I love all the talk that the Bears are horrible, what have the Cowboys done? they might be good on paper but so far I have seen shit from them. it starts in the trenches and the O line is terrible. Cutler will have another week to work on the new system with his WR and RB's
They couldnt run the ball last week so they passed it and passed it well. Dont think a team that was favored by 3.5 points on the road and lost outright, should be laying 9 in the next game (all being at home, i get it) but until Dallas proves they can win and win convinsingly give me Bears +9, maybe +19 in a teaser
I see your point Mayday and agree on a lot of it. I said I hoped it would go down but don't see it. My point is that the Lions being a mid-low power rank team and on the road gave the Bears all they could handle. Put in the turf/grass factor and the absolute fact that Cutler does horridly in hostile/intimidating environments and I give the Bears a scant chance of covering. Bears feel lucky to have won. I really think that the Cowboys had that game except for 3 moronic plays. I see them being able to hold focus at home where the Bears won't. Skins are real tough, especially at home. Lions a good road team? Maybe. I don't know man. Either way, for now it's a no play for me.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Maydaymalone:
I actually see the line going up.
I love all the talk that the Bears are horrible, what have the Cowboys done? they might be good on paper but so far I have seen shit from them. it starts in the trenches and the O line is terrible. Cutler will have another week to work on the new system with his WR and RB's
They couldnt run the ball last week so they passed it and passed it well. Dont think a team that was favored by 3.5 points on the road and lost outright, should be laying 9 in the next game (all being at home, i get it) but until Dallas proves they can win and win convinsingly give me Bears +9, maybe +19 in a teaser
I see your point Mayday and agree on a lot of it. I said I hoped it would go down but don't see it. My point is that the Lions being a mid-low power rank team and on the road gave the Bears all they could handle. Put in the turf/grass factor and the absolute fact that Cutler does horridly in hostile/intimidating environments and I give the Bears a scant chance of covering. Bears feel lucky to have won. I really think that the Cowboys had that game except for 3 moronic plays. I see them being able to hold focus at home where the Bears won't. Skins are real tough, especially at home. Lions a good road team? Maybe. I don't know man. Either way, for now it's a no play for me.
Dallas is 7-1 when laying less than 10 to the NFC North at Home. This is a good bounce back spot for the Cowboys. Both Columbo and Kosier expected to practice Wed. If they practice, they will play which will be a huge boost.
Dallas backers get in while you can before the spread is steamed up.
0
Dallas is 7-1 when laying less than 10 to the NFC North at Home. This is a good bounce back spot for the Cowboys. Both Columbo and Kosier expected to practice Wed. If they practice, they will play which will be a huge boost.
Dallas backers get in while you can before the spread is steamed up.
There is a reason that the Broncos dumped Cutler, the Jeff George of the modern era. Million dollar arm, ten cent head. He has shown no signs of being able to beat a good team like Dallas, especially in their very loud home opener. Dallas by DD.
0
There is a reason that the Broncos dumped Cutler, the Jeff George of the modern era. Million dollar arm, ten cent head. He has shown no signs of being able to beat a good team like Dallas, especially in their very loud home opener. Dallas by DD.
Dallas is 7-1 when laying less than 10 to the NFC North at Home. This is a good bounce back spot for the Cowboys. Both Columbo and Kosier expected to practice Wed. If they practice, they will play which will be a huge boost.
Dallas backers get in while you can before the spread is steamed up.
Healthy of Colombo and Kosier are huge. Can you imagine Julius Peppers lining up in front of Barron? Bears are capable of rushing the passer and Urlacher proved to everyone (prob himself too) that he is back in a big way. Bears def problems are in the secondary, but if Dallas can't protect Romo it won't much matter. Bears have a better pass rush than the Skins. Just don't see Dallas getting a ton of yards in this game. Should be a grinder and turnovers will be huge. Kinda crazy to lay 9 I think. You can only sorta do it on faith and hope and gut. +9 is the right side.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Firebird27:
Dallas is 7-1 when laying less than 10 to the NFC North at Home. This is a good bounce back spot for the Cowboys. Both Columbo and Kosier expected to practice Wed. If they practice, they will play which will be a huge boost.
Dallas backers get in while you can before the spread is steamed up.
Healthy of Colombo and Kosier are huge. Can you imagine Julius Peppers lining up in front of Barron? Bears are capable of rushing the passer and Urlacher proved to everyone (prob himself too) that he is back in a big way. Bears def problems are in the secondary, but if Dallas can't protect Romo it won't much matter. Bears have a better pass rush than the Skins. Just don't see Dallas getting a ton of yards in this game. Should be a grinder and turnovers will be huge. Kinda crazy to lay 9 I think. You can only sorta do it on faith and hope and gut. +9 is the right side.
