Do you want me to name all the QBs that didn't wear #16. And i'm pretty sure Goff wears 16 because of Montana. He grew up in a Niners household.
The players you can name that didn't is irrelevant. The fact is 3 California team QBs, did wear 16 and we'e in Super bowls. This means the number 16 has something to do with California and these players birth numerology. Goff wears the number because he was told to. The Montana story is simply made up. You'll only get better at gambling when you learn you are watching staged entertainment.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Do you want me to name all the QBs that didn't wear #16. And i'm pretty sure Goff wears 16 because of Montana. He grew up in a Niners household.
The players you can name that didn't is irrelevant. The fact is 3 California team QBs, did wear 16 and we'e in Super bowls. This means the number 16 has something to do with California and these players birth numerology. Goff wears the number because he was told to. The Montana story is simply made up. You'll only get better at gambling when you learn you are watching staged entertainment.
If we're talking ON cali teams well then Steve Young wore #8. Rich Gannon wore #12. There's only so many numbers a QB can wear. You're not gonna see #54 on a QB. Most linebackers wear 50s numbers, some O-linemen and full backs. WRs wear 80s. D-linemen 90s.
Are you paying attention? Picking players,who didnt' is irrelevant to those who did . 3 from California teams is ridiculously astrological coincidence. Learn to be a better observer. You need to learn numerology and gematria or you'll continue to be a average hack gambler depending on odds and chance.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
If we're talking ON cali teams well then Steve Young wore #8. Rich Gannon wore #12. There's only so many numbers a QB can wear. You're not gonna see #54 on a QB. Most linebackers wear 50s numbers, some O-linemen and full backs. WRs wear 80s. D-linemen 90s.
Are you paying attention? Picking players,who didnt' is irrelevant to those who did . 3 from California teams is ridiculously astrological coincidence. Learn to be a better observer. You need to learn numerology and gematria or you'll continue to be a average hack gambler depending on odds and chance.
Wouldn't you notice certain repetitions and wonder,what's up with that? Jim Plunkett,Joe Montana, Jared Goff, all QBs on California teams went to Super bowls. You can't call that kind of symmetry a coincidence. Players don't pick their own numbers, that's a lie, a myth. Their numbers are based on a few things like numerology etc.
You forgot Tommy Goat. California QBs traditionally fling it more in from high school. The weather is better. Tradionally they play more of a smashmouth brand in other parts of the country. As far as players picking their own numbers, a lot of these guys wear the same number since childhood.
You couldn't prove what any of these players wore since high school if you tried. The fact is, I already know I'm absolutely correct after 4 years of research. No player chooses his own number in the pros. That is an absolute fact. If there' a chance in hell that he wears the same number since high school, it means a handler or cybernetics is involved. Their numbers are given to them based on numerology and gematria.
You're off your rocker. This is the problem with people who believe things like you believe. And you even said it yourself, albeit about others. Your mind isn't open to anything else. You believe what you believe. People who believe in Gematria love to point to things after the fact and say, "See, this is no coincidence." but you guys never seem to predict things before hand. And even when you make statements after the fact, they are a looooong reach. Whatever helps you sleep at night though.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Wouldn't you notice certain repetitions and wonder,what's up with that? Jim Plunkett,Joe Montana, Jared Goff, all QBs on California teams went to Super bowls. You can't call that kind of symmetry a coincidence. Players don't pick their own numbers, that's a lie, a myth. Their numbers are based on a few things like numerology etc.
You forgot Tommy Goat. California QBs traditionally fling it more in from high school. The weather is better. Tradionally they play more of a smashmouth brand in other parts of the country. As far as players picking their own numbers, a lot of these guys wear the same number since childhood.
You couldn't prove what any of these players wore since high school if you tried. The fact is, I already know I'm absolutely correct after 4 years of research. No player chooses his own number in the pros. That is an absolute fact. If there' a chance in hell that he wears the same number since high school, it means a handler or cybernetics is involved. Their numbers are given to them based on numerology and gematria.
You're off your rocker. This is the problem with people who believe things like you believe. And you even said it yourself, albeit about others. Your mind isn't open to anything else. You believe what you believe. People who believe in Gematria love to point to things after the fact and say, "See, this is no coincidence." but you guys never seem to predict things before hand. And even when you make statements after the fact, they are a looooong reach. Whatever helps you sleep at night though.
