NFC East no matter who is at QB. They are loaded from top to bottom. I hate to say this, but I think the Eagles are going to fly all over the field on offense and defense in a dominant fashion this season. I’ve looked at the Eagles depth chart and I don’t see any weaknesses. The only reason they didn’t make the playoffs last year was fluky plays and tipped balls.
If Vick goes down, I think he loses his starting spot to Foles. Then, Foles steps right in and runs the offense with ease. I don’t think there is an offense with more speed than the Eagles. As a Cowboys fan, I’m afraid of the Redskins and Eagles, not the Giants.
Easy schedule? I don’t see what easy about it covers bro? For a team like the Dolphins, the schedule is far from easy. What is the record you see and who are they going to beat?
Tannehill has a long way to go before he is able to lead. I expect him to have a horrible rookie season. The Dolphins are implementing a new o-line scheme and they only have two good offensive linemen. Bad news for a rookie QB with NO WR’s (other than Bess) to throw to even if he has anytime back there.
Last year when Miami's schedule came out I knew it was tough but they had a stretch where they could make up ground. Starting week 9 they played KC,Wash,Buf,Dal,Oak. I knew if they played well during this 5 game stretch they had a chance to have a good year. All they had to do was be 3-5 at that point. They went 4-1 in those games (only loss was to Dallas by 1) They have a very similar stretch this year. They have 5 games starting week 3 where they play Arizona, Cincy, Rams, Jets, Colts. All 5 of those games outside of Cincy, Miami should win.
Their schedule is easy. Jets (2) Bills (2), Ari, Oak, Jags, Colts, Rams, seattle. How is that not an easy schedule?
Also, you expect Tannehill to have a horrible rookie year? So that means you expect Tannehill to start the season bad for 2 weeks and then be replaced by Moore who threw 16 Tds and 9 INTs last year? I'm not a Matt Moore guy but his numbers speak for themselves. Tannehill is not guaranteed anything this year other than starting week 1. Guys behind him are still working hard.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:
Easy schedule? I don’t see what easy about it covers bro? For a team like the Dolphins, the schedule is far from easy. What is the record you see and who are they going to beat?
Tannehill has a long way to go before he is able to lead. I expect him to have a horrible rookie season. The Dolphins are implementing a new o-line scheme and they only have two good offensive linemen. Bad news for a rookie QB with NO WR’s (other than Bess) to throw to even if he has anytime back there.
Last year when Miami's schedule came out I knew it was tough but they had a stretch where they could make up ground. Starting week 9 they played KC,Wash,Buf,Dal,Oak. I knew if they played well during this 5 game stretch they had a chance to have a good year. All they had to do was be 3-5 at that point. They went 4-1 in those games (only loss was to Dallas by 1) They have a very similar stretch this year. They have 5 games starting week 3 where they play Arizona, Cincy, Rams, Jets, Colts. All 5 of those games outside of Cincy, Miami should win.
Their schedule is easy. Jets (2) Bills (2), Ari, Oak, Jags, Colts, Rams, seattle. How is that not an easy schedule?
Also, you expect Tannehill to have a horrible rookie year? So that means you expect Tannehill to start the season bad for 2 weeks and then be replaced by Moore who threw 16 Tds and 9 INTs last year? I'm not a Matt Moore guy but his numbers speak for themselves. Tannehill is not guaranteed anything this year other than starting week 1. Guys behind him are still working hard.
Easy schedule? I don’t see what easy about it covers bro? For a team like the Dolphins, the schedule is far from easy. What is the record you see and who are they going to beat?
@Hou - loss
Oak - Win
Jets - Win
@Ari - loss
@cincy - loss
Rams - blowouttt win
bye
@jets - loss
@colts - Win
Tenn - loss
@buff - loss
@Sea - Win
pats - loss
@sf - loss
Jags - win
Bills - Win
@pats - loss
I see 7-9..and their win total is at 7, which I've been saying is right on point. I chuckle at the people who realistically think this is a 2-3 win team. I wish I knew you so we could bet big
0
Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:
Easy schedule? I don’t see what easy about it covers bro? For a team like the Dolphins, the schedule is far from easy. What is the record you see and who are they going to beat?