I see your point Mayday and agree on a lot of it. I said I hoped it would go down but don't see it. My point is that the Lions being a mid-low power rank team and on the road gave the Bears all they could handle. Put in the turf/grass factor and the absolute fact that Cutler does horridly in hostile/intimidating environments and I give the Bears a scant chance of covering. Bears feel lucky to have won. I really think that the Cowboys had that game except for 3 moronic plays. I see them being able to hold focus at home where the Bears won't. Skins are real tough, especially at home. Lions a good road team? Maybe. I don't know man. Either way, for now it's a no play for me.
Lions a good road team? 3-29 since 2006 on the road. The Bears almost lost to a horrible road team.
0
Quote Originally Posted by The_Wolf:
I see your point Mayday and agree on a lot of it. I said I hoped it would go down but don't see it. My point is that the Lions being a mid-low power rank team and on the road gave the Bears all they could handle. Put in the turf/grass factor and the absolute fact that Cutler does horridly in hostile/intimidating environments and I give the Bears a scant chance of covering. Bears feel lucky to have won. I really think that the Cowboys had that game except for 3 moronic plays. I see them being able to hold focus at home where the Bears won't. Skins are real tough, especially at home. Lions a good road team? Maybe. I don't know man. Either way, for now it's a no play for me.
Lions a good road team? 3-29 since 2006 on the road. The Bears almost lost to a horrible road team.
There is a reason that the Broncos dumped Cutler, the Jeff George of the modern era. Million dollar arm, ten cent head. He has shown no signs of being able to beat a good team like Dallas, especially in their very loud home opener. Dallas by DD.
What about the other side of the ball? Will Dallas score enough to cover that spread? For the most part, the Bears D actually looked awfully tough on Sunday. And Dallas' off. line looked putrid. The line/total seem to be giving Dallas like 25 points. Unless their defense and special teams help in a big way I doubt that happens. Looking for a 17-13 type grinder score here.
Bears +9 and U41 and parlay them up too.
0
Quote Originally Posted by brewster:
There is a reason that the Broncos dumped Cutler, the Jeff George of the modern era. Million dollar arm, ten cent head. He has shown no signs of being able to beat a good team like Dallas, especially in their very loud home opener. Dallas by DD.
What about the other side of the ball? Will Dallas score enough to cover that spread? For the most part, the Bears D actually looked awfully tough on Sunday. And Dallas' off. line looked putrid. The line/total seem to be giving Dallas like 25 points. Unless their defense and special teams help in a big way I doubt that happens. Looking for a 17-13 type grinder score here.
Dallas is 7-1 when laying less than 10 to the NFC North at Home. This is a good bounce back spot for the Cowboys. Both Columbo and Kosier expected to practice Wed. If they practice, they will play which will be a huge boost.
Dallas backers get in while you can before the spread is steamed up.
If they play then I would def. change my tune on this game
0
Quote Originally Posted by Firebird27:
Dallas is 7-1 when laying less than 10 to the NFC North at Home. This is a good bounce back spot for the Cowboys. Both Columbo and Kosier expected to practice Wed. If they practice, they will play which will be a huge boost.
Dallas backers get in while you can before the spread is steamed up.
If they play then I would def. change my tune on this game
Healthy of Colombo and Kosier are huge. Can you imagine Julius Peppers lining up in front of Barron? Bears are capable of rushing the passer and Urlacher proved to everyone (prob himself too) that he is back in a big way. Bears def problems are in the secondary, but if Dallas can't protect Romo it won't much matter. Bears have a better pass rush than the Skins. Just don't see Dallas getting a ton of yards in this game. Should be a grinder and turnovers will be huge. Kinda crazy to lay 9 I think. You can only sorta do it on faith and hope and gut. +9 is the right side.
Bears pass rush will be negated by a good Dallas running game (avg 4.7 a carry against the Skins) and play action passes. Miles Austin will have a field day against the Bears secondary.
I will rely on Trends, Stats, Personnel Matchups to aid in my decision making, not faith, hope and gut.
0
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2:
Healthy of Colombo and Kosier are huge. Can you imagine Julius Peppers lining up in front of Barron? Bears are capable of rushing the passer and Urlacher proved to everyone (prob himself too) that he is back in a big way. Bears def problems are in the secondary, but if Dallas can't protect Romo it won't much matter. Bears have a better pass rush than the Skins. Just don't see Dallas getting a ton of yards in this game. Should be a grinder and turnovers will be huge. Kinda crazy to lay 9 I think. You can only sorta do it on faith and hope and gut. +9 is the right side.
