U deserve it srry. Placing action on small road favs will get u nowhere. It's not rivers fault, rock line was 3-, your still dead in water. So yes go find a job, your way to emotional for this buddy. Nice profanity btw, what r u 14
and you used your alias to post this? 10 post in the past 17 months....are we suppose to take you seriously
0
Quote Originally Posted by p-lane1:
U deserve it srry. Placing action on small road favs will get u nowhere. It's not rivers fault, rock line was 3-, your still dead in water. So yes go find a job, your way to emotional for this buddy. Nice profanity btw, what r u 14
and you used your alias to post this? 10 post in the past 17 months....are we suppose to take you seriously
Classless post that HAPPENED and is factual, stop trying to come off
like because it didnt happened in the other thread that my feelings
towards you are unjust!
0
Quote Originally Posted by TomE:
Well, I see you are mad at the world.
Seriously, you should be mad at only yourself.
I can sum up the problem in two words:
SHIT PICK!!!!
bummer
BOL on your future endeavors.
Classless post that HAPPENED and is factual, stop trying to come off
like because it didnt happened in the other thread that my feelings
towards you are unjust!
Hate to break it to you, but wagers are graded based on the final result. So if you want to think that your losing wager was the "right pick", go right ahead if it makes you feel better. It certainly won't make you a better handicapper though. Do you base your "right pick" on who your perception of the better team is? Perceptions change during the course of the season. Your early perception may not be the same as your later perception. How many people thought Detroit was super bowl bound at 5-0 before they lost two games? Not me, but plenty of people based their perception of the team on what happened those first 5 games, with roughly 2/3 of the season remaining. So they lost 2 games straight and now of course the perception is quite different. Also, without going into much detail about it, perceptions vary from person to person. Do you base your "right pick" on the events which transpire during the game. EVERY SINGLE GAME has events which transpire, culminating in a final result. You seriously going to tell me that the events which transpired in the final minutes are more important than other events which also transpired during the game. Of course nobody who had KC is going to complain about some of the crappy penalties which went against them or Cassel's mistakes or the conservative KC play calling which resulted in something like 5 total yards of offense in the 2nd Q until KC finally got a first down or two and kicked a FG before Half Time.... because they won their bets when it was all said and done. Only the SD losers are going to be complaining, but does that make it legit? If you really think only the final moments are what determines whether you had the right pick or wrong pick, then I propose simply not playing a 1st, 2nd, or 3rd Quarter. For that matter, let's skip most of the 4th Quarter as well. Let's just make every football game 2 minutes long. Sounds pretty stupid, huh? Well that's how your argument sounds to me. You have a beginning of a game and an end of a game, and a whole bunch of chaos and happenings in between. All that matters ultimately is the final score. What is so hard to grasp about that? Imagine that you never, ever got to see or hear about any games. All you get to do is your handicapping, and then see a final result. You still going to determine whether the pick was right or wrong based on anything other than the final result? Of course not. Saying your loser pick was actually the right pick is ludicrous! All your dreaming and complaining of what could have been, should have been is wasted thought and energy diverting you from the crux of the matter which is......THE FINAL SCORE and how your thinking and methodology delivered you a winner, or crapped on you with a loser! Good luck improving your handicapping skills when you won't even acknowledge that the final result is what determines whether your pick was right or wrong. If you stubbornly cling to the notion that your pick was "right", in spite of whether your bet cashed or not, then you are doomed to continue making your "right picks" and continue accumulating losses. All for the sake of salvaging pride and not acknowledging quite simply that your losing pick was WRONG! You want to sling about the MORON word? Einstein said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. Yeah, making a losing pick and believing it was right leads to the same thing. Repeating the same failed logic and reasoning because even though you lost, you believe you were right. That's REALLY MORONIC! LOL Good luck with that!
