heading into this game. If Vikings win and cover the spread that will make 13/15 games and set a record since the Superbowl era began. Just curious if anyone takes this into handicapping or not. I am a Vikings fan and they always seem to struggle in Primetime games but haven't struggled against the Bears in a really long time. I really feel this game is a toss up. If Fields can connect early and often with Moore (as he has done when healthy) that will open up the running game for Chicago. Plus add to that a turnover or two by Dobbs (he has been good for one or two since he took over) this could be a very tough game. I am leaning Chicago +10 teased to the over 36.5.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
heading into this game. If Vikings win and cover the spread that will make 13/15 games and set a record since the Superbowl era began. Just curious if anyone takes this into handicapping or not. I am a Vikings fan and they always seem to struggle in Primetime games but haven't struggled against the Bears in a really long time. I really feel this game is a toss up. If Fields can connect early and often with Moore (as he has done when healthy) that will open up the running game for Chicago. Plus add to that a turnover or two by Dobbs (he has been good for one or two since he took over) this could be a very tough game. I am leaning Chicago +10 teased to the over 36.5.
My fellow South Dakotan, always nice to see your threads. I was just tallying this up and thinking the same thing earlier today. One of the most square weekends of NFL in my memory. Faves, thus public majority backed sides did very very well this weekend. I'll be on Chicago while I plug my nose. If they lose, I'll double up with Hawks on Thursday because these huge public plays aren't going to continue to hit like this. Think about it since the Packers upset the Lions....you've seen public backed Cowboys, 49ers, Dolphins, and Ravens all win against the spread in PrimeTime with anywhere from 2/3 to 3/4 of the action on them.
0
My fellow South Dakotan, always nice to see your threads. I was just tallying this up and thinking the same thing earlier today. One of the most square weekends of NFL in my memory. Faves, thus public majority backed sides did very very well this weekend. I'll be on Chicago while I plug my nose. If they lose, I'll double up with Hawks on Thursday because these huge public plays aren't going to continue to hit like this. Think about it since the Packers upset the Lions....you've seen public backed Cowboys, 49ers, Dolphins, and Ravens all win against the spread in PrimeTime with anywhere from 2/3 to 3/4 of the action on them.
I was leaning to Chicago already but when I heard that stat it made me more confident to bet it. Betting against a historical outcome seems good to me and i like the way chicago has been playing
0
@jesron1269
I was leaning to Chicago already but when I heard that stat it made me more confident to bet it. Betting against a historical outcome seems good to me and i like the way chicago has been playing
@jesron1269 I was leaning to Chicago already but when I heard that stat it made me more confident to bet it. Betting against a historical outcome seems good to me and i like the way chicago has been playing
If nothing else you have to imagine that there will be regression to the mean. BOL!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Yanasaur:
@jesron1269 I was leaning to Chicago already but when I heard that stat it made me more confident to bet it. Betting against a historical outcome seems good to me and i like the way chicago has been playing
If nothing else you have to imagine that there will be regression to the mean. BOL!
I played CHI +14.5 in a parlay with over 31.5 and two BTTS for NHL at -140 odds. I can't play an under in football (unless it is an Iowa under but sadly the jig is up in that and the lines are getting lower and lower).
0
@Martylee
I played CHI +14.5 in a parlay with over 31.5 and two BTTS for NHL at -140 odds. I can't play an under in football (unless it is an Iowa under but sadly the jig is up in that and the lines are getting lower and lower).
Okay. Not sure if you are shitting all over the points made or saying that this is an unbelievable run by the favorites. I was being kinda tongue in cheek about it personally.
1
Quote Originally Posted by tech65:
@jesron1269 Yes it matters. Unbelievable.
Okay. Not sure if you are shitting all over the points made or saying that this is an unbelievable run by the favorites. I was being kinda tongue in cheek about it personally.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.