Bears pass rush will be negated by a good Dallas running game (avg 4.7 a carry against the Skins) and play action passes. Miles Austin will have a field day against the Bears secondary.
I will rely on Trends, Stats, Personnel Matchups to aid in my decision making, not faith, hope and gut.
The Bears will have a real tough time vs this defense, especially at the home opener. Dallas' front seven is one of the best in the league vs a horrible Chicago offensive line. Cutler better put more padding in that helmut and lace up them runnin' shoes. We might see Todd Collins this game.
0
The Bears will have a real tough time vs this defense, especially at the home opener. Dallas' front seven is one of the best in the league vs a horrible Chicago offensive line. Cutler better put more padding in that helmut and lace up them runnin' shoes. We might see Todd Collins this game.
What about the other side of the ball? Will Dallas score enough to cover that spread? For the most part, the Bears D actually looked awfully tough on Sunday. And Dallas' off. line looked putrid. The line/total seem to be giving Dallas like 25 points. Unless their defense and special teams help in a big way I doubt that happens. Looking for a 17-13 type grinder score here.
Bears +9 and U41 and parlay them up too.
The Bears looked tough against the Lions who played without Stafford for half the game and barely hung onto win. Bears have a much tougher test this week facing the Cowboys. The Cowboys O line had too many penalties, I'll give you that, but overall, they are better than Detroit. The Bears did turn the ball over 4 times and were 0-4 in the redzone. I expect the Bears to bounce back in both areas, however, the Bears will give up the ball and struggle to score.
With the line/total where it is, how are you coming up with 25 points? I'd like to see that math.
Would you take the Bears on the ML? If not, then you're betting the spread and not the game. Your only hope is a backdoor cover.
0
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2:
What about the other side of the ball? Will Dallas score enough to cover that spread? For the most part, the Bears D actually looked awfully tough on Sunday. And Dallas' off. line looked putrid. The line/total seem to be giving Dallas like 25 points. Unless their defense and special teams help in a big way I doubt that happens. Looking for a 17-13 type grinder score here.
Bears +9 and U41 and parlay them up too.
The Bears looked tough against the Lions who played without Stafford for half the game and barely hung onto win. Bears have a much tougher test this week facing the Cowboys. The Cowboys O line had too many penalties, I'll give you that, but overall, they are better than Detroit. The Bears did turn the ball over 4 times and were 0-4 in the redzone. I expect the Bears to bounce back in both areas, however, the Bears will give up the ball and struggle to score.
With the line/total where it is, how are you coming up with 25 points? I'd like to see that math.
Would you take the Bears on the ML? If not, then you're betting the spread and not the game. Your only hope is a backdoor cover.
Respectfully disagree. This is exactly the bet that costs people money. Betting on one week's results. Cutler is still Cutler. The Dallas D is good! The offense will respond after being embarrassed. Must win game for Dallas IMO. I would wait to see if it drops, but I do think Dallas wins by 10+. I hate Dallas so I'm not just being a contrarian. I am betting Dallas this week. Good luck.
0
Respectfully disagree. This is exactly the bet that costs people money. Betting on one week's results. Cutler is still Cutler. The Dallas D is good! The offense will respond after being embarrassed. Must win game for Dallas IMO. I would wait to see if it drops, but I do think Dallas wins by 10+. I hate Dallas so I'm not just being a contrarian. I am betting Dallas this week. Good luck.
The Bears looked tough against the Lions who played without Stafford for half the game and barely hung onto win. Bears have a much tougher test this week facing the Cowboys. The Cowboys O line had too many penalties, I'll give you that, but overall, they are better than Detroit. The Bears did turn the ball over 4 times and were 0-4 in the redzone. I expect the Bears to bounce back in both areas, however, the Bears will give up the ball and struggle to score.
With the line/total where it is, how are you coming up with 25 points? I'd like to see that math.
Would you take the Bears on the ML? If not, then you're betting the spread and not the game. Your only hope is a backdoor cover.
-9/41 would be 25-16 (25 plus 16 is 41). Haven't seen a team total yet, but unless the line/total moves a bunch, figure Dallas TT to be around 24/25.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Firebird27:
The Bears looked tough against the Lions who played without Stafford for half the game and barely hung onto win. Bears have a much tougher test this week facing the Cowboys. The Cowboys O line had too many penalties, I'll give you that, but overall, they are better than Detroit. The Bears did turn the ball over 4 times and were 0-4 in the redzone. I expect the Bears to bounce back in both areas, however, the Bears will give up the ball and struggle to score.
With the line/total where it is, how are you coming up with 25 points? I'd like to see that math.
Would you take the Bears on the ML? If not, then you're betting the spread and not the game. Your only hope is a backdoor cover.