@Hou - loss
Oak - Win
Jets - Win
@Ari - loss
@cincy - loss
Rams - blowouttt win
bye
@jets - loss
@colts - Win
Tenn - loss
@buff - loss
@Sea - Win
pats - loss
@sf - loss
Jags - win
Bills - Win
@pats - loss
I see 7-9..and their win total is at 7, which I've been saying is right on point. I chuckle at the people who realistically think this is a 2-3 win team. I wish I knew you so we could bet big
I see 7-9..and their win total is at 7, which I've been saying is right on point. I chuckle at the people who realistically think this is a 2-3 win team. I wish I knew you so we could bet big
I have the Raiders winning on the road. I don’t see them traveling to AZ and beating the Cards defense. I can’t see them beating Luck and the Colts on the road. The Jets suck on offense, but they don’t suck that bad to where they will lose to Tannehill. I expect him to shit the bed when he goes up against that defense.
I have the Bills offense lighting up the scoreboard against that 25th ranked pass defense and I have Seattle (this team is the real deal) just stomping the dolphins. The Dolphins have a “Joke” as a head coach and Tannehill is going to finish the season, if he truly is the future, so I expect him to learn how to play in the league the hard way.
I could be wrong, which I am wrong a lot, but I see that they will be lucky to win four games. I will say this… if I’m wrong I will come on here and humbly bow to you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by earthWake:
@Hou - loss
Oak - Win
Jets - Win
@Ari - loss
@cincy - loss
Rams - blowouttt win
bye
@jets - loss
@colts - Win
Tenn - loss
@buff - loss
@Sea - Win
pats - loss
@sf - loss
Jags - win
Bills - Win
@pats - loss
I see 7-9..and their win total is at 7, which I've been saying is right on point. I chuckle at the people who realistically think this is a 2-3 win team. I wish I knew you so we could bet big
I have the Raiders winning on the road. I don’t see them traveling to AZ and beating the Cards defense. I can’t see them beating Luck and the Colts on the road. The Jets suck on offense, but they don’t suck that bad to where they will lose to Tannehill. I expect him to shit the bed when he goes up against that defense.
I have the Bills offense lighting up the scoreboard against that 25th ranked pass defense and I have Seattle (this team is the real deal) just stomping the dolphins. The Dolphins have a “Joke” as a head coach and Tannehill is going to finish the season, if he truly is the future, so I expect him to learn how to play in the league the hard way.
I could be wrong, which I am wrong a lot, but I see that they will be lucky to win four games. I will say this… if I’m wrong I will come on here and humbly bow to you.
I have the Raiders winning on the road. I don’t see them traveling to AZ and beating the Cards defense. I can’t see them beating Luck and the Colts on the road. The Jets suck on offense, but they don’t suck that bad to where they will lose to Tannehill. I expect him to shit the bed when he goes up against that defense.
I have the Bills offense lighting up the scoreboard against that 25th ranked pass defense and I have Seattle (this team is the real deal) just stomping the dolphins. The Dolphins have a “Joke” as a head coach and Tannehill is going to finish the season, if he truly is the future, so I expect him to learn how to play in the league the hard way.
I could be wrong, which I am wrong a lot, but I see that they will be lucky to win four games. I will say this… if I’m wrong I will come on here and humbly bow to you.
Miami outscored the Bills 65-31 last year, so I definitely give Fins atleast one win vs them. Everything else you say is based on opinion, which you are entitled to, but I think its wayy off.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:
I have the Raiders winning on the road. I don’t see them traveling to AZ and beating the Cards defense. I can’t see them beating Luck and the Colts on the road. The Jets suck on offense, but they don’t suck that bad to where they will lose to Tannehill. I expect him to shit the bed when he goes up against that defense.
I have the Bills offense lighting up the scoreboard against that 25th ranked pass defense and I have Seattle (this team is the real deal) just stomping the dolphins. The Dolphins have a “Joke” as a head coach and Tannehill is going to finish the season, if he truly is the future, so I expect him to learn how to play in the league the hard way.
I could be wrong, which I am wrong a lot, but I see that they will be lucky to win four games. I will say this… if I’m wrong I will come on here and humbly bow to you.