If we're talking ON cali teams well then Steve Young wore #8. Rich Gannon wore #12. There's only so many numbers a QB can wear. You're not gonna see #54 on a QB. Most linebackers wear 50s numbers, some O-linemen and full backs. WRs wear 80s. D-linemen 90s.
Are you paying attention? Picking players,who didnt' is irrelevant to those who did . 3 from California teams is ridiculously astrological coincidence. Learn to be a better observer. You need to learn numerology and gematria or you'll continue to be a average hack gambler depending on odds and chance.
Except I am a really, really good gambler. And not because of Gematria. It's because of years and years of working at it. So don't give me any b.s. about Gematria and gambling. The guys who believe that stuff never make predictions pregame. They come around after the fact and tie it all together in the most convoluted ways. It's easy to pick winners with Gematria if you wait until the game is over.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
1
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
If we're talking ON cali teams well then Steve Young wore #8. Rich Gannon wore #12. There's only so many numbers a QB can wear. You're not gonna see #54 on a QB. Most linebackers wear 50s numbers, some O-linemen and full backs. WRs wear 80s. D-linemen 90s.
Are you paying attention? Picking players,who didnt' is irrelevant to those who did . 3 from California teams is ridiculously astrological coincidence. Learn to be a better observer. You need to learn numerology and gematria or you'll continue to be a average hack gambler depending on odds and chance.
Except I am a really, really good gambler. And not because of Gematria. It's because of years and years of working at it. So don't give me any b.s. about Gematria and gambling. The guys who believe that stuff never make predictions pregame. They come around after the fact and tie it all together in the most convoluted ways. It's easy to pick winners with Gematria if you wait until the game is over.
Listen to your own words. You want me to ignore the examples that debunk your theory in favor of those that do. That's how it works with people who believe this crap. You ignore facts and twist others to fit your narrative.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Listen to your own words. You want me to ignore the examples that debunk your theory in favor of those that do. That's how it works with people who believe this crap. You ignore facts and twist others to fit your narrative.
.[/Quote] You couldn't prove what any of these players wore since high school if you tried. The fact is, I already know I'm absolutely correct after 4 years of research. No player chooses his own number in the pros. That is an absolute fact. If there' a chance in hell that he wears the same number since high school, it means a handler or cybernetics is involved. Their numbers are given to them based on numerology and gematria.[/Quote] You're off your rocker. This is the problem with people who believe things like you believe. And you even said it yourself, albeit about others. Your mind isn't open to anything else. You believe what you believe. People who believe in Gematria love to point to things after the fact and say, "See, this is no coincidence." but you guys never seem to predict things before hand. And even when you make statements after the fact, they are a looooong reach. Whatever helps you sleep at night though.[/Quote]
There is no such thing as a belief. You either know something or you dont. Until you choose to learn gematria and numerology, it's you that has false beliefs
0
.[/Quote] You couldn't prove what any of these players wore since high school if you tried. The fact is, I already know I'm absolutely correct after 4 years of research. No player chooses his own number in the pros. That is an absolute fact. If there' a chance in hell that he wears the same number since high school, it means a handler or cybernetics is involved. Their numbers are given to them based on numerology and gematria.[/Quote] You're off your rocker. This is the problem with people who believe things like you believe. And you even said it yourself, albeit about others. Your mind isn't open to anything else. You believe what you believe. People who believe in Gematria love to point to things after the fact and say, "See, this is no coincidence." but you guys never seem to predict things before hand. And even when you make statements after the fact, they are a looooong reach. Whatever helps you sleep at night though.[/Quote]
There is no such thing as a belief. You either know something or you dont. Until you choose to learn gematria and numerology, it's you that has false beliefs
Listen to your own words. You want me to ignore the examples that debunk your theory in favor of those that do. That's how it works with people who believe this crap. You ignore facts and twist others to fit your narrative.
You didn't debunk anything. You said other guys didn't have number 16. In now way does that debunk what I said .
You've got a very poor comprehensive level.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Listen to your own words. You want me to ignore the examples that debunk your theory in favor of those that do. That's how it works with people who believe this crap. You ignore facts and twist others to fit your narrative.
You didn't debunk anything. You said other guys didn't have number 16. In now way does that debunk what I said .
Listen to your own words. You want me to ignore the examples that debunk your theory in favor of those that do. That's how it works with people who believe this crap. You ignore facts and twist others to fit your narrative.
