you wouldnt be surprised if Philly will win or cover yet you back Dallas -4? Make it make sense. You acknowledge that strange things happen in NFL and yet you back the favorites? Doesnt your logic support the underdog?
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
you wouldnt be surprised if Philly will win or cover yet you back Dallas -4? Make it make sense. You acknowledge that strange things happen in NFL and yet you back the favorites? Doesnt your logic support the underdog?
exactly. the logic should scream no bet for him but yet still bets. Then we'll see a post later saying "so and so sucks and I shouldve known all along.
@Way2Good
exactly. the logic should scream no bet for him but yet still bets. Then we'll see a post later saying "so and so sucks and I shouldve known all along.
I see what you're saying. Unfortunately, logic doesn't work in the NFL or other sports for that matter. Sometimes you gotta do the opposite of what makes sense.
It's never over until the money is in your hand.
@Way2Good
I see what you're saying. Unfortunately, logic doesn't work in the NFL or other sports for that matter. Sometimes you gotta do the opposite of what makes sense.
If I lose then I move on. Its my money i am risking and I will live with the results.
Even if Philly wins they do not have a qb I can back. Barkley being back might help unless they are trailing and have to abandon the run which I believe will happen.
It's never over until the money is in your hand.
@p42
No. I don't make those types of posts.
If I lose then I move on. Its my money i am risking and I will live with the results.
Even if Philly wins they do not have a qb I can back. Barkley being back might help unless they are trailing and have to abandon the run which I believe will happen.
isn't Eagles +4.5 or ML is the opposite of what makes sense here? or am I missing something? for something to be considered favorite in game certain metrics have been weighted to be in their favor so they are the pick that makes sense right? The logic is so skewed here its like saying the sky is blue in the morning it must be dark since it is not white.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
@dayknight
isn't Eagles +4.5 or ML is the opposite of what makes sense here? or am I missing something? for something to be considered favorite in game certain metrics have been weighted to be in their favor so they are the pick that makes sense right? The logic is so skewed here its like saying the sky is blue in the morning it must be dark since it is not white.
so dallas should be the underdogs tonight? I dont know what to believe anymore, maybe unicorns and a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow. I dont know how you project spreads that if you think dallas should be the underdogs. I am so perplexed with your logic and even if you think dallas should not be a favorite on the road specially in their division the pick that "makes sense" will be Eagles at home but still you pick Dallas? ahhh the opposite of what makes sense.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
@dayknight
so dallas should be the underdogs tonight? I dont know what to believe anymore, maybe unicorns and a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow. I dont know how you project spreads that if you think dallas should be the underdogs. I am so perplexed with your logic and even if you think dallas should not be a favorite on the road specially in their division the pick that "makes sense" will be Eagles at home but still you pick Dallas? ahhh the opposite of what makes sense.