AT 11:51 am eastern time the following day you actually wrote this AFTER the game? Are you
kidding me? Some kid's midterm paper is shorter than this crap. Another
"look at me...Im starter then you all pos"t. Monday Morning QB'ing at
its finest...come Sunday PLEASE type an essay over your losing picks
0
Quote Originally Posted by TomE:
Hate to break it to you, but wagers are graded based on the final result. So if you want to think that your losing wager was the "right pick", go right ahead if it makes you feel better. It certainly won't make you a better handicapper though. Do you base your "right pick" on who your perception of the better team is? Perceptions change during the course of the season. Your early perception may not be the same as your later perception. How many people thought Detroit was super bowl bound at 5-0 before they lost two games? Not me, but plenty of people based their perception of the team on what happened those first 5 games, with roughly 2/3 of the season remaining. So they lost 2 games straight and now of course the perception is quite different. Also, without going into much detail about it, perceptions vary from person to person. Do you base your "right pick" on the events which transpire during the game. EVERY SINGLE GAME has events which transpire, culminating in a final result. You seriously going to tell me that the events which transpired in the final minutes are more important than other events which also transpired during the game. Of course nobody who had KC is going to complain about some of the crappy penalties which went against them or Cassel's mistakes or the conservative KC play calling which resulted in something like 5 total yards of offense in the 2nd Q until KC finally got a first down or two and kicked a FG before Half Time.... because they won their bets when it was all said and done. Only the SD losers are going to be complaining, but does that make it legit? If you really think only the final moments are what determines whether you had the right pick or wrong pick, then I propose simply not playing a 1st, 2nd, or 3rd Quarter. For that matter, let's skip most of the 4th Quarter as well. Let's just make every football game 2 minutes long. Sounds pretty stupid, huh? Well that's how your argument sounds to me. You have a beginning of a game and an end of a game, and a whole bunch of chaos and happenings in between. All that matters ultimately is the final score. What is so hard to grasp about that? Imagine that you never, ever got to see or hear about any games. All you get to do is your handicapping, and then see a final result. You still going to determine whether the pick was right or wrong based on anything other than the final result? Of course not. Saying your loser pick was actually the right pick is ludicrous! All your dreaming and complaining of what could have been, should have been is wasted thought and energy diverting you from the crux of the matter which is......THE FINAL SCORE and how your thinking and methodology delivered you a winner, or crapped on you with a loser! Good luck improving your handicapping skills when you won't even acknowledge that the final result is what determines whether your pick was right or wrong. If you stubbornly cling to the notion that your pick was "right", in spite of whether your bet cashed or not, then you are doomed to continue making your "right picks" and continue accumulating losses. All for the sake of salvaging pride and not acknowledging quite simply that your losing pick was WRONG! You want to sling about the MORON word? Einstein said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. Yeah, making a losing pick and believing it was right leads to the same thing. Repeating the same failed logic and reasoning because even though you lost, you believe you were right. That's REALLY MORONIC! LOL Good luck with that!
AT 11:51 am eastern time the following day you actually wrote this AFTER the game? Are you
kidding me? Some kid's midterm paper is shorter than this crap. Another
"look at me...Im starter then you all pos"t. Monday Morning QB'ing at
its finest...come Sunday PLEASE type an essay over your losing picks
To TomE: All you basically said is I based the game on the final 2 minutes. Well MORON I did not and I am not even gonna argue with you when your only point was KC only had 5 yards in the 2nd qtr. Exactly my point MORON KC did nothing to win that game. The refs and SD beat themselves MORON. Now I am done.
Oh wait
MORON!!!
0
To TomE: All you basically said is I based the game on the final 2 minutes. Well MORON I did not and I am not even gonna argue with you when your only point was KC only had 5 yards in the 2nd qtr. Exactly my point MORON KC did nothing to win that game. The refs and SD beat themselves MORON. Now I am done.
To TomE: All you basically said is I based the game on the final 2 minutes. Well MORON I did not and I am not even gonna argue with you when your only point was KC only had 5 yards in the 2nd qtr. Exactly my point MORONKC did nothing to win that game. The refs and SD beat themselves MORON. Now I am done.
Oh wait
MORON!!!
LOL Seriously, YOU are calling ME a moron? The first rule when you call someone else a moron is not just prove what a moron you are! "KC did nothingto win that game" That's sheer nonsense MORON. You are really, really stupid.