You didn't debunk anything. You said other guys didn't have number 16. In now way does that debunk what I said . You've got a very poor comprehensive level.
Ok, you're right. Let me word it differently. Of you can list three cases that you say prove a point, and I can list more than three cases that disprove said point, it stands to reason that the point is invalid. Under you parameters, you can never really prove or disprove any of this so you have to rely on what's most likely. My comprehension skills are off the chart, bro.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Listen to your own words. You want me to ignore the examples that debunk your theory in favor of those that do. That's how it works with people who believe this crap. You ignore facts and twist others to fit your narrative.
You didn't debunk anything. You said other guys didn't have number 16. In now way does that debunk what I said . You've got a very poor comprehensive level.
Ok, you're right. Let me word it differently. Of you can list three cases that you say prove a point, and I can list more than three cases that disprove said point, it stands to reason that the point is invalid. Under you parameters, you can never really prove or disprove any of this so you have to rely on what's most likely. My comprehension skills are off the chart, bro.
Again though, whayever helps you sleep at night. I see where this is going already. I tear holes in all of your theories and instead of filling said holes, you try to insult my intelligence. It's a typical ploy used by the weak minded on this website.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Again though, whayever helps you sleep at night. I see where this is going already. I tear holes in all of your theories and instead of filling said holes, you try to insult my intelligence. It's a typical ploy used by the weak minded on this website.
If we're talking ON cali teams well then Steve Young wore #8. Rich Gannon wore #12. There's only so many numbers a QB can wear. You're not gonna see #54 on a QB. Most linebackers wear 50s numbers, some O-linemen and full backs. WRs wear 80s. D-linemen 90s.
Are you paying attention? Picking players,who didnt' is irrelevant to those who did . 3 from California teams is ridiculously astrological coincidence. Learn to be a better observer. You need to learn numerology and gematria or you'll continue to be a average hack gambler depending on odds and chance.
Except I am a really, really good gambler. And not because of Gematria. It's because of years and years of working at it. So don't give me any b.s. about Gematria and gambling. The guys who believe that stuff never make predictions pregame. They come around after the fact and tie it all together in the most convoluted ways. It's easy to pick winners with Gematria if you wait until the game is over.
You're actually incredibly horrible at what you do if you haven't figured out its entirely predetermined by now. Yeah, so, people point things out after the fact, so what? Thats' called learning from history. You can't learn valuable important stuff in one week. Youre still in denial, so you'll never grasp it.
There are people better at it then others, thats true in everything. You havent' learned yet, who's legitimate and who isnt. Its' still a blur to you. Until you dive in, you'll continue to remain ignorant.
It does matter and it does work. Until you learn it and learn how to utilize it, your critique is nothing but belief and not knowledge whether it works.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
If we're talking ON cali teams well then Steve Young wore #8. Rich Gannon wore #12. There's only so many numbers a QB can wear. You're not gonna see #54 on a QB. Most linebackers wear 50s numbers, some O-linemen and full backs. WRs wear 80s. D-linemen 90s.
Are you paying attention? Picking players,who didnt' is irrelevant to those who did . 3 from California teams is ridiculously astrological coincidence. Learn to be a better observer. You need to learn numerology and gematria or you'll continue to be a average hack gambler depending on odds and chance.
Except I am a really, really good gambler. And not because of Gematria. It's because of years and years of working at it. So don't give me any b.s. about Gematria and gambling. The guys who believe that stuff never make predictions pregame. They come around after the fact and tie it all together in the most convoluted ways. It's easy to pick winners with Gematria if you wait until the game is over.
You're actually incredibly horrible at what you do if you haven't figured out its entirely predetermined by now. Yeah, so, people point things out after the fact, so what? Thats' called learning from history. You can't learn valuable important stuff in one week. Youre still in denial, so you'll never grasp it.
There are people better at it then others, thats true in everything. You havent' learned yet, who's legitimate and who isnt. Its' still a blur to you. Until you dive in, you'll continue to remain ignorant.
It does matter and it does work. Until you learn it and learn how to utilize it, your critique is nothing but belief and not knowledge whether it works.
Again though, whayever helps you sleep at night. I see where this is going already. I tear holes in all of your theories and instead of filling said holes, you try to insult my intelligence. It's a typical ploy used by the weak minded on this website.
Lol pay attention 3rd grade level student.
