Let me see if you Cowgirl fans can add. 0 + 0 =?
Take your time answering that.
(a) First 0 is how many playoff games your starting qb has won
(b) Second 0 is how many playoff games your coach has won
Before this thread gets excited and calls this a potential dynasty how about 1 playoff vicotry followed by another and maybe 1 superbowl will come.
Geez and I thought my hopes and dreams of just 1 championship is realistic here in Philly. ![]()
I love this! This is great ALLABOUTME! ![]()
Let me put a different spin on this...
In 1991 how many playoff games...
(a) ...had Troy Aikman won as a starting NFL QB in his career?
(b) ...had Jimmy Johnson/Barry Switzer won as an NFL head coach?
Hmmmmm..........
And now? ![]()
Let me see if you Cowgirl fans can add. 0 + 0 =?
Take your time answering that.
(a) First 0 is how many playoff games your starting qb has won
(b) Second 0 is how many playoff games your coach has won
Before this thread gets excited and calls this a potential dynasty how about 1 playoff vicotry followed by another and maybe 1 superbowl will come.
Geez and I thought my hopes and dreams of just 1 championship is realistic here in Philly. ![]()
I love this! This is great ALLABOUTME! ![]()
Let me put a different spin on this...
In 1991 how many playoff games...
(a) ...had Troy Aikman won as a starting NFL QB in his career?
(b) ...had Jimmy Johnson/Barry Switzer won as an NFL head coach?
Hmmmmm..........
And now? ![]()
I love this! This is great ALLABOUTME! ![]()
Let me put a different spin on this...
In 1991 how many playoff games...
(a) ...had Troy Aikman won as a starting NFL QB in his career?
(b) ...had Jimmy Johnson/Barry Switzer won as an NFL head coach?
Hmmmmm..........
And now? ![]()
Keep Spinning ..... Sorry I couldnt find a thread where back in 91 it stated the COWGIRLS would be a dynasty before they won a playoff game.
Just a ludicrous statement to make when you havent won 1 superbowl or even a playoff game for that matter.
A Dynasty ... you haven't won a playoff game in 10 seasons.
I can understand realism and wishful thinking but geez what a hunch.
I love this! This is great ALLABOUTME! ![]()
Let me put a different spin on this...
In 1991 how many playoff games...
(a) ...had Troy Aikman won as a starting NFL QB in his career?
(b) ...had Jimmy Johnson/Barry Switzer won as an NFL head coach?
Hmmmmm..........
And now? ![]()
Keep Spinning ..... Sorry I couldnt find a thread where back in 91 it stated the COWGIRLS would be a dynasty before they won a playoff game.
Just a ludicrous statement to make when you havent won 1 superbowl or even a playoff game for that matter.
A Dynasty ... you haven't won a playoff game in 10 seasons.
I can understand realism and wishful thinking but geez what a hunch.
Keep Spinning ..... Sorry I couldnt find a thread where back in 91 it stated the COWGIRLS would be a dynasty before they won a playoff game.
Just a ludicrous statement to make when you havent won 1 superbowl or even a playoff game for that matter.
A Dynasty ... you haven't won a playoff game in 10 seasons.
I can understand realism and wishful thinking but geez what a hunch.
Keep Spinning ..... Sorry I couldnt find a thread where back in 91 it stated the COWGIRLS would be a dynasty before they won a playoff game.
Just a ludicrous statement to make when you havent won 1 superbowl or even a playoff game for that matter.
A Dynasty ... you haven't won a playoff game in 10 seasons.
I can understand realism and wishful thinking but geez what a hunch.
A few things here.
The ERA that all players play in.
The free agency market
Money talks
You had AIkman/Irvin/Smith
I dont think Romo is Aikman, TO is coming to an end and sure enough your starting RB isn't one of the greateset RB of all time.
Lets say you win the superbowl all the above now plays a huge part and now a days its about making as much as possible as soon as possible.
Again win 1 game then 1 superbowl.
I mean is NE a dynasty? 3 out of the last 7 years? I heard talks if they won that 4th then yes but they didn't and I don't see how Dallas Cowbooys can win 4 out of the next 7 to even put it out there as talks of a dynasty.
A few things here.
The ERA that all players play in.
The free agency market
Money talks
You had AIkman/Irvin/Smith
I dont think Romo is Aikman, TO is coming to an end and sure enough your starting RB isn't one of the greateset RB of all time.
Lets say you win the superbowl all the above now plays a huge part and now a days its about making as much as possible as soon as possible.