Miami outscored the Bills 65-31 last year, so I definitely give Fins atleast one win vs them. Everything else you say is based on opinion, which you are entitled to, but I think its wayy off.
Mario Williams is a beast but he is the third best player on that line. Kyle Williams and Marcel Dareus are better than him. That line should produce 35+ sacks.
0
Bills will go 10-6
Mario Williams is a beast but he is the third best player on that line. Kyle Williams and Marcel Dareus are better than him. That line should produce 35+ sacks.
Miami outscored the Bills 65-31 last year, so I definitely give Fins atleast one win vs them. Everything else you say is based on opinion, which you are entitled to, but I think its wayy off.
I don’t see myself betting for or against your team very much this season, so I wish you and your dolphins team the BOL.
0
Quote Originally Posted by earthWake:
Miami outscored the Bills 65-31 last year, so I definitely give Fins atleast one win vs them. Everything else you say is based on opinion, which you are entitled to, but I think its wayy off.
I don’t see myself betting for or against your team very much this season, so I wish you and your dolphins team the BOL.
Brought them up a win due to RG3. I don't like their receivers and I don't like their cornerbacks/safeties after losing LaRon Landry to the Jets. That is really all.
One win eh?
Well that is interesting because the skins won 5 with Rex Grossman, and even though we have not seen RG in a game he is lightyears ahead of Grossman in what he can offer
the receivers are much better now vs last year
Davis is a stud - we have talent all over the offense, a great Defensive Line can help moderate average secondary. Landy was a liablilty by the way - he got burnt on every play action pass. he has a run attack brain and QB's knew it.
The problem isnt the QB and it isnt the WR's or the Seconday
its the schedule bro, playing Dallas on Turkey day
(Fuck you NFL) 5 division games in last 7 weeks including that turkey game.. how does a 5-11 team get such a wicked schedule
i think 8 games is realistic and with that schedule that would be a great year
0
Quote Originally Posted by CMJohnson1:
Washington Redskins 6-10 (5-11 in 2011)
Brought them up a win due to RG3. I don't like their receivers and I don't like their cornerbacks/safeties after losing LaRon Landry to the Jets. That is really all.
One win eh?
Well that is interesting because the skins won 5 with Rex Grossman, and even though we have not seen RG in a game he is lightyears ahead of Grossman in what he can offer
the receivers are much better now vs last year
Davis is a stud - we have talent all over the offense, a great Defensive Line can help moderate average secondary. Landy was a liablilty by the way - he got burnt on every play action pass. he has a run attack brain and QB's knew it.
The problem isnt the QB and it isnt the WR's or the Seconday
its the schedule bro, playing Dallas on Turkey day
(Fuck you NFL) 5 division games in last 7 weeks including that turkey game.. how does a 5-11 team get such a wicked schedule
i think 8 games is realistic and with that schedule that would be a great year
Redskins could certainly be a sneaky team...but I always side with veteran QB's over unknown rookies...and with Romo, Vick, and Manning in the East, I gotta put RG3 lower
0
Redskins could certainly be a sneaky team...but I always side with veteran QB's over unknown rookies...and with Romo, Vick, and Manning in the East, I gotta put RG3 lower
Aaron Rodgers will fall back a little bit...and their running back situation isn't phenomenal. Biggest question is the same question that the Patriots have...can the defense provide enough stops to give the offense the chance to put up points? Charles Woodson isn't getting younger...their safeties are average at best...and their defensive line outside of Raji isn't incredible. The Lions have a good offense, the Bears and Vikings are both much improved on that side of the ball. I see a 6-2 division record, and a 6-2 non-division record.
Detroit Lions 10-6 (10-6 in 2011)
Due to the off the field issues and suspensions for this team I can't bring them up a win. Still a legitimate playoff team, but lacking the experience to make a deep push into the playoffs. I would like to see a true #1 running back emerge from this team to take a lot of the pressure off of Stafford and Megatron. Their defensive secondary isn't wonderful either, so the Packers will give them trouble, and possibly the Bears as well now with Brandon Marshall. I like this team, but I'm not fully on the bandwagon yet.