The Sharks game, where they came back from 3-0 with 10 minutes left in game..and scored 4 goals on about 3 minutes.
That was their 113th playoff win on the 113th day of the year. Are going to childishly scream coincidence again? Another 1 in a million coincidence? This is why billionaires continue to be billionaires . The common man is too stupid to know when he' being screwed.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Again though, whayever helps you sleep at night. I see where this is going already. I tear holes in all of your theories and instead of filling said holes, you try to insult my intelligence. It's a typical ploy used by the weak minded on this website.
Lol pay attention 3rd grade level student.
The Sharks game, where they came back from 3-0 with 10 minutes left in game..and scored 4 goals on about 3 minutes.
That was their 113th playoff win on the 113th day of the year. Are going to childishly scream coincidence again? Another 1 in a million coincidence? This is why billionaires continue to be billionaires . The common man is too stupid to know when he' being screwed.
Again though, whayever helps you sleep at night. I see where this is going already. I tear holes in all of your theories and instead of filling said holes, you try to insult my intelligence. It's a typical ploy used by the weak minded on this website.
Lol pay attention 3rd grade level student. The Sharks game, where they came back from 3-0 with 10 minutes left in game..and scored 4 goals on about 3 minutes. That was their 113th playoff win on the 113th day of the year. Are going to childishly scream coincidence again? Another 1 in a million coincidence? This is why billionaires continue to be billionaires . The common man is too stupid to know when he' being screwed.
Did you post that they would win this game before it happened? I'll bet you didn't. You just proved both of my points in one post.
1. People who believe in Gematria, or any form of numerology, can always find correlations after the fact but can never make a prediction pre-game/pre-event.
2. Small minded people, when backed into a corner, hurl insults. You have nothing valid to say so you insult my intelligence. There's no one on the entire planet who speaks and reads english who could read your post, and the read my post, and come to the conclusion that i'm the one at a 3rd grade level. Insults are the best you can do though because everything else you say is empty.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Again though, whayever helps you sleep at night. I see where this is going already. I tear holes in all of your theories and instead of filling said holes, you try to insult my intelligence. It's a typical ploy used by the weak minded on this website.
Lol pay attention 3rd grade level student. The Sharks game, where they came back from 3-0 with 10 minutes left in game..and scored 4 goals on about 3 minutes. That was their 113th playoff win on the 113th day of the year. Are going to childishly scream coincidence again? Another 1 in a million coincidence? This is why billionaires continue to be billionaires . The common man is too stupid to know when he' being screwed.
Did you post that they would win this game before it happened? I'll bet you didn't. You just proved both of my points in one post.
1. People who believe in Gematria, or any form of numerology, can always find correlations after the fact but can never make a prediction pre-game/pre-event.
2. Small minded people, when backed into a corner, hurl insults. You have nothing valid to say so you insult my intelligence. There's no one on the entire planet who speaks and reads english who could read your post, and the read my post, and come to the conclusion that i'm the one at a 3rd grade level. Insults are the best you can do though because everything else you say is empty.
This is a pointless argument. You can believe what you want, it really doesn't matter to me. What I will say is, and this being a gambling based site, I can guarantee that I will always win more money with study and capping then you will with Gematria. Guarantee. You can't place wagers after the fact so pointing out arbitrary numerological correlations after a game has ended on a capping website is about as useful as bringing a fur coat to the Sahara. And don't give me the guff about, "Learning after the fact." The only thing you can learn from bringing a fur coat to the Sahara is that you don't need a fur coat in the Sahara. I take that back. You can also learn that you're stupid.
BOL with your Gematria based wagers. I just know that one of these days one of you guys will make an actual prediction instead of an after the fact observation. I done with the madness that is this debate
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
This is a pointless argument. You can believe what you want, it really doesn't matter to me. What I will say is, and this being a gambling based site, I can guarantee that I will always win more money with study and capping then you will with Gematria. Guarantee. You can't place wagers after the fact so pointing out arbitrary numerological correlations after a game has ended on a capping website is about as useful as bringing a fur coat to the Sahara. And don't give me the guff about, "Learning after the fact." The only thing you can learn from bringing a fur coat to the Sahara is that you don't need a fur coat in the Sahara. I take that back. You can also learn that you're stupid.