Again win 1 game then 1 superbowl.
I mean is NE a dynasty? 3 out of the last 7 years? I heard talks if they won that 4th then yes but they didn't and I don't see how Dallas Cowbooys can win 4 out of the next 7 to even put it out there as talks of a dynasty.
Keep Spinning ..... Sorry I couldnt find a thread where back in 91 it stated the COWGIRLS would be a dynasty before they won a playoff game.
Just a ludicrous statement to make when you havent won 1 superbowl or even a playoff game for that matter.
A Dynasty ... you haven't won a playoff game in 10 seasons.
I can understand realism and wishful thinking but geez what a hunch.
ALLABOUTME - I think you got this whole thing all wrong buddy, NOBODY is trying to say IT IS the next dynasty...
Nobody's saying that.
Is it possible though? Is the talent there? Sure, it's possible and that's all anybody's saying here. Just like in the early 90's when the Cowboys loaded up on all that talent and then came the dynasty of the 90's. The pieces were put in place then and they've been put in place now; a good young QB who continues to improve after just 1.5 seasons as a starter, very talented position players, very good lines on both offense and defense, and a defense with excellent pass rushers and playmakers who may have just shored up possibly their only previous weakness in the secondary.
It's there...the question is if they all these pieces can put the final puzzle together? That's the question, and it's really up to them. The rest of us are just spectators who will enjoy seeing how it plays out...![]()
Keep Spinning ..... Sorry I couldnt find a thread where back in 91 it stated the COWGIRLS would be a dynasty before they won a playoff game.
Just a ludicrous statement to make when you havent won 1 superbowl or even a playoff game for that matter.
A Dynasty ... you haven't won a playoff game in 10 seasons.
I can understand realism and wishful thinking but geez what a hunch.
ALLABOUTME - I think you got this whole thing all wrong buddy, NOBODY is trying to say IT IS the next dynasty...
Nobody's saying that.
Is it possible though? Is the talent there? Sure, it's possible and that's all anybody's saying here. Just like in the early 90's when the Cowboys loaded up on all that talent and then came the dynasty of the 90's. The pieces were put in place then and they've been put in place now; a good young QB who continues to improve after just 1.5 seasons as a starter, very talented position players, very good lines on both offense and defense, and a defense with excellent pass rushers and playmakers who may have just shored up possibly their only previous weakness in the secondary.
It's there...the question is if they all these pieces can put the final puzzle together? That's the question, and it's really up to them. The rest of us are just spectators who will enjoy seeing how it plays out...![]()
ALLABOUTME - I think you got this whole thing all wrong buddy, NOBODY is trying to say IT IS the next dynasty...
Nobody's saying that.
Is it possible though? Is the talent there? Sure, it's possible and that's all anybody's saying here. Just like in the early 90's when the Cowboys loaded up on all that talent and then came the dynasty of the 90's. The pieces were put in place then and they've been put in place now; a good young QB who continues to improve after just 1.5 seasons as a starter, very talented position players, very good lines on both offense and defense, and a defense with excellent pass rushers and playmakers who may have just shored up possibly their only previous weakness in the secondary.
It's there...the question is if they all these pieces can put the final puzzle together? That's the question, and it's really up to them. The rest of us are just spectators who will enjoy seeing how it plays out...![]()
See my response above thats why they won't be.
A ton of teams in the last 10 years have had way better teams put in place but haven't even won a superbowl let alone multiple and hoping to become a dynasty.
Just my 2 cents.
Either way BOL this season should be great to see your O very the EAGLES D.
They were top 10 last year and the expectations are TOP 5 this year. ![]()
ALLABOUTME - I think you got this whole thing all wrong buddy, NOBODY is trying to say IT IS the next dynasty...
Nobody's saying that.
Is it possible though? Is the talent there? Sure, it's possible and that's all anybody's saying here. Just like in the early 90's when the Cowboys loaded up on all that talent and then came the dynasty of the 90's. The pieces were put in place then and they've been put in place now; a good young QB who continues to improve after just 1.5 seasons as a starter, very talented position players, very good lines on both offense and defense, and a defense with excellent pass rushers and playmakers who may have just shored up possibly their only previous weakness in the secondary.
It's there...the question is if they all these pieces can put the final puzzle together? That's the question, and it's really up to them. The rest of us are just spectators who will enjoy seeing how it plays out...![]()
See my response above thats why they won't be.
A ton of teams in the last 10 years have had way better teams put in place but haven't even won a superbowl let alone multiple and hoping to become a dynasty.