Chicago Bears 9-7(8-8 in 2011)
Offense is better, and in an offensively driven league, that will mean an improvement in the record as well. I'm just not a huge fan of Jay Cutler, and although having a weapon like Marshall at the edge and a possibly future weapon with Alshon Jeffrey will help, I'm not sure they are a playoff level team this year. They have a great defense once again, which will keep them in a ton of games. But their defensive tackles aren't great, Urlacher is getting old, and you can rush the ball against them.
Minnesota Vikings 4-12 (3-13 in 2011)
Another one win improvement given out. A lot of people might give them a few more wins, but I want to see how the Christian Ponder experiment works out. Also, if Peterson has lost a step with the injury last season. Matt Kalil should be able to step right in and help give Ponder time to throw to the receivers...who are decent, nothing spectacular. Their defense is solid once again with Henderson, Allen, Williams, and Winfield. I just have a feeling they will be losing quite a few close games.
0
NFC NORTH
Green Bay Packers 12-4 (15-1 in 2011)
Aaron Rodgers will fall back a little bit...and their running back situation isn't phenomenal. Biggest question is the same question that the Patriots have...can the defense provide enough stops to give the offense the chance to put up points? Charles Woodson isn't getting younger...their safeties are average at best...and their defensive line outside of Raji isn't incredible. The Lions have a good offense, the Bears and Vikings are both much improved on that side of the ball. I see a 6-2 division record, and a 6-2 non-division record.
Detroit Lions 10-6 (10-6 in 2011)
Due to the off the field issues and suspensions for this team I can't bring them up a win. Still a legitimate playoff team, but lacking the experience to make a deep push into the playoffs. I would like to see a true #1 running back emerge from this team to take a lot of the pressure off of Stafford and Megatron. Their defensive secondary isn't wonderful either, so the Packers will give them trouble, and possibly the Bears as well now with Brandon Marshall. I like this team, but I'm not fully on the bandwagon yet.
Chicago Bears 9-7(8-8 in 2011)
Offense is better, and in an offensively driven league, that will mean an improvement in the record as well. I'm just not a huge fan of Jay Cutler, and although having a weapon like Marshall at the edge and a possibly future weapon with Alshon Jeffrey will help, I'm not sure they are a playoff level team this year. They have a great defense once again, which will keep them in a ton of games. But their defensive tackles aren't great, Urlacher is getting old, and you can rush the ball against them.
Minnesota Vikings 4-12 (3-13 in 2011)
Another one win improvement given out. A lot of people might give them a few more wins, but I want to see how the Christian Ponder experiment works out. Also, if Peterson has lost a step with the injury last season. Matt Kalil should be able to step right in and help give Ponder time to throw to the receivers...who are decent, nothing spectacular. Their defense is solid once again with Henderson, Allen, Williams, and Winfield. I just have a feeling they will be losing quite a few close games.
With the suspensions of the Saints, I feel as though the Falcons are the best team in this division. A make or break year for Matt Ryan and Michael Turner. Great receivers and great depth. A very solid offensive line. Defensive line might be a little suspect, but with the addition of Asante Samuel it should seriously help. The reason I'm dropping them down a win is the fact that they have to play the NFC East this season, and IMO they are a better division.
New Orleans Saints 8-8 (13-3 in 2011)
Suspensions were big, and they will seriously hurt this defense. They weren't an extremely solid defense to begin with...just barely above average. Ellis and Smith are decent on the defensive line...and Greer and Jenkins are probably their best secondary players. But much like the Falcons, going up against the solid offenses throughout the NFC East will kill this team.
(6-10 in 2011)
I like this team, but I just don't trust them completely. I will bump them up one win because I think Cam Newton and Steve Smith will have a special kind of year. Luke Kuechly is the perfect draft pick for this team, and I like the defensive intensity he can provide. I'm just not that big on their defensive line...and I'm not sure how much pressure they will be able to get on opposing quarterbacks. They ranked 25th in sacks last season...and I really can't see that getting much better. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 5-11 (4-12 in 2011)
Offense has seriously improved IMO with another year under the belt for Josh Freeman...the addition of Vincent Jackson...and a solid running back combo of Doug Martin and LeGarrette Blount. They have one of the best offensive lines in the league as well. But I'm not sure how ready Schiano is for the speed and intensity of the NFL. This is another team that was very difficult for me to predict...I would be willing to give them up to 7 wins.