BOL with your Gematria based wagers. I just know that one of these days one of you guys will make an actual prediction instead of an after the fact observation. I done with the madness that is this debate
The warriors didn't start winning championships till they started building a new stadium. Same with Rams and 49ers making it to SBs when building new stadiums. Falcons/Cardinals /Titans/Ravens .. build a new stadium, and odds,are good you'll get a playoff run soon. Vikings didn't make SB yet but they did get playoffs. It's a given that the Raiders will succeed when they move. The leagues realize fans are so stupid now, they don't even wait a year or two. Out of the blue teams win and no one suspects anything. The Golden Knights lol
For more than a decade now, in California, each year, at least one team from one of the 4 major sports, has made it to a conf championship or final. That's not lucky coincidence. And please, don't say something like, ...well they have 3 or 4 teams in California, so they have a better chance....4 teams out of 32.. or 16 out of 100 something teams, does not add up to 100% probability for a decade. It's blatant collusion. No ifs ands or buts about it. The reason Seattle went to two SBS is because they took out the Sonics and their revenue stream. Now they'll have expansion hockey team in a year and seahawks can drop off. Follow the money. Another reason the Warriors are winning and the Sharks, who have also already been in a final.. is because the leagues already knew, years in advance, thst they were moving the Raiders. People with billions, know what they will do, years before you ever find out.
0
The warriors didn't start winning championships till they started building a new stadium. Same with Rams and 49ers making it to SBs when building new stadiums. Falcons/Cardinals /Titans/Ravens .. build a new stadium, and odds,are good you'll get a playoff run soon. Vikings didn't make SB yet but they did get playoffs. It's a given that the Raiders will succeed when they move. The leagues realize fans are so stupid now, they don't even wait a year or two. Out of the blue teams win and no one suspects anything. The Golden Knights lol
For more than a decade now, in California, each year, at least one team from one of the 4 major sports, has made it to a conf championship or final. That's not lucky coincidence. And please, don't say something like, ...well they have 3 or 4 teams in California, so they have a better chance....4 teams out of 32.. or 16 out of 100 something teams, does not add up to 100% probability for a decade. It's blatant collusion. No ifs ands or buts about it. The reason Seattle went to two SBS is because they took out the Sonics and their revenue stream. Now they'll have expansion hockey team in a year and seahawks can drop off. Follow the money. Another reason the Warriors are winning and the Sharks, who have also already been in a final.. is because the leagues already knew, years in advance, thst they were moving the Raiders. People with billions, know what they will do, years before you ever find out.
This is a pointless argument. You can believe what you want, it really doesn't matter to me. What I will say is, and this being a gambling based site, I can guarantee that I will always win more money with study and capping then you will with Gematria. Guarantee. You can't place wagers after the fact so pointing out arbitrary numerological correlations after a game has ended on a capping website is about as useful as bringing a fur coat to the Sahara. And don't give me the guff about, "Learning after the fact." The only thing you can learn from bringing a fur coat to the Sahara is that you don't need a fur coat in the Sahara. I take that back. You can also learn that you're stupid. BOL with your Gematria based wagers. I just know that one of these days one of you guys will make an actual prediction instead of an after the fact observation. I done with the madness that is this debate
After the fact? Um..you can't' learn forward until you understand the past.
I'm teaching you what to look for in the future.
Being able to discern the past Is how you learn. The past patterns show distinct predetermined games.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
This is a pointless argument. You can believe what you want, it really doesn't matter to me. What I will say is, and this being a gambling based site, I can guarantee that I will always win more money with study and capping then you will with Gematria. Guarantee. You can't place wagers after the fact so pointing out arbitrary numerological correlations after a game has ended on a capping website is about as useful as bringing a fur coat to the Sahara. And don't give me the guff about, "Learning after the fact." The only thing you can learn from bringing a fur coat to the Sahara is that you don't need a fur coat in the Sahara. I take that back. You can also learn that you're stupid. BOL with your Gematria based wagers. I just know that one of these days one of you guys will make an actual prediction instead of an after the fact observation. I done with the madness that is this debate
After the fact? Um..you can't' learn forward until you understand the past.
I'm teaching you what to look for in the future.
Being able to discern the past Is how you learn. The past patterns show distinct predetermined games.