KC played great defense throughout. (nothing?) They completely took Gates out of the game. (nothing?) They completely frustrated Phillip Rivers. (nothing?) They held all 4 SD rushers (Matthews, Brinkley, Rivers, Hester) to 102 total yards rushing! (nothing?) 2 PICKS, 2 RECOVERED FUMBLES! (nothing?) Cassel: 261 yards passing, 8.2 yards per catch. He did just enough when needed to beat SD. (nothing?)
NOTHING?????? On the contrary, they did just enough to win! And you're calling me a moron! HA!
You are one sorry ass poor loser is what it comes down to.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mrquija27:
To TomE: All you basically said is I based the game on the final 2 minutes. Well MORON I did not and I am not even gonna argue with you when your only point was KC only had 5 yards in the 2nd qtr. Exactly my point MORONKC did nothing to win that game. The refs and SD beat themselves MORON. Now I am done.
Oh wait
MORON!!!
LOL Seriously, YOU are calling ME a moron? The first rule when you call someone else a moron is not just prove what a moron you are! "KC did nothingto win that game" That's sheer nonsense MORON. You are really, really stupid.
KC played great defense throughout. (nothing?) They completely took Gates out of the game. (nothing?) They completely frustrated Phillip Rivers. (nothing?) They held all 4 SD rushers (Matthews, Brinkley, Rivers, Hester) to 102 total yards rushing! (nothing?) 2 PICKS, 2 RECOVERED FUMBLES! (nothing?) Cassel: 261 yards passing, 8.2 yards per catch. He did just enough when needed to beat SD. (nothing?)
NOTHING?????? On the contrary, they did just enough to win! And you're calling me a moron! HA!
You are one sorry ass poor loser is what it comes down to.
You are a lot dumber than I thought. You just said you thought it was a field goal game either way! DUH! Yet you chose to lay the field goal rather than take it? Think about that dumbass. If it's a field goal game either way (you said it, not me!), you lay the 3 points and the BEST YOU CAN HOPE FOR BASED ON YOUR OWN FEELING IS A TIE! You made a bet hoping for a tie in your best case scenario??? If you take the 3 points based on your own feeling, the WORST YOU CAN DO IS GET A PUSH! Let's see: tie or loss on the one hand tie or win on the other hand Yep, you chose the dumb end of the deal!
Whatever dude. Keep blaming everyone and everything for the result. Believe you made the right bet. Keep on making that same "right" bet over and over. Rock on.
Oh, and be mad and tell me "fuck you" for trying to straighten out your messed up head.
Whatever.
I'm done chatting with you, moron.
San Diego should have won by 3, if Rivers didn't fumble the snap. That means that oddsmakers line, at SD -3 was exactly correct. So if the line is exactly correct, the winning bet really could have been either one. That's my only point - don't come on here telling everyone how smart you are because you made the RIGHT bet, and the SD bet was a SHIT BET!! That is a) classless and b) not factually correct. It was a toss-up in terms of which BET would win. That was my point.
I'm done talking to your stupid ass. Go away and stop sucking your own dick about a pick you (luckily) got right 3 days ago! Seriously, dude...you're starting to look like an obsessive psychopath. Let it go!
You must be new to sports betting because you surely do NOT act like you've ever won before. Go fuck yourself. And stop writing 1,000 word post that no one reads.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TomE:
You are a lot dumber than I thought. You just said you thought it was a field goal game either way! DUH! Yet you chose to lay the field goal rather than take it? Think about that dumbass. If it's a field goal game either way (you said it, not me!), you lay the 3 points and the BEST YOU CAN HOPE FOR BASED ON YOUR OWN FEELING IS A TIE! You made a bet hoping for a tie in your best case scenario??? If you take the 3 points based on your own feeling, the WORST YOU CAN DO IS GET A PUSH! Let's see: tie or loss on the one hand tie or win on the other hand Yep, you chose the dumb end of the deal!