0
NFC SOUTH
Atlanta Falcons 9-7 (10-6 in 2011)
With the suspensions of the Saints, I feel as though the Falcons are the best team in this division. A make or break year for Matt Ryan and Michael Turner. Great receivers and great depth. A very solid offensive line. Defensive line might be a little suspect, but with the addition of Asante Samuel it should seriously help. The reason I'm dropping them down a win is the fact that they have to play the NFC East this season, and IMO they are a better division.
New Orleans Saints 8-8 (13-3 in 2011)
Suspensions were big, and they will seriously hurt this defense. They weren't an extremely solid defense to begin with...just barely above average. Ellis and Smith are decent on the defensive line...and Greer and Jenkins are probably their best secondary players. But much like the Falcons, going up against the solid offenses throughout the NFC East will kill this team.
(6-10 in 2011)
I like this team, but I just don't trust them completely. I will bump them up one win because I think Cam Newton and Steve Smith will have a special kind of year. Luke Kuechly is the perfect draft pick for this team, and I like the defensive intensity he can provide. I'm just not that big on their defensive line...and I'm not sure how much pressure they will be able to get on opposing quarterbacks. They ranked 25th in sacks last season...and I really can't see that getting much better. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 5-11 (4-12 in 2011)
Offense has seriously improved IMO with another year under the belt for Josh Freeman...the addition of Vincent Jackson...and a solid running back combo of Doug Martin and LeGarrette Blount. They have one of the best offensive lines in the league as well. But I'm not sure how ready Schiano is for the speed and intensity of the NFL. This is another team that was very difficult for me to predict...I would be willing to give them up to 7 wins.
Just don't see them capturing the lightning in a bottle type of season that they had last year. First of all teams are not going to take them lightly which might have happened at the start of last season. Second of all...their offense brought in some new players, but did they really improve? Last season they had the perfect offense for this type of team...ground and pound and don't let Alex Smith make mistakes. Now with Manningham and Moss they are putting Smith in a position to want to throw the ball more.
They still have the best defense in the league however, and in a not so great division, that will be good enough to make it back to the playoffs for the second straight year. I just don't think this team is 13 wins good this season.
Seattle Seahawks 7-9 (7-9 in 2011)
Whether Flynn or Wilson is playing, I can't bump them up any wins simply because their offensive line isn't fantastic (something that I feel you need to have with an inexperienced QB) and the weapons on the outside are also less than stellar. The defense is good enough to make some plays, and will certainly keep this team in a lot of games. I just don't think Pete Carroll has what it takes to build a successful NFL team. Still..the Seahawks will be an interesting team to watch this season.
Arizona Cardinals 6-10 (8-8 in 2011)
Too many questions at quarterback, and none of them are the questions that you want to be asking. Neither John Skelton or Kevin Kolb give this team enough of a chance to be successful this season...especially going up against the defenses in Seattle and San Fran. They have their big play guy with Fitzgerald, and no doubt he will put up numbers...but they have still failed to address the running back situation. I do like their defense...I just see them losing a lot of 20-14 type of games.
St. Louis Rams 4-12 (2-14 in 2011)
I really didn't even want to put them this high, but I'll be generous. This is the worst team in the league...and by a wide margin in my mind. They had the #2 pick and traded it when they should have taken someone to improve this team. Just breaking it down by position...
QB Sam Bradford - C- RB Steven Jackson - B+ WR Amendola/Gibson/Quick - C- TE Kendricks - D OL Saffold/Ojinnaka/Wells/Dahl/Richardson - C DL Long/Brockers/Langford/Quinn - B LB Dunbar/Lauranaitis/Haggan - C- CB Finnegan/Jenkins - B S Stewart/Mikell - C
Once again...that's being generous. Even their schedule isn't kind giving them home games against New England, Green Bay, the Jets, and San Fran (division game). They have to go TO BUFFALO in December. Just not a good team.
0
NFC WEST
San Francisco 49ers 10-6 (13-3 in 2011)
Just don't see them capturing the lightning in a bottle type of season that they had last year. First of all teams are not going to take them lightly which might have happened at the start of last season. Second of all...their offense brought in some new players, but did they really improve? Last season they had the perfect offense for this type of team...ground and pound and don't let Alex Smith make mistakes. Now with Manningham and Moss they are putting Smith in a position to want to throw the ball more.