The warriors didn't start winning championships till they started building a new stadium. Same with Rams and 49ers making it to SBs when building new stadiums. Falcons/Cardinals /Titans/Ravens .. build a new stadium, and odds,are good you'll get a playoff run soon. Vikings didn't make SB yet but they did get playoffs. It's a given that the Raiders will succeed when they move. The leagues realize fans are so stupid now, they don't even wait a year or two. Out of the blue teams win and no one suspects anything. The Golden Knights lolFor more than a decade now, in California, each year, at least one team from one of the 4 major sports, has made it to a conf championship or final. That's not lucky coincidence. And please, don't say something like, ...well they have 3 or 4 teams in California, so they have a better chance....4 teams out of 32.. or 16 out of 100 something teams, does not add up to 100% probability for a decade. It's blatant collusion. No ifs ands or buts about it. The reason Seattle went to two SBS is because they took out the Sonics and their revenue stream.Now they'll have expansion hockey team in a year and seahawks can drop off. Follow the money. Another reason the Warriors are winning and the Sharks, who have also already been in a final.. is because the leagues already knew, years in advance, thst they were moving the Raiders. People with billions, know what they will do, years before you ever find out.
The Warriors won a title before a stadium plan was even proposed. The Falcons went to a Super Bowl in the 90's. The Rams won in St. Louis and still couldn't get a new stadium. Tennessee has a new stadium and are yet to get close. The Texans have a new stadium. The Nets have a new arena in a new city. Sac has a new arena. Every sport has teams with new facilities that don't sniff a league championship and teams and teams in old facilities that do. Teams get new facilities because theirs are old. Simple as that.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
The warriors didn't start winning championships till they started building a new stadium. Same with Rams and 49ers making it to SBs when building new stadiums. Falcons/Cardinals /Titans/Ravens .. build a new stadium, and odds,are good you'll get a playoff run soon. Vikings didn't make SB yet but they did get playoffs. It's a given that the Raiders will succeed when they move. The leagues realize fans are so stupid now, they don't even wait a year or two. Out of the blue teams win and no one suspects anything. The Golden Knights lolFor more than a decade now, in California, each year, at least one team from one of the 4 major sports, has made it to a conf championship or final. That's not lucky coincidence. And please, don't say something like, ...well they have 3 or 4 teams in California, so they have a better chance....4 teams out of 32.. or 16 out of 100 something teams, does not add up to 100% probability for a decade. It's blatant collusion. No ifs ands or buts about it. The reason Seattle went to two SBS is because they took out the Sonics and their revenue stream.Now they'll have expansion hockey team in a year and seahawks can drop off. Follow the money. Another reason the Warriors are winning and the Sharks, who have also already been in a final.. is because the leagues already knew, years in advance, thst they were moving the Raiders. People with billions, know what they will do, years before you ever find out.
The Warriors won a title before a stadium plan was even proposed. The Falcons went to a Super Bowl in the 90's. The Rams won in St. Louis and still couldn't get a new stadium. Tennessee has a new stadium and are yet to get close. The Texans have a new stadium. The Nets have a new arena in a new city. Sac has a new arena. Every sport has teams with new facilities that don't sniff a league championship and teams and teams in old facilities that do. Teams get new facilities because theirs are old. Simple as that.
I have already told you that the Sharks won their 113th playoff game on the 113th day of the year. That is absolute, unquestionable proof its staged. That's too perfect to be a coincidence. Not to mention the 4 goals in 3 minutes. You can' argue against that kind of detail. It can' happen naturally or randomly. I have proven it with that alone. To deny that is why the dumbing down of this country is complete. You need to read 1984 again and realize it' alone biography.
0
I have already told you that the Sharks won their 113th playoff game on the 113th day of the year. That is absolute, unquestionable proof its staged. That's too perfect to be a coincidence. Not to mention the 4 goals in 3 minutes. You can' argue against that kind of detail. It can' happen naturally or randomly. I have proven it with that alone. To deny that is why the dumbing down of this country is complete. You need to read 1984 again and realize it' alone biography.