Whatever dude. Keep blaming everyone and everything for the result. Believe you made the right bet. Keep on making that same "right" bet over and over. Rock on.
Oh, and be mad and tell me "fuck you" for trying to straighten out your messed up head.
Whatever.
I'm done chatting with you, moron.
San Diego should have won by 3, if Rivers didn't fumble the snap. That means that oddsmakers line, at SD -3 was exactly correct. So if the line is exactly correct, the winning bet really could have been either one. That's my only point - don't come on here telling everyone how smart you are because you made the RIGHT bet, and the SD bet was a SHIT BET!! That is a) classless and b) not factually correct. It was a toss-up in terms of which BET would win. That was my point.
I'm done talking to your stupid ass. Go away and stop sucking your own dick about a pick you (luckily) got right 3 days ago! Seriously, dude...you're starting to look like an obsessive psychopath. Let it go!
You must be new to sports betting because you surely do NOT act like you've ever won before. Go fuck yourself. And stop writing 1,000 word post that no one reads.
AT 11:51 am eastern time the following day you actually wrote this AFTER the game? Are you
kidding me? Some kid's midterm paper is shorter than this crap. Another
"look at me...Im starter then you all pos"t. Monday Morning QB'ing at
its finest...come Sunday PLEASE type an essay over your losing picks
EVERY SINGLE TIME YOU TALK TO ME YOU JUST SHOW HOW STUPID YOU ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Look at your opening argument I highlighted for you in red. I have to highlight everything for your because in the "Fuck you Phillip Rivers" thread I showed everyone what a LIAR you are! You deny what you say, confuse the points as much as you can, and here you are making an idiot out of yourself again!
I know your feeble mind doesn't get the connection of the highlighted quote by you and what I just said so I'm afraid I'm going to have to spell it out for you.
Here's YOUR OWN ARGUMENT thrown right back in your face asshole!
AT 10:19:18 am Eastern Time (11/3/11) - THREE FULL DAYS AFTER the game you wrote that?? Are you kidding me?
Your going to complain because I wrote something 1 day after the game and you're still going on about it 3 days after the game? I know you're stupid, but do you see how funny that is? You don't see the ridiculousness of your statement? If I'm the loser because I wrote something 1 day after the game, what does that make you whining about the same crap 3 days after the game? A triple loser? LOL
GFY IDIOT
0
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:
AT 11:51 am eastern time the following day you actually wrote this AFTER the game? Are you
kidding me? Some kid's midterm paper is shorter than this crap. Another
"look at me...Im starter then you all pos"t. Monday Morning QB'ing at
its finest...come Sunday PLEASE type an essay over your losing picks
EVERY SINGLE TIME YOU TALK TO ME YOU JUST SHOW HOW STUPID YOU ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Look at your opening argument I highlighted for you in red. I have to highlight everything for your because in the "Fuck you Phillip Rivers" thread I showed everyone what a LIAR you are! You deny what you say, confuse the points as much as you can, and here you are making an idiot out of yourself again!
I know your feeble mind doesn't get the connection of the highlighted quote by you and what I just said so I'm afraid I'm going to have to spell it out for you.
Here's YOUR OWN ARGUMENT thrown right back in your face asshole!
AT 10:19:18 am Eastern Time (11/3/11) - THREE FULL DAYS AFTER the game you wrote that?? Are you kidding me?
Your going to complain because I wrote something 1 day after the game and you're still going on about it 3 days after the game? I know you're stupid, but do you see how funny that is? You don't see the ridiculousness of your statement? If I'm the loser because I wrote something 1 day after the game, what does that make you whining about the same crap 3 days after the game? A triple loser? LOL
you'll be back soon as u get some more money to deposit.lol. I have had some bad money management issues myself and 3 or 4 times I have turned 300 into 3,000 or more in less than 2 weeks and then within 2 weeks later was broke. LOL> I am really lucky at hitting ML parlays and each time I went up big I hit a few parlays for example 20 bucks to win 6 or 700 or more and then soon as I lose a couple games I start chasing doubling up to try to get it back and then all hell breaks loose. I think I am finally just gonna start using a normal betting strategy of a set amount on each game and try to come out ahead over a longer period of time. Sounds good huh? But I am not even sure I beliieve it myself that I will change my ways. It's called an addiction. For me it's a substitute addiction as I used to be a drug addict and after 6 yearsin prison stopped using and started betting while locked up and now am addicted to betting. LOL! But I am not alone in that matter
What is this you speak of?