They still have the best defense in the league however, and in a not so great division, that will be good enough to make it back to the playoffs for the second straight year. I just don't think this team is 13 wins good this season.
Seattle Seahawks 7-9 (7-9 in 2011)
Whether Flynn or Wilson is playing, I can't bump them up any wins simply because their offensive line isn't fantastic (something that I feel you need to have with an inexperienced QB) and the weapons on the outside are also less than stellar. The defense is good enough to make some plays, and will certainly keep this team in a lot of games. I just don't think Pete Carroll has what it takes to build a successful NFL team. Still..the Seahawks will be an interesting team to watch this season.
Arizona Cardinals 6-10 (8-8 in 2011)
Too many questions at quarterback, and none of them are the questions that you want to be asking. Neither John Skelton or Kevin Kolb give this team enough of a chance to be successful this season...especially going up against the defenses in Seattle and San Fran. They have their big play guy with Fitzgerald, and no doubt he will put up numbers...but they have still failed to address the running back situation. I do like their defense...I just see them losing a lot of 20-14 type of games.
St. Louis Rams 4-12 (2-14 in 2011)
I really didn't even want to put them this high, but I'll be generous. This is the worst team in the league...and by a wide margin in my mind. They had the #2 pick and traded it when they should have taken someone to improve this team. Just breaking it down by position...
QB Sam Bradford - C- RB Steven Jackson - B+ WR Amendola/Gibson/Quick - C- TE Kendricks - D OL Saffold/Ojinnaka/Wells/Dahl/Richardson - C DL Long/Brockers/Langford/Quinn - B LB Dunbar/Lauranaitis/Haggan - C- CB Finnegan/Jenkins - B S Stewart/Mikell - C
Once again...that's being generous. Even their schedule isn't kind giving them home games against New England, Green Bay, the Jets, and San Fran (division game). They have to go TO BUFFALO in December. Just not a good team.
Last season they were the two best teams, and heading into this season they are the two best teams. Great coaching, solid at every position. Big game experience. Legitimate home field advantage. I look at the AFC and don't see anyone that can withstand the Patriots offense for four quarters (Ravens and Steelers come close). Same thing with the NFC, but the Packers have some stiffer competition with the Cowboys, Giants, Lions, and Niners.
0
SUPER BOWL
New England Patriots def. Green Packers 35-31
Last season they were the two best teams, and heading into this season they are the two best teams. Great coaching, solid at every position. Big game experience. Legitimate home field advantage. I look at the AFC and don't see anyone that can withstand the Patriots offense for four quarters (Ravens and Steelers come close). Same thing with the NFC, but the Packers have some stiffer competition with the Cowboys, Giants, Lions, and Niners.
I almost agree with your analysis of the NFC north and NFC west. I have the Lions actually winning the division, for the first time in around 20 years, and the Seahawks finishing 9-7.
I got the 49ers, Bengals, Ravens, Texans, Broncos, Lions, Seahawks, Redskins, Eagles, and Cowboys (offensive line TBD) having a great competitive season. Finally, the saying “Any Given Sunday” is actually true. The dominance of the same teams is over.
I got the Steelers, Saints, Jets, Giants, Patriots, and Packers all having a tough year, compared to what they usually do every season. These teams are beatable right now. The NFL playing field is leveling out. It’s going to be a wild and unpredictable season this year.
0
I almost agree with your analysis of the NFC north and NFC west. I have the Lions actually winning the division, for the first time in around 20 years, and the Seahawks finishing 9-7.
I got the 49ers, Bengals, Ravens, Texans, Broncos, Lions, Seahawks, Redskins, Eagles, and Cowboys (offensive line TBD) having a great competitive season. Finally, the saying “Any Given Sunday” is actually true. The dominance of the same teams is over.
I got the Steelers, Saints, Jets, Giants, Patriots, and Packers all having a tough year, compared to what they usually do every season. These teams are beatable right now. The NFL playing field is leveling out. It’s going to be a wild and unpredictable season this year.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.