Everything you say has holes in it. I can't believe I even responded to you again. No more.
you are using one dimensional childish logic. theres always more than one variable. Im just giving you basic stuff to start with. theres not a single hole in anything i've said. If you actually did any decent research.. youd notice building new stadiums leads to winning a vast majority of the time. you are simply in denial/ cognitive dissonance. You are absolutely wrong in everything you think, until you come to the realization you are watching entertainment.
you fail to realize you are mocking an ally. I'm trying help you.
until you learn gematria and numerology, youll continue to be in the dark
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Everything you say has holes in it. I can't believe I even responded to you again. No more.
you are using one dimensional childish logic. theres always more than one variable. Im just giving you basic stuff to start with. theres not a single hole in anything i've said. If you actually did any decent research.. youd notice building new stadiums leads to winning a vast majority of the time. you are simply in denial/ cognitive dissonance. You are absolutely wrong in everything you think, until you come to the realization you are watching entertainment.
you fail to realize you are mocking an ally. I'm trying help you.
until you learn gematria and numerology, youll continue to be in the dark
The Warriors won a title before a stadium plan was even proposed. The Falcons went to a Super Bowl in the 90's. The Rams won in St. Louis and still couldn't get a new stadium. Tennessee has a new stadium and are yet to get close. The Texans have a new stadium. The Nets have a new arena in a new city. Sac has a new arena. Every sport has teams with new facilities that don't sniff a league championship and teams and teams in old facilities that do. Teams get new facilities because theirs are old. Simple as that.
lol what exactly do you think youre disproving?
the warriors stadium was announced in 2012. they then went to finals from 2014, on.
yeah the Falcons went to a previous SB . where did i say SBs only involve a new stadium?
Texans= I said, by and large, it happens a majority of the time. CHerry picking doesnt remotely disprove me. there are many variables. You people are like children with no critical thinking skills
Titans went to a SB in 99 season. stadium was finished in 99. wheres the problem? . Theres more than one variable but the consistency of my truth can not be denied.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
The Warriors won a title before a stadium plan was even proposed. The Falcons went to a Super Bowl in the 90's. The Rams won in St. Louis and still couldn't get a new stadium. Tennessee has a new stadium and are yet to get close. The Texans have a new stadium. The Nets have a new arena in a new city. Sac has a new arena. Every sport has teams with new facilities that don't sniff a league championship and teams and teams in old facilities that do. Teams get new facilities because theirs are old. Simple as that.
lol what exactly do you think youre disproving?
the warriors stadium was announced in 2012. they then went to finals from 2014, on.
yeah the Falcons went to a previous SB . where did i say SBs only involve a new stadium?
Texans= I said, by and large, it happens a majority of the time. CHerry picking doesnt remotely disprove me. there are many variables. You people are like children with no critical thinking skills
Titans went to a SB in 99 season. stadium was finished in 99. wheres the problem? . Theres more than one variable but the consistency of my truth can not be denied.
There's always been rigs in sports, but watching a game like this if you think that was played fairly and just another "great Tom Brady comeback", you're just ignorant and an idiot.4th and 10 Chiefs get ball to end game....OH WAIT....worst roughing the passer call I've seen in my lifeChiefs interception to end the game.....OH WAIT....he was LINED UP offsides how convenientPatriots win the toss. EVERY BIG 3RD DOWN, Edelman WIDE OPEN over the middle. So much more.Yeah maybe Im salty from my large Chiefs bet, but if you dont think it's rigged you're dumb
i agree so fixed. i do think the saints fix was more obvious though. stick to betting baseball and hockey much more difficult to fix. but remember anything that can be fixed will be fixed. it is disappointing.
0
Quote Originally Posted by YoungStunna:
There's always been rigs in sports, but watching a game like this if you think that was played fairly and just another "great Tom Brady comeback", you're just ignorant and an idiot.4th and 10 Chiefs get ball to end game....OH WAIT....worst roughing the passer call I've seen in my lifeChiefs interception to end the game.....OH WAIT....he was LINED UP offsides how convenientPatriots win the toss. EVERY BIG 3RD DOWN, Edelman WIDE OPEN over the middle. So much more.Yeah maybe Im salty from my large Chiefs bet, but if you dont think it's rigged you're dumb
i agree so fixed. i do think the saints fix was more obvious though. stick to betting baseball and hockey much more difficult to fix. but remember anything that can be fixed will be fixed. it is disappointing.
There's always been rigs in sports, but watching a game like this if you think that was played fairly and just another "great Tom Brady comeback", you're just ignorant and an idiot.4th and 10 Chiefs get ball to end game....OH WAIT....worst roughing the passer call I've seen in my lifeChiefs interception to end the game.....OH WAIT....he was LINED UP offsides how convenientPatriots win the toss. EVERY BIG 3RD DOWN, Edelman WIDE OPEN over the middle. So much more.Yeah maybe Im salty from my large Chiefs bet, but if you dont think it's rigged you're dumb
i agree so fixed. i do think the saints fix was more obvious though. stick to betting baseball and hockey much more difficult to fix. but remember anything that can be fixed will be fixed. it is disappointing.
