All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

*** Green Bay / Chicago ***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 19369
Posts: 156
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 3214
Posted: #51

GO GREEN AND GOLD....

BEARS GOT , A GIVE ME, WITH THE HAWKS..

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 444
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by TampaTony:

That excatly what Vegas want you to think. Now let me ask you something, if Rogers is so unstoppable, what happened the last two times they played?

To me, CHI is the complete team. Run game, Defense, Special Teams and a good TE. If this game was in GB, that would be a different story, but homefiel advantage must not be underestimated, BOOM BOOM.

I would disagree and say that Green Bay is more complete. Unfortunately you need more than a average tight end. Green Bay has a much better offense and has the 5th best defense in the NFL (Bears 9th). Special teams goes to the Bears, but other than that they are lacking a lot more than the packers to make them "complete".

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #53
Quote Originally Posted by jameswashington:

Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

Green Bay  - 3        5 units



If your not paying attention, shame on you then. The Green Bay packers are lighting it up right now. That offense can not!!! Will Not!!! impossible to stop!!! These guys dictate the game. Big Ben or Fat Rex can game plan all they want too....But when Aaron Rodgers steps on the field he wont be stopped.

Why lock this bet in now? Because its a winner, that's why. Sorry if you don't like the answer but it is what it is.

Attention all haters: Dont talk shit, I m really not in the mood. If you want to argue or something... Go back and read the last several plays I gave you.


GL men
[/Quote]5 units>????? thats it>???? this is like men vs 4th graders



you guys are crazy....

Hey Einstein I bet with real Dollars..... Unlike the other 80% of this forum
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #54
Quote Originally Posted by goatboy54:

Boom Boom just another idiot from the confederacy that doesn't understand CHICAGO BEAR FOOTBALL.  "Aaron Rodgers is going to own everything in Chicago..." blah blah blah

I hope you have a dime on the Packers....makes me feel great about my dime on the Bears.

PHILLY and ATL were beatable all year long.  Everyone jizzin in their pants to fast for Green Bay.

BEARS v STEELERS for a battle between two REAL football cities.

DONE.

Goat fuck.... You and I both know Green Bay will Smack Chicago...




Me

Goat

I try to help........and all I get is this..
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 55436
Posted: #55

BOOM....gotta ask you......

 

Whats the total play!!!?? 

 

I will be on GB and lean the over as well....GB 35 Chi 20 sounds about right

 

Love how your thread got highjacked by a bunch of haters and losers.....means you are on the right track

 

BOOM

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 4096
Posted: #56
ill beat you packers dont sniff 30 what kind of crack r u sniffing???
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 262
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by Trax:

Like other have said, Green Bay is far from unstoppable right now, they beat Philly, well the Bears beat them too, they beat the Falcons, they were an over rated #1 seed, look at how the Saints beat them at the end, and the Seahawks beat them.

The Bears beat Green Bay this year already, and then that game in week 17, Green Bay was playing for there lives in that game while the Bears had nothing to play for, and they could only put 10 on the board against them, how much better do you think the Bears will play in this game when they're also playing for their lives, & their at home?  So this game is far from a lock for Green Bay.


And what do you mean, "Go back & read the last several plays I gave you"?

in week 17 chicago had nothing to play for? if that was the case how come they didnt take most of their starters out? how come their d played so hard? they tried their best to beat GB but couldnt. they would of loved to knock the packers outta the playoffs but made that mistake by letting them slip in. now they meet them in the ship n GB is more dangerous now than when they were in week 17. everyone says its not gonna b easy but i see the packers winning with no problems at all! 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 4096
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by d33jay86:


in week 17 chicago had nothing to play for? if that was the case how come they didnt take most of their starters out? how come their d played so hard? they tried their best to beat GB but couldnt. they would of loved to knock the packers outta the playoffs but made that mistake by letting them slip in. now they meet them in the ship n GB is more dangerous now than when they were in week 17. everyone says its not gonna b easy but i see the packers winning with no problems at all! 
your kidding right??? that was a glorified practice getting reps bears could care less if they saw packers in playoffs since games in chi town anyway. bears played as simple as possible that game
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 231
Posted: #59
THE ONLY WAY THE BEARS CAN WIN IS IF I BET GB ON THE MONEY LINE I AM A MUSH SO ILL HAVE TO TAKE ONE FOR THE TEAM GO BEARS
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 20039
Posted: #60
Green Bay  - 3    
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #61
Nice hit on the big play on the over in the Gbay game last week Boom, congrats!                    Go Gbay!
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

BOOM....gotta ask you......