I assure you that noone else on this forum is addicted to gambling
I won about 5 grand in the past 3 months on baseball and in the past 2 weeks have given back half of it already on football and chasing losses. I'm learning that sports betting is an absolute grind.
0
Quote Originally Posted by theguru1:
you'll be back soon as u get some more money to deposit.lol. I have had some bad money management issues myself and 3 or 4 times I have turned 300 into 3,000 or more in less than 2 weeks and then within 2 weeks later was broke. LOL> I am really lucky at hitting ML parlays and each time I went up big I hit a few parlays for example 20 bucks to win 6 or 700 or more and then soon as I lose a couple games I start chasing doubling up to try to get it back and then all hell breaks loose. I think I am finally just gonna start using a normal betting strategy of a set amount on each game and try to come out ahead over a longer period of time. Sounds good huh? But I am not even sure I beliieve it myself that I will change my ways. It's called an addiction. For me it's a substitute addiction as I used to be a drug addict and after 6 yearsin prison stopped using and started betting while locked up and now am addicted to betting. LOL! But I am not alone in that matter
What is this you speak of?
I assure you that noone else on this forum is addicted to gambling
I won about 5 grand in the past 3 months on baseball and in the past 2 weeks have given back half of it already on football and chasing losses. I'm learning that sports betting is an absolute grind.
San Diego should have won by 3, if Rivers didn't fumble the snap. That means that oddsmakers line, at SD -3 was exactly correct. So if the line is exactly correct, the winning bet really could have been either one. That's my only point - don't come on here telling everyone how smart you are because you made the RIGHT bet, and the SD bet was a SHIT BET!! That is a) classless and b) not factually correct. It was a toss-up in terms of which BET would win. That was my point.
I'm done talking to your stupid ass. Go away and stop sucking your own dick about a pick you (luckily) got right 3 days ago! Seriously, dude...you're starting to look like an obsessive psychopath. Let it go!
You must be new to sports betting because you surely do NOT act like you've ever won before. Go fuck yourself. And stop writing 1,000 word post that no one reads.
"San Diego should have won by 3, if Rivers didn't fumble the snap" Translation: If the dog didn't stop to take a shit in the woods, he would have caught the rabbit"
Idiot. Let me give you back your own stupid logic which precedes the event you are so sore about.
San Diego should have lost by 8. If the Refs make the right call on that first down catch to the 1 yard line, SD does not even tie the game. That's right idiot. That catch to the one yard line was an incomplete pass. The ball rolled on the ground. The Zebras didn't catch it. The cameras and film sure did though! SD smartly ran up to the line and ran the TD play before the KC crew even knew what hit 'em. They should have thrown the challenge flag and I guarantee that there was indisputable evidence to overturn that first down play to the one yard line. Where does that leave you as far as River's fumble goes when they're still down by 8? Nowhere moron, it's a moot point then!
You cry about the events in the game which went against you, but you ignore the events in the game which went your way. Way to use your brain! Way to be balanced and fair in your argument loser!
No, YOU GFY!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slick Rick:
San Diego should have won by 3, if Rivers didn't fumble the snap. That means that oddsmakers line, at SD -3 was exactly correct. So if the line is exactly correct, the winning bet really could have been either one. That's my only point - don't come on here telling everyone how smart you are because you made the RIGHT bet, and the SD bet was a SHIT BET!! That is a) classless and b) not factually correct. It was a toss-up in terms of which BET would win. That was my point.
I'm done talking to your stupid ass. Go away and stop sucking your own dick about a pick you (luckily) got right 3 days ago! Seriously, dude...you're starting to look like an obsessive psychopath. Let it go!
