Why did they look inept then for the most part in the regular season finale at home when they had everything on the line and the Bears had zippo to play for? Neither Philly nor Atlanta defense all that impressive, esp late in the year. Bears D is another story, esp at home. They may win, maybe even cover, but impossible to stop? Pfft.
They look inept? You do know that the win/loss differential for the Packers is only 21 points. What that means is...out of their 6 losses, they have only lost by a combined total of 21 points in those 6 losses. That is pretty impressive if you ask me. And that is 2 games without Rodgers. And on top of that, they even had 6 starters go on IR this year.
Why did they look inept then for the most part in the regular season finale at home when they had everything on the line and the Bears had zippo to play for? Neither Philly nor Atlanta defense all that impressive, esp late in the year. Bears D is another story, esp at home. They may win, maybe even cover, but impossible to stop? Pfft.
They look inept? You do know that the win/loss differential for the Packers is only 21 points. What that means is...out of their 6 losses, they have only lost by a combined total of 21 points in those 6 losses. That is pretty impressive if you ask me. And that is 2 games without Rodgers. And on top of that, they even had 6 starters go on IR this year.
Boom Boom, cash your ticket now buddy. Just got word here in Chicago that the Bears already forefitted the game. They are in such awe of what the packers have done that they don't even want to play the game. It's the biggest mismatch in decades. Congrats on your winner
Boom Boom, cash your ticket now buddy. Just got word here in Chicago that the Bears already forefitted the game. They are in such awe of what the packers have done that they don't even want to play the game. It's the biggest mismatch in decades. Congrats on your winner
What speed? Bears have way more speed weapons on offense. Forte, Knox, Hester.
Speed doesn't matter. You can't even compare Hester's skills as a reciever to Green Bay's 4th string reciever. And that is no joke. Forte really isn't that fast. I'd give the edge to Starks when it comes to speed. Maybe on special teams they are faster, but that is about it. Hester's speed, unfortunately doesn't help is route running.
What speed? Bears have way more speed weapons on offense. Forte, Knox, Hester.
Speed doesn't matter. You can't even compare Hester's skills as a reciever to Green Bay's 4th string reciever. And that is no joke. Forte really isn't that fast. I'd give the edge to Starks when it comes to speed. Maybe on special teams they are faster, but that is about it. Hester's speed, unfortunately doesn't help is route running.
Speed doesn't matter. You can't even compare Hester's skills as a reciever to Green Bay's 4th string reciever. And that is no joke. Forte really isn't that fast. I'd give the edge to Starks when it comes to speed. Maybe on special teams they are faster, but that is about it. Hester's speed, unfortunately doesn't help is route running.
Starks are u serious?? he rushings for 1 good game and then people think he is jim brown for christ sake
Speed doesn't matter. You can't even compare Hester's skills as a reciever to Green Bay's 4th string reciever. And that is no joke. Forte really isn't that fast. I'd give the edge to Starks when it comes to speed. Maybe on special teams they are faster, but that is about it. Hester's speed, unfortunately doesn't help is route running.
Starks are u serious?? he rushings for 1 good game and then people think he is jim brown for christ sake
Take it from a guy who knows both teams very well! the Packers are the better team overall, they are a couple of years more advanced. The Bears are the one team year after year that gives the Packer's offense problems with that Cover2 defense! This game will be very competitive as it usually is! The difference will be the Packer's D vs. Cutler. Rogers will hold his own, but definitely not like the last couple of weeks! The packers win by 7, the Bears will not cover the spread all three times this season! They are going to get lots of action on the home dog here! The line will stay steady all week long, like it was with the Ravens/ Chiefs! People are automatically going to say the world is on Green Bay, but in actual $$$ it will even out! TRUST ME! I am 8-1 this year on PACKER GAMES, I KNOW MY TEAM!
Take it from a guy who knows both teams very well! the Packers are the better team overall, they are a couple of years more advanced. The Bears are the one team year after year that gives the Packer's offense problems with that Cover2 defense! This game will be very competitive as it usually is! The difference will be the Packer's D vs. Cutler. Rogers will hold his own, but definitely not like the last couple of weeks! The packers win by 7, the Bears will not cover the spread all three times this season! They are going to get lots of action on the home dog here! The line will stay steady all week long, like it was with the Ravens/ Chiefs! People are automatically going to say the world is on Green Bay, but in actual $$$ it will even out! TRUST ME! I am 8-1 this year on PACKER GAMES, I KNOW MY TEAM!