Just my 2 cents.
Either way BOL this season should be great to see your O very the EAGLES D.
They were top 10 last year and the expectations are TOP 5 this year. ![]()
See my response above thats why they won't be.
A ton of teams in the last 10 years have had way better teams put in place but haven't even won a superbowl let alone multiple and hoping to become a dynasty.
Just my 2 cents.
Either way BOL this season should be great to see your O very the EAGLES D.
They were top 10 last year and the expectations are TOP 5 this year. ![]()
this is coming from a raven fan mind you, but this current dallas roster is BY FAR the most talented roster i have ever seen in the NFL since the 95 cowboys. they are even more talented then NE, Indy or SD. the thing that sets those teams (except for SD) apart from Dallas is coaching which this dallas team is talented enough to overcome.
you guys trashing dallas do realize that the cowboys set A NFL RECORD FOR MOST PROBOWLERS IN A SEASON WITH 13!!! now you add in Pacman, which regardless how you feel about him as a person, is a top 10 CB (brian balldinger thought pacman was the best CB in the NFL by the end of the 2006 season) and the best return man not named Devon Hester (pacman has 5 return TD's in 2 years). plus you add a verteran leader at LB (zach Thomas) that dallas was sorely lacking because there play recognition was lacking last year and Zach is the best in the league at diagnosing plays. Add that to the fact that this is the second year being in the offensive and defensive systems AND this is only Romo's SECOND FULL YEAR AS A STARTER, i think the original posters question was legitamate and could very well come to fruition
See my response above thats why they won't be.
A ton of teams in the last 10 years have had way better teams put in place but haven't even won a superbowl let alone multiple and hoping to become a dynasty.
Just my 2 cents.
Either way BOL this season should be great to see your O very the EAGLES D.
They were top 10 last year and the expectations are TOP 5 this year. ![]()
this is coming from a raven fan mind you, but this current dallas roster is BY FAR the most talented roster i have ever seen in the NFL since the 95 cowboys. they are even more talented then NE, Indy or SD. the thing that sets those teams (except for SD) apart from Dallas is coaching which this dallas team is talented enough to overcome.
you guys trashing dallas do realize that the cowboys set A NFL RECORD FOR MOST PROBOWLERS IN A SEASON WITH 13!!! now you add in Pacman, which regardless how you feel about him as a person, is a top 10 CB (brian balldinger thought pacman was the best CB in the NFL by the end of the 2006 season) and the best return man not named Devon Hester (pacman has 5 return TD's in 2 years). plus you add a verteran leader at LB (zach Thomas) that dallas was sorely lacking because there play recognition was lacking last year and Zach is the best in the league at diagnosing plays. Add that to the fact that this is the second year being in the offensive and defensive systems AND this is only Romo's SECOND FULL YEAR AS A STARTER, i think the original posters question was legitamate and could very well come to fruition
this is coming from a raven fan mind you, but this current dallas roster is BY FAR the most talented roster i have ever seen in the NFL since the 95 cowboys. they are even more talented then NE, Indy or SD. the thing that sets those teams (except for SD) apart from Dallas is coaching which this dallas team is talented enough to overcome.
you guys trashing dallas do realize that the cowboys set A NFL RECORD FOR MOST PROBOWLERS IN A SEASON WITH 13!!! now you add in Pacman, which regardless how you feel about him as a person, is a top 10 CB (brian balldinger thought pacman was the best CB in the NFL by the end of the 2006 season) and the best return man not named Devon Hester (pacman has 5 return TD's in 2 years). plus you add a verteran leader at LB (zach Thomas) that dallas was sorely lacking because there play recognition was lacking last year and Zach is the best in the league at diagnosing plays. Add that to the fact that this is the second year being in the offensive and defensive systems AND this is only Romo's SECOND FULL YEAR AS A STARTER, i think the original posters question was legitamate and could very well come to fruition
I never knocked the Cowboys. However the reasons I have above makes what you say above the reason they wont be a dynasty.
To many Big Names which means to many Big Pay Days which means if they win a superbowl together they won't all last on the same team together.
They are a very talented team with alot of Big Names but why even play this year or the next 5 since you already have them winning it all. Another PAPER CHAMPION TEAM. We seen many times how that worked itself out.![]()
Superbowl in the next 3 years very likely, Dynasty unlikely.
PS what is everyone defintion of a DYNASTY?
A team that is going to compete and make the playoffs and contend for a championship year in and year out? or one that wins 3 superbowls in a row? 4 out of 7 ... what?