You must be new to sports betting because you surely do NOT act like you've ever won before. Go fuck yourself. And stop writing 1,000 word post that no one reads.
"San Diego should have won by 3, if Rivers didn't fumble the snap" Translation: If the dog didn't stop to take a shit in the woods, he would have caught the rabbit"
Idiot. Let me give you back your own stupid logic which precedes the event you are so sore about.
San Diego should have lost by 8. If the Refs make the right call on that first down catch to the 1 yard line, SD does not even tie the game. That's right idiot. That catch to the one yard line was an incomplete pass. The ball rolled on the ground. The Zebras didn't catch it. The cameras and film sure did though! SD smartly ran up to the line and ran the TD play before the KC crew even knew what hit 'em. They should have thrown the challenge flag and I guarantee that there was indisputable evidence to overturn that first down play to the one yard line. Where does that leave you as far as River's fumble goes when they're still down by 8? Nowhere moron, it's a moot point then!
You cry about the events in the game which went against you, but you ignore the events in the game which went your way. Way to use your brain! Way to be balanced and fair in your argument loser!
Right, because the play at the very end of the game where something that hasn't happened since the Tony Romo fumble several YEARS ago (where a botched snap costs a team the game), isn't something we should focus on. We should be going through the video and looking for every play that was a questionable call, bad bounce, etc to make sure our analysis is 100% "fair and balanced." ?? Is that what you do? No wonder you're such a fucking weirdo!!!
Go away! No one cares anymore but you! You are making yourself look like a sad and pathetic little girl. People who LOST the bet have moved on. WHY CAN'T YOU??!?
0
Right, because the play at the very end of the game where something that hasn't happened since the Tony Romo fumble several YEARS ago (where a botched snap costs a team the game), isn't something we should focus on. We should be going through the video and looking for every play that was a questionable call, bad bounce, etc to make sure our analysis is 100% "fair and balanced." ?? Is that what you do? No wonder you're such a fucking weirdo!!!
Go away! No one cares anymore but you! You are making yourself look like a sad and pathetic little girl. People who LOST the bet have moved on. WHY CAN'T YOU??!?
EVERY SINGLE TIME YOU TALK TO ME YOU JUST SHOW HOW STUPID YOU ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Look at your opening argument I highlighted for you in red. I have to highlight everything for your because in the "Fuck you Phillip Rivers" thread I showed everyone what a LIAR you are! You deny what you say, confuse the points as much as you can, and here you are making an idiot out of yourself again!
I know your feeble mind doesn't get the connection of the highlighted quote by you and what I just said so I'm afraid I'm going to have to spell it out for you.
Here's YOUR OWN ARGUMENT thrown right back in your face asshole!
AT 10:19:18 am Eastern Time (11/3/11) - THREE FULL DAYS AFTER the game you wrote that?? Are you kidding me?
Your going to complain because I wrote something 1 day after the game and you're still going on about it 3 days after the game? I know you're stupid, but do you see how funny that is? You don't see the ridiculousness of your statement? If I'm the loser because I wrote something 1 day after the game, what does that make you whining about the same crap 3 days after the game? A triple loser? LOL
GFY IDIOT
All of your arguing is over what I say...but you have not addressed ANY points of these arguments
Secondly...you were talking about the GAME a day after...I am TALKING ABOUT YOU 3 DAYS AFTER! Do you see the difference
TomE the douchebag...Tuesday morning QB
Smoke_O showing the board this entire week since Monday how big of a loser you really are. Stop pointing the most mundane bullshit and ANSWER the questions
- why are you a wannbe tout?
- why are you dogging other posters without provocation
-why are you writing 1000 word essays on a gambling forum
if you dont answer these then get lost. The fuck are you talking about Im confusing points....have you not see all of the bump quotes of YOURS. Those are the points. Yet you highlight a time stamp!
0
Quote Originally Posted by TomE:
EVERY SINGLE TIME YOU TALK TO ME YOU JUST SHOW HOW STUPID YOU ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Look at your opening argument I highlighted for you in red. I have to highlight everything for your because in the "Fuck you Phillip Rivers" thread I showed everyone what a LIAR you are! You deny what you say, confuse the points as much as you can, and here you are making an idiot out of yourself again!
