All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Hank Stram Superbowl Formula has a BLOWOUT winner...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 11760
Posts: 33
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 244
Posted: #1
Hank Stram's famous Superbowl Formula is said to be at 39-4-2 going into this game. He did have it for all SB's. I can't confirm that for sure but I KNOW it's an unbelievable record for picking the straight up winner and Hank Stram is no dummy. I for one will be POUNDING the 49ers money line in Vegas next weekend...
 
1. Give 10 points if a team has won a Super Bowl in the last three years. NONE
2. Give 8.0 points to any team whose opponent is in their first Super Bowl in franchise history. NONE
3. Give 8.0 points to the team that has allowed the fewer defensive rushes. 49ERS
4. Give 7.0 points to the team with the best straight up win/loss record including playoffs. 49ERS
5. Give 7.0 points to the team with the most offensive rushes. 49ERS
6. Give 5.0 points to the team with the lower defensive rush average per carry. 49ERS
7. Give 4.0 points to the team that has the best net kick-punt touchdown returns. ???
8. Give 4.0 points to the team the team with the better record against the point spread. 49ERS
9. Give 4.0 points to the team that has the superior net penalty yards. 49ERS
10. Give 3.5 points to the team that has the best yards per pass attempt. 49ERS
11. Give 3.5 points to the team that has given up the fewest points. 49ERS
12. Give 3.5 points to the team that has allowed the fewest rushing touchdowns. ???
13. Give 3.0 points to the team that has the most sacks. 49ERS
14. Give 2.5 points to the team with the fewest offensive pass attempts. 49ERS
15. Give 2.0 points to the team that had the best net punts (total) on the year. ???
16. Give 1.5 points to the team with the best average per offensive rush. 49ERS
17. Give 1.0 points to the team with the best completion percentage. 49ERS
 
FINAL TALLY: 50-0 with only 9.5 points I couldn't fill in. WOW. Last time it was that one-sided was Pitt over GB and GB beat this Formula. Look for that NOT to happen again.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 244
Posted: #2
Mistake, I meant to say he DID NOT have this formula for ALL Superbowls. Almost all of them.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 42661
Posted: #3
You should take the spread at -110 instead of laying -175 on ML, if the "System" predicts a SF blow out? 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 22150
Posted: #4
Isn't he just a little bit dead?

Good ole HS..."Just keep matriculating the ball down the field fellas"
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 244
Posted: #5

Europa, I would lay the 3.5 but the hook is killing me and I'm betting large and will simply bet the ML to be safe. Not great capping strategy but I'm in Vegas going off on this weekend. ;) Read this interesting article...

https://computerprediction.com/hank-stram-superbowl-system-2011

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 42661
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by vegasjimmy:

Europa, I would lay the 3.5 but the hook is killing me and I'm betting large and will simply bet the ML to be safe. Not great capping strategy but I'm in Vegas going off on this weekend. ;) Read this interesting article...

https://computerprediction.com/hank-stram-superbowl-system-2011


Laying fav MLs in NFL playoffs may not sound very profitable in long term, you would probably do better just take the spread?  GL!   
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 359
Posted: #7


dude, u did this couple of years ago with Pitt vs GB.. and how did that turn out for u ?

and i remember last year, someone posted the same formula.. and the NE Pats had the big 'advantage' against the Giants.. and how did that turn out ? 

leave the 'formulas' to the geeks and focus on the match-ups
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 244
Posted: #8

CC12, you can't ignore 39-4-2 straight up record. Sorry pal. Bet the Ravens, the matchups do not favor you there either.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 3857
Posted: #9
What would you do if the PS3 game predicts Balty to win? I believe this also has a great record as of late.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by vegasjimmy:

CC12, you can't ignore 39-4-2 straight up record. Sorry pal. Bet the Ravens, the matchups do not favor you there either.





 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 244
Posted: #11
Copag07, I'll take Hank Stram's record and sound formula over PS3 but I hear ya. ;)
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 12121
Posted: #12

I think Stram back dated that system and used it first in the 80's, I remember when he first used it.

I would not bet on it, just googleD it and it lost 6 of 7 games going into 2010 SB and lost that SB taking the Colts over Saints.

Feel free to look this up, I already have....................no.1  which gives a team the most points, is the opposite of history in covering the spread, especially recent history.

 Teams in the SB in previous  three years.

Rams won in 1999, failed to cover in 2001

Pats win in 2001 fail to cover in 2003 and 2004 .

Pats win in 2004, fail to cover in 2007.

Pitt wins in 2005, fails to cover in 2008

Colts win in 2006, fail to cover in 2009.

Pitt won in 2008, failed to cover in 2010

The team in the SB previous 3 years gets the most points of any stat, that worked-out in the early SB years when  Stram back-dated to develop it but does not work today.

This system will not work today, hey, feel-free to throw ALL THE CASH YOU WANT ON-IT.....................................................

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 244
Posted: #13
Hey theclaw your analysis doesn't really make sense to me and just for that I'm DOUBLING my bet on the 49ERS! Please think of me when your Ravens cash is gone and the Ray Lewis fairy tale ends with tears and depression. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 8983
Posted: #14
^^^^ wow vegasjimmy 

U gonna lose real big 


Perfect fade post lol
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 8983
Posted: #15
Betting Favs of -3.5 to -4 ML would leave you 4-12 in the superbowls lol 



No bueno por 49 ers
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 8983
Posted: #16
^^^last 16 SB
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 2409
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by Cooler999:

Isn't he just a little bit dead?

Good ole HS..."Just keep matriculating the ball down the field fellas"


Classic 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 359
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by vegasjimmy:

Sorry pal. Bet the Ravens, the matchups do not favor you there either.

Enlighten me.. I am all ears.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 230
Posted: #19
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 3129
Posted: #20
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 12121
Posted: #21

Quote Originally Posted by vegasjimmy:

Hey theclaw your analysis doesn't really make sense to me and just for that I'm DOUBLING my bet on the 49ERS! Please think of me when your Ravens cash is gone and the Ray Lewis fairy tale ends with tears and depression. 

The most important part of that system, no1 which gives the most points at 10 points .

Says to back team that won the  SB in the past 3 years, those teams are  on a 0-7 ATS run and those 0-7 teams are recieving the most points in the most important indicator in the system.

How the hell can that be a good system, use your head.

If no.1 is so flawed what about the other numbers ?

Teams winning the SB in the previous 3 years worked well in the 60's and 70's and 80's  when Stram back-dated it during the 80's, but does not work today since free agency changed quite a bit in the league.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 26036
Posted: #22

SYSTEMS DO NOT WORK

EITHER DO LOCKS

BOL TO ALL

BEER IS GREAT 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 628
Posted: #23
even w/o the system i'm on the 9ers -3....bol
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 12121
Posted: #24

In the 60's, 70's and 80's, a team in the SB in the previous 3 years is 7-0 SU and 6-1 ATS.

That system was developed using  results from a different era, those results  are no longer true today, hey just trying to trying to help you out.

If you like the 9ers and they could win and cover, then take them, but I wouldn't take them BECAUSE this system told you so.........................................................

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 2135
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by vegasjimmy:

Europa, I would lay the 3.5 but the hook is killing me and I'm betting large and will simply bet the ML to be safe. Not great capping strategy but I'm in Vegas going off on this weekend. ;) Read this interesting article...

https://computerprediction.com/hank-stram-superbowl-system-2011

smart move!! put yourself in position to win !!

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.