Its very unlikely we will ever see a true team dynasty in football again. Just my $.02![]()
this is coming from a raven fan mind you, but this current dallas roster is BY FAR the most talented roster i have ever seen in the NFL since the 95 cowboys. they are even more talented then NE, Indy or SD. the thing that sets those teams (except for SD) apart from Dallas is coaching which this dallas team is talented enough to overcome.
you guys trashing dallas do realize that the cowboys set A NFL RECORD FOR MOST PROBOWLERS IN A SEASON WITH 13!!! now you add in Pacman, which regardless how you feel about him as a person, is a top 10 CB (brian balldinger thought pacman was the best CB in the NFL by the end of the 2006 season) and the best return man not named Devon Hester (pacman has 5 return TD's in 2 years). plus you add a verteran leader at LB (zach Thomas) that dallas was sorely lacking because there play recognition was lacking last year and Zach is the best in the league at diagnosing plays. Add that to the fact that this is the second year being in the offensive and defensive systems AND this is only Romo's SECOND FULL YEAR AS A STARTER, i think the original posters question was legitamate and could very well come to fruition
I never knocked the Cowboys. However the reasons I have above makes what you say above the reason they wont be a dynasty.
To many Big Names which means to many Big Pay Days which means if they win a superbowl together they won't all last on the same team together.
They are a very talented team with alot of Big Names but why even play this year or the next 5 since you already have them winning it all. Another PAPER CHAMPION TEAM. We seen many times how that worked itself out.![]()
Superbowl in the next 3 years very likely, Dynasty unlikely.
PS what is everyone defintion of a DYNASTY?
A team that is going to compete and make the playoffs and contend for a championship year in and year out? or one that wins 3 superbowls in a row? 4 out of 7 ... what?
Its very unlikely we will ever see a true team dynasty in football again. Just my $.02![]()
I would love to see that! I watched Jefferson play in high school right here in El Paso! He was an absolute stud coming out of Parkland High School...went to Univ. of Arizona, didn't work out and went to Montana St. He was somewhat of an unknown, but, I know the kid can play, I'd love to see him emerge as the guy...![]()
I would love to see that! I watched Jefferson play in high school right here in El Paso! He was an absolute stud coming out of Parkland High School...went to Univ. of Arizona, didn't work out and went to Montana St. He was somewhat of an unknown, but, I know the kid can play, I'd love to see him emerge as the guy...![]()
this is coming from a raven fan mind you, but this current dallas roster is BY FAR the most talented roster i have ever seen in the NFL since the 95 cowboys. they are even more talented then NE, Indy or SD. the thing that sets those teams (except for SD) apart from Dallas is coaching which this dallas team is talented enough to overcome.
you guys trashing dallas do realize that the cowboys set A NFL RECORD FOR MOST PROBOWLERS IN A SEASON WITH 13!!! now you add in Pacman, which regardless how you feel about him as a person, is a top 10 CB (brian balldinger thought pacman was the best CB in the NFL by the end of the 2006 season) and the best return man not named Devon Hester (pacman has 5 return TD's in 2 years). plus you add a verteran leader at LB (zach Thomas) that dallas was sorely lacking because there play recognition was lacking last year and Zach is the best in the league at diagnosing plays. Add that to the fact that this is the second year being in the offensive and defensive systems AND this is only Romo's SECOND FULL YEAR AS A STARTER, i think the original posters question was legitamate and could very well come to fruition
this is coming from a raven fan mind you, but this current dallas roster is BY FAR the most talented roster i have ever seen in the NFL since the 95 cowboys. they are even more talented then NE, Indy or SD. the thing that sets those teams (except for SD) apart from Dallas is coaching which this dallas team is talented enough to overcome.
you guys trashing dallas do realize that the cowboys set A NFL RECORD FOR MOST PROBOWLERS IN A SEASON WITH 13!!! now you add in Pacman, which regardless how you feel about him as a person, is a top 10 CB (brian balldinger thought pacman was the best CB in the NFL by the end of the 2006 season) and the best return man not named Devon Hester (pacman has 5 return TD's in 2 years). plus you add a verteran leader at LB (zach Thomas) that dallas was sorely lacking because there play recognition was lacking last year and Zach is the best in the league at diagnosing plays. Add that to the fact that this is the second year being in the offensive and defensive systems AND this is only Romo's SECOND FULL YEAR AS A STARTER, i think the original posters question was legitamate and could very well come to fruition

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.