I know your feeble mind doesn't get the connection of the highlighted quote by you and what I just said so I'm afraid I'm going to have to spell it out for you.
Here's YOUR OWN ARGUMENT thrown right back in your face asshole!
AT 10:19:18 am Eastern Time (11/3/11) - THREE FULL DAYS AFTER the game you wrote that?? Are you kidding me?
Your going to complain because I wrote something 1 day after the game and you're still going on about it 3 days after the game? I know you're stupid, but do you see how funny that is? You don't see the ridiculousness of your statement? If I'm the loser because I wrote something 1 day after the game, what does that make you whining about the same crap 3 days after the game? A triple loser? LOL
GFY IDIOT
All of your arguing is over what I say...but you have not addressed ANY points of these arguments
Secondly...you were talking about the GAME a day after...I am TALKING ABOUT YOU 3 DAYS AFTER! Do you see the difference
TomE the douchebag...Tuesday morning QB
Smoke_O showing the board this entire week since Monday how big of a loser you really are. Stop pointing the most mundane bullshit and ANSWER the questions
- why are you a wannbe tout?
- why are you dogging other posters without provocation
-why are you writing 1000 word essays on a gambling forum
if you dont answer these then get lost. The fuck are you talking about Im confusing points....have you not see all of the bump quotes of YOURS. Those are the points. Yet you highlight a time stamp!
Also Im not whining about the game! I wasn't the one being a Monday Morning QB...and I wasnt the one with the classless post on the first page of this THREAD. That was your bitch ass
0
Also Im not whining about the game! I wasn't the one being a Monday Morning QB...and I wasnt the one with the classless post on the first page of this THREAD. That was your bitch ass
Classless post that HAPPENED and is factual, stop trying to come off like because it didnt happened in the other thread that my feelings towards you are unjust!
Half of the backlash you are receiving is for this post and the rest are from your posts in this thread as well as other hours after the game pointing out to the entire forum how great you are and how KC was the only and correct pick! Just touting yourself as much as possible. Those are the points! Ignore them if you want..but bet your bottom dollar come Sunday your ass better have a 1000 word essay on why you picked a loser, since you bask in the glory of your winners...Now run tell that!
0
QUOTE Originally Posted by TomE:
Well, I see you are mad at the world.
Seriously, you should be mad at only yourself.
I can sum up the problem in two words:
SHIT PICK!!!!
bummer
BOL on your future endeavors.
Classless post that HAPPENED and is factual, stop trying to come off like because it didnt happened in the other thread that my feelings towards you are unjust!
Half of the backlash you are receiving is for this post and the rest are from your posts in this thread as well as other hours after the game pointing out to the entire forum how great you are and how KC was the only and correct pick! Just touting yourself as much as possible. Those are the points! Ignore them if you want..but bet your bottom dollar come Sunday your ass better have a 1000 word essay on why you picked a loser, since you bask in the glory of your winners...Now run tell that!
I heard many people said that NFL is NOT FIXED, but too me it is a 100% fixed and control by Vegas. They are ready know the odd and money before the game start so they control the game. All the calls and time out are called by Mr. Vegas. The decision is control by each quarter, 1h, 2h, and game. Logically, this is why are sport players paid big chunk of $$$$$$$.
My dog has better grammar than you
Ya, the NFL is fixed. They have meetings every week with all the players, coaches, trainers, refs... and they decide how each game will play out. Just like professional wrestling.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MasterNBA:
I heard many people said that NFL is NOT FIXED, but too me it is a 100% fixed and control by Vegas. They are ready know the odd and money before the game start so they control the game. All the calls and time out are called by Mr. Vegas. The decision is control by each quarter, 1h, 2h, and game. Logically, this is why are sport players paid big chunk of $$$$$$$.