All the sports work in unison.
Building a new stadium in LA? Fine, we'll have the Rams go to a SB and the Dodgers host 7 world series games in 2 years.
Youre right. Saints, Rams, .When a player hits another player in the helmet on national tv, in front of millions and nothing is called. There's no other logical conclusion but that it's predetermined and staged. It' blatant proof, no matter what anyone here thinks of my peripheral examples.
The Lakers will in the finals next year. It doesn't matter if they are being coached by by a Tree stump and the 4 players on the court with Lebron are puppies or 5 ft 7 inch white guys. The league will make sure he' in another final.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sonofpop:
Quote Originally Posted by YoungStunna:
There's always been rigs in sports, but watching a game like this if you think that was played fairly and just another "great Tom Brady comeback", you're just ignorant and an idiot.4th and 10 Chiefs get ball to end game....OH WAIT....worst roughing the passer call I've seen in my lifeChiefs interception to end the game.....OH WAIT....he was LINED UP offsides how convenientPatriots win the toss. EVERY BIG 3RD DOWN, Edelman WIDE OPEN over the middle. So much more.Yeah maybe Im salty from my large Chiefs bet, but if you dont think it's rigged you're dumb
i agree so fixed. i do think the saints fix was more obvious though. stick to betting baseball and hockey much more difficult to fix. but remember anything that can be fixed will be fixed. it is disappointing.
All the sports work in unison.
Building a new stadium in LA? Fine, we'll have the Rams go to a SB and the Dodgers host 7 world series games in 2 years.
Youre right. Saints, Rams, .When a player hits another player in the helmet on national tv, in front of millions and nothing is called. There's no other logical conclusion but that it's predetermined and staged. It' blatant proof, no matter what anyone here thinks of my peripheral examples.
The Lakers will in the finals next year. It doesn't matter if they are being coached by by a Tree stump and the 4 players on the court with Lebron are puppies or 5 ft 7 inch white guys. The league will make sure he' in another final.
True. Must be paying these guys big bucks to throw these games. They've only spent their whole lives training and preparing for this... makes sense they'd be bought out so easily
They get paid big bucks already, to so exactly as told. It doesn't mean they all know something. It means a jock follows the play exactly called. Or he gets canned, being labeled "uncoachable.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mookie_Bets:
True. Must be paying these guys big bucks to throw these games. They've only spent their whole lives training and preparing for this... makes sense they'd be bought out so easily
They get paid big bucks already, to so exactly as told. It doesn't mean they all know something. It means a jock follows the play exactly called. Or he gets canned, being labeled "uncoachable.
to all the people who say sports arent fuking rigged...I LOST A LOT OF MONEY AT THE BEGINING OF THE YEAR ON A WTA TENNIS MATCH - PAVLYUCHENKOVA LOST TO KUDERMETOVA. COUPLE WEEKS LATER PAVLYUCHENKOVA IS IN THE QUARTER FINALS OF THE AUSTRALIAN OPEN WHILE KUDERMETOVA LOST IN THE FIRST ROUND OF THE QUALIFIERS OF THE AUSTRALIAN OPEN... so fuk all the people that say sports are not rigged...without sports betting no one would ever watch this garbage...
One of covers biggest donkey mushes is back after hiding for a year...time to celebrate the king donkmush's return
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Quote Originally Posted by mookie2017:
to all the people who say sports arent fuking rigged...I LOST A LOT OF MONEY AT THE BEGINING OF THE YEAR ON A WTA TENNIS MATCH - PAVLYUCHENKOVA LOST TO KUDERMETOVA. COUPLE WEEKS LATER PAVLYUCHENKOVA IS IN THE QUARTER FINALS OF THE AUSTRALIAN OPEN WHILE KUDERMETOVA LOST IN THE FIRST ROUND OF THE QUALIFIERS OF THE AUSTRALIAN OPEN... so fuk all the people that say sports are not rigged...without sports betting no one would ever watch this garbage...
One of covers biggest donkey mushes is back after hiding for a year...time to celebrate the king donkmush's return
Hot Forum Topics