-9/41 would be 25-16 (25 plus 16 is 41). Haven't seen a team total yet, but unless the line/total moves a bunch, figure Dallas TT to be around 24/25.
And for all the ugliness and near loss, the Bears had 463 yards total offense to Detroit's 168. The 463 is the most for a Bears team in a regulation game since 1995 and the 168 is the fewest since October 2006. They need to clean up the fumbles and punch it in from the 1 but if they cleaned that up the Bears could have easily scored 40+. They didn't so you can say it doesn't matter, but they also were able to move the ball well most of the game and held Detroit to 21 yards on 20 carries. Dallas has a much tougher defense so they will have to score more efficiently.
0
And for all the ugliness and near loss, the Bears had 463 yards total offense to Detroit's 168. The 463 is the most for a Bears team in a regulation game since 1995 and the 168 is the fewest since October 2006. They need to clean up the fumbles and punch it in from the 1 but if they cleaned that up the Bears could have easily scored 40+. They didn't so you can say it doesn't matter, but they also were able to move the ball well most of the game and held Detroit to 21 yards on 20 carries. Dallas has a much tougher defense so they will have to score more efficiently.
And for all the ugliness and near loss, the Bears had 463 yards total offense to Detroit's 168. The 463 is the most for a Bears team in a regulation game since 1995 and the 168 is the fewest since October 2006. They need to clean up the fumbles and punch it in from the 1 but if they cleaned that up the Bears could have easily scored 40+. They didn't so you can say it doesn't matter, but they also were able to move the ball well most of the game and held Detroit to 21 yards on 20 carries. Dallas has a much tougher defense so they will have to score more efficiently.
463 for and 168 against who, the Lions who I will repeat are 3-29 on the road since 2006. Just admit it, the Bears barely beat a bad team at home. 40+ points??? As they say on the WSCR 670 AM, "Who are you crappin'?" If they "clean" up the turnovers and their inability to run it in short yardage situations, they get 28 points maybe, but not 40. Detroit hasn't had a running game since Barry Sanders retired, so I'm not impressed with holding them to 1 yard per carry.
"Dallas has a much tougher defense so they will have to score more efficiently." 0-4 in the Redzone last week against the Lions. Do you think you'll even see the redzone against the Cowboys?
0
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2:
And for all the ugliness and near loss, the Bears had 463 yards total offense to Detroit's 168. The 463 is the most for a Bears team in a regulation game since 1995 and the 168 is the fewest since October 2006. They need to clean up the fumbles and punch it in from the 1 but if they cleaned that up the Bears could have easily scored 40+. They didn't so you can say it doesn't matter, but they also were able to move the ball well most of the game and held Detroit to 21 yards on 20 carries. Dallas has a much tougher defense so they will have to score more efficiently.
463 for and 168 against who, the Lions who I will repeat are 3-29 on the road since 2006. Just admit it, the Bears barely beat a bad team at home. 40+ points??? As they say on the WSCR 670 AM, "Who are you crappin'?" If they "clean" up the turnovers and their inability to run it in short yardage situations, they get 28 points maybe, but not 40. Detroit hasn't had a running game since Barry Sanders retired, so I'm not impressed with holding them to 1 yard per carry.
"Dallas has a much tougher defense so they will have to score more efficiently." 0-4 in the Redzone last week against the Lions. Do you think you'll even see the redzone against the Cowboys?
The Bears will have a real tough time vs this defense, especially at the home opener. Dallas' front seven is one of the best in the league vs a horrible Chicago offensive line. Cutler better put more padding in that helmut and lace up them runnin' shoes. We might see Todd Collins this game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MDAAKD:
The Bears will have a real tough time vs this defense, especially at the home opener. Dallas' front seven is one of the best in the league vs a horrible Chicago offensive line. Cutler better put more padding in that helmut and lace up them runnin' shoes. We might see Todd Collins this game.
Peppers left an implant of Stafford's shoulder in Soldier Field. You don't think he's licking his chops to go after Dallas' decimated line? The front office is "hoping" Colombo and Kosier can practice this week.
Da Bears cover.
0
Peppers left an implant of Stafford's shoulder in Soldier Field. You don't think he's licking his chops to go after Dallas' decimated line? The front office is "hoping" Colombo and Kosier can practice this week.
Bears dont lose games by big margins. +9 is money in the bank. As much as i think the bears are horrible they won a game with 4 turnovers and 100 penalty yards, where the cowboys lost to a team who didnt score a TD in a prime time game.
0
Bears dont lose games by big margins. +9 is money in the bank. As much as i think the bears are horrible they won a game with 4 turnovers and 100 penalty yards, where the cowboys lost to a team who didnt score a TD in a prime time game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.