My dog has better grammar than you
Ya, the NFL is fixed. They have meetings every week with all the players, coaches, trainers, refs... and they decide how each game will play out. Just like professional wrestling.
i feel u man i was down 300 this year so i decided to put another 300 on the chargers all signs pointed to a chargers win f*ck rivers damn every i touch turns to shit to i am done as well i think there is a conspiracy to
Well everything I touch turns to shit in sports betting. I lost a lot of money tonight on the chargers. I played QB my whole life and never fumbled a snap like that from forth grade on. What a turn of events. From being up and rich to flat out broke. I need to get a real job now. WOW! GOD spoke tonight and ended my career. There has to be a higher power out there! and that power has something against me. Tonight I was struck down. Rivers Is the devil, I hate that man.FML and FUCK YOU RIVERS.. FUCK YOU TURNER, FUCK the refs, FUCK this fixed game. IM OUT.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Lightweis:
i feel u man i was down 300 this year so i decided to put another 300 on the chargers all signs pointed to a chargers win f*ck rivers damn every i touch turns to shit to i am done as well i think there is a conspiracy to
Well everything I touch turns to shit in sports betting. I lost a lot of money tonight on the chargers. I played QB my whole life and never fumbled a snap like that from forth grade on. What a turn of events. From being up and rich to flat out broke. I need to get a real job now. WOW! GOD spoke tonight and ended my career. There has to be a higher power out there! and that power has something against me. Tonight I was struck down. Rivers Is the devil, I hate that man.FML and FUCK YOU RIVERS.. FUCK YOU TURNER, FUCK the refs, FUCK this fixed game. IM OUT.
And thanks god he did not win either one of the 2 team teaser otherwise he might come out and say "if grandma has a dick, she would have been transsexual"
LOL
The first and greatest victory is to conquer self
0
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:
we missed his 2 team teaser...post #20 He sure is great at those teasers...wonder if he will write a dissertation as to why it lost
And thanks god he did not win either one of the 2 team teaser otherwise he might come out and say "if grandma has a dick, she would have been transsexual"
Guess I was wrong, it's complete domination. Congrats Mia OH backers... Akron: 1st Half 39 yards rushing? 30 yards passing? lol, I'll be surprised if they don't get shut out.
Guess I was wrong, it's complete domination. Congrats Mia OH backers... Akron: 1st Half 39 yards rushing? 30 yards passing? lol, I'll be surprised if they don't get shut out.
2 lousy teams = take the points (3-4 and 1-6, 4-10 SU combined!) 2 bad defenses = take the overs (each giving up about 400 ypg and 59ppg combined)
That
being said, 2 poor offenses too, only 37ppg combined. Will the weak
offenses be able to capitalize against the poor defenses? They
should.... Perhaps though the weak defenses can finally do something against poor offenses. It's possible.... Maybe the truth will be somewhere in between.
Interesting though that Tues and Wed MAC games were both: Dog, Over Trifecta after tonight?
I'm going with: Akron +20 Over 42 6 point teaser
BOL
Quote Originally Posted by TomE:
Guess I was wrong, it's complete domination. Congrats Mia OH backers... Akron: 1st Half 39 yards rushing? 30 yards passing? lol, I'll be surprised if they don't get shut out.
2nd Half Mia -7.5 -105
The first and greatest victory is to conquer self
0
Quote Originally Posted by TomE:
I agree laxeagle
2 lousy teams = take the points (3-4 and 1-6, 4-10 SU combined!) 2 bad defenses = take the overs (each giving up about 400 ypg and 59ppg combined)
That
being said, 2 poor offenses too, only 37ppg combined. Will the weak
offenses be able to capitalize against the poor defenses? They
should.... Perhaps though the weak defenses can finally do something against poor offenses. It's possible.... Maybe the truth will be somewhere in between.
Interesting though that Tues and Wed MAC games were both: Dog, Over Trifecta after tonight?
I'm going with: Akron +20 Over 42 6 point teaser
BOL
Quote Originally Posted by TomE:
Guess I was wrong, it's complete domination. Congrats Mia OH backers... Akron: 1st Half 39 yards rushing? 30 yards passing? lol, I'll be surprised if they don't get shut out.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