 

Whats the total play!!!?? 

 

I will be on GB and lean the over as well....GB 35 Chi 20 sounds about right

 

Love how your thread got highjacked by a bunch of haters and losers.....means you are on the right track

 

BOOM

Train....  i m getting all these hatersWhats the deal with that??? 

A total play will be coming closer to game day...
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 25135
Posted: #63
like it...gl buddy
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1370
Posted: #64
good luck
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 444
Posted: #65

Quote Originally Posted by jameswashington:

your kidding right??? that was a glorified practice getting reps bears could care less if they saw packers in playoffs since games in chi town anyway. bears played as simple as possible that game

Yes, they were trying in a game they played their starters. When Lovie Smith said he wanted to sweep the NFC North, he was lying. I think you're right actually. It was all just a "practice game" and they gave up 7 sacks (risking injury to their starting QB) all due to a "practice" game.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 7874
Posted: #66

Packers

Good Luck On The Action
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 742
Posted: #67
as long as the bears stop the running game forcing rodgers to throw the short passes...I believe the packers will make mistakes (especially the receivers either dropping passes or fumbling the ball) I think everytime I watch the bears play the packers james jones or one of the rb always fumbles, and they miss fg's. This game all depends the bears stopping the big plays, because rodgers will get his yards...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 742
Posted: #68
also most of the time Julius Peppers forces the gb tackles penalties which maybe crucial on 3rd downs
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 69
Posted: #69

Okay, I am actually excited to see how everyone jumps over the pack, because that usually means the other will happen.  I am with Washington on this one, as much as it looked like the Bears wanted to knock out the Packers in week 17, why did they not stick to the balanced attack that has been so successful post bye week?

Cutler had 41 pass attempts and that was far from balanced.  To me it seemed like they wanted to try some things out just in case.  I don't think that GB will have much luck using that game as any indication of how the Bears will play on Sunday, or at least how they should.

I am not going to say who will win, but I think besides turnovers, the most balanced team will win this game.  As a fan of the game I hope that it is not one sided and we see two of the best francises in the history of the sport play their own Super Bowl, not in a Dome, but were football was meant to be played, outdoors, in the freezing cold.

May the best team win!

 

 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 4096
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by reh800:

Yes, they were trying in a game they played their starters. When Lovie Smith said he wanted to sweep the NFC North, he was lying. I think you're right actually. It was all just a "practice game" and they gave up 7 sacks (risking injury to their starting QB) all due to a "practice" game.

was it was a practice to them and if they won the game great if not oh well. Cutler wasnt going to come out of that game he wanted to play but as far as the gameplan yes it was a practice plan. if you listen to what lovie says ur a moron guy speaks more garbag and useless info then any coach i know.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1822
Posted: #71

PACKERS AND JETS IN DA SUPER BOWL

No gamble No future
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 444
Posted: #72

Quote Originally Posted by jameswashington:

was it was a practice to them and if they won the game great if not oh well. Cutler wasnt going to come out of that game he wanted to play but as far as the gameplan yes it was a practice plan. if you listen to what lovie says ur a moron guy speaks more garbag and useless info then any coach i know.

So then you're saying the Bears were stupid enough to risk injury to their starting QB for a practice? When they new that Green Bay defense was going to be all over them since they needed to win? I guess you can believe that if it makes you more comfortable backing the Bears. Either way, good luck.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 14
Posted: #73
I am so far undecided on this game (at least the side), but do see a couple of factors that favor the Bears. The first is that the Packers are #31 in the league in yards per rush allowed (4.7). Chicago could choose to grind it out with Forte and Taylor and control the clock, not coincidentally the opposite of what they showed in the meaningless (for them) season finale. The Bears did rush for 110 yards on just 22 carries (5.5 avg.) in that game with Forte averaging 6.1. No matter how hot Rodgers may be, he can't do any damage from the bench. The 2nd factor is the Chicago return game as they are #1 in KO returns and #2 in punt returns. Hester can put up 7 real quick.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 14
Posted: #74
Oops, make that 110 yards on 20 carries, not 22.
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 55436
Posted: #75

Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

Train....  i m getting all these hatersWhats the deal with that??? 

A total play will be coming closer to game day...

Fun aint it!!!

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.