Starks are u serious?? he rushings for 1 good game and then people think he is jim brown for christ sake
I'm talking football speed. Not talent. As a running back, the edge is clearly for Forte. Obviously you misunderstood me. I don't think that Starks is better than Forte or even close.
Starks are u serious?? he rushings for 1 good game and then people think he is jim brown for christ sake
I'm talking football speed. Not talent. As a running back, the edge is clearly for Forte. Obviously you misunderstood me. I don't think that Starks is better than Forte or even close.
I'm talking football speed. Not talent. As a running back, the edge is clearly for Forte. Obviously you misunderstood me. I don't think that Starks is better than Forte or even close.
actually at the combine forte 4.46 40yd dash starks 4.5
I'm talking football speed. Not talent. As a running back, the edge is clearly for Forte. Obviously you misunderstood me. I don't think that Starks is better than Forte or even close.
actually at the combine forte 4.46 40yd dash starks 4.5
actually at the combine forte 4.46 40yd dash starks 4.5
There is a difference between running a 40 yard dash at a combine and having on-field football speed. It is just my opinion. That being said, its clear the running game edge goes to the Bears. But wide recievers/passing game goes to Packers by a long shot. The Bears best wide reciever is equivilant to the Packers 4th string. It'll be a great game nonetheless and I am not picking a winner right now because I certainly do not know.
actually at the combine forte 4.46 40yd dash starks 4.5
There is a difference between running a 40 yard dash at a combine and having on-field football speed. It is just my opinion. That being said, its clear the running game edge goes to the Bears. But wide recievers/passing game goes to Packers by a long shot. The Bears best wide reciever is equivilant to the Packers 4th string. It'll be a great game nonetheless and I am not picking a winner right now because I certainly do not know.
wipe rodgers jizz of your lips for a second and relize bears will stuff starks and wont be so easy for gay rodg to be throwing in the cold and wind!! christ i cant wait for bears to win and this packer blow jobs can stop
Rodgers play in Wisconsin im sure hes used to cold weather and wind
wipe rodgers jizz of your lips for a second and relize bears will stuff starks and wont be so easy for gay rodg to be throwing in the cold and wind!! christ i cant wait for bears to win and this packer blow jobs can stop
Rodgers play in Wisconsin im sure hes used to cold weather and wind
Speed doesn't matter. You can't even compare Hester's skills as a reciever to Green Bay's 4th string reciever. And that is no joke. Forte really isn't that fast. I'd give the edge to Starks when it comes to speed. Maybe on special teams they are faster, but that is about it. Hester's speed, unfortunately doesn't help is route running.
Starks faster than Forte? Put down the pipe. 280 pound Julius Peppers is probably faster than Starks.
Speed doesn't matter. You can't even compare Hester's skills as a reciever to Green Bay's 4th string reciever. And that is no joke. Forte really isn't that fast. I'd give the edge to Starks when it comes to speed. Maybe on special teams they are faster, but that is about it. Hester's speed, unfortunately doesn't help is route running.
Starks faster than Forte? Put down the pipe. 280 pound Julius Peppers is probably faster than Starks.
Sorry depeche, but as a fellow Bears fan I must inform you as far as straight line speed in the 40 goes..Starks is much faster..Obviously, 40 times have been overrated for years though.. NFL Combine Results Starks 4.48 Forte 4.59
Sorry depeche, but as a fellow Bears fan I must inform you as far as straight line speed in the 40 goes..Starks is much faster..Obviously, 40 times have been overrated for years though.. NFL Combine Results Starks 4.48 Forte 4.59
I dont care whos faster i will take Forte over Starks running the ball and i will take Hester putting the Bears in better field position than the Packers returner.Defense is even and the QB edge is Rodgers and the Bears being at home helps them.These teams are pretty evenly matched.
But gain the Pack has their 3rd gm in a row on the road very hard to win the 3rd.Also a team in the playoffs that has scored 40 or more is 1-13 the next gm.
I dont care whos faster i will take Forte over Starks running the ball and i will take Hester putting the Bears in better field position than the Packers returner.Defense is even and the QB edge is Rodgers and the Bears being at home helps them.These teams are pretty evenly matched.
But gain the Pack has their 3rd gm in a row on the road very hard to win the 3rd.Also a team in the playoffs that has scored 40 or more is 1-13 the next gm.
The Bears D is far superior to that D in ATL. Plus 4 Turnovers given to The Pack in that game. It won't be that easy against The Bears. This game is going to be one for the ages.
The Bears D is far superior to that D in ATL. Plus 4 Turnovers given to The Pack in that game. It won't be that easy against The Bears. This game is going to be one for the ages.
Sorry depeche, but as a fellow Bears fan I must inform you as far as straight line speed in the 40 goes..Starks is much faster..Obviously, 40 times have been overrated for years though.. NFL Combine Results Starks 4.48 Forte 4.59
Agreed. The 40 yard dash is the most overrated combine event.
Sorry depeche, but as a fellow Bears fan I must inform you as far as straight line speed in the 40 goes..Starks is much faster..Obviously, 40 times have been overrated for years though.. NFL Combine Results Starks 4.48 Forte 4.59
Agreed. The 40 yard dash is the most overrated combine event.
Boom Boom just another idiot from the confederacy that doesn't understand CHICAGO BEAR FOOTBALL. "Aaron Rodgers is going to own everything in Chicago..." blah blah blah
I hope you have a dime on the Packers....makes me feel great about my dime on the Bears.
PHILLY and ATL were beatable all year long. Everyone jizzin in their pants to fast for Green Bay.
BEARS v STEELERS for a battle between two REAL football cities.
Boom Boom just another idiot from the confederacy that doesn't understand CHICAGO BEAR FOOTBALL. "Aaron Rodgers is going to own everything in Chicago..." blah blah blah
I hope you have a dime on the Packers....makes me feel great about my dime on the Bears.
PHILLY and ATL were beatable all year long. Everyone jizzin in their pants to fast for Green Bay.
BEARS v STEELERS for a battle between two REAL football cities.
Boom Boom just another idiot from the confederacy that doesn't understand CHICAGO BEAR FOOTBALL. "Aaron Rodgers is going to own everything in Chicago..." blah blah blah
I hope you have a dime on the Packers....makes me feel great about my dime on the Bears.
PHILLY and ATL were beatable all year long. Everyone jizzin in their pants to fast for Green Bay.
BEARS v STEELERS for a battle between two REAL football cities.
DONE.
Every team is beatable. Although Atlanta is a hard team to beat at home. It'll be a good game!
Boom Boom just another idiot from the confederacy that doesn't understand CHICAGO BEAR FOOTBALL. "Aaron Rodgers is going to own everything in Chicago..." blah blah blah
I hope you have a dime on the Packers....makes me feel great about my dime on the Bears.
PHILLY and ATL were beatable all year long. Everyone jizzin in their pants to fast for Green Bay.
BEARS v STEELERS for a battle between two REAL football cities.
DONE.
Every team is beatable. Although Atlanta is a hard team to beat at home. It'll be a good game!
If your not paying attention, shame on you then. The Green Bay packers are lighting it up right now. That offense can not!!! Will Not!!! impossible to stop!!! These guys dictate the game. Big Ben or Fat Rex can game plan all they want too....But when Aaron Rodgers steps on the field he wont be stopped.
That excatly what Vegas want you to think. Now let me ask you something, if Rogers is so unstoppable, what happened the last two times they played?
To me, CHI is the complete team. Run game, Defense, Special Teams and a good TE. If this game was in GB, that would be a different story, but homefiel advantage must not be underestimated, BOOM BOOM.
If your not paying attention, shame on you then. The Green Bay packers are lighting it up right now. That offense can not!!! Will Not!!! impossible to stop!!! These guys dictate the game. Big Ben or Fat Rex can game plan all they want too....But when Aaron Rodgers steps on the field he wont be stopped.
That excatly what Vegas want you to think. Now let me ask you something, if Rogers is so unstoppable, what happened the last two times they played?
To me, CHI is the complete team. Run game, Defense, Special Teams and a good TE. If this game was in GB, that would be a different story, but homefiel advantage must not be underestimated, BOOM